Skip to main content
Log in

Does Conversion of a Laparoscopic Colectomy Adversely Affect Patient Outcome?

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE

Conversion during laparoscopic colectomy varies in frequency according to the surgeon’s experience and case selection. However, there remains concern that conversion is associated with increased morbidity and higher hospital costs.

METHODS

From January 1999 to August 2002, 430 laparoscopic colectomies were performed by two surgeons, with 51 (12 percent) cases converted to open surgery. Converted cases were matched for operation and age to 51 open cases performed mostly by other colorectal surgeons from our department. Data collected included gender, American Society of Anesthesiology score, operative indication, resection type, operative stage at conversion, in-hospital complications, direct hospital costs, unexpected readmission within 30 days, and mortality.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups for age (converted, 55 ± 19; open, 62 ± 16), male:female ratio (converted, 17:34; open, 23:28), or American Society of Anesthesiology score distribution. Indications for surgery were neoplasia (converted, 16; open, 31); diverticular disease (converted, 21; open, 13); Crohn’s disease (converted, 12; open, 5); and other disease (converted, 2; open, 2). Operative times were similar (converted, 150 ± 56 minutes; open, 132 ± 48 minutes). Conversions occurred before defining the major vascular pedicle/ureter (50 percent), in relation to intracorporeal vascular ligation (15 percent), or during bowel transection or presacral dissection (35 percent). Specific indications for conversion were technical (41 percent), followed by adhesions (33 percent), phlegmon or abscess (23 percent), bleeding (6 percent), and failure to identify the ureter (6 percent). Median hospital stay was five days for both groups. In-hospital complications (converted 11.6 percent; open 8 percent), 30-day readmission rate (converted 13 percent vs. open 8 percent), and direct costs were similar between groups. There were no mortalities.

CONCLUSION

Conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy does not result in inappropriately prolonged operative times, increased morbidity or length of stay, increased direct costs, or unexpected readmissions compared with similarly complex laparotomies. A policy of commencing most cases suitable for a laparoscopic approach laparoscopically offers patients the benefits of a laparoscopic colectomy without adversely affecting perioperative risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M Gibson C Byrd C Pierce F Wright W Norwood T Gibson (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colon resections: a five-year retrospective review Am Surg 66 245–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3itV2nsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10759193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. JJ Tuech C Pessaux N Rougue N Regenet JP Arnaud (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis. A prospective comparative study in the elderly Surg Endosc 14 1031–3 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640000267 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FovFeruw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11116412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. HH Chen SD Wexner EG Weiss JJ Nogueras O Alabaz AJ Iroatulam (1998) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colectomy for benign colorectal disease is associated with a significant reduction in disability as compared with laparotomy Surg Endosc 12 1397–400 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900867 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FktVWhsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9822465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. AJ Senagore KM Madbouly VW Fazio HJ Duepree KM Brady CP Delaney (2003) ArticleTitleAdvantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients Arch Surg 138 252–6 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.138.3.252 Occurrence Handle12611568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. CP Delaney RP Kiran AJ Senagore K Brady VW Fazio (2003) ArticleTitleCase-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery Ann Surg 238 67–72 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200307000-00009 Occurrence Handle12832967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. M Braga A Vignali L Gianotti et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. A randomized trial on short-term outcome Ann Surg 236 759–67 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200212000-00008 Occurrence Handle12454514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. ME Franklin GB Kazantsev D Abrego JA Diaze J Balli JL Glass (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic surgery for stage III colon cancer: long-term follow-up Surg Endosc 14 612–6 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640000169 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7gvFWmsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10948295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. S Yamamoto M Watanabe H Hasegawa M Kitajima (2001) ArticleTitleOncologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open surgery for advanced colorectal cancer Hepatogastroenterology 48 1248–51 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrntFajsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11677939

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. AM Lacy JC Garcia-Valdecasas S Delgado A Castells P Taura JM Pique (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial Lancet 359 2224–9 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09290-5 Occurrence Handle12103285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. F Marusch I Gastinger C Schneider et al. (2001) ArticleTitleImportance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery Dis Colon Rectum 44 207–16 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ot1Sluw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11227937

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. P Gervaz A Pikarsky M Utech et al. (2001) ArticleTitleConverted laparoscopic surgery. A meta-analysis Surg Endosc 15 827–32 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004640080062 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrksFSitg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11443444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. O Schwandner T Schiedeck HP Bruch (1999) ArticleTitleThe role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Do predictive factors exist? Surg Endosc 13 151–6 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900927 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M7hslCrsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9918619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. MC Moine ParticleLe JM Fabre C Vacher F Navarro MC Picot P Domergue (2003) ArticleTitleFactors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease Br J Surg 90 232–6 Occurrence Handle10.1002/bjs.4035 Occurrence Handle12555302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. S Pandya JJ Murray JA Coller LC Rusin (1999) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic colectomy. Indications for conversion to laparotomy Arch Surg 134 471–5 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.134.5.471 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3lsV2qtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10323418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. AJ Senagore HJ Duepree CP Delaney S Dissanaike KM Brady VW Fazio (2002) ArticleTitleCost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences Dis Colon Rectum 45 485–90 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6225-x Occurrence Handle12006930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. AJ Senagore MA Luchtefeld JM Mackeigan (1999) ArticleTitleWhat is the learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy? Am Surg 61 681–5

    Google Scholar 

  17. AJ Senagore (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic techniques in intestinal surgery Semin Laparosc Surg 8 183–8 Occurrence Handle10.1053/slas.2001.25371 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrktVyksg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11588768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. CP Delaney M Zutshi AJ Senagore FH Remzi J Hammel VW Fazio (2003) ArticleTitleProspective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection Dis Colon Rectum 46 851–9 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6672-4 Occurrence Handle12847356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. SA Lord SW Larach A Ferrara PR Williamson CP Lago MW Lube (1996) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic resections for colorectal carcinoma: a three-year experience Dis Colon Rectum 39 148–54 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB38znt1I%3D Occurrence Handle8620780

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. K Slim D Pezet Y Riff E Clark J Chipponi (1995) ArticleTitleHigh morbidity rate after converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery Br J Surg 82 1406–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD1Mjotl0%3D Occurrence Handle7489179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Conor P. Delaney M.D., Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Casillas, S., Delaney, C., Senagore, A. et al. Does Conversion of a Laparoscopic Colectomy Adversely Affect Patient Outcome?. Dis Colon Rectum 47, 1680–1685 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0692-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0692-4

Key words

Navigation