Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The application of FISH techniques for physical mapping in the dog (Canis familiaris)

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Mammalian Genome Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The abundance of CA/GT repeats in the DNA of the2 dog (Canis familiaris) has established the importance of polymorphic microsatellites in the development of a low density map of the canine genome. The assignment of linkage groups of markers to chromosomes by physical mapping requires reliable cytogenetic techniques for routine production of metaphase cells. The dog has 78 chromosomes, many of which are smaller and more contracted than those of other mammals. Although the molecular study of inherited disease in dogs has important implications for both improved welfare in dogs and the provision of animal models for human diseases, the small size and large number of chromosomes in the canine genome has discouraged the inclusion of cytogenetic analysis in the planning of relevant research protocols. In this report, Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) techniques have been optimized for the physical mapping of probes in C. familiaris. A method to obtain a good yield of early and midmetaphases from short-term peripheral blood cultures and the optimal conditions for hybridization and detection of probes is described. Thirteen mi-crosatellite-containing cosmid probes from a canine genomic library in pWE15, a highly repetitive probe (human ribosomal DNA pHr14E3), and a human X Chromosome (Chr) paint have been mapped. Six microsatellites, two ribosomal sites, and the human paint have been assigned to specific chromosomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Deschenes, S.M., Puck, J.M., Dutra, A.S., Somberg, R.L., Felsburg, P.J., Henthorn, P.S. (1994). Comparative mapping of canine and human proximal Xq and genetic analysis of canine X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency. Genomics 23, 62–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fanning, T.G. (1989). Molecular evolution of centromere-associated nu-cleotide sequences in two species of canids. Gene 85, 559–563.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fujinaga, T., Yamashita, M, Yoshida, M.C., Mizuno, S., Tajima, M., Okamoto, Y., Otomo, K. (1989). The banding pattern of normal canine chromosomes. Nippon Juigaku Zasshi, Jpn. J. Vet. Sci. 51, 294–299.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, N.G., Humphreys, S.J., Binns, M.M., Curtis, R., Holliman, A., Scott, A.M. (1993). Characterisation of canine microsatellites. In DNA Fingerprinting: State of Science, S.D.J. Pena, R. Chakraborty, J.T. Epplen, A.J. Jeffreys, eds. (Basel: Birkhauser Verlag), pp. 415–420. Lichter, P., Chang Tang, C.-J., Call, K., Hermanson, G., Evans, G.A.,

    Google Scholar 

  • Housman, D., Ward, D.C. (1990). High-resolution mapping of human chromosome 11 by in situ hybridisation with cosmid clones. Science 247, 64–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthey, R. (1954). Chromosomes et systematique des canides. Mammalia 18, 225–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modi, W.S., Fanning, T.G., Wayne, R.K., O’ Brien, S.J. (1988). Chromosomal localization of satellite DNA sequences among 22 species of felids and canids (Carnivora). Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 48, 208–213.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nacheva, E., Holloway, T., Carter, N., Grace, C, White, N., Green, I.R. (1995). Disorders of 20q deletions in patients with myeloproliferative disorders or myelodysplastic syndromes. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet. 80, 87–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rothuizen, J., Wolfswinkel, J., Lenstra, J.A., Frants, R.R. (1994). The incidence of mini- and micro-satellite repetitive DNA in the canine genome. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89, 403–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scherthan, H., Cremer, T., Arnason, U., Weier, H.-U., Lima-de-Faria, A., Fronicke, E. (1994). Comparative chromosome painting discloses homologous segments in distantly related mammals. Nature Genet. 6, 342–347.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seiden, J.R., Moorhead, P.S., Oehlest, M.L., Patterson, D.F. (1975). The Giemsa banding pattern of the canine karyotype. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 15, 380–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solinas-Toldo, S., Fries, R., Neilbergs, H.L., Barendse, W., Womack, J.E., Hetzel, D.J.S., Strazinger, G. (1993). Physically mapped, cosmid-derived microsatellite markers as anchor loci on bovine chromosomes. Mamm. Genome 4, 720–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D.M., Jacky, P.B., Prieur, D.J. (1991). The Giemsa banding pattern of canine chromosomes, using a cell synchronization technique. Genome 34, 407–412.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Switonski, M. (1995). Committee for the Standardisation of Canine Karyotype (Second International DOGMAP Meeting, Cambridge, UK).

  • Wang, H. Fedoroff S. (1972). Banding in human chromosomes treated with trypsin: Nature New Biol. 235, 52–54.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, P.E., Holmes, N.G., Dickens, H.F. et al. The application of FISH techniques for physical mapping in the dog (Canis familiaris). Mammalian Genome 7, 37–41 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003359900009

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003359900009

Keywords

Navigation