Abstract
Background
Despite standardized techniques, anastomotic complications after colorectal resection remain a challenging problem. Among those, anastomotic stricture is a debilitating outcome which often requires multiple interventions and which is prone to recur. The present series investigates the long-term results of endoscopic balloon dilation for stenotic colorectal anastomosis.
Methods
Consecutive patients from a single institution who presented with an anastomotic stenosis after a colorectal resection were identified using a prospective clinical database. Medical records were systematically reviewed to detail patients’ outcomes.
Results
Over 17 years (1988–2015), 2361 consecutive patients underwent a colorectal anastomosis. Of those, 76 patients (3.2 %) suffered a symptomatic anastomotic stenosis within a median of 5 months (interquartile range (IQR) 2–13) of the index procedure. All stenoses were primarily treated by endoscopic balloon dilation. Median follow-up was 11 years (IQR 7–14). In half the patients, one to two attempts at endoscopic balloon dilation definitively relieved the stenosis. Overall, the median number of endoscopic balloon dilation required was 3 (IQR 2–3). Recurrence rates at 1 year, 3 year, and 5 year were 11, 22, and 25 %, respectively. Median time to recurrence was 12 months (IQR 3–24). Ultimately, two patients (2.6 %) underwent an operation due to failure of endoscopic treatment. All other patients (97.4 %) were treated successfully with endoscopic balloon dilation. A total of 12 patients (15.7 %) suffered a complication from endoscopic dilation. Of those, 11 were minor bleeding and one was a perforation at the level of the anastomosis. All complications were managed conservatively, and no emergency procedure was required as a consequence of attempted endoscopic balloon dilation.
Conclusion
Endoscopic balloon dilation is a safe approach to effectively relieve an anastomotic stenosis following a colorectal resection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kissin MW, Cox AG, Wilkins RA, Kark AE (1985) The fate of the EEA stapled anastomosis: a clinico-radiological study of 38 patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 67:20–22
Schlegel RD, Dehni N, Parc R, Caplin S, Tiret E (2001) Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic strictures. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1464–1468
Max E, Sweeney WB, Bailey HR, Oommen SC, Butts DR, Smith KW, Zamora LF, Skakun GB (1991) Results of 1000 single-layer continuous polypropylene intestinal anastomoses. Am J Surg 162:461–467
Hiranyakas A, Da Silva G, Denoya P, Shawki S, Wexner SD (2013) Colorectal anastomotic stricture: is it associated with inadequate colonic mobilization? Techn Coloproctol 17:371–375
Neutzling CB, Lustosa SA, Proenca IM, da Silva EM, Matos D (2012) Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003144
Orsay CP, Bass EM, Firfer B, Ramakrishnan V, Abcarian H (1995) Blood flow in colon anastomotic stricture formation. Dis Colon Rectum 38:202–206
Pahlman L, Glimelius B, Frykholm G (1989) Ischaemic strictures in patients treated with a low anterior resection and perioperative radiotherapy for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 76:605–606
Senagore A, Milsom JW, Walshaw RK, Dunstan R, Mazier WP, Chaudry IH (1990) Intramural pH: a quantitative measurement for predicting colorectal anastomotic healing. Dis Colon Rectum 33:175–179
Delaunay-Tardy K, Barthelemy C, Dumas O, Balique JG, Audigier JC (2003) Endoscopic therapy of benign colonic post-operative strictures: report on 27 cases. Gastroenterol Clin et Biol 27:610–613
Pietropaolo V, Masoni L, Ferrara M, Montori A (1990) Endoscopic dilation of colonic postoperative strictures. Surg Endosc 4:26–30
Truong S, Willis S, Schumpelick V (1997) Endoscopic therapy of benign anastomotic strictures of the colorectum by electroincision and balloon dilatation. Endoscopy 29:845–849
Genser L, Manceau G, Karoui M, Breton S, Brevart C, Rousseau G, Vaillant JC, Hannoun L (2013) Postoperative and long-term outcomes after redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: retrospective analysis of 50 patients and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 56:747–755
Lefevre JH, Bretagnol F, Maggiori L, Ferron M, Alves A, Panis Y (2011) Redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a valuable surgical challenge. Surgery 149:65–71
Belvedere B, Frattaroli S, Carbone A, Viceconte G (2012) Anastomotic strictures in colorectal surgery: treatment with endoscopic balloon dilation. Il G di Chir 33:243–245
Fregonese D, Di Falco G, Di Toma F (1990) Balloon dilatation of anastomotic intestinal stenoses: long-term results. Endoscopy 22:249–253
Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA (1997) Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 50:1129–1136
Tuson JR, Everett WG (1990) A retrospective study of colostomies, leaks and strictures after colorectal anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 5:44–48
Pucciarelli S, Toppan P, Pilati PL, Piccoli A, Chemello F, Lise M (1994) Efficacy of dilatations for anastomotic colorectal stenoses: prognostic factors. Int J Colorectal Dis 9:149–152
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Drs. Magdalena Biraima, Michel Adamina, Res Jost, Stefan Breitenstein, and Christopher Soll have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Biraima, M., Adamina, M., Jost, R. et al. Long-term results of endoscopic balloon dilation for treatment of colorectal anastomotic stenosis. Surg Endosc 30, 4432–4437 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4762-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4762-8