Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Needle-knife papillotomy and fistulotomy improved the treatment outcome of patients with difficult biliary cannulation

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

Needle-knife papillotomy and fistulotomy (NKPF) is a new, modified technique designed for difficult biliary cannulation. The safety and efficacy of performing NKPF based on characteristics of main duodenal papilla (MDP) was evaluated.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients with intact papilla who were established as candidates for therapeutic ERCP at tertiary referral center. A total of 532 patients were included in conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) group in which repeated cannulation was tried in patients with difficult bile duct cannulation; and 598 patients enrolled in early NKPF group according to predefined parameters. Based on the characteristics of MDP, different types of NKPF were performed. The endoscopic data (mean procedure time, anatomy of the main papilla), rate of cannulation success, and post-ERCP complications were collected.

Results

A total of 82 patients underwent NKPF. The mean procedure time of the small papilla group was longer than bulging papilla group (P < 0.05). The success rate of biliary cannulation in the small papilla group (69.3 %) was lower than in the bulging papilla group (100 %, P < 0.01). The overall successful biliary cannulation of patients in the NKPF group was significantly higher than in the conventional group (98.8 vs 90.8 %, P > 0.05). The total complication rate was 6.6 % among conventional group patients and 5.7 % among NKPF group, respectively. The overall complication rate and rates of specific complications (pancreatitis, bleeding, cholangitis, and perforation) in the two groups were similar (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Early NKPF based on characteristics of MDP raised the success rate of biliary cannulation when conventional cannulation failed and did not increase the complication rate post-ERCP. Clinic Trials. gov number, Hongwei-1102-12.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bailey AA, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Walsh PR, Murray MA, Lee EY, Kwan V, Lynch PM (2008) A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy 40(4):296–301. doi:10.1055/s-2007-995566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM, Eusebi LH, Ceroni L, Laterza L, Fabbri C, Bazzoli F (2010) Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication risk? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy 42(5):381–388. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1243992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Figueiredo FA, Pelosi AD, Machado L, Francioni E, Freitas G, Hatum PB, de Mello Perez R (2010) Precut papillotomy: a risky technique not only for experts but also for average endoscopists skilled in ERCP. Dig Dis Sci 55(5):1485–1489. doi:10.1007/s10620-009-0860-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Donnellan F, Zeb F, Courtney G, Aftab AR (2010) Suprapapillary needleknife fistulotomy: a safe and effective method for accessing the biliary system. Surg Endosc 24(8):1937–1940. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-0881-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bailey AA, Bourke MJ, Kaffes AJ (2010) Needle-knife sphincterotomy: factors predicting its use and the relationship with postERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 71(2):266–271. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gong B, Hao L, Bie L, Sun B, Wang M (2010) Does precut technique improve selective bile duct cannulation or increase post-ERCP pancreatitis rate? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 24(11):2670–2680. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1033-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Swan MP, Alexander S, Moss A, Williams SJ, Ruppin D, Hope R, Bourke MJ (2013) Needle knife sphincterotomy does not increase the risk of pancreatitis in patients with difficult biliary cannulation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(4):430–436. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2012.12.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lim JU, Joo KR, Cha JM, Shin HP, Lee JI, Park JJ, Jeon JW, Kim BS, Joo S (2012) Early use of needle-knife fistulotomy is safe in situations where difficult biliary cannulation is expected. Dig Dis Sci 57(5):1384–1390. doi:10.1007/s10620-012-2030-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaffes AJ, Sriram PV, Rao GV, Santosh D, Reddy DN (2005) Early institution of pre-cutting for difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective study comparing conventional vs. a modified technique. Gastrointest Endosc 62(5):669–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang QS, Han B, Xu JH, Bao WM, Tao JL, Zhang Y (2013) Needle knife precut papillotomy and fistulotomy for difficult biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Digestion 88(2):95–100. doi:10.1159/000352027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee TH, Bang BW, Park SH, Jeong S, Lee DH, Kim SJ (2011) Precut fistulotomy for difficult biliary cannulation: is it a risky preference in relation to the experience of an endoscopist? Dig Dis Sci 56(6):1896–1903. doi:10.1007/s10620-010-1483-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Avisse C, Flament JB, Delattre JF (2000) Ampulla of Vater. Anatomic, embryologic, and surgical aspects. Surg Clin North Am 80(1):201–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell RC, Meyers WC, Liguory C, Nickl N (1991) Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 37(3):383–393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman ML, Guda NM (2005) ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 61(1):112–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Löhr J-M, Aabaken L, Arnelo U, Grönroos J, Halttunen J, Hauge T, Jonas E, Kleveland PM, Nordblad Schmidt P, Swahn F, Saarela A, Toth E, Meisner S (2012) How to cannulate? A survey of the scandinavian association for digestive endoscopy (SADE) in 141 endoscopists. Scand J Gastroenterol 47(7):861–869. doi:10.3109/00365521.2012.672588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fukatsu H, Kawamoto H, Harada R, Tsutsumi K, Fujii M, Kato H, Hirao K, Nakanishi T, Mizuno O, Ogawa T, Ishida E, Okada H, Sakaguchi K (2009) Quantitative assessment of technical proficiency in performing needle-knife precut papillotomy. Surg Endosc 23(9):2066–2072. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-9969-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lopes L, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rolanda C (2014) Safety and efficacy of precut needle-knife fistulotomy. Scand J Gastroenterol 49(6):759–765. doi:10.3109/00365521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rabenstein T, Ruppert T, Schneider HT, Hahn EG, Ell C (1997) Benefits and risks of needle-knife papillotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 46(3):207–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N (2007) Effect of precut sphincterotomy on biliary cannulation based on the characteristics of the major duodenal papilla. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(9):1113–1118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S, Testoni PA (2003) Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 35(10):830–834

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Navaneethan U, Konjeti R, Venkatesh PG, Sanaka MR, Parsi MA (2014) Early precut sphincterotomy and the risk of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography related complications: an updated meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 6(5):200–208. doi:10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.200

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, Curioni S, Lomazzi A, Dinelli M, Minoli G, Crosta C, Comin U, Fertitta A, Prada A, Passoni GR, Testoni PA (2001) Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 96(2):417–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ, Lande JD, Pheley AM (1996) Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 335(13):909–918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, Pilotto A, Forlano R (2007) Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 102(8):1781–1788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, Hamlyn A, Logan RF, Martin D, Riley SA, Veitch P, Wilkinson ML, Williamson PR, Lombard M (2007) Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 39(9):793–801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Colton JB, Curran CC (2009) Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 70(3):457–467. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Digestive Endoscopy Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Branch of Shanghai First People’s Hospital, Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China

    Qi-Sheng Zhang, Bing Han, Jian-Hua Xu, Peng Gao & Yu-Cui Shen

Authors
  1. Qi-Sheng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bing Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jian-Hua Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peng Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yu-Cui Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi-Sheng Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, QS., Han, B., Xu, JH. et al. Needle-knife papillotomy and fistulotomy improved the treatment outcome of patients with difficult biliary cannulation. Surg Endosc 30, 5506–5512 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4914-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4914-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation