Abstract
Research laboratories, part of international aerobiological networks are often using different collection media on their exposed tape (or slides). However, their relative pollen capture efficiency has rarely been tested. A single Hirst-trap was used, in Bologna, in February and March 1993, for this experiment. Melinex tapes were divided longitudinally in two equal parts, so that two different media could be tested simultaneously. The tested media were: gelatine/glycerine, hexane/vaseline, silicone/carbon tetrachloride, and paraffin. Each comparisons were repeated on 4 different days. At the time of the sampling, the dominant airborne particles were Cupressaceae andCladosporium. The differences between the different media were non-significant (meanF of different days of 1.720, mean probability of 0.241 (min. of 0.077, max. of 0.356)). The highest probabilities of a significative difference all involved glycerine/gelatine either in comparison with paraffin (0.76), with silicone (0.75), or with vaseline (0.75), while the lowest was for the couple silicone-vaseline (0.59). In general, even if these differences were non-significant, gelatine underestimated spore counts in comparison to silicone, but overestimated them if compared to vaseline or paraffin. However, vaseline looked more efficient then silicone for spore capture. For pollen counts, the same ratios were found, except for the couple silicone-gelatine, which has given similar results. The lowest differences were found withAlternaria andDreschlera, while the highest were found withCladosporium andEpicoccum. The relationship between spore diameter and differences between media was highly significant (τ=−0.786,P=0.027). This was not the case for pollen, withPopulus andAlnus giving the highest differences, andBetula andUlmus the lowest (τ=0.048,P=0.873).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Comtois P, Alcazar P, Néron D. Pollen count statistics and its relevance to precision. 1st European conference on Aerobiology. Santiago de Compostela, 1996.
Durham OC. The volumetric incidence of atmospheric allergens. IV. A proposed standard method of gravimetry sampling and volumetric interpolation of results. J Allergy 1946;17:79–86.
Gagnon L, Comtois P. Peut-on comparer les résultats de différents types de capteurs polliniques?. Grana 1992;31(2):125–30.
Galán C, Domínguez-Vilches E. The capture media in aerobiological sampling. Aerobiologia 1997;13(3):155–60.
Hirst J. An automatic volumetric spore trap. Ann Appl Biol 1952;39:257–65.
Hogan AW. Evaluation of a silicone adhesive as an aerosol collecting medium. J Appl Meteorol 1971;10:592–5.
Kapyla M. Adhesives and mounting media in aerobiological sampling. Grana 1989;28:215–8.
Perkins WA. The Rotorod sampler. 2nd semi-annual report. Aerosol Lab., Dept. of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, CML. 186, 1957.
Solomon WR, Burge H, Boise JR. Performance of adhesives for rotating arm impactors. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1980;65:467–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
“Si les recherches des microbes de l’air acquièrent un développement mérité…(il faut)…spécifier, avec la plus grande rigueur…les qualités des liquides nutritifs…de façon qu’il soit toujours facile de rapporter les résultats à UNE liqueur type adoptéed’un commun accord”. — P. Miquel, 1883.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Comtois, P., Mandrioli, P. Pollen capture media: a comparative study. Aerobiologia 13, 149–154 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02694501
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02694501