Abstract
This paper is concerned with the problem of ranking Lorenz curves in situations where the Lorenz curves intersect and no unambiguous ranking can be attained without introducing weaker ranking criteria than first-degree Lorenz dominance. To deal with such situations two alternative sequences of nested dominance criteria between Lorenz curves are introduced. At the limit the systems of dominance criteria appear to depend solely on the income share of either the worst-off or the best-off income recipient. This result suggests two alternative strategies for increasing the number of Lorenz curves that can be strictly ordered; one that places more emphasis on changes that occur in the lower part of the income distribution and the other that places more emphasis on changes that occur in the upper part of the income distribution. Both strategies turn out to depart from the Gini coefficient; one requires higher degree of downside and the other higher degree of upside inequality aversion than what is exhibited by the Gini coefficient. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the sequences of dominance criteria characterize two separate systems of nested subfamilies of inequality measures and thus provide a method for identifying the least restrictive social preferences required to reach an unambiguous ranking of a given set of Lorenz curves. Moreover, it is demonstrated that the introduction of successively more general transfer principles than the Pigou–Dalton principle of transfers forms a helpful basis for judging the normative significance of higher degrees of Lorenz dominance. The dominance results for Lorenz curves do also apply to generalized Lorenz curves and thus provide convenient characterizations of the corresponding social welfare orderings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaberge R (2000) Characterizations of Lorenz curves and income distributions. Soc Choice Welf 17: 639–653. doi:10.1007/s003550000046
Aaberge R (2001) Axiomatic characterization of the Gini coefficient and Lorenz curve orderings. J Econ Theory 101: 115–132. doi:10.1006/jeth.2000.2749
Atkinson AB (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 2: 244–263. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(70)90039-6
Atkinson AB (2007) More on the measurement of inequality. J Econ Inequal 6: 277–283. doi:10.1007/s10888-007-9075-7
Atkinson AB, Rainwater L, Smeeding T (1995) “Income Distribution in OECD Countries: The Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS)”, Social Policy Studies No. 18, OECD, Paris
Bossert W (1990) An approximation of the single-series Ginis. J Econ Theory 50: 82–92. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(90)90086-Y
Chateauneuf A, Gajdos T, Welthien P-H (2002) The principle of strong diminishing transfers. J Econ Theory 103: 311–333. doi:10.1006/jeth.2000.2786
Chew SH (1983) A generalization of the quasilinear mean with applications to the measurement of inequality and decision theory resolving the Allais paradox. Econometrica 51: 1065–1092. doi:10.2307/1912052
Chiu HW (2007) Intersecting Lorenz curves, the degree of downside inequality aversion, and tax reforms. Soc Choice Welf 28: 375–399. doi:10.1007/s00355-006-0170-7
Cowell FA (1977): “Measuring Inequality”, Deddington, Philip Allan
Dardanoni V, Lambert PJ (1988) Welfare rankings of income distributions: A role for the variance and some insights for tax reforms. Soc Choice Welf 5: 1–17. doi:10.1007/BF00435494
Davies JB, Hoy M (1995) Making inequality comparisons when Lorenz curves intersect. Am Econ Rev 85: 980–986
Donaldson D, Weymark JA (1980) A single parameter generalization of the Gini indices of inequality. J Econ Theory 22: 67–86. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(80)90065-4
Ebert U (1987) Size and distribution of incomes as determinants of social welfare. J Econ Theory 41: 23–33. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(87)90003-2
Fields GE, Fei JCH (1978) On inequality comparisons. Econometrica 46: 303–316. doi:10.2307/1913902
Fishburn PC, Willig RD (1984) Transfer principles in income distribution. J Public Econ 25: 323–328. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(84)90059-8
Giaccardi F (1950) Un criterio per la construzione di indici di conzentrazione. Riv Ital Demogr Stat 4: 527–538
Hadar J, Russel W (1969) Rules for ordering uncertain prospects. Am Econ Rev 59: 25–34
Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Polya G (1934) Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kolm SC (1969) The optimal production of social justice. In: Margolis J, Guitton H(eds) Public economics. Macmillan, New York
Kolm SC (1976) Unequal inequalities I. J Econ Theory 12: 416–442. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(76)90037-5
Lambert PJ (1985) Social welfare and the Gini coefficient revisited. Math Soc Sci 9: 19–26. doi:10.1016/0165-4896(85)90003-4
Lambert PJ (1993a) The Distribution and Redistribution of Income: A Mathematical Analysis. Manchester University Press, Manchester
Lambert PJ (1993) Evaluating impact effects of tax reforms. J Econ Surv 7: 205–242. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.1993.tb00166.x
Mehran F (1976) Linear measures of inequality. Econometrica 44: 805–809. doi:10.2307/1913446
Moffitt RA (2003) The negative income tax and the evolution of U. S. welfare policy. J Econ Perspect 17: 119–140. doi:10.1257/089533003769204380
Muliere P, Scarsini M (1989) A note on stochastic dominance and inequality measures. J Econ Theory 49: 314–323. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(89)90084-7
Piesch W (1975) “Statistische Konzentrationsmasse”, Mohr (Siebeck), Tübingen
Sen A (1992) Inequality reexamined. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Shorrocks AF (1983) Ranking income distributions. Economica 50: 3–17. doi:10.2307/2554117
Shorrocks AF, Foster JE (1987) Transfer sensitive inequality measures. Rev Econ Stud 14: 485–497. doi:10.2307/2297571
Smith A (1979) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Wang SS, Young VR (1998) Ordering risks: Expected utility theory versus Yaari’s dual theory of risk. Insur Math Econ 22: 145–161. doi:10.1016/S0167-6687(97)00036-X
Weymark J (1981) Generalized Gini inequality indices. Math Soc Sci 1: 409–430. doi:10.1016/0165-4896(81)90018-4
Whitmore G (1970) Third-degree stochastic dominance. Am Econ Rev 60: 457–459
Yaari ME (1988) A controversial proposal concerning inequality measurement. J Econ Theory 44: 381–397. doi:10.1016/0022-0531(88)90010-5
Yitzhaki S (1983) On an extension of the Gini inequality index. Int Econ Rev 24: 617–628. doi:10.2307/2648789
Zoli C (1999) Intersecting generalized Lorenz curves and the Gini index. Soc Choice Welf 16: 183–196. doi:10.1007/s003550050139
Zoli C (2002) Inverse stochastic dominance, inequality measurement and Gini indices. J Econ 9 (Suppl):119–161
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Parts of this paper were written when the author was visiting ICER in Torino. ICER and the Norwegian Research Council are gratefully acknowledged for providing financial support. I would like to thank Claudio Zoli for many stimulating discussions and a referee for helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aaberge, R. Ranking intersecting Lorenz curves. Soc Choice Welf 33, 235–259 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0354-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0354-4