Skip to main content
Log in

Administration sequence-dependent antitumor effects of paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil in the human gastric cancer cell line MKN45

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The clinical outcome of gastric cancer patients has been improved by combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and paclitaxel (PXL). However, the optimal schedule of this combination has not been determined. Methods: The efficacies of sequential administrations of 5-FU and PXL on the gastric cancer cell line MKN45 were investigated using a WST-8 colorimetric assay. The cell cycle distribution of each drug was evaluated by flow-cytometry. Furthermore, the mechanism of antitumor activity enhancement by the administration sequence was investigated by western blotting. Results: MKN45 cell growth was significantly inhibited by each drug in a dose- and time-dependent manner. The cytotoxicities of PXL followed by 5-FU were significantly greater than those of 5-FU followed by PXL. The flow-cytometric analysis revealed that PXL exposure caused viable cell accumulation in G2/M phase in a dose-dependent manner. Western blotting showed that PXL exposure followed by 5-FU up-regulated Chk1 and Wee1 protein expressions until PXL removal and 5-FU exposure, when these expressions gradually decreased to their basal levels. 14-3-3σ protein expression was significantly up-regulated upon PXL treatment followed by 5-FU. Interestingly, Mad2 protein expression with PXL treatment followed by 5-FU gradually increased after the PXL removal and 5-FU exposure. Conclusions: PXL followed by 5-FU administration may be the optimal sequence for treatment of gastric cancer. The enhanced viable cell accumulation after PXL pretreatment may be related to G2 arrest. After PXL removal and 5-FU exposure, the cells progressing to M phase may undergo cell death by mitotic catastrophe due to DNA damage caused by 5-FU exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ohtsu A, Shimada Y, Shirao K et al (2003) Randomized phase III trial of fluorouracil alone versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus uracil and tegafur plus mitomycin in patients with unresectable, advanced gastric cancer: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9205). J Clin Oncol 21:54–59

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vanhoefer U, Rougier P, Wilke H et al (2000) Final results of a randomized phase III trial of sequential high-dose methotrexate, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin versus etoposide, leucovorin, and fluorouracil versus infusional fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer: a trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 18:2648–2657

    Google Scholar 

  3. Van Cutsem E (2004) The treatment of advanced gastric cancer: new findings on the activity of the taxanes. Oncologist 9:9–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kusunoki M, Yanagi H, Kotera H et al (1998) Effects of pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy using oral UFT and continuous venous 5FU infusion on the prognosis of irradiated rectal carcinomas with p53 overexpression. Int J Oncol 13:653–657

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kusunoki M, Yanagi H, Noda M et al (1999) The usefulness of pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy (UFT plus 5FU) in the treatment of unresectable colorectal carcinomas. Oncol Rep 6:547–552

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kusunoki M, Yanagi H, Noda M et al (2000) Results of pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy in combination with hepatic arterial 5-fluorouracil infusion and oral UFT after resection of hepatic colorectal metastases. Cancer 89:1228–1235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanaka K, Konishi N, Ohmori Y et al (2003) Modified pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil, UFT, and taxotere (docetaxel) for advanced gastric cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 8:381–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Murad AM, Petroianu A, Guimaraes RC et al (1999) Phase II trial of the combination of paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: a novel, safe, and effective regimen. Am J Clin Oncol 22:580–586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim YH, Shin SW, Kim BS et al (1999) Paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced gastric carcinoma. Cancer 85:295–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kollmannsberger C, Quietzsch D, Haag C et al (2000) A phase II study of paclitaxel, weekly, 24-hour continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 83:458–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yokozaki H. (2000) Molecular characteristics of eight gastric cancer cell lines established in Japan. Pathol Int 50:767–777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshikawa R, Kusunoki M, Yanagi H et al (2001) Dual antitumor effects of 5-fluorouracil on the cell cycle in colorectal carcinoma cells: a novel target mechanism concept for pharmacokinetic modulating chemotherapy. Cancer Res 61:1029–1037

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohtsu A, Boku N, Tamura F et al (1998) An early phase II study of a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel for advanced gastric cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 21:416–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yamada Y, Shirao K, Ohtsu A et al (2001) Phase II trial of paclitaxel by three-hour infusion for advanced gastric cancer with short premedication for prophylaxis against paclitaxel-associated hypersensitivity reactions. Ann Oncol 12:1133–1137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamaguchi K, Tada M, Horikoshi N et al (2002) Phase II study of paclitaxel with 3-h infusion in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 5:90–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson KR, Wang L, Miller MC III et al (1997) 5-Fluorouracil interferes with paclitaxel cytotoxicity against human solid tumor cells. Clin Cancer Res 3:1739–1745

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnson KR, Young KK, Fan W (1999) Antagonistic interplay between antimitotic and G1-S arresting agents observed in experimental combination therapy. Clin Cancer Res 5:2559–2565

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson KR, Fan W (2002) Reduced expression of p53 and p21WAF1/CIP1 sensitizes human breast cancer cells to paclitaxel and its combination with 5-fluorouracil. Anticancer Res 22:3197–3204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grem JL, Nguyen D, Monahan BP et al (1999) Sequence-dependent antagonism between fluorouracil and paclitaxel in human breast cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol 58:477–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kano Y, Akutsu M, Tsunoda S et al (1996) Schedule-dependent interaction between paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil in human carcinoma cell lines in vitro. Br J Cancer 74:704–710

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. DiPaola RS (2002) To arrest or not to G(2)-M cell-cycle arrest: commentary re: Tyagi AK, Singh RP, Agorwal C, Chan DC, Agorwal R. Silibinin strongly synergizes human prostate carcinomaDU145 cells to doxorubicin-induced growth inhibition, G(2)-M arrest, and apoptosis. Clin Cancer Res 8:3311–3314

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lanzi C, Cassinelli G, Cucuru G et al (2001) Cell cycle checkpoint efficiency and cellular response to paclitaxel in prostate cancer cells. Prostate 48:254–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Woods CM, Zhu J, McQueney PA et al (1995) Taxol-induced mitotic block triggers rapid onset of a p53-independent pathway. Mol Med 1:506–526

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Horwitz SB (1992) Mechanism of action of Taxol. Trends Pharmacol Sci 13:134–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang X, Jin DY, Wong HL et al (2003) MAD2-induced sensitization to vincristine is associated with mitotic arrest and Raf/Bcl-2 phosphorylation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Oncogene 22:109–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheung HW, Jin DY, Ling MT et al (2005) Mitotic arrest deficient 2 expression induces chemosensitization to a DNA-damaging agent, cisplatin, in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 65:1450–1458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Anand S, Penrhyn-Lowe S, Venkitaraman AR (2003) AURORA-A amplification overrides the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint, inducing resistance to Taxol. Cancer Cell 3:51–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nitta M, Kobayashi O, Honda S et al (2004) Spindle checkpoint function is required for mitotic catastrophe induced by DNA-damaging agents. Oncogene 23:6548–6558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. van Bree C, Savonije JH, Franken NA et al (2000) The effect of p53-function on the sensitivity to paclitaxel with or without hyperthermia in human colorectal carcinoma cells. Int J Oncol 16:739–744

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lowe SW, Ruley HE, Jacks T et al (1993) p53-dependent apoptosis modulates the cytotoxicity of anticancer agents. Cell 74:957–967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lavarino C, Delia D, Di Palma S et al (1997) p53 in drug resistance in ovarian cancer. Lancet 349:1556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Debernardis D, Sire EG, De Feudis P et al (1997) p53 status does not affect sensitivity of human ovarian cancer cell lines to paclitaxel. Cancer Res 57:870–874

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masato Kusunoki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toiyama, Y., Tanaka, K., Konishi, N. et al. Administration sequence-dependent antitumor effects of paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil in the human gastric cancer cell line MKN45. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 57, 368–375 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-005-0057-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-005-0057-9

Keywords

Navigation