Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to review current developments in bone tissue engineering, with special focus on the promising role of nanobiotechnology. This unique fusion between nanotechnology and biotechnology offers unprecedented possibilities in studying and modulating biological processes on a molecular and atomic scale. First we discuss the multiscale hierarchical structure of bone and its implication on the design of new scaffolds and delivery systems. Then we briefly present different types of nanostructured scaffolds, and finally we conclude with nanoparticle delivery systems and their potential use in promoting bone regeneration. This review is not meant to be exhaustive and comprehensive, but aims to highlight concepts and key advances in the field of nanobiotechnology and bone regeneration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulus H, Tsiridis E (2005) Bone substitutes: an update. Injury 36:S20–S27
Wheeler DL, Enneking WF (2005) Allograft bone decreases in strength in vivo over time. Clin Orthop Relat Res 435:36–42
Yang Y (2009) Skeletal morphogenesis during embryonic development. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 19(3):197–218
Ivkovic A, Marijanovic I, Hudetz D, Porter RM, Pecina M, Evans CH (2011) Regenerative medicine and tissue engineering in orthopaedic surgery. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 3:923–944
Hernigou P, Pariat J, Queinnec S, Homma Y, Lachaniette CH, Chevallier N et al (2014) Supercharging irradiated allografts with mesenchymal stem cells improves acetabular bone grafting in revision arthroplasty. Int Orthop
Wang X, Wang Y, Gou W, Lu Q, Peng J, Lu S (2013) Role of mesenchymal stem cells in bone regeneration and fracture repair: a review. Int Orthop 37(12):2491–2498
Vukicevic S, Oppermann H, Verbanac D, Jankolija M, Popek I, Curak J et al (2014) The clinical use of bone morphogenetic proteins revisited: a novel biocompatible carrier device OSTEOGROW for bone healing. Int Orthop 38(3):635–647
Emerich DF, Thanos CG (2003) Nanotechnology and medicine. Expert Opin Biol Ther 3:655–663
What is nanotechnology? National Nanotechnology Initiative. http://nano.gov/nanotech-101/what/definition. Accessed 5 Apr 2014
Fakruddin M, Hossain Z, Afroz H (2012) Prospects and applications of nanobiotechnology: a medical perspective. J Nanobiotechnology 10:31
Moghimi SM, Hunter AC, Murray JC (2005) Nanomedicine: current status and future prospects. FASEB J 19:311–330
Aizenberg J, Weaver JC, Thanawala MS, Sundar VC, Morse DE, Fratzl P (2005) Skeleton of Euplectella sp.: structural hierarchy from the nanoscale to the macroscale. Science 309(5732):275–278
Fantner GE, Hassenkam T, Kindt JH, Weaver JC, Birkedal H, Pechenik L et al (2005) Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separate during bone fracture. Nat Mater 4(8):612–616
Chen PY, Lin AY, Lin YS, Seki Y, Stokes AG, Peyras J et al (2008) Structure and mechanical properties of selected biological materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 1(3):208–226
Hang F, Barber AH (2011) Nano-mechanical properties of individual mineralized collagen fibrils from bone tissue. J R Soc Interface 8(57):500–505
Landis WJ, Silver FH (2009) Mineral deposition in the extracellular matrices of vertebrate tissues: identification of possible apatite nucleation sites on type I collagen. Cells Tissues Organs 189(1–4):20–24
Wiesmann HP, Meyer U, Plate U, Höhling HJ (2005) Aspects of collagen mineralization in hard tissue formation. Int Rev Cytol 242:121–156
Gupta HS, Wagermaier W, Zickler GA, Raz-Ben Aroush D, Funari SS, Roschger P et al (2005) Nanoscale deformation mechanisms in bone. Nano Lett 5(10):2108–2111
Garg T, Singh O, Arora S, Murthy R (2012) Scaffold: a novel carrier for cell and drug delivery. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 29(1):1–63
Ikeda R, Fujioka H, Nagura I, Kokubu T, Toyokawa N, Inui A et al (2009) The effect of porosity and mechanical property of a synthetic polymer scaffold on repair of osteochondral defects. Int Orthop 33(3):821–828
Zimmerman EA, Barth HD, Ritchie RO (2012) On the multiscale origins of fracture resistance in human bone and its biological degradation. JOM 64:486–493
Dzenis Y (2008) Materials science. Structural nanocomposites. Science 319(5862):419–420
Launey ME, Munch E, Alsem DH, Barth HB, Saiz E, Tomsia AP et al (2009) Designing highly toughened hybrid composites through nature-inspired hierarchical complexity. Acta Mater 57:2919–2932
Ritchie RO (2008) The quest for stronger, tougher materials. Science 320:448
Saiz E, Zimmermann EA, Lee JS, Wegst UG, Tomsia AP (2013) Perspectives on the role of nanotechnology in bone tissue engineering. Dent Mater 29(1):103–115
Chevalier J, Gremillard L, Deville S (2007) Low-temperature degradation of zirconia and implications for biomedical implants. Annu Rev Mater Res 37:1–32
Zhang ZG, Li ZH, Mao XZ, Wang WC (2011) Advances in bone repair with nanobiomaterials: mini-review. Cytotechnology 63(5):437–443
Ma PX, Zhang R, Xiao G, Franceschi R (2001) Engineering new bone tissue in vitro on highly porous poly(alpha-hydroxyl acids)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res 54(2):284–293
Qian J, Xu W, Yong X, Jin X, Zhang W (2014) Fabrication and in vitro biocompatibility of biomorphic PLGA/nHA composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 36:95–101
Karp JM, Langer R (2007) Development and therapeutic applications of advanced biomaterials. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18(5):454–459
Le X, Poinern GE, Ali N, Berry CM, Fawcett D (2013) Engineering a biocompatible scaffold with either micrometre or nanometre scale surface topography for promoting protein adsorption and cellular response. Int J Biomater 2013:782549. doi:10.1155/2013/782549
Curtis AS, Gadegaard N, Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Wilkinson CD, Aitchison G (2004) Cells react to nanoscale order and symmetry in their surroundings. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 3(1):61–65
Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, McMurray RJ, Affrossman S, Wilkinson CD et al (2009) Interactions with nanoscale topography: adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage. J Biomed Mater Res A 91(1):195–208
Sniadecki NJ, Desai RA, Ruiz SA, Chen CS (2006) Nanotechnology for cell-substrate interactions. Ann Biomed Eng 34(1):59–74
Nielson R, Kaehr B, Shear JB (2009) Microreplication and design of biological architectures using dynamic-mask multiphoton lithography. Small 5(1):120–125
Hu X, Park SH, Gil ES, Xia XX, Weiss AS, Kaplan DL (2011) The influence of elasticity and surface roughness on myogenic and osteogenic differentiation of cells on silk-elastin. Biomaterials 32(34):8979–8989
Lamers E, Walboomers XF, Domanski M, Prodanov L, Melis J, Luttge R et al (2012) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the inflammatory response to nanoscale grooved substrates. Nanomedicine 8(3):308–317
Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU (2004) Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 25(19):4731–4739
Tran N, Webster TJ (2009) Nanotechnology for bone materials. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 1(3):336–351
Wang J, Yu X (2010) Preparation, characterization and in vitro analysis of novel structured nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 6(8):3004–3012
Hao W, Dong J, Jiang M, Wu J, Cui F, Zhou D (2010) Enhanced bone formation in large segmental radial defects by combining adipose-derived stem cells expressing bone morphogenetic protein 2 with nHA/RHLC/PLA scaffold. Int Orthop 34(8):1341–1349
Khang D, Carpenter J, Chun YW, Pareta R, Webster TJ (2010) Nanotechnology for regenerative medicine. Biomed Microdevices 12(4):575–587
Laurencin CT, Kumbar SG, Nukavarapu SP (2009) Nanotechnology and orthopedics: a personal perspective. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 1(1):6–10
Mafi P, Hindocha S, Mafi R, Khan WS (2012) Evaluation of biological protein-based collagen scaffolds in cartilage and musculoskeletal tissue engineering–a systematic review of the literature. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 7(4):302–309
Li WJ, Cooper JA Jr, Mauck RL, Tuan RS (2006) Fabrication and characterization of six electrospun poly(alpha-hydroxy ester)-based fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater 2(4):377–385
Venugopal JR, Low S, Choon AT, Kumar AB, Ramakrishna S (2008) Nanobioengineered electrospun composite nanofibers and osteoblasts for bone regeneration. Artif Organs 32(5):388–397
Xiao X, Liu R, Huang Q (2008) Preparation and characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite/polymer composite scaffolds. J Mater Sci Mater Med 19(11):3429–3435
Price RL, Ellison K, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ (2004) Nanometer surface roughness increases select osteoblast adhesion on carbon nanofiber compacts. J Biomed Mater Res A 70(1):129–138
Bhattacharya M, Wutticharoenmongkol-Thitiwongsawet P, Hamamoto DT, Lee D, Cui T, Prasad HS, Ahmad M (2011) Bone formation on carbon nanotube composite. J Biomed Mater Res A 96(1):75–82
Horii A, Wang X, Gelain F, Zhang S (2007) Biological designer self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffolds significantly enhance osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and 3-D migration. PLoS One 2(2):e190
Marí-Buyé N, Luque T, Navajas D, Semino CE (2013) Development of a three-dimensional bone-like construct in a soft self-assembling peptide matrix. Tissue Eng Part A 19(7–8):870–881
Misawa H, Kobayashi N, Soto-Gutierrez A, Chen Y, Yoshida A, Rivas-Carrillo JD et al (2006) PuraMatrix facilitates bone regeneration in bone defects of calvaria in mice. Cell Transplant 15(10):903–910
Gu W, Wu C, Chen J, Xiao Y (2013) Nanotechnology in the targeted drug delivery for bone diseases and bone regeneration. Int J Nanomedicine 8:2305–2317
Zhang S, Uludağ H (2009) Nanoparticulate systems for growth factor delivery. Pharm Res 26:1561–1580
Hosseinkhani H, Hosseinkhani M, Khademhosseini A, Kobayashi H (2007) Bone regeneration through controlled release of bone morphogenetic protein-2 from 3-D tissue engineered nano-scaffold. J Control Release 117(3):380–386
Tabata T, Takei Y (2004) Morphogens, their identification and regulation. Development 131(4):703–712
Phillippi JA, Miller E, Weiss L, Huard J, Waggoner A, Campbell P (2008) Microenvironments engineered by inkjet bioprinting spatially direct adult stem cells toward muscle- and bone-like subpopulations. Stem Cells 26(1):127–134
Cooper GM, Miller ED, Decesare GE, Usas A, Lensie EL, Bykowski MR et al (2010) Inkjet-based biopatterning of bone morphogenetic protein-2 to spatially control calvarial bone formation. Tissue Eng Part A 16(5):1749–1759
Domachuk P, Tsioris K, Omenetto FG, Kaplan DL (2010) Bio-microfluidics: biomaterials and biomimetic designs. Adv Mater 22(2):249–260
Wang X, Wenk E, Zhang X, Meinel L, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Kaplan DL (2009) Growth factor gradients via microsphere delivery in biopolymer scaffolds for osteochondral tissue engineering. J Control Release 134(2):81–90
Pavlukhina S, Sukhishvili S (2011) Polymer assemblies for controlled delivery of bioactive molecules from surfaces. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 63(9):822–836
Shah NJ, Macdonald ML, Beben YM, Padera RF, Samuel RE, Hammond PT (2011) Tunable dual growth factor delivery from polyelectrolyte multilayer films. Biomaterials 32(26):6183–6193
Acknowledgments
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement No.278807.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Nadomir Gusić and Alan Ivković contributed equally to this work
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gusić, N., Ivković, A., VaFaye, J. et al. Nanobiotechnology and bone regeneration: a mini-review. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 38, 1877–1884 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2412-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2412-0