Summary
Plant cells growing in an artificial culture environment make numerous genetic mistakes. These alterations are manifested as increased frequencies of single-gene mutations, chromosome breakages, transposable element activations, quantitative trait variations, and modifications of normal DNA methylation patterns. Evidence is presented that indicates a high frequency of DNA hypomethylation as the result of the tissue culture process. Fifteen percent of the methylation changes appear to have been homozygous in the original regenerated plants. A hypothesis is advanced that relates DNA methylation to the variety of genetic alterations found among maize tissue culture regenerants and their progenies. The epigenetic nature of DNA methylation raises questions concerning the stability of tissue culture-induced changes in self-pollinations and crosses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antequera, F.; Bird, A. P. Unmethylated CpG islands associated with genes in higher plants. EMBO J. 7:2295–2299; 1989.
Armstrong, C. L. Genetic and cytogenetic stability of maize tissue cultures: a comparative study of organogenic and embryogenic cultures. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota; 1986. Thesis.
Armstrong, C. L.; Phillips, R. L. Genetic and cytogenetic variation in plants regenerated from organogenic and friable, embryogenic tissue cultures of maize. Crop Sci. 28:363–369; 1988.
Baenziger, P. S.; Wesenberg, D. M.; Schaeffer, G. W., et al. Variation among anther culture derived doubled haploids of “Kitt” wheat. In: Sakamoto, S., ed. Proceedings of the Sixth International Wheat Genetics Symposium. Kyoto, Japan: Plant Germ-Plasm Inst. for Agric., Kyoto Univ.; 1983.
Banks, J. A.; Masson, P.; Fedoroff, N. Molecular mechanisms in the developmental regulation of the maize suppressor-mutator transposable element. Genes Dev. 2:1364–1380; 1988.
Bayliss, M. W. Chromosomal variation in plant tissues in culture. Int. Rev. Cytol. Suppl. 11A:113–144; 1980.
Benzion, G. Genetic and cytogenetic analysis of maize tissue cultures: a cell line pedigree analysis. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota; 1984. Thesis.
Benzion, G.; Phillips, R. L.; Rines, H. W. Case histories of genetic variabilityin vitro: oats and maize. In: Vasil, I. K., ed. Cell culture and somatic cell genetics of plants, vol. 3. New York: Academic Press; 1986:435–448.
Bianchi, A.; Salamini, F.; Parlavecchio, R. On the origin of controlling elements in maize. Genet. Agrar. 22:335–344; 1969.
Boyes, J.; Bird, A. DNA methylation inhibits transcription indirectly via a methyl-CpG binding protein. Cell 64:1123–1134; 1991.
Brettell, R. I. S.; Dennis, E. S. Reactivation of a silent Ac following tissue culture is associated with heritable alterations in its methylation pattern. Mol. Gen. Genet. 229:365–372; 1991.
Brettell, R. I. S.; Dennis, E. S.; Scowcroft, W. R., et al. Molecular analysis of a somaclonal variant of alcohol dehydrogenase. Mol. Gen. Genet. 202:335–344; 1986.
Brown, P. T. H. DNA methylation in plants and its role in tissue culture. Genome 31:717–729; 1989.
Brown, P. T. H.; Kyozuka, J.; Sukekiyo, Y., et al. Molecular changes in protoplast-derived rice plants. Mol. Gen. Genet. 223:324–328; 1990.
Brown, P. T. H.; Gobel, E.; Lorz, H. RFLP analysis ofZea mays callus cultures and their regenerated plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:227–232; 1991.
Cedar, H. DNA methylation and gene activity. Cell 53:3–4; 1988.
Chandler, V. L.; Walbot, V. DNA modification of a maize transposable element correlates with loss of activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:1767–1771; 1986.
Chomet, P. S.; Wessler, S.; Dellaporta, S. Inactivation of the maize transposable element activator (Ac) is associated with its DNA modification. EMBO J. 6:295–302; 1987.
Culley, D. E. Evidence for activation of a cryptic transposable element Ac in maize endosperm cultures. In: VI Int. Congr. Plant Tiss. Cell Culture, Minneapolis, MN. 3–8 August, 1986. St. Paul, MN: Univ. of Minnesota. Abstracts p.220.
Dahleen, L. S.; Stuthman, D. D.; Rines, H. W. Agronomic trait variation in oat lines derived from tissue culture. Crop Sci. 31:90–94; 1991.
D’Amato, F. Cytogenetics of differentiation in tissue and cell cultures. In: Reinert, J.; Bajaj, V. P. S., eds. Plant cell, tissue, and organ culture. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1977:343–357.
D’Amato, F. Cytogenetics of plant cell and tissue cultures and their regenerates. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 3:73–112; 1985.
Dennis, E. S.; Brettell, R. I. S.; Peacock, W. J. A tissue culture inducedAdh1 null mutant of maize results from a single base change. Mol. Gen. Genet. 210:181–183; 1987.
Doerschug, E. B. Studies ofDotted, a regulatory element in maize. I. Induction ofDotted by chromatid breaks. II. Phase variation ofDotted. Theor. Appl. Genet. 43:182–189; 1973.
Earle, E. B.; Gracen, V. E. Somaclonal variation in progeny of plants from corn tissue culture. In: Henke, R.; Hughes, K.; Hollaender, A., eds. Propagation of higher plants through tissue culture. New York: Plenum Press; 1985.
Edallo, S.; Zucchinali, C.; Perenzin, M., et al. Chromosomal variation and frequency of spontaneous mutation associated within vitro culture and plant regeneration of maize. Maydica 26:39–56; 1981.
Ergle, D. R.; Katterman, F. R. H. Deoxyribonucleic acid of cotton. Plant Physiol. 36:811–815; 1961.
Evola, S. V.; Burr, F. A.; Burr, B. The nature of tissue culture-induced mutations in maize. Eleventh Annual Aharon Katzir-Katchalsky Conference, abstract.
Fedoroff, N.; Banks, J.; Masson, P. Molecular genetic analysis of the maize suppressor-mutator element’s epigenetic developmental regulatory mechanism. Genome 31:973–979; 1989.
Fukui, K. Sequential occurrence of mutations in a growing rice callus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 65:225–230; 1983.
Groose, R. W.; Bingham, E. T. An unstable anthocyanin mutation recovered from tissue culture of alfalfa (Medicago sativa). 1. High frequency of reversion upon reculture. 2. Stable nonrevertants derived from reculture. Plant Cell Rep. 5:104–110; 1986.
Gruenbaum, Y.; Naveh-Many, T.; Cedar, H. Sequence specificity of methylation in higher plant DNA. Nature 292:860–862; 1981.
Hall, G.; Allen, G. C.; Loer, D. S., et al. Nuclear scaffolds and scaffold-attachment regions in higher plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:9320–9324; 1991.
Holliday, R. The inheritance of epigenetic defects. Science 238:163–170; 1987.
Johnson, S. S.; Phillips, R. L.; Rines, H. W. Possible role of heterochromatin in chromosome breakage induced by tissue culture in oats (Avena sativa L.). Genome 29:439–446; 1987.
Kaeppler, S. M. Molecular and genetic studies of tissue culture-induced variation in maize. St. Paul: Univ. Minnesota; 1992. Thesis.
Klaas, M.; Amasino, R. DNA methylation is reduced in DNase1-sensitive regions of plant chromatin. Plant Physiol. 91:451–454; 1989.
Larkin, P. J. Somaclonal variation: history, method, and meaning. Iowa State J. Res. 61:393–434; 1987.
Larkin, P. J.; Ryan, S. A.; Brettell, R. I. S., et al. Heritable somaclonal variation in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 67:443–455; 1984.
Larkin, P. J.; Scowcroft, W. R. Somaclonal variation—a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60:197–214; 1981.
Larkin, P.; Scowcroft, W. R. Somaclonal variation and crop improvement. In: Kosuge, T.; Meredith, C. P.; Hollander, A., eds. Genetic engineering of plants: an agricultural perspective. New York: Plenum Press; 1983:289–314.
Lee, M. L.; Geadelmann, J. L.; Phillips, R. L. Agronomic evaluation of inbred lines derived from tissue cultures of maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75:841–849; 1988.
Lee, M. L.; Phillips, R. L. Genomic rearrangements in maize induced by tissue culture. Genome 29:122–128; 1987a.
Lee, M. L.; Phillips, R. L. Genetic variability in progeny of regenerated maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Genome 29:344–355; 1987b.
Lee, M. L.; Phillips, R. L. The chromosomal basis of somaclonal variation. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 39:413–437; 1988.
LoSchiavo, F.; Pitto, L.; Giuliano, G., et al. DNA methylation of embryogenic carrot cell cultures and its variations as caused by mutation, differentiation, hormones, and hypomethylating drugs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 77:325–331; 1989.
McClintock, B. The origin and behavior of mutable loci in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 36:344–355; 1950.
McClintock, B. Mechanisms that rapidly reorganize the genome. Stadler Genet. Symp. 10:25–47; 1978.
McClintock, B. The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 226:792–801; 1984.
McCoy, T. J.; Phillips, R. L.; Rines, H. W. Cytogenetic analysis of plants regenerated from oat (Avena sativa) tissue cultures; high frequency of partial chromsome loss. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 24:37–50; 1982.
McCoy, T. J.; Phillips, R. L. Chromosome stability in maize (Zea mays) tissue cultures and sectoring in some regenerated plants. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 24:559–565; 1982.
Messenguer, R.; Ganal, M. W.; Steffens, J. C., et al. Characterization of the level, target sites and inheritance of cytosine methylation in tomato nuclear DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 16:753–770; 1991.
Monk, M. Changes in DNA methylation during mouse embryonic development in relation to X-chromosome activity and imprinting. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 326:299–312; 1990.
Müller, E.; Brown, P. T. H.; Hartke, S., et al. DNA variation in tissue culture-derived rice plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:673–679; 1990.
Neuffer, M. G. Stability of the suppressor element in two mutator systems of theA1 locus in maize. Genetics 53:541–549; 1966.
Oono, K.In vitro methods applied to rice. In: Thorpe, T. A., ed. Plant tissue culture. New York: Academic Press; 1981:273–298.
Oono, K. Putative homozygous mutants in regenerated plants of rice. Mol. Gen. Genet. 198:377–384; 1985.
Orton, T. J. Genetic variation in somatic tissues: Method or madness? Adv. Plant Pathol. 2:153–189; 1984.
Pardue, M. L. Dynamic instability of chromosomes and genomes. Cell 66:427–431; 1991.
Pavlica, M.; Nagy, B.; Papes, D. 2,4-D causes chromosome and chromatin abnormalities in plant cells and mutation in cultured mammalian cells. Mutat. Res. 263:77–82; 1991.
Peschke, V. M.; Phillips, R. L. Activation of the maize transposable elementSuppressor-mutator (Spm) in tissue culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:90–97; 1991.
Peschke, V. M.; Phillips, R. L.; Gengenbach, B. G. Discovery of transposable element activity among progeny of tissue culture-derived maize plants. Science 238:804–807; 1987.
Peschke, V. M.; Phillips, R. L.; Gengenbach, B. G. Genetic and molecular analysis of tissue culture-derivedAc elements. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82:121–129; 1991.
Peschke, V. M.; Phillips, R. L. Genetic implications of somaclonal variation in plants. Adv. Genet. 30:41–75; 1992.
Peterson, P. A. A mutable plae green locus in maize. Genetics 38:682–683; 1953.
Phillips, R. L. Somaclonal and gametoclonal variation. Genome 31:1119–1120; 1989.
Phillips, R. L.; Kaeppler, S. M.; Peschke, V. M. Do we understand somaclonal variation? In: Nijkamp, H. J. J.; VanDerPlas, L. H. W.; Van Aartrijk, J., eds. Progress in plant cellular and molecular biology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing; 1990:131–141.
Pryor, A.; Faulker, K.; Rhoades, M. M., et al. Asynchronous replication of heterochromatin in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:6705–6709; 1980.
Quemeda, H.; Roth, E. J.; Lark, K. G. Changes in methylation of tissue cultured soybean cells detected by digestion with the restriction enzymesHpall andMspI. Plant Cell Rep. 6:63–66; 1987.
Rhoades, M. M.; Dempsey, E. On the mechanism of chromatin loss induced by the B chromosome of maize. Genetics 71:73–96; 1972.
Rhoades, M. M.; Dempsey, E. Chromatin elimination induced by the B chromosome of maize. J. Hered. 64:12–18; 1973.
Rhodes, C. A.; Phillips, R. L.; Green, C. E. Cytogenetic stability of aneuploid maize tissue cultures. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 28:374–384; 1986.
Rice, T. B. Tissue culture induced genetic variation in regenerated maize inbreds. In: Proc. 37th Annu. Corn and Sorghum Research Conference. Chicago, IL, December, 1982. Washington, DC: Amer. Seed Assoc.; 1982:148–162.
Schaeffer, G. W. Recovery of heritable variability in anther-derived doubled-haploid rice. Crop Sci. 22:1160–1164; 1982.
Schwartz, D. Gene-controlled cytosine demethylation in the promoter region of theAc transposable element in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:2789–2793; 1989.
Schwartz, D.; Dennis, E. Transposase activity of theAc controlling element in maize is regulated by its degree of methylation. Mol. Gen. Genet. 205:476–482; 1986.
Silva, A. J.; White, R. Inheritance of allelic blueprints for methylation patterns. Cell 54:145–152; 1988.
Sun, Z. X.; Zheng, K. L. Somaclonal variation in rice. In: Bajaj, Y. P. S., ed. Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, vol. 3. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1990:288–325.
Sunderland, N. Nuclear cytology. In: Street, H. E., ed. Plant tissue and cell culture, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell; 1973:177–205.
Vergara, R.; Verde, F.; Pitto, L., et al. Reversible variations in the methylation pattern of carrot DNA during somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Rep. 8:697–700; 1990.
Vincent, A.; Heitz, D.; Petit, C., et al. Abnormal methylation pattern detected in fragile-X patients by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Nature 349:624–626; 1991.
Walbot, V. Reactivation of theMutator transposable element system following gamma irradiation of seed. Mol. Gen. Genet. 212:259–264; 1988.
Woodman, J. C.; Kramer, D. A. The recovery of somaclonal variants from tissue cultures of B73, an elite inbred line of maize. In: VI Intl. Congr. Plant Tissue Cell Culture, Minneapolis, MN, 3–8 August, 1986. St. Paul, MN: Univ. of Minnesota. Abstracts, p. 215.
Zehr, B. E.; Williams, M. E.; Duncan, D. R., et al. Somaclonal variation among the progeny of plants regenerated from callus cultures of seven inbred lines of maize. Can. J. Bot. 61:491–499; 1987.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Presented in the Session-in-Depth Exploitation of Plant Cell Culture Variants at the 1992 World Congress on Cell and Tissue Culture, Washington, DC, June 20–25, 1992.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaeppler, S.M., Phillips, R.L. DNA methylation and tissue culture-induced variation in plants. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant 29, 125–130 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02632283
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02632283