Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The inflorescence: Introduction

  • Interpreting Botanical Progress
  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  • Barfod, A. 1988. Inflorescence morphology of some South American Anacardiaceae and the possible phylogenetic trends. Nord. J. Bot. 8: 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. 1955. Histogenesis of the inflorescence and flower ofTriticum aeslivum. Austral. J. Bot. 3: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1957a. Floral histogenesis in the Monocotyledons. I. The Gramineae. Austral. J. Bot. 5: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1957b. Floral histogenesis in the Monocotyledons. II. The Cyperaceae. Austral. J. Bot. 5: 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1958. Floral histogenesis in the Monocotyledons. III. The Juncaceae. Austral. J. Bot. 6: 285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1960. Floral histogenesis in the Monocotyledons. IV. The Liliaceae. Austral. J. Bot. 8: 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, G. 1892. Handbook of the British Flora. Ed. 6, rev. by J. D. Hooker. L. Reeve, London.

  • Bernier, G. 1962. Evolution of the apical meristem inSinapis alba (long-day plant) in long days, in short days, and during the transfer from short days to long days. Caryologia 15: 303–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boke, N. H. 1947. Development of the adult shoot apex and floral initiation inVinca rosea. Amer. J. Bot. 34: 433–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, B. G. &L. A. S. Johnson. 1979. Evolution in the Myrtaceae—Evidence from inflorescence structure. Proc. Linn. Soc. New South Wales 102: 157–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, W. C. 1977. The Piperales and the Monocots: Alternative hypotheses for the origin of mono-cotyledonous flowers. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 43: 345–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derstine, K. S. &S. C. Tucker. 1991. Organ initiation and development of inflorescences and flowers ofAcacia baileyana. Amer. J. Bot. 78: 816–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, A. W. &S. C. Tucker. 1996a. Inflorescence ontogeny and floral organogenesis in Grevilleoideae (Proteaceae), with emphasis on the nature of the flower pairs. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 157: 341–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1996b. Comparative floral ontogenies among Persoonioideae includingBellendena (Proteaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 83: 1528–1555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eames, A. J. 1961. Morphology of the angiosperms. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, A. W. 1878. Blüthendiagramme. Pts. 1,2. W. Engelmann, Leipzig. Reprinted 1954, O. Koeltz, Eppenhain.

  • Endress, P. K. 1987. The Chloranthaceae: Reproductive structures and phylogenetic position. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 109: 153–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. Cercidiphyllaceae. Pp. 250–252in K. Kubitski, J. G. Rohwer & V. Bittrich (eds.), The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. II. Flowering plants: Dicotyledons. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995. Major evolutionary traits of monocot flowers. Pp. 43–79in P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler & C. J. Humphries (eds.), Monocotyledons: Systematics and evolution. Vol. 1. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996. Structure and function of female and bisexual organ complexes in Gnetales. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 157:(Suppl.): S113-S125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esau, K. 1965. Plant anatomy. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. M. S. &M. K. Barton. 1997. Genetics of angiosperm shoot apical meristem development. Annual Rev. Pl. Phys., Molec. Biol. 48: 673–701.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. B. &H. E. Moore Jr. 1977. Multiple inflorescences in palms (Arecaceae): Their development and significance. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 98: 573–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, A. S. 1941. Comparative studies on the structure of the shoot apex in seed plants. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 68: 339–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijters, D. 1978. Principles of simulation of inflorescence development. Ann. Bot. 42: 549–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, E. M., Jr. 1954. The shoot apex in angiosperms. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 20: 477–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &G. E. Corson Jr. 1971. The shoot apex in seed plants. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 37: 143–229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — &K. D. Stewart. 1965. Ultrastructure of vegetative and reproductive apices ofChenopodium album. Science 149: 75–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • — &H. B. Tepper. 1961. Ontogeny of the inflorescence inChenopodium album. Amer. J. Bot. 48: 657–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1962a. Histochemical and autoradiographic studies of floral induction inChenopodium album. Amer. J. Bot. 49: 706–714.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1962b. Ontogenetic and histochemical changes in the vegetative shoot tip ofChenopodium album. Amer. J. Bot. 49: 902–911.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gottsberger, G. 1974. The structure and function of the primitive angiosperm flower—A discussion. Acta Bot. Neerl. 23: 461–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire, V. 1938. La morphogénese et l’autonomie de l’appareil floral. I. Le carpelle. Cellule 47: 287–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, J. W. 1992. Metamerism, heterochrony, and inflorescence morphology of thePithecellobium- complex (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae: Ingeae). Brittonia 44: 140–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995. Generic relationships of Mimosoideae tribe Ingeae, with emphasis on the New WorldPithecellobium-complex. Pp. 101–121in M. D. Crisp & J. J. Doyle (eds.), Advances in legume systematics 7: Phylogeny. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, W. 1963. Weitere Untersuchungen zur Organisation des Sproszscheitelmeristems: Der Vegetionspunkt traubiger Floreszenzen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 82: 273–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallé, F. &R. A. A. Oldeman. 1970. Essai sur l’architecture et la dynamique de croissance des arbres tropicaux. Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, E. M. 1994. Developmental evidence for the derivation of syncephalia inLagascea (Heliantheae; Asteraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 81: 1139–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1995. Inflorescence and floral ontogeny in Asteraceae: A synthesis of historical and currentconcepts. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 61 (2,3): 93–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,S. C. Tucker &L. E. Urbatsch. 1991. Floral initiation and early development inErigeron philadelphicus (Asteraceae). Amer. J. Bot. 78: 108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, V. H. (ed.). 1985. Flowering plants of the world. Mayflower Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horridge, J. S., J. E. Pegler &P. T. Atkey. 1985. A study of leaf and inflorescence initiation and development inChrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. cv. Snowdon by scanning electron microscopy. Rep. Glasshouse Crops Research Institute 1985: 170–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huijser, P., J. Klein, W.-E. Lonnig, H. Meijer, H. Saedler &H. Sommer. 1992. Bracteomania, an inflorescence anomaly, is caused by the loss of function of the MADS-box gene squamosa inAntirrhinum majus. EMBO Jour. 11: 1239–1249.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, R. B. 1970. Evolution and adaptation of inflorescences in the Hydrocharitaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 57: 708–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchoff, B. K. 1986. Inflorescence structure and development in the Zingiberales:Thalia geniculata (Marantaceae). Canad. J. Bot. 64: 859–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988. Inflorescence and flower development inCostus scaber (Costaceae). Canad. J. Bot. 66: 339–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990. The phyllotaxy ofCostus (Costaceae). Bot. Gaz. 15: 88–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997. Inflorescence and flower development in the Hedychieae (Zingiberaceae):Hedychium. Canad. J. Bot. 75: 581–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998. Inflorescence and flower development in the Hedychieae (Zingiberaceae):Scaphochlamys kunstleri. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 159: 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &H. Kunze. 1995. Inflorescence and floral development inOrchidantha maxillarioides (Lowiaceae). Int. J. PL Sci. 156: 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuijt, J. I. 1978. Inflorescence morphology of Loranthaceae—An evolutionary synthesis. Blumea 27:1–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, A. D. 1971. Floral development in the “Amentiferae.” Ph.D. diss., McGill University.

  • —. 1978. Organogenesis of the male inflorescence and flowers ofMyrica esculenta. Canad. J. Bot. 56: 2415–2423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1979a. Development of the female flower and gynecandrous partial inflorescenceof Myrica californica. Canad. J. Bot. 57: 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1979b. Inception of the cupuleof Quercus macrocarpa andFagus grandifolia. Canad. J. Bot. 57:1777–1782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1980. Organogenesis of the female reproductive structure ofMyrica pensylvanica. Canad. J. Bot. 58: 2001–2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molder, M. &J. N. Owens. 1973. Ontogeny and histochemistry of the intermediate and reproductive apices ofCosmos bipinnatus var. Sensation in response to gibberellin A3 and photoperiod. Canad. J. Bot. 51:535–555.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H. E., Jr. &N. W. Uhl. 1982. Major trends of evolution in palms. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 48: 1–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nougarède, A., G. Bernier &P. Rondet. 1964. Comportement du méristeme apical duPerilla nankinensis, en relation avec les conditions photopériodiques. Rev. Gén. Bot. 71: 205–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankhurst, R. J. 1994. The representation of shape and form by computer. Pages 153–168in D. S. Ingram & A. Hudson (eds), Shape and form in plants and fungi: Papers presented at a Linnean Society regional meeting held at the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh. Linnean Society of London and Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, J. 1914. The evolution of the inflorescence. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 42: 511–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipson, W. R. 1946. Studies in the development of the inflorescence. I. The capitulum ofBellis perennis. Ann. Bot. (London) 10: 257–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1947a. Some observations on the apical meristem of leafy and flowering shoots. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 53: 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1947b. Studies in the development of the inflorescence. II. The capitula ofSuccisa pratensis andDipsacus fullonum. Ann. Bot. (London) 11: 285–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1947c. Studies in the development of the inflorescence. III. The thyrse ofValeriana officinalis. Ann. Bot. (London) 11: 409–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1948. Studies in the development of the inflorescence. IV. The capitula ofHieraceum boreale andDahlia gracilis. Ann. Bot. (London) 12: 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1949. The ontogeny of the shoot apex in dicotyledons. Biol. Rev. (Cambridge) 24: 21–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Popham, R. A. 1964. Developmental studies of flowering. Pp. 138–156in Meristems and differentiation. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology 16. Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &A. P. Chan. 1952. Origin and development of the receptacle ofChrysanthemum morifolium. Amer. J. Bot. 39: 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posluszny, U. 1981. Unicarpellate floral development inPotamogeton zosteriformis. Canad. J. Bot. 59: 495–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1983. Re-evaluation of certain key relationships in the Alismatidae: Floral organogenesis ofScheuchzeria palustris (Scheuchzeriaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 70: 925–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. Evolution of the helobial flower. Aquatic Bot. 44: 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &R. Sattler. 1973. Floral development ofPotamogeton densus. Canad. J. Bot. 51: 647–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1974a. Floral developmentof Potamogeton richardsonii. Amer. J. Bot. 61: 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1974b. Floral development ofRuppia maritima var.maritima. Canad. J. Bot. 52: 1607–1612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1976. Floral development ofZannichellia palustris. Canad. J. Bot. 54: 651–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &P. B. Tomlinson. 1977. Morphology and development of floral shoots and organs in certain Zannichelliaceae. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 75: 21–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez-Domenech, J. I. &S. C. Tucker. 1989. Phylogenetic implications of inflorescence and floral ontogenyof Mimosa strigillosa. Amer. J. Bot. 76: 1583–1593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauh, W. &H. Reznik. 1953. Histogenetische Untersuchungen an Blüten- und Infloreszenzachsen. II. Die Histogenese der Achsenköpfchenformiger Inflorescenzen. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 29:233–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickett, H. W. 1944. The classification of inflorescences. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 10: 183–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1955. Materials for a dictionary of botanical terms. III. Inflorescences. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 82: 419–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, R. 1965. Perianth developmentof Potamogeton richardsonii. Amer. J. Bot. 52: 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1973. Organogenesis of flowers. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, S. &D. R. Meeks-Wagner. 1991. A mutation in theArabidopsis TFL1 gene affects inflorescence meristem development. Pl. Cell 3: 877–892.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skipworth, J. P. &W. R. Philipson. 1966. The cortical vascular system and the interpretation of theMagnolia flower. Phytomorphology 16: 463–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L., Jr. 1973. Evolutionary trends in the inflorescence of angiosperms. Flora 162:501–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1974. Flowering plants: Evolution above the species level. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy, B. G. L. &I. W. Bailey. 1949. The morphology and relationships ofCercidiphyllum. J. Arnold Arbor. 30: 187–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, P. B. 1983. Tree architecture. Amer. Sci. 71:141–149.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Troll, W. 1964. Die Infloreszenzen, Typologie um Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers. Vol. 1. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1969. Die Infloreszenzen, Typologie um Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers. Vol. 2, Part 1. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, S. C. 1959. Ontogeny of the inflorescence and the flower inDrimys wintert var.chilensis. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 30: 257–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1960. Ontogeny of the floral apex ofMichelia fuscata. Amer. J. Bot. 47: 266–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1980. Inflorescence and flower development in the Piperaceae. I.Peperomia. Amer. J. Bot. 67: 686–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1981. Inflorescence and floral development inHouttuynia cordata (Saururaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 68: 1017–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1982. Inflorescence and flower development in the Piperaceae. II Inflorescence development ofPiper. Amer. J. Bot. 69: 743–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987. Pseudoracemes in papilionoid legumes: Their nature, development, and variation. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 95: 181–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988. Heteromorphic flower development inNeptunia pubescens (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae). Amer. J. Bot. 75: 205–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991. Helical floral organogenesis inGleditsia, a primitive caesalpinioid legume. Amer. J. Bot. 78:1130–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998. Floral ontogeny in legume generaPetalostylis, Labichea, andDialium (Caesalpinioideae: Cassieae): A series in floral reduction. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 184–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &A. J. Bourland. 1994. Ontogeny of staminate and carpellate flowers ofSchisandra glabra (Schisandra). Pl. Syst. & Evol., Suppl. 8: 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl, N. W. 1972. Inflorescence and flower structure inNypa fruticans (Palmae). Amer. J. Bot. 59: 729–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1976. Developmental studies inPtychosperma (Palmae). I. The inflorescence and the flower cluster. Amer. J. Bot. 63: 82–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &J. Dransfield. 1984. Development of the inflorescence, androecium, and gynoecium with reference to palms. Pp. 397–449in R. W. White & W. C. Dickison (eds.), Contemporary problems in plant anatomy. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &H. E. Moore Jr. 1978. The structure of the acervulus, the flower cluster of Chamaedoroid palms. Amer. J. Bot. 65: 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. 1973. Die Struktur der paarblütigen Partialfloreszenzen der Gesneriaceen und bestimmter Scrophulariaceen. Beirr. Biol. Pflanzen 49: 429–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1978. Transitions from pair-flowered to normal cymes in Gesneriaceae. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 36: 355–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weberling, F. 1965. Typology of inflorescences. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 59: 215–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988. The architecture of inflorescences in the Myrtales. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 75:226–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989. Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Transl. by R. J. Pankhurst. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, R. 1982. Inflorescence architecture: How flower number, arrangement, and phenology affect pollination and fruit-set. Amer. J. Bot. 69: 585–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yahel, H., A. Kadman-Zahavi &Y. Tsukamoto. 1985.Chrysanthemum (perennial species). Pp. 258–264in A. H. Halevy (ed.), CRC Handbook of flowering. Vol. 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology (Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology), University of California, 93106, Santa Barbara, CA, USA

    Shirley C. Tucker

  2. Royal Botanic Gardens, Melbourne Birdwood Avenue, 3141, South Yarra, Victoria, Australia

    James Grimes

Authors
  1. Shirley C. Tucker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James Grimes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tucker, S.C., Grimes, J. The inflorescence: Introduction. Bot. Rev 65, 303–316 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857752

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857752

Keywords

Search

Navigation