Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy

A prospective randomized trial

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A variety of devices are available for pedicle ligation during laparoscopic colectomy including vascular staplers, clips, and electrothermal bipolar vessel-sealing devices. This study assesses their speed, reliability, and cost to guide surgeons in their choice for intracorporeal pedicle ligation.

Methods

A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic vascular staplers and disposable clip appliers (S/C) with the LigaSure Atlas (LIG) was performed during elective right, left, and total colectomy. Cases were stratified by procedure. Failure was defined as any bleeding after proper pedicle ligation.

Results

The study included 48 S/C patients and 52 LIG patients with no differences in demographics, diagnosis, procedure, number of vessels ligated per procedure, or operative time. Failure occurred for 14 (9.2%) of the 152 vessels ligated in the S/C group, as compared with 5 (3%) of the 169 vessels ligated in the LIG group (p = 0.02). The median blood loss associated with device failure was 50 ml (range, 20–50 ml) in S/C group, as compared with 100 ml (range 25–800 ml) in the LIG group (p = 0.054). Major blood loss attributable to device failure and surgeon error occurred in only one LIG case. The mean cost per case of vessel ligation was significantly less in the LIG group ($317 ± $0 vs $400 ± $112; p < 0.001). The cost differences were greatest for total colectomy (LIG = $317 ± $0 vs S/C = $565 ± $67; p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Device failure, although more common in the S/C group, does not result in significant blood loss. The LigaSure Atlas is more cost effective during laparoscopic colectomy, especially total colectomy, and may allow the surgeon more versatility in its application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akari Y, Noake T, Kanazawa M, Momosaki K, Nozoe Y, Inoue A, Ishibashi N, Ogata Y, Shirouzu K (2004) Clipless hand-assisted laparoscopic total colectomy using Ligasure Atlas. Kurume Med J 51: 105–108

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bennett CL, Stryker SJ, Ferreira MR, Rosario M, Adams J, Beart R (1997) The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1,194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg 132: 41–44

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown SL, Woo EK (2004) Surgical stapler-associated fatalities and adverse events reported to the Food and Drug Administration. J Am Coll Surg 199: 374–381

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carbonell AM, Joels CS, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) A comparison of laparoscopic bipolar vessel sealing devices in the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-size arteries. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13: 377–380

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Casillas S, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Brady K, Fazio VW (2004) Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 47: 1680–1685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang YJ, Marcello PW, Rusin LC, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ (2005) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a helping hand or hindrance. Surg Endosc 19: 656–661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heniford BT, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Backus C, Pratt B, Greene FL (2001) Initial results with an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer. Surg Endosc 15: 799–801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Larach SW, Patankar SK, Ferrara A, Williamson PR, Perozo SE, Lord AS (1997) Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis and comparison of early vs latter experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40: 592–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Levy B, Emery L (2003) Randomized trial of suture versus electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing in vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 102: 147–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matthews BD, Pratt BL, Kercher KW, Mostafa G, Lentzner A, Lipford EH, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2001) Effectiveness of the ultrasonic coagulating shears, LigaSure vessel sealer, and surgical clip application in biliary surgery: a comparative analysis. Am Surg 67: 901–906

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rivadeneira DE, Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Rusin LC, Murray JJ, Coller JA, Schoetz DJ (2004) Benefits of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 1371–1376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Takada M, Ichihara T, Kuroda Y (2005) Comparative study of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 19: 226–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was funded in part by a grant from Valleylab, Boulder, Colorado, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. W. Marcello.

Additional information

Presented at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) meeting, Hollywood, FL, USA, 15 April 2005

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marcello, P.W., Roberts, P.L., Rusin, L.C. et al. Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 20, 263–269 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0258-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0258-7

Keywords

Navigation