Abstract
This paper clarifies the conceptual distinction of downside inequality aversion (or transfer sensitivity) as a normative criterion for judging income distributions from the Pigou-Dalton principle of transfers. We show that when the Lorenz curves of two income distributions intersect, how the change from one distribution to the other is judged by an inequality index exhibiting downside inequality aversion often depends on the relative strengths of its downside inequality aversion and inequality aversion. For additive inequality indices or their monotonic transformations, a measure characterizing the strength of an index’s downside inequality aversion against its inequality aversion is shown to determine the ranking by the index of two distributions whose Lorenz curves cross once. The precise condition under which the same result generalizes to the case of multiple-crossing Lorenz curves is also identified. The results are particularly useful in understanding the distributional impact of tax reforms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson AB (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 2:244–263
Atkinson AB (1973) More on the measurement of inequality. mimeo
Bossert W, Pfingsten A (1990) Intermediate inequality: concepts, indices, and welfare implications. Math Soc Sci 19:117–34
Budd EC (1970) Postwar changes in the size of distribution of income in the U.S. Amer Econ Rev 60:247–260
Chiu WH (2005) Skewness preference, risk aversion, and the precedence relations on stochastic changes. Manag Sci 51:1812–1828
Dardanoni V, Lambert P (1988) Welfare rankings of income distributions: a role for the variance and some insights for tax reform. Soc Choice Welfare 5:1–17
Davies JB, Hoy M (1985) Comparing income distributions under aversion to downside inequality. mimeo
Davies JB, Hoy M (1994) The normative significance of using third-degree stochastic dominance in compariing income distributions. J Econ Theory 64:520–530
Davies JB, Hoy M (1995) Making inequality comparisons when lorenz curves intersect. Amer Econ Rev 85:980–986
Davies JB, Hoy M (2002) Flat rate taxes and inequality measurement. J Pub Econ 84:33–46
Kimball MS (1990) Precautionary saving in the small and the the large. Econometrica 58:53–73
Kolm S (1976) Unequal inequalities: I. J Econ Theory 12:416–442
Kuznets S (1963) Quantitative aspects of economic growth of nations. Econ Dev Cult Change 11:1–80
Lambert PJ (2001) The distribution and redistribution of income. Manchester University Press, Manchester
Lambert PJ, Lanza G (2003) The effect on inequality of changing one or two incomes. Economics Discussion Paper, No. 15, University of Oregon
Mehran F (1976) Linear measures of income inequality. Econometrica 44:805–809
Menezes C, Geiss C, Tressler J (1980) Increasing downside risk. Amer Econ Rev 70:921–932
Sawyer M (1976) Income distribution in OECD countries. OECD economic outlook, occasional studies, paris
Sen A (1973) On economic inequality. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Shorrocks AF, Foster JE (1987) Transfer sensitive inequality measures. Rev Econ Stud 54:485–497
Yarri M (1998) A controversial proposal concerning inequality measurement. J Econ Theory 44:381–397
Zheng B (1997) Aggregate poverty measures. J Econ Survey 11:123–162
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I received exceptionally helpful comments from Mike Hoy, Peter Lambert, the Editor, Buhong Zheng, and an anonymous referee. The remaining errors and shortcomings are my own – W.H. Chiu
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chiu, W.H. Intersecting Lorenz Curves, the Degree of Downside Inequality Aversion, and Tax Reforms. Soc Choice Welfare 28, 375–399 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0170-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0170-7