Skip to main content
Log in

The Impact of Biofumigation and Chemical Fumigation Methods on the Structure and Function of the Soil Microbial Community

  • Environmental Microbiology
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biofumigation (BIOF) is carried out mainly by the incorporation of brassica plant parts into the soil, and this fumigation activity has been linked to their high glucosinolate (GSL) content. GSLs are hydrolyzed by the endogenous enzyme myrosinase to release isothiocyanates (ITCs). A microcosm study was conducted to investigate the effects induced on the soil microbial community by the incorporation of broccoli residues into soil either with (BM) or without (B) added myrosinase and of chemical fumigation, either as soil application of 2-phenylethyl ITC (PITC) or metham sodium (MS). Soil microbial activity was evaluated by measuring fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis and soil respiration. Effects on the structure of the total microbial community were assessed by phospholipid fatty acid analysis, while the impact on important fungal (ascomycetes (ASC)) and bacterial (ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB)) guilds was evaluated by denaturating gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Overall, B, and to a lesser extent BM, stimulated microbial activity and biomass. The diminished effect of BM compared to B was particularly evident in fungi and Gram-negative bacteria and was attributed to rapid ITC release following the myrosinase treatment. PITC did not have a significant effect, whereas an inhibitory effect was observed in the MS-treated soil. DGGE analysis showed that the ASC community was temporarily altered by BIOF treatments and more persistently by the MS treatment, while the structure of the AOB community was not affected by the treatments. Cloning of the ASC community showed that MS application had a deleterious effect on potential plant pathogens like Fusarium, Nectria, and Cladosporium compared to BIOF treatments which did not appear to inhibit them. Our findings indicate that BIOF induces changes on the structure and function of the soil microbial community that are mostly related to microbial substrate availability changes derived from the soil amendment with fresh organic materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BIOF:

Biofumigation

GSLs:

Glucosinolates

B:

Broccoli

BM:

Broccoli + myrosinase

ITC:

Isothiocyanate

PITC:

2-phenylethyl isothiocyanate

MS:

Metham sodium

PLFA:

Phospholipid fatty acids

FAME:

Fatty acid methyl esters

DGGE:

Denaturating gradient gel electrophoresis

ASC:

Ascomycetes

AOB:

Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria

DAA:

Days after application

FDA:

Fluorescein diacetate

References

  1. Adam G, Duncan H (2001) Development of a sensitive and rapid method for the measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils. Soil Biol Biochem 33:943–951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bailey VL, Peacock AD, Smith JL, Bolton H Jr (2002) Relationships between soil microbial biomass determined by chloroform fumigation–extraction, substrate-induced respiration, and phospholipid fatty acid analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1385–1389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bending GD, Lincoln SD (1999) Characterization of volatile sulphur-containing compounds produced during decomposition of Brassica juncea tissues in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 31:695–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bending GD, Lincoln SD (2000) Inhibition of soil nitrifying bacteria communities and their activities by glucosinolate hydrolysis products. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1261–1269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berbegal M, Garcia-Jimenez J, Armengol J (2008) Effect of cauliflower residue amendments and soil solarization on Verticillium wilt control in artichoke. Plant Dis 92:595–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown PD, Morra MJ (2009) Brassicaceae tissues as inhibitors of nitrification in soil. J Agric Food Chem 57:7706–7711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang Y-J, Anwar Hussain AKM, Stephen JR, Mullens MD, White DC, Peackock A (2001) Impact of herbicides on the abundance and structure of indigenous β-subgroup ammonia-oxidizer communities in soil microcosms. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:2462–2468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Clegg CD, Lovell RDL, Hobbs PJ (2003) The impact of grassland management regime on the community structure of selected bacterial groups in soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 43:263–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen MF, Yamasaki H, Mazzola M (2005) Brassica napus seed meal soil amendment modifies microbial community structure, nitric oxide production and incidence of Rhizoctonia root rot. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1215–1227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen MF, Mazzola M (2006) Resident bacteria, nitric oxide emission and particle size modulate the effect of Brassica napus seed meal on disease incited by Rhizoctonia solani and Pythium spp. Plant Soil 286:75–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Collins HP, Alva A, Boydston RA, Cochran RI, Hamm PB, McGuire A, Riga E (2006) Soil microbial, fungal, and nematode responses to soil fumigation and cover crops under potato production. Biol Fertil Soils 42:247–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. De Cal A, Martinez-Treceno A, Salto T, Lopez-Aranda JM, Melgarejo P (2005) Effect of chemical fumigation on soil fungal communities in Spanish strawberry nurseries. Appl Soil Ecol 28:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fahey WJ, Zalcmann TA, Talalay P (2001) The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry 56:5–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Federle TW, (1986) Microbial distribution in soil-new techniques. In: Megusar F, Gantar M (Eds) Perspectives in microbial ecology. Slovene Society for Microbiology, International Symposium on Microbial Ecology IV, pp 493–498

  15. Friberg H, Edel-Herman V, Faivre C, Gautheron N, Fayolle L, Faloya V, Montfort F, Christian S (2009) Cause and duration of mustard incorporation effects on soil-borne plant pathogenic fungi. Soil Biol Biochem 41:205–2084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grinhut T, Hadar Y, Chen Y (2007) Degradation and transformation of humic substances by saprotrophic fungi: processes and mechanisms. Fung Biol Rev 21:179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ibekwe AM, Papiernik SK, Gan J, Yates SR, Yang C-H, Crowley DE (2001) Impact of fumigants on soil microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:3245–3257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ibekwe AM, Kennedy AC, Frohne PS, Papiernik SK, Yang CH, Crowley DE (2002) Microbial diversity along transect of agronomic zones. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 39:183–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Infantino A, Aragona M, Brunneti A, Laroz E, Oliva A, Porta-Puglia A (2003) Molecular and physiological characterization of Italian isolates of Pyrenochaeta lycopersici. Mycol Res 107:707–716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jukes TH, Cantor CR (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HN (ed) Mammalian protein metabolism. Academic, NY, pp 21–132

    Google Scholar 

  21. Karpouzas DG, Rousidou C, Papadopoulou KK, Bekris F, Zervakis G, Singh BK, Ehaliotis C (2009) Effect of continuous olive mill wastewater applications, in the presence and absence of N fertilization, on the structure of rhizopshere soil fungal communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 70:56–69

    Google Scholar 

  22. Karpouzas DG, Ntougias S, Iskidou E, Rousidou C, Papadopoulou KK, Zervakis G, Ehaliotis C (2010) Olive mill wastewaters affects the structure of soil bacterial communities. Appl Soil Ecol 45:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaur A, Chaudhary A, Kaur A, Choudhary R, Kaushik R (2005) Phospholipid fatty acid—a bioindicator of environmental monitoring and assessment in soil ecosystem. Curr Sci 89:1103–1112

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kirkegaard JA, Sarwar M (1998) Biofumigation potential of brassicas—I. Variation in glucosinolate profiles of diverse field-grown brassicas. Plant Soil 201:71–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kirkegaard JA, Sarwar M, Wong PTW, Mead A, Howe G, Newell M (2000) Field studies on the biofumigation of take-all by Brassica break crops. Aust J Agric Res 51:445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kowalchuk GA, Stephen JR, DeBoer W, Prosser JI, Embley TM, Woldendorp JW (1997) Analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria of the beta subdivision of the class proteobacteria in coastal sand dunes by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and sequencing of PCR-amplified 16S ribosomal DNA fragments. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:1489–1497

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kowalchuk GA, Stephen JR (2001) Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria: a model for molecular microbial ecology. Ann Rev Microbiol 55:485–529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kurola J, Salkinoja-Salonen M, Aarnio T, Hultman J, Romantschuk M (2005) Activity, diversity and population size of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in oil-contaminated landfarming soil. FEMS Microbiol Lett 250:33–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Larena I, Salazar O, González V, Julián MC, Rubio V (1999) Design of a primer for ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer with enhanced specificity for ascomycetes. J Biotechnol 75:187–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Larkin PR, Honeycut WC (2006) Effects of different 3-year cropping systems on soil microbial communities and Rhizoctonia diseases of potato. Phytopathology 96:68–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Larkin RP, Griffin ST (2007) Control of soilborne potato diseases using Brassica green manures. Crop Prot 26:1067–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lundquist EJ, Jackson LE, Scow KM, Hsu C (1999) Changes in microbial biomass and community composition, and soil carbon and nitrogen pools after incorporation of rye into three California agricultural soils. Soil Biol Biochem 31:221–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Macalady JL, Fuller ME, Scow KM (1998) Effects of metam sodium fumigation on soil microbial activity and community structure. J Environ Qual 27:54–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mahmood S, Freitag ET, Prosser IJ (2006) Comparison of PCR primer-based strategies for characterization of ammonia oxidizer communities in environmental samples. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 56:482–493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Manicci ML, Lazzeri L, Palmieri S (1997) In vitro fungitoxic activity of some glucosinolates and their enzyme-derived products toward plant pathogenic fungi. J Agric Food Chem 45:2768–2773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Matthiessen J, Shackleton MA (2005) Biofumigation: environmental impacts on the biological activity of diverse pure and plant-derived isothiocyanates. Pest Manag Sci 61:1043–1051

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Matthiessen J, Kirkegaard J (2006) Biofumigation and enhanced biodegradation: opportunity and challenge in soilborne pest and disease management. Crit Rev Plant Sci 25:235–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. McCaig AE, Embley TM, Prosser JI (1994) Molecular analysis of enrichment cultures of marine ammonia oxidisers. FEMS Microbiol Lett 120:363–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. McCaig AE, Glover LA, Prosser JI (2001) Numerical analysis of grassland bacterial community structure under different land management regimens by using 16S ribosomal DNA sequence data and denaturating gradient gel electrophoresis banding patterns. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4554–4559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mithen RF (2001) Glucosinolates and their degradation products. Adv Bot Res 35:213–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini MT, Landi L, Pietramellara G, Renella G (2003) Microbial diversity and soil functions. Eur J Soil Sci 54:655–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ntougias S, Ehaliotis C, Papadopoulou KK, Zervakis G (2006) Application of respiration and FDA hydrolysis measurements for estimating microbial activity during composting processes. Biol Fertil Soil 42:330–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ochiai N, Powelson ML, Crowe FJ, Dick RP (2008) Green manure effects on soil quality in relation to suppression of Verticillium wilt of potatoes. Biol Fertil Soil 44:1013–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Osono T, Fukasawa Y, Takeda H (2003) Roles of diverse fungi in larch needle-litter decomposition. Mycologia 95:820–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Peacock AD, Mullen MD, Ringelberg DB, Tyler DD, Hedrick DB, Gale PM, White DC (2001) Soil microbial community responses to dairy manure or ammonium nitrate applications. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1011–1019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Philips CJ, Harris D, Dollhopf SL, Gross KL, Prosser JI, Eldor AP (2000) Effects of agronomic treatments on structure and function of ammonia-oxidizing communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:5410–5418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Prosser JI, Nicol GW (2008) Relative contributions of archaea and bacteria to aerobic ammonia oxidation in the environment. Environ Microbiol 10:2931–2941

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Purkhold U, Pommerening-Roser A, Juretschko S, Schmid MC, Koops HP, Wagner M (2003) Phylogeny of all recognized species of ammonia oxidizers based on comparative 16S rRNA and amoA sequence analysis: implications for molecular diversity surveys. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:5368–5382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rumberger A, Marschner P (2003) 2-Phenylethylisothiocyanate concentration and microbial community composition in the rhizosphere of canola. Soil Biol Biochem 35:445–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molec Biol Evol 4:406–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Sánchez-Monedero MA, Mondini C, Cayuela L, Roig A, Contin M, De Nobili M (2008) Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis, respiration and microbial biomass in freshly amended soils. Biol Fertil Soils 44:885–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sinha AP, Agnihotri VP, Singh V (1979) Effect of soil fumigation with vapam on the dynamics of soil microflora and their related biochemical activity. Plant Soil 53:89–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Smith BJ, Kirkegaard JA (2002) In-vitro inhibition of soil microorganisms by 2-phenyl ethyl isothiocyanate. Plant Pathol 51:585–593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Son Y, Seo KY, Kim RH, Kim J (2006) Soil respiration and FDA hydrolysis following conversion of abandoned agricultural lands to natural vegetation in central Korean. J Plant Biol 49:231–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Spyrou IM, Karpouzas DG, Menkissoglu-Spiroudi U (2009) Do botanical pesticides alter the structure of the soil microbial community. Microb Ecol 58:715–727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tu C, Ristaino BJ, Hu S (2006) Soil microbial biomass and activity in organic tomato farming systems: effect of organic inputs and straw mulching. Soil Biol Biochem 38:247–255

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Viebahn M, Veenman C, Wernars K, van Loon LC, Smit E, Bakker PAHM (2005) Assessment of differences in ascomycete communities in the rhizosphere of field-grown wheat and potato. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53:245–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Wang G, Xu Y, Jin J, Liu J, Zhang Q, Liu X (2009) Effect of soil type and soybean genotype on fungal community in soybean rhizosphere during reproductive growth stages. Plant Soil 144:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Webster G, Embley TM, Prosser JI (2002) Grassland management regimens reduce small-scale heterogeneity and species diversity of [beta]-proteobacterial ammonia oxidizer populations. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:20–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wittstock U, Halkier BA (2002) Glucosinolate research in the Arabidopsis era. Trends Plant Sci 7:263–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Zelenev VV, van Bruggen AHC, Semenov AM (2005) Short-term wavelike dynamics of bacterial populations in response to nutrient input from fresh plant residues. Microb Ecol 49:83–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Research Promotion Foundation in the Republic of Cyprus within the frame of the project BIOFUME 0506/07.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Constantinos Ehaliotis or Dimitrios G. Karpouzas.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 60 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Omirou, M., Rousidou, C., Bekris, F. et al. The Impact of Biofumigation and Chemical Fumigation Methods on the Structure and Function of the Soil Microbial Community. Microb Ecol 61, 201–213 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9740-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9740-4

Keywords

Navigation