Skip to main content
Log in

RFLP analysis of Zea mays callus cultures and their regenerated plants

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Tissue culture of the Zea mays inbred line A188 resulted in the regeneration of plants having a high level of phenotypic variation compared to seed-grown control plants. To determine how such variation was induced and whether this could be related to specific in vitro culture methods, callus cultures were established and maintained on different, commonly used culture media. Plants were regenerated and the genomic DNA of callus cultures and regenerants analysed for RFLP differences. The results show that regardless of the gene probe used, callus formation resulted in significant deviations from the DNA pattern normally found in seed-grown control plants. Alterations in gene copy number also occurred. As differentiation and organogenesis began, the level of DNA variation fell, and most of the regenerated plants showed a genetic similarity to the controls; those with RFLP differences were the somaclonal variants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown PTH (1989) DNA methylation in plants and its role in tissue culture. Genome 31: 717–729

    Google Scholar 

  • Caboche M, Lark KG (1981) Preferential replication of repeated DNA sequences in nuclei isolated from soybean cells grown in suspension culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci 78: 1731–1735

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Amato F (1985) Cytogenetics of plant cell and tissue cultures and their regenerants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 3: 73–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhar MS, Dabak MM, Gupta VS, Ranjekar PK (1988) Organisation and properties of repeated DNA sequences in rice genome. Plant Sci 55: 43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Edallo S, Zucchinali C, Perenzin M, Salamini F (1981) Chromosomal variation and frequency of spontaneous mutation associated with in vitro culture and plant regeneration in maize. Maydica 26: 39–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell RB (1985) Repeated sequences and genome change. In: Hohn B, Dennis ES (eds) Genetic flux in plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 139–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 50: 151–158

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green CE, Phillips RE (1975) Plant regeneration from tissue cultures of maize. Crop Sci 15: 417–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Hake S, Walbot V (1980) The genome of Zea mays, its organisation and homology to related grasses. Chromosoma 79: 251–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Hangyel Tarczy M, Feher F, Deak M (1986) Chromosome variation of somaclones in tetraploid lucerne. Noventermeles 35: 281–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartke S, Lörz H (1989) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from various indica rice genotypes. J Genet Breed 43: 205–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns MA, Strommer JN, Freeling M (1983) Exceptionally high levels of restriction site polymorphism in DNA near the maize Adh1 gene. Genetics 105: 733–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp A, Bright SWJ (1985) On the origins of somaclonal variation. In: Miflin BJ (eds) Oxford surveys of plant and cell biology, vol 2. Oxford University Press. Oxford, pp 199–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapitan NEV, Sears RG, Gill BS (1988) Amplification of repeated sequences in wheat x rye hybrids regenerated from tissue culture. Theor Appl Genet 75: 381–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Lührs R, Lörz H (1987) Plant regeneration in vitro from embryogenic cultures of spring and winter-type barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties. Theor Appl Genet 75: 16–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrish F, Vasil V, Vasil IK (1987) Developmental morphogenesis and genetic manipulation in tissue cultures of the Gramineae. Adv Genet 24: 431–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Müller E, Brown PTH, Hartke S, Lörz H (1990) DNA variation in tissue culture-derived rice plants. Theor Appl Genet 80: 673–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschke VM, Phillips RL, Gengenbach BG (1987) Discovery of transposable element activity among progeny of tissue culture-derived maize plants. Science 238: 804–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Potrykus I, Harms CT, Lörz H (1979) Callus formation from cell cultures protoplasts of corn Zea mays (L.). Theor Appl Genet 54: 209–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby PWJ, Diekmann M, Rhodes C, Berg P (1977) Labelling deoxynucleic acid to a high specific activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA polymerase I. J Mol Biol 113: 237–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivin CJ, Cullis CA, Walbot V (1986) Evaluating quantitative variation in the genome of Zea mays. Genetics 113: 1001–1019

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern EM (1975) Detection of sepcific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98: 503–517

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swedlund B, Vasil IK (1985) Cytogenetic characterisation of embryogenic callus and regenerated plants of Pennisetum americanum (L.). K. Schum. Theor Appl Genet 69: 575–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B, Powell A (1985) Isolation of plant DNA and RNA. Focus 4: 4–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng KL, Castiglione S, Biasini MG, Biroli A, Morandi C, Scala F (1987) Nuclear DNA amplification in cultured cells of Oryza sativa (L.). Theor Appl Genet 74: 65–70

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by F. Salamini

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, P.T.H., Göbel, E. & Lörz, H. RFLP analysis of Zea mays callus cultures and their regenerated plants. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 81, 227–232 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00215727

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00215727

Key words

Navigation