Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Electrothermal bipolar vessel ligation improves operative time during laparoscopic total proctocolectomy: a large single-center experience

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic total proctocolectomy (TPC) with or without ileoanal pouch is a major operation for which the traditional benefits of laparoscopy were not immediately apparent, in part due to the longer operating times. The use of energy devices has been shown to improve operative outcomes for patients who undergo laparoscopic segmental colectomies, but there are limited data for laparoscopic TPC (LTPC).

Methods

All patients who underwent LTPC between January 2002 and July 2011 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional-review-board-approved database. Univariate and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of electrothermal bipolar vessel sealers (EBVS) for vessel ligation on operative time. Secondary outcomes included vessel ligation failures, estimated blood loss, and other intra- and postoperative outcomes.

Results

One hundred and forty-five patients underwent LTPC, including 126 restorative ileoanal pouch and diverting ileostomy operations and 19 TPC and end ileostomy procedures. Fifteen percent of LTPCs were totally laparoscopic, 45 % were laparoscopic-assisted, 32 % were hand-assisted, and 8 % were laparoscopic-converted cases. Laparoscopic vessel ligation was performed using EBVS (76 %), endoscopic staplers (12 %), or hybrid techniques (12 %). Vessel ligation groups were similar in demographics, body mass index, surgical indication, immunosuppression, and prior surgery. EBVS were associated with shorter median operative times (247 vs. 290 vs. 300 min, p = 0.018) and fewer vessel ligation failures (1 vs. 11 vs. 12 %, p = 0.027) compared with endoscopic staplers and hybrid techniques, respectively. There were no differences in estimated blood loss and intra-operative complications among the three groups. Length of stay, 30-day morbidity, and 30-day re-operation rates were also similar. On multiple linear regression analysis, EBVS were a significant predictor of operative time (p = 0.019).

Conclusions

Routine use of electrothermal bipolar vessel ligation for LTPC is associated with shorter operative time and fewer vessel ligation failures without higher risk of complications than other vessel control methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed Ali U, Keus F, Heikens JT, Bemelman WA, Berdah SV, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ (2009) Open versus laparoscopic (assisted) ileo pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD006267

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kelly K, Condon ET, Redmond HP, Kirwan WO (2010) The benefits of a laparoscopic approach in ileal pouch anal anastomosis formation: a single institutional retrospective case-matched experience. Ir J Med Sci 179:197–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gu J, Stocchi L, Geisler DP, Kiran RP (2011) Staged restorative proctocolectomy: laparoscopic or open completion proctectomy after laparoscopic subtotal colectomy? Surg Endosc 25:3294–3299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fajardo AD, Dharmarajan S, George V, Hunt SR, Birnbaum EH, Fleshman JW, Mutch MG (2010) Laparoscopic versus open 2-stage ileal pouch: laparoscopic approach allows for faster restoration of intestinal continuity. J Am Coll Surg 211:377–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tileny HS, Lovegrove RE, Heriot AG, Purkayastha S, Constantinides V, Nicholls RJ, Tekkis PP (2007) Comparison of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open approaches to ileal pouch surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:531–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. El-Gazzaz GS, Kiran RP, Remzi FH, Hull TL, Geisler DP (2009) Outcomes for case-matched laparoscopically assisted versus open restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg 96:522–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tou S, Malik AI, Wexner SD, Nelson RL (2011) Energy source instruments for laparoscopic colectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:CD007886

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Akari Y, Noake T, Kanazawa M, Yamada K, Momosaki K, Nozoe Y, Inoue A, Ishibashi N, Ogata Y, Shirouzu K (2004) Clipless hand-assisted laparoscopic total colectomy using Ligasure Atlas. Kurume Med J 51:105–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakajima K, Nezu R, Ito T, Nishida T (2010) Hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: the optimization of instrumentation toward standardization. Surg Today 40:840–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Rusin LC, Holubkov R, Schoetz DJ (2006) Vascular pedicle ligation techniques during laparoscopic colectomy. A prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 20:263–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. NHLBI Obesity Education Initiative Expert Panel on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults (1998) Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—the evidence report. Obes Res 6:51S–209S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Reissman P, Salky BA, Pfeifer J, Edye M, Jagelman DG, Wexner SD (1996) Laparoscopic surgery in the management of inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Surg 171(1):47–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Efron JE, Uriburu JP, Wexner SD, Pikarsky A, Hamel C, Weiss GG, Nogueras JJ (2001) Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal anal pouch anastomosis in obese patients. Obes Surg 11:246–251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Canedo JA, Pinto RA, McLemore EC, Rosen L, Wexner SD (2010) Restorative proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in obese patients. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1030–1034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Heniford BT, Matthews BD, Sing RF, Backus C, Pratt B, Greene FL (2001) Initial results with an electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer. Surg Endosc 15:799–801

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Campbell PA, Cresswell AB, Frank TG, Cuschieri A (2003) Real time thermography during energized vessel sealing and dissection. Surg Endosc 17:1640–1645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Harold KL, Pollinger H, Matthews BD, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolar thermal energy, and vascular clips for the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. Surg Endosc 17:1228–1230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Elektra McDermott for her editorial assistance and preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven D. Wexner.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Steven D. Wexner receives an inventor’s income from Medtronic/Covidien for intellectual property license and consulting fees from Medtronic for consulting.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garfinkle, R., Boutros, M., Hippalgaonkar, N. et al. Electrothermal bipolar vessel ligation improves operative time during laparoscopic total proctocolectomy: a large single-center experience. Surg Endosc 30, 2840–2847 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4565-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4565-3

Keywords

Navigation