Summary
The Piperales (in a narrow sense) possess a suite of characters which are common among monocots but rare or uncommon among dicots. The concordance of these characters in the Piperales argues against convergence and that the Piperales, like the Nymphaeales, are more closely related to the monocots than other living dicots. Because the Piperales, Arales, and some Najadales exhibit relationships that span the most profound dichotomy in angiosperms, it is argued that these plants represent very ancient lineages. A comparative overview of their flowers has led to a hypothesis suggesting that simple flowers, similar to those of the Chloranthaceae, came together by the loss of internodes to form the three-parted flowers of the Piperales and many monocots. To account for the commonly seen arrangements of floral parts in these plants it is postulated that the ancestral simple flowers had a single small bract, two stamens, and a single adaxial pistil. Evidence from the Lactoridaceae, Saururaceae, Potamogetonaceae, Alismatales, and others is cited in support of this hypothesis. Evidence for the later development of the corolla comes from ontogenetic studies in the Alismatales. Some flowers in the Juncaginaceae and Cyperaceae suggest that unisexual simple flowers came together to form three-parted flowers in other lineages, such as the Liliales. The present theory and the strobilus hypothesis are contrasted and discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Abbe, E. C. 1972. The inflorescence and flower in maleMyrica esculenta var.farquhariana. Bot. Gaz. (Crawfordsville)133: 206–213.
Agrawal, J. S. 1952. Embryology ofLilaea subulata with a discussion of its systematic position. Phytomorphology2: 15–29.
Airy Shaw, H. K. 1973. A dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns, by J. C. Willis. 8th edition. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1245 pp.
Aston, H. I. 1973. Aquatic plants of Australia. Melbourne Univ. Press, Carlton. 368 pp.
Balfour, E. 1957. The development of the vascular system inMacropiper excelsa, 1. The embryo and the seedling. Phytomorphology7: 354–364.
Barnard, C. 1958. Floral histogenesis in the monocotyledons III. The Juncaceae. Austral. J. Bot.6: 285–298.
—. 1961. The interpretation of the angiosperm flower. Austral. J. Sci.24: 64–72.
Bate-Smith, E. C. 1962. The phenolic constituents of plants and their taxonomic significance. I. Dicotyledons. J. Linn. Soc. Bot.58: 95–173.
Behnke, H. D. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: Ultrastructure. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62: 647–663.
Bentham, G. &J. D. Hooker. 1883. Genera Plantarum, vol. 3. Reeve & Co., London. 1258 pp.
Bessey, C. E. 1915. The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.2: 109–164.
Burger, W. 1972. Evolutionary trends in the Central American species ofPiper. Brittonia24: 356–362.
Carlquist, S. 1964. Morphology and relationship of Lactoridaceae. Aliso5: 421–435.
—. 1969. Toward acceptable evolutionary interpretations in floral anatomy. Phytomorphology19: 332–362.
Celakovsky, L. J. 1897. Ueber den phylogenetischen Entwicklungsgang der Blüthe und über den Ursprung der Blumenkrone. 1er. Theil. Sitzungsber. Königl. Böhm. Ges. Wiss. Prag. Math.-Naturwiss. Cl.1896: 1–91.
—. 1901. Ueber den phylogenetischen Entwicklungs gang der Blüthe und über den Ursprung der Blumenkrone. 2er. Theil Sitzungsber. Königl. Böhm. Ges. Wiss. Prag. Math.-Naturwiss. Cl.1900: 1–221.
Chanda, S. 1966. On the pollen morphology of the Centrolepidaceae, Restionaceae, and Flagellariaceae with special reference to taxonomy. Grana Palynol.6: 355–415.
Charlton, W. A. &A. Ahmed. 1973. Studies in the Alismataceae IV. Developmental morphology ofRanalisma humile and comparisons with two members of the Butomaceae,Hydrocleis nymphoides andButomus umbellatus. Canad. J. Bot.51: 899–910.
Cheadle, V. I. 1942. The occurrence and types of vessels in the various organs of the plant in the Monocotyledonae. Amer. J. Bot.29: 441–450.
Cheadle, V. I. &H. Kosakai. 1974. A note on vessels in Hypolytreae of Cyperaceae. Blumea22: 149–150.
—. 1975. Vessels in Juncales. II. Centrolepidaceae and Restionaceae. Amer. J. Bot.62: 1017–1026.
Clarke, C. B. 1909. Illustrations of Cyperaceae. Williams & Norgate, London. 144 tab.
Constance, L. 1953. The systematics of the Angiosperms.In: A Century of Progress in the Natural Sciences. Calif. Acad. Sci., San Francisco. 405–483.
Cordemoy, J. de. 1863. Monographie du groupe des Chloranthacees. Adansonia3: 280–310.
Corner, E. J. H. 1946. Centrifugal Stamens. J. Arnold Arbor.27: 423–437.
Croizat, L. 1964. Thoughts on high systematics, phylogeny and floral morphology, with a note on the Angiospermae. Candollea19: 17–96.
Croizat, L. 1973. Les Euphorbiacees vues en elles-memes et dans leurs rapports envers l’angiospermie en general. Mem. Soc. Brot.23: 5–207.
Cronquist, A. 1968. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. Houghton Mifflin, Boston. 396 pp.
—. 1969a. On the relation between taxonomy and evolution. Taxon18: 177–187.
—. 1969b. Broad features of the system of Angiosperms. Taxon18: 188–193.
-. 1974. Thoughts on the origin of the Monocotyledons. Birbal Sahni Inst. Palaeobot. Spec. Publ. 1: 19–24.
Cutter, E. G. 1959. On a theory of phyllotaxis and histogenesis. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc.34: 243–263.
Dahlgren, R. 1975. A system of classification of the angiosperms to be used to demonstrate the distribution of characters. Bot. Not.128: 119–147.
Davis, G. L. 1966. Systematic Embryology of the Angiosperms. John Wiley, New York. 528 pp.
Den Hartog, C. 1957. Alismataceae. Fl. Males. Bull. Ser. 1,5: 317–334.
Deyl, M. 1955. The evolution of the plants and the taxonomy of Monocotyledons. Sborn. Nár. Mus. v Praze, Řada B, Přir. Vědy 11 B, no. 6. (Bot. no. 3) 1–143.
Dilcher, D. L., W. L. Crepet, &C. D. Beeker. 1976. Reproductive and vegetative morphology of a cretaceous angiosperm. Science191: 854–856.
Doyle, J. A. 1969. Cretaceous angiosperm pollen of the Atlantic Coastal Plain and its evolutionary significance. J. Arnold Arbor.50: 1–35.
—. 1973. Fossil evidence on early evolution of the monocotyledons. Quart. Rev. Biol.48: 399–413.
Doyle, J. A. &L. J. Hickey. 1976. Pollen and leaves from the mid-cretaceous Potomac group and their bearing on early angiosperm evolution.In: Origin and Early Evolution of Angiosperms, ed. by C. B. Beck. Columbia Univ. Press, New York. 139–206.
Eames, A. J. 1961. Morphology of the Angiosperms. McGraw-Hill, New York. 518 pp.
Edwards, J. G. 1920. Flower and seed ofHedyosmum nutans. Bot. Gaz. (Crawfordsville)70: 409–424.
Ehrenberg, L. 1945. Zur kenntnis der Homologieverhältnisse in der angiospermen Blüte. Bot. Not.1945: 438–444.
Ehrendorfer, F., F. Krendl, E. Habeier, &W. Sauer. 1968. Chromosome numbers and evolution in primitive angiosperms. Taxon17: 337–353.
Eichler, A. W. 1875. Bluthendiagramme, 1er Theil. Engelmann, Leipzig. (reprinted O. Koeltz, Eppenhain. 1954) 348 pp.
—. 1878. Bluthendiagramme, 2er Theil. Engelmann, Leipzig. (reprinted O. Koeltz, Eppenhain. 1954) 575 pp.
Emberger, L. 1951. L’origine de la fleur. Experientia7: 161–168.
Emberger, L. inM. Chadefaud &L. Emberger. 1960. Traite de Botanique (Systematique). Tome 2, Les Végétaux Vasculaires. Masson et Cie. Edit., Paris. 1539 pp.
Endress, P. K. 1971. Bau der weiblichen Blüten vonHedyosmum mexicanum Cordemoy (Chloranthaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst.91: 39–60.
—. 1973. Arils and aril-like structures in woody Ranales. New Phytol.72: 1159–1171.
—. 1975. Nachbarliche Formbeziehungen mit Hüllfunktion im Infloreszenz- und Blütenbereich. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.96: 1–44.
Engler, A. 1926.In: Engler, A. & K. Prantl, Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd. edition, vol. 14a. Engelmann, Leipzig. 167 pp.
Erdtman, G. 1952. Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy, Angiosperms. Almquist & Wiksell, Stockholm 539 pp.
Eyde, R. H. 1975. The foliar theory of the flower. Amer. Sci.63: 430–437.
Eyde, R., D. H. Nicolson, &P. Sherwin. 1967. A survey of floral anatomy in Araceae. Amer. J. Bot.54: 478–497.
Gamerro, J. C. 1968. Observaciones sobre la biologia floral y morfologia de la PotamogetonaceaRuppia cirrhosa (Peteg.) Grande (=R. spiralis L. ex Dum.). Darwiniana14: 575–608.
Gibbs, R. D. 1974. Chemotaxonomy of Flowering Plants, 4 vols. McGill-Queen’s Univ. Press, Montreal. 2372 pp.
Gifford, E. M., Jr. &G. E. Corson, Jr. 1971. The shoot apex in seed plants. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster)37: 143–229.
Gottsberger, G. 1970. Beiträge zur Biologie von Annonaceen-Blüten. Oesterr. Bot. Z.118: 237–279.
—. 1974. The structure and function of the primitive Angiosperm flower —a discussion. Acta. Bot. Neerl.23: 461–471.
Guillarmod, A. J. &W. Marais. 1972. A new species ofAponogeton (Aponogetonaceae). Kew Bull.27: 563–565.
Guttenberg, H. v. &R. Muller-Schroder. 1958. Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung des Embryos und der Keimpflanze vonNuphar luteum Smith. Planta51: 481–510.
Haines, R. &K. A. Lye. 1975. Seedlings of Nymphaeaceae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.70: 255–265.
Hamann, U. 1962. Beitrag zur Embryologie der Centrolepidaceae mit Bemerkungen über den Bau der Blüten und Blütenstande und die systematische Stellung der Familie. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.75: 153–171.
—. 1965. Neue Untersuchungen zur Embryologie und Systematik der Centrolepidaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.96: 154–191.
Harling, G. 1946. Studien über den Blütenbau und die Embryologie der Familie Cyclanthaceae. Svensk. Bot. Tidskr.40: 257–272.
Hegnauer, R. 1963. Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. Bd. 2, Chemische Reihe Bd. 16. Birkhauser, Basel & Stuttgart. 540 pp.
—. 1964. Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. Bd. 3, Chemische Reihe Bd. 18. Birkhauser, Basel & Stuttgart. 743 pp.
—. 1971. Pflanzenstoffe und Pflanzensystematik. Naturwiss. Wochenschr.58: 585–598.
—. 1973. Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. Bd. 6, Chemische Reihe Bd. 21. Birkhauser, Basel & Stuttgart. 882 pp.
Heinsbroek, P. G. &W. A. van Neel. 1969. Note on the bearing of the pattern of vascular bundles on the morphology of the stamens ofVictoria ama- zonica (Poepp.) Sowerby. Proc. Koninkl. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch.72: 431–444.
Hickey, L. J. &J. A. Wolfe. 1975. The bases of Angiosperm phytogeny: vegetative morphology. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.62: 538–589.
Hiepko, P. 1965. Vergleichend-morphologische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen über das Perianth bei den Polycarpicae. I. und II. Teil. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.84: 359–508.
—. 1966. Das Blütendiagram vonDrimys winteri J. R. et G. Forst. (Winteraceae). Willdenowia4: 221–226.
Hill, A. W. 1906. The morphology and seedling structure of the geophilous species ofPeperomia, together with some views on the origin of monocotyledons. Ann. Bot. (London)20: 395–427.
—. 1938. The monocotylous seedlings of certain dicotyledons. With special reference to the Gesneriaceae. Ann. Bot. (London) n.s.2: 127–143.
Hoffstadt, R. E. 1916. The vascular anatomy ofPiper methysticum. Bot. Gaz. (Crawfordsville)62: 115–132.
Holm, T. 1905.Anemopsis californica (Nutt.) H. & A., an anatomical study. Amer. J. Sci. ser. 4,19: 76–82.
—. 1926.Saururus cernuus, a morphological study. Amer. J. Sci. ser. 5,12: 162–168.
Holttum, R. E. 1948. The spikelet in Cyperaceae. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster)14: 525–541.
Hooker, J. D. 1886. Flora of British India. vol. 5 (part 13). Reeve & Co., London. 910 pp.
Howard, R. A. 1970. Some observations on the nodes of woody plants with special reference to the problem of the ‘split lateral’ versus the ‘common gap’.In: New Research in Plant Anatomy, edited by N. K. B. Robson, D. F. Cutter, & M. Gregory. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.63, suppl. 1: 195–214.
Hughes, N. F. 1976. Palaeobiology of Angiosperm Origins. Problems of Mesozoic seed-plant evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, London. 242 pp.
Hutchinson, J. 1973. The Families of Flowering Plants. 3rd edition. Oxford Univ. Press, London. 968 pp.
Ihlenfeldt, H.-D. 1960. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche, morphologische und systematische Untersuchungen anMesembryanthemum. Feddes Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni. Veg.63: 1–104.
Johow, F. 1896. Estudios sobre la Flora de las Islas de Juan Fernandez. Imp. Cervantes, Santiago. 287 pp.
Kaplan, D. R. 1973. The problem of leaf morphology and evolution in the monocotyledons. Quart. Rev. Biol.48: 437–457.
Kapp, R. O. 1969. How to Know Pollen and Spores. W. C. Brown, Dubuque, 249 pp.
Kaul, R. B. 1965. Development and vasculature of the androecium in the Butomaceae. Abstract. Amer. J. Bot.52: 624.
—. 1967a. Development and vasculature of the flowers ofLophotocarpus calycinus andSagittaria latifolia. Amer. J. Bot.54: 914–920.
—. 1967b. Ontogeny and anatomy of the flower ofLimnocharis flava (Butomaceae). Amer. J. Bot.54: 1223–1230.
—. 1968a. Floral development and vasculature inHydrocleis nymphoides (Butomaceae). Amer. J. Bot.55: 236–242.
—. 1968b. Floral morphology and phylogeny in the Hydrocharitaceae. Phytomorphology18: 13–35.
—. 1976. Conduplicate and specialized carpels in Alismatales. Amer. J. Bot.63: 175–182.
Kern, J. H. 1962. New look at some Cyperaceae mainly from the tropical stand-point. Advancem. Sci.19(78): 141–148.
Kosakai, H., M. F. Moseley, Jr. &V. I. Cheadle. 1970. Morphological studies of Nymphaeaceae. V. DoesNelumbo have vessels? Amer. J. Bot.57: 487–494.
Krassilov, V. 1973. Mesozoic plants and the problem of angiosperm ancestry. Lethaia6: 163–178.
Kubitzki, K. 1972. Probleme der Grossystematik der Blütenpflanzen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.85: 259–277.
Kubitzki, K. &N. Resnik. 1966. Flavonoid-Muster der Polycarpicae als systematisches Merkmal. 1. Ubersicht über die Familien. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen42: 445–470.
Kuprianova, L. A. 1967. Palynological data for the history of the Chloranthaceae. Pollen et Spores9: 95–100.
Lawton, I. R. S. &J. R. Lawton. 1967. The morphology of the dormant embryo and young seedling ofDioscorea from Nigeria. Proc. Linn. Soc. London178: 153–159.
Leinfellner, W. 1956. Die blattartig flachen Staubblätter und ihre gestaltlichen Beziehungen zum Bautypus des Angiospermen-Staubblattes. Oesterr. Bot. Z.103: 246–290.
—. 1963. Das Perigon der Liliaceen ist staminaler Herkunft. Oesterr. Bot. Z.110: 448–467.
Leins, P. 1971. Das Androecium der Dikotylen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.84: 191–193.
—. 1975. Die Beziehungen zwischen multistaminaten und einfachen Androeceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.96: 231–237.
Leins, P. &P. Stadler. 1973. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen am Androecium der Alismatales. Oesterr. Bot. Z.121: 51–63.
Leppik, E. E. 1963. Reconstruction of a CretaceousMagnolia flower. Advanc. Front. Plant Sci.4: 74–94.
—. 1968. Morphogenetic classification of flower types. Phytomorphology18: 451–466.
—. 1971. Palaeontological evidence on the morphogenic development of flower types. Phytomorphology21: 164–174.
—. 1972. Origin and evolution of bilateral symmetry in flowers. Evol. Biol.5: 49–85.
Lorougnon, G. 1973. Le vecteur pollinique chez lesMapania et lesHypolytrum, Cyperacees du sous-bois des forets tropicals ombrophiles. Bull. Jard. Bot. Etat.43: 33–36.
Lotsy, J. P. 1911. Vorträge über Botanische Stammesgeschichte III. Cormophyta-Siphonogama. (not seen). Jena.
Macdonald, A. D. 1974. Theoretical problems of interpreting floral organogenesis ofLaportea canadensis. Canad. J. Bot.52: 639–644.
Macdonald, A. D. &R. Sattler. 1973. Floral development ofMyrica gale and the controversy over floral concepts. Canad. J. Bot.52: 1965–1976.
McLaughlin, R. P. 1933. Systematic anatomy of the woods of the Magnoliales. Trop. Woods34: 3–37.
Maheshwari, P. &R. N. Kapil. 1966. Some Indian contributions to the embryology of angiosperms. Phytomorphology16: 239–291.
Majumdar, G. P. &P. Pal. 1961. Developmental studies: VI. The morphology of the so-called stipule ofPiper (Piperaceae) from a comparative ontogenetical study of this structure inPiper betle, P. longum, P. nigrum, P. ornatum and two other species ofPiper and the morphology of the leaf-sheath ofScindapsus officinalis (Araceae). Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India, pt. B: Biol. Sci.27: 26–39.
Markgraf, F. 1936. Blütenbau und Verwandtschaft bei den einfachsten Helobiae. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.54: 191–229.
Mattfeld, J. 1935. Zur Morphologie und Systematik der Cyperaceae. Proc. Int. Bot. Cong. Amsterdam, 322–330.
—. 1938. Das morphologische Wesen und die phylogenetische Bedeutung der Blumenblatter. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.56: 86–116.
Maze, J., L. R. Böhm, &C. E. Beil. 1972. Studies on the relationships and evolution of supraspecific taxa utilizing developmental data. 1.Stipa lernmonii (Gramineae). Canad. J. Bot.50: 2327–2352.
Maze, J., N. G. Dengler, &L. R. Bohm. 1971. Comparative floret development inStipa tortilis andOryzopsis miliaceae (Gramineae). Bot. Gaz. (Crawfordsville)132: 273–298.
Meeuse, A. D. J. 1971. Interpretative gynoecial morphology of the Lactoridaceae and the Winteraceae —a reassessment. Acta Bot. Need.20: 221–238.
—. 1972. Facts and fiction in floral morphology with special reference to the Polycarpicae. 1, 2, 3. Acta Bot. Neerl.21: 113–127, 235–252, 351–365.
—. 1974. Taxonomic affinities between Piperales and Polycarpicae and their implications in interpretative floral morphology. Advances Plant Morph.1972: 3–27.
—. 1975a. Aspects of the evolution of the monocotyledons. Acta Bot. Neerl.24: 421–436.
—. 1975b. Interpretative floral morphology of the Cyperaceae on the basis of the Anthoid concept. Acta Bot. Neerl.24: 291–304.
—. 1975c. Floral evolution as the key to Angiosperm descent. Acta Bot. Indica3: 1–18.
Melchior, H., editor. 1964. Engler’s Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, 12th edition, vol. 2. Geb. Borntraeger, Berlin. 666 pp.
Melville, R. 1962. A new theory of the Angiosperm flower: 1, the Gynoecium. Kew Bull.16: 1–50.
—. 1963. A new theory of the Angiosperm flower: II, the Androecium. Kew Bull.17: 1–63.
—. 1969. Floral structure and evolution. 1. The Magnoliales. Kew Bull.23: 133–180.
Metcalfe, C. R. &L. Chalk. 1950. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, 2 vols. Oxford Univ. Press, London. 1500 pp.
Miki, S. 1937. The origin ofNajas andPotamogeton. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo)51: 472–480.
Moore, H. E., Jr. &N. W. Uhl. 1973. Palms and the origin and evolution of the monocotyledons. Quart. Rev. Biol.48: 414–436.
Moseley, M. F. 1958. Morphological studies of the Nymphaeaceae I. The nature of the stamens. Phytomorphology8: 1–29.
—. 1974. Some thoughts of a phylogenetic anatomist on the evolution of the flower. I. Advances Plant Morph.1972: 394–407.
Muller, J. 1970. Palynological evidence on early differentiation of Angiosperms. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc.45: 417–450.
Nair, P. K. K. 1974. Pollen morphology and phylogenetic classification of primitive angiosperms. Advances Plant Morph.1972: 255–263.
Nozeran, R. 1955. Contribution à l’étude de quelques structures florales. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. ser. 11,16: 1–224.
Parkin, J. 1923. The strobilus theory of Angiosperm descent. Proc. Linn. Soc. London.135: 51–66.
Patel, R. N. 1975. Wood anatomy of the dicotyledons indigenous to New Zealand, 10. Chloranthaceae. New Zealand J. Bot.13: 141–148.
Philipson, W. R. 1974. Ovular morphology and the major classification of the dicotyledons. Bot. J. Linn. Soc.68: 89–108.
Plantefol, L. 1948. L’ontogenie de la fleur. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. ser. 11,9: 35–186.
Posluszny, U. &R. Sattler. 1973. Floral development ofPotamogeton densus. Canad. J. Bot.51: 647–656.
—. 1974a. Floral development ofPotamogeton richardsonii. Amer. J. Bot.61: 209–216.
—. 1974b. Floral development ofRuppia maritima var.maritima. Canad. J. Bot.52: 1607–1612.
Prance, G. T. &J. R. Arias. 1975. A study of the floral biology ofVictoria amazonica (Poepp.) Sowerby (Nymphaeaceae). Acta Amazonica5: 109–139.
Puri, V. 1951. The role of floral anatomy in the solution of morphological problems. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster)17: 471–554.
Raju, M. V. S. 1961. Morphology and anatomy of the Saururaceae. 1. Floral anatomy and embryology. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.48: 107–124.
Rao, Y. S. 1953. Karyo-systematic studies in Helobiales. 1. Butomaceae. Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India19: 563–581.
Raven, P. H., D. W. Kyhos, &M. S. Cave. 1971. Chromosome numbers and relationships in Annoniflorae. Taxon20: 479–483.
Rensch, B. 1959. Evolution above the Species Level. Columbia Univ. Press, New York. 419 pp.
Ritterbusch, A. 1971. Morphologische Untersuchungen zur Wuchsform vonPhilodendron. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.90: 527–549.
Rivieres, R. 1957. La valeur de la fleur d’Uticeae. Compt. Rend. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. Paris244: 653–656.
Rohweder, O. &E. Treu-Koene. 1971. Bau und morphologische Bedeutung der InflorenzHouttuynia cordata Thunb. (Saururaceae). Vierteljahrsschr. der Naturf. Ges. Zurich116: 195–212.
Rousseau, D. 1927. Contribution à l’anatomie comparée des piperacées. Mem. Acad. Roy. Sci. Belgique, Cl. Sci. (8°) ser. 2,9: 1–45.
—. 1928. Reprint of the abovein: Arch. Bot. Univ. Liege7: 1–69.
Sastrapradja, S. 1968. On the morphology of the flowers inPeperomia (Piperaceae) species. Ann. Bogor.4: 235–244. 2
Sastri, R. L. N. 1969. Comparative morphology and phylogeny of the Ranales. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc.44: 291–319.
Sattler, R. 1965. Perianth development ofPotamogeton richardsonii. Amer. J. Bot.52: 35–41.
—. 1973. Organogenesis of Flowers. A photographic text-atlas. Univ. of Toronto Press, Toronto & Buffalo. 207 pp.
Sattler, R. &V. Singh. 1973. Floral development ofHydrocleis nymphoides. Canad. J. Bot.51: 2455–2458.
Schmid, R. 1972. Floral bundle fusion and vascular conservatism. Taxon21: 429–446.
Schultze-Motel, W. 1959. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche und vergleichend-morphologische Untersuchungen in Blütenbereich der Cyperaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst.78: 129–170.
Selling, O. H. 1947. Aponogetonaceae in the Cretaceous of South America. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.41: 182.
Semple, K. S. 1974. Pollination in Piperaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.61: 868–871.
Sen, S. 1975. Cytotaxonomy of Liliales. Feddes Repert. Beih.86: 255–305.
Simpson, G. L. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia Univ. Press, New York. 247 pp.
Singh, V. 1966. Morphological and anatomical studies in Helobiae. VI. Vascular anatomy of the flower of Alismaceae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India, Sect. B, Biol. Sci.36: 329–344.
Singh, V. &R. Sattler. 1972. Floral development ofAlisma triviale. Canad. J. Bot.50: 619–627.
—. 1973. Nonspiral androecium and gynoecium ofSagittaria latifolia. Canad. J. Bot.51: 1093–1095.
—. 1974. Floral development ofButomus umbellatus. Canad. J. Bot.52: 223–230.
Smith, A. C. 1972. An appraisal of the orders and families of primitive extant families of Angiosperms. J. Ind. Bot. Soc. Golden Jubilee Vol.50a: 215–229.
Stant, M. Y. 1967. Anatomy of Butomaceae. J. Linn. Soc. Bot.60: 31–60.
Stebbins, G. L. 1967. Adaptive radiation and trends of evolution in higher plants. Evol. Biol.1: 101–142.
—. 1970. Adaptive radiation of reproductive characters in Angiosperms. 1. Pollination mechanisms. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.1: 307–326.
-. 1973a. Morphogenesis, vascularization, and phylogeny in Angiosperms. Breviora, no. 418: 1–19.
—. 1973b. Evolutionary trends in the inflorescence of Angiosperms. Flora162: 501–528.
—. 1974. Flowering Plants. Evolution above the species level. Belknap Press, Cambridge. 399 pp.
Steward, A. N. 1958. Manual of Vascular Plants of the Lower Yangtze Valley, China. Oregon State College, Corvallis. 621 pp.
Suessenguth, K. 1921. Beiträge zur Frage des systematischen Anschlusses der Monocotylen. Beih. Bot. Centralbl.38, pt. 2: 1–79.
Swamy, B. G. L. 1953. The morphology and relationships of the Chloranthaceae. J. Arnold Arbor.34: 375–408.
Swamy, B. G. L. &I. W. Bailey. 1950.Sarcandra, a vesselless genus of the Chloranthaceae. J. Arnold Arbor.31: 117–129.
Swamy, B. G. L. &N. Parameswaran. 1963. The helobial endosperm. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc.38: 1–50.
Takhtajan, A. 1959. Die Evolution der Angiospermen. G. Fischer, Jena. 344 pp.
—. 1969. Flowering Plants, Origin and Dispersai. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh. 310 pp.
Thien, L. 1974. Floral biology ofMagnolia. Amer. J. Bot.61: 1037–1045.
Thorne, R. F. 1963. Some problems and guiding principles of angiosperm phylogeny. Amer. Naturalist97: 287–305.
—. 1974. A phylogenetic classification of the Annoniflorae. Aliso8: 147–209.
Tucker, S. C. 1975a Development of the inflorescence apex and floral primordia inSaururus cernuus. Abstract. Amer. J. Bot.62: (suppl.) 16.
—. 1975b. Floral development inSaururus cernuus. 1. Floral initiation and stamen development. Amer. J. Bot.62: 993–1007.
—. 1976. Floral development inSaururus cernuus (Saururaceae). 2. Carpel initiation and floral vasculature. Amer. J. Bot.63: 289–301.
Uhl, N. Whitford. 1947. Studies in floral morphology and anatomy of certain members of the Helobiae. Thesis (Ph. D.), Cornell Univ., Ithaca, New York.
Van Bruggen, H. W. E. 1969. Revision of the genusAponogeton (Aponogetonaceae). 3. The species of Australia. Blumea17: 121–137.
Van der Pijl, L. 1960. Ecological aspects of flower evolution. 1. Phyletic evolution. Evolution14: 403–416.
Van Heel, W. A. 1969. The synangial nature of pollen sacs on the strength of ‘congenital fusion’ and ‘conservatism of the vascular bundle system’, with special reference to some Malvales. 1 and 2. Proc. Kon. Nederl. Akad. Weten. Amst. ser. c.72: 172–206.
Van Steenis, C. G. G. J. 1948. Aponogetonaceae. Fl. Males. Bull. ser. 1,4: 11–12.
Vijayaraghavan, M. R. 1964. Morphology and embryology of a vesselless dicotyledon,Sarcandra irvingbaileyi Swamy, and systematic position of the Chloranthaceae. Phytomorphology14: 429–441.
Vink, W. 1970. The Winteraceae of the Old World.Pseudowintera andDrimys, morphology and taxonomy. Blumea18: 225–354.
Walker, I. W. 1974. Aperture evolution in the pollen of primitive Angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot.61: 1112–1136.
—. 1976. Comparative pollen morphology and phylogeny of the Ranalean complex.In: Origin and Early Evolution of Angiosperms. ed. by C. B. Beck. Columbia Univ. Press, New York. 241–299.
Weidlich, W. H. 1976. The organization of the vascular system in the stems of the Nymphaeaceae. 1.Nymphaea subgeneraCastalia andHydrocallis. Amer. J. Bot.63: 499–509.
Whitehead, D. R. 1969. Wind pollination in the Angiosperms; evolutionary and environmental considerations. Evolution23: 28–35.
Wilder, G. 1974. Symmetry and development ofButomus umbellatus (Butomaceae) andLimnocharis flava (Limnocharitaceae). Amer. J. Bot.61: 379–394.
Yoshida, O. 1960. Embryologische Studien über Ordnung Piperales. 4. Embryologie vonPiper futokadsura Sieb. & Zucc. J. Coll. Arts Chiba Univ. Nat. Sci. Ser.3: 155–162.
Zimmermann, W. 1963. Gibt es ausser dem phylogenetischen System “naturliche” Systeme der Organismen? Biol. Zentralbl.82: 525–568.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burger, W.C. The piperales and the monocots. Bot. Rev 43, 345–393 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860716
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860716