Skip to main content
Log in

Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Analysis and comparison of early vs. latter experience

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to test if the techniques learned during our early learning experience have proved to be effective in reducing the complications specifically related to the laparoscopic technique of colorectal surgery. METHODS: From October 1991 until July 1996, 195 laparoscopic operations were performed on the colon and the rectum. These data were divided into “early” and “latter” groups. The conversion reasons and early and late postoperative complications were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Incidence of conversions required because of iatrogenic injuries showed a decline from 7.3 percent in the early group to 1.4 percent in the latter group. Sixty-six postoperative complications were observed in 59 (30.3 percent) patients. Complications specifically related to the technique of laparoscopic surgery occurred in nine (4.6 percent) patients. These were postoperative bleeding in three patients, port site hernias in five patients, and left ureteric stricture in one patient. Eight (6.5 percent) of these complications occurred in the early group, whereas one (1.4 percent) occurred in the latter group. Analyzing the conversions caused by intraoperative iatrogenic injuries and the specific postoperative complications together reveals that the incidence of 13.8 percent (17/123) in the early group has been reduced significantly to 2.8 percent (2/72) in the latter group. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our experience, we have identified techniques, which are discussed in detail, to make laparoscopic colorectal surgery safe. Strict adherence to these techniques has significantly reduced the incidence of complications, specifically those related to the laparoscopic technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ramos JM, Beart RW Jr, Goes R, Ortega AE, Schlinkert RT. Role of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery: a prospective evaluation of 200 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:494–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Falk PM, Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD,et al. Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:28–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a prospective assessment and current perspective. Br J Surg 1993;80:1602–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lord SA, Larach SW, Ferrara A, Lago CP, Williamson PR. Complications in laparoscopic colon surgery [meeting abstract]. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:P45.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Larach SW, Salomon MC, Williamson PR, Goldstein E. Laparoscopic assisted abdominoperineal resection. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993;3:115–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Larach SW, Hellinger MD. The evolving role of laparoscopic technique in the performance of Hartmann's procedure. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1994;3:717–30.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Larach SW, Salomon MC, Williamson PR, Goldstein E. Laparoscopic asssisted colectomy: experience during the learning curve. Coloproctology 1993;15:38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrara A, Larach SW, Williamson PR, Lago CP. Use of mini-Pfannenstiel incision to assist laparoscopic low colo-rectal resection and anastomosis. Techn Coloproctol 1996;4:22–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Larach SW, Ferrara A, Williamson PR. Laparoscopic assisted anterior resection with intracorporeal stapled anastomosis. Techn Coloproctol 1995;3:3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lord SA, Larach SW, Ferrara A, Williamson PR, Lago CP, Lube MW. Laparoscopic resections for colorectal carcinoma: a three-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:148–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983;15:59–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubois F. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: historical perspective and personal experience. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991;1:52–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berci G, Sackier JM. The Los Angeles experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1991;161:382–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Flowers JL, Bailey RW, Scovill WA, Zucker KA. The Baltimore experience with laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 1991;161:388–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Arregui ME, Davis CJ, Arkush A, Nagan RF. In selected patients outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and significantly reduces hospitalization charges. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991;1:240–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saclarides TJ, Ko ST, Airan M, Dillon C, Franklin J. Laparoscopic removal of a large colonic lipoma: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:1027–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Phillips EH, Franklin M, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Ramos R, Rosenthal D. Laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 1992;216:703–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Monson JR, Darzi A, Carey PD, Guillou PJ. Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in an unselected group of patients. Lancet 1992;340:831–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peters WR, Bartels TL. Minimally invasive colectomy: are the potential benefits realized? Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:751–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dean PA, Beart RW Jr, Nelson H, Elftmann TD, Schlinkert RT. Laparoscopic-assisted segmental colectomy: early Mayo Clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc 1994;69:834–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wexner SD, Reissman P, Pfeifer J, Bernstein M, Geron N. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis of 140 cases. Surg Endosc 1996;10:133–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Larach, S.W., Patankar, S.K., Ferrara, A. et al. Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 592–596 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055385

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02055385

Key words

Navigation