Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Colorectal anastomotic stricture: Is it associated with inadequate colonic mobilization?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anastomotic stricture or stenosis is a well-described complication of intestinal anastomosis. The incidence of stricture after colorectal anastomosis ranges from 0 to 30 %. The aim of this study was to identify possible factors related to postoperative colorectal anastomotic stricture and to indicate reoperative surgery outcomes.

Methods

After institutional review board approval, medical records were reviewed for patients who underwent surgery for colorectal anastomotic stricture at Cleveland Clinic Florida between January 2001 and December 2010. The main outcome measures were demographics, indications for initial surgery, body mass index, comorbidities, previous treatment, level of anastomosis, history of radiotherapy, and operative data for the reoperative surgery.

Results

Nineteen patients (15 males) were eligible for the study. Nine patients had a diagnosis of cancer, 7 of whom received radiotherapy. The initial surgeries were low anterior resection (n = 9; 47.4 %), high anterior resection (n = 9; 47.4 %), and sigmoidectomy (n = 1; 5.2 %). Six patients (31.6 %) had anastomotic leak after initial surgery. The majority of the patients (n = 17; 89.5 %) had an intact splenic flexure, inferior mesenteric artery, and inferior mesenteric vein. In all patients, full mobilization of the splenic flexure and high ligation of the mesenteric vessels was performed. Seven patients (36 %) developed postoperative complications. Over a mean follow-up of 24.3 months, there was no recurrence of anastomotic stricture.

Conclusions

An intact splenic flexure and mesenteric vessels were the most prevalent in patients who underwent reoperation at our institution. Full mobilization of the splenic flexure, high ligation of the mesenteric vessels, anastomotic stricture resection, and re-anastomosis can be successfully performed with satisfactory outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bannura GC, Cumsille MA, Barrera AE, Contreras JP, Melo CL, Soto DC (2004) Predictive factors of stenosis after stapled colorectal anastomosis: prospective analysis of 179 consecutive patients. World J Surg 28:921–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beart RW Jr, Kelly KA (1981) Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses. Am J Surg 141:143–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blamey SL, Lee PW (1982) A comparison of circular stapling devices in colorectal anastomoses. Br J Surg 69:19–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Graffner H, Fredlund P, Olsson SA, Oscarson J, Petersson BG (1983) Protective colostomy in low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument. A randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 26:87–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarker SK, Chaudhry R, Sinha VK (1994) A comparison of stapled vs handsewn anastomosis in anterior resection for carcinoma rectum. Indian J Cancer 31:133–137

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fingerhut A, Hay JM, Elhadad A, Lacaine F, Flamant Y (1995) Supraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples–a controlled clinical trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Surgery 118:479–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brennan SS, Pickford IR, Evans M, Pollock AV (1982) Staples or sutures for colonic anastomoses—a controlled clinical trial. Br J Surg 69:722–724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fasth S, Hedlund H, Svaninger G, Hulten L (1982) Autosuture of low colorectal anastomosis. Acta Chir Scand 148:535–539

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Griffen FD, Knight CD Sr, Whitaker JM, Knight CD Jr (1990) The double stapling technique for low anterior resection. Results, modifications, and observations. Ann Surg 211:745–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Griffen FD, Knight CD Sr, Knight CD Jr (1992) Results of the double stapling procedure in pelvic surgery. World J Surg 16:866–871

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ambrosetti P, Francis K, De Peyer R, Frossard JL (2008) Colorectal anastomotic stenosis after elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease: a prospective evaluation of 68 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1345–1349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Luchtefeld MA, Milsom JW, Senagore A, Surrell JA, Mazier WP (1989) Colorectal anastomotic stenosis. Results of a survey of the ASCRS membership. Dis Colon Rectum 32:733–736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lim M, Akhtar S, Sasapu K et al (2006) Clinical and subclinical leaks after low colorectal anastomosis: a clinical and radiologic study. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1611–1619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hallbook O, Sjodahl R (1996) Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg 83:60–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baran JJ, Goldstein SD, Resnik AM (1992) The double-staple technique in colorectal anastomoses: a critical review. Am Surg 58:270–272

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. MacRae HM, McLeod RS (1998) Handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 41:180–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. World Health Organization (1995) Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 854:1–452

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shimada S, Matsuda M, Uno K, Matsuzaki H, Murakami S, Ogawa M (1996) A new device for the treatment of coloproctostomic stricture after double stapling anastomoses. Ann Surg 224:603–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tamim WZ, Ghellai A, Counihan TC, Swanson RS, Colby JM, Sweeney WB (2000) Experience with endoluminal colonic wall stents for the management of large bowel obstruction for benign and malignant disease. Arch Surg 135:434–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Luck A, Chapuis P, Sinclair G, Hood J (2001) Endoscopic laser stricturotomy and balloon dilatation for benign colorectal strictures. ANZ J Surg 71:594–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Truong S, Willis S, Schumpelick V (1997) Endoscopic therapy of benign anastomotic strictures of the colorectum by electroincision and balloon dilatation. Endoscopy 29:845–849

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Brandimarte G, Tursi A, Gasbarrini G (2000) Endoscopic treatment of benign anastomotic colorectal stenosis with electrocautery. Endoscopy 32:461–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Johansson C (1996) Endoscopic dilation of rectal strictures: a prospective study of 18 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 39:423–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. de Lange EE, Shaffer HA Jr (1991) Rectal strictures: treatment with fluoroscopically guided balloon dilation. Radiology 178:475–479

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Di Giorgio P, De Luca L, Rivellini G, Sorrentino E, D’Amore E, De Luca B (2004) Endoscopic dilation of benign colorectal anastomotic stricture after low anterior resection: a prospective comparison study of two balloon types. Gastrointest Endosc 60:347–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Werre A, Mulder C, van Heteren C, Bilgen E (2000) Dilation of benign strictures following low anterior resection using Savary-Gilliard bougies. Endoscopy 32:385–388

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Virgilio C, Cosentino S, Favara C, Russo V, Russo A (1995) Endoscopic treatment of postoperative colonic strictures using an achalasia dilator: short-term and long-term results. Endoscopy 27:219–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Skreden K, Wiig JN, Myrvold HE (1987) Balloon dilation of rectal strictures. Acta Chir Scand 153:615–617

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schlegel RD, Dehni N, Parc R, Caplin S, Tiret E (2001) Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic strictures. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1464–1468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pietropaolo V, Masoni L, Ferrara M, Montori A (1990) Endoscopic dilation of colonic postoperative strictures. Surg Endosc 4:26–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Swenson O, Idriss FS (1966) Excision of rectal stricture with end-to-end anastomosis. Arch Surg 93:54–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fazio V, Zutshi M, Remzi F et al (2007) A randomized multicenter trial to compare long-term functional outcome, quality of life, and complications of surgical procedures for low rectal cancers. Ann Surg 246:481–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sugarbaker PH, Corlew S (1982) Influence of surgical techniques on survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 25:545–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Pezim ME, Nicholls RJ (1984) Survival after high or low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during curative surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 200:729–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Surtees P, Ritchie JK, Phillips RK (1990) High versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 77:618–621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hall NR, Finan PJ, Stephenson BM, Lowndes RH, Young HL (1995) High tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in distal colorectal resections—a safe vascular procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis 10:29–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Corder AP, Karanjia ND, Williams JD, Heald RJ (1992) Flush aortic tie versus selective preservation of the ascending left colic artery in low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 79:680–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dworkin MJ, Allen-Mersh TG (1996) Effect of inferior mesenteric artery ligation on blood flow in the marginal artery-dependent sigmoid colon. J Am Coll Surg 183:357–360

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Orsay CP, Bass EM, Firfer B, Ramakrishnan V, Abcarian H (1995) Blood flow in colon anastomotic stricture formation. Dis Colon Rectum 38:202–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Chung RS, Hitch DC, Armstrong DN (1988) The role of tissue ischemia in the pathogenesis of anastomotic stricture. Surgery 104:824–829

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No relevant disclosures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd, Weston, FL, 33331, USA

    A. Hiranyakas, G. Da Silva, P. Denoya, S. Shawki & S. D. Wexner

Authors
  1. A. Hiranyakas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Denoya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Shawki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. D. Wexner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. D. Wexner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hiranyakas, A., Da Silva, G., Denoya, P. et al. Colorectal anastomotic stricture: Is it associated with inadequate colonic mobilization?. Tech Coloproctol 17, 371–375 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0929-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0929-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation