Skip to main content
Log in

Adenine methylation atdam sites increases transient gene expression in plant cells

  • Papers
  • Published:
Transgenic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Escherichia coli encodes two major DNA methylation systems:dam, which produces 6-methyladenine; anddcm, which produces 5-methylcytosine. About 1–2% of adenine and cytosine residues in plasmid DNAs prepared inE. coli are methylated by these systems. Since DNA methylation profoundly influences gene expression in eukaryotes, we were interested in determining whether these bacterially encoded modifications might also effect plant gene expression in experimental systems. We therefore examined the influence ofdam anddcm methylation on gene expression from four GUS fusion constructs in transient assays in protoplasts and microprojectile-bombarded whole tissues. In these constructs, GUS expression was driven by promoter regions derived from theArabidopsis alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh1), maize ubiquitin (Ubil1), rice actin (Act1) and CaMV 35S genes. We show that methyladenine produced bydam methylation increased gene expression from constructs based on theAdh1, Ubi1 andAct1 genes. The increase in gene expression ranged from three-fold forUbi1 andAdh1 in protoplasts to 50-fold forAct1 in bombarded wheat tissues. Expression of a 35S. GUS construct was, however, insensitive todam methylation.dcm methylation had little if any effect on transient gene expression for any of these constructs. We provide indirect evidence that the critical sites of adenine methylation lie within sequences from the promoter regions, suggesting thatdam methylation increases transcription rate. These results have important experimental implications and also raise the intriguing possibility that methyladenine might play a role in the regulation of gene expressionin vivo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bogusz, D., Llewellyn, D.J., Craig, S., Dennis, E.S., Appleby, C.A. and Peacock, W.J. (1990) Nonlegume hemoglobin genes retain organ-specific expression in heterologous transgenic plants.Plant Cell 2, 633–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D.F., Dale, P.J., Heslop-Harrison, J.S., Snape, J.W., Harwood, W., Bean, S. and Mullineaux, P.M. (1994) Stability of transgenes and presence of N6 methyladenine DNA in transformed wheat cells.Plant J. 5, 429–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, A.H., Sharrock, R.A. and Quail, P.H. (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes: structure, thermal perturbation of expression and transcript splicing, and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation.Plant Mol. Biol. 18, 675–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dolferus, R., Jacobs, M., Peacock, W.J. and Dennis, E.S. (1994) Differential interactions of promoter elements in stress response of theArabidopsis Adh gene.Plant Physiol. 105, 1075–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, B.L. and Beachy, R.N. (1990) Manipulation of β-glucuronidase for use as a reporter in vacuolar targeting studies.Plant Mol. Biol. 15, 821–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finer, J.J., Vain, P., Jones, M.W. and McMullen, M.D. (1992) Development of the particle inflow gun for DNA delivery to plant cells.Plant Cell Rep. 11, 323–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, E.J., Brettell, R.I.S. and Dennis, E.J. (1993) The role of DNA methylation in the regulation of plant gene expression. In Jost, J.P. and Saluz, H.P. eds,DNA Methylation: Molecular Biology and Biological Significance, pp. 218–261. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, J. and McElroy, D. (1994) Transgene inactivation: plants fight back!Bio/Technology 12, 883–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, R.A., Kavanagh, T.A. and Brown, M.W. (1987) GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants.EMBO J. 6, 3901–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, P.H., Pereira, E., Marlow, S.A., Turbett, G., Mitchell, C.A., Jacobsen, P.F., Holliday, R. and Papadimitriou, J.M. (1994) Evidence for adenine methylation within the mouse myogenic geneMyo-D1.Gene 151, 89–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, K.N. and Michayluk, M.R. (1975) Nutritional requirements for growth ofVicia hajastama cells and protoplasts at a very low population density in liquid media.Planta 126, 105–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Last, D.I., Bretell, R.I.S., Chamberlain, D.A., Chaudhury, A.M., Larkin, P.J., Marsh, E.L., Peacock, W.J. and Dennis, E.S. (1991) pEMU — an improved promoter for gene expression in cereal cells.Theor. Appl. Genet. 81, 581–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinus, M.G. (1987) Methylation of DNA. In: Ingraham, J.L., Brooks Low, K., Magasanik, B., Schaechter, M. and Umbarger, H.E., eds.,Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium Cellular and Molecular Biology Volume 1, pp. 697–702. Washington, USA; American Society for Microbiology.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, D., Blowers, A.D., Jenes, B. and Wu, R. (1991) Construction of expression vectors based on the rice Actin-1 (Act1) 5′ region for use in monocot transformation.Mol. Gen. Genet. 231, 150–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, B.R. and Marinus, M.G. (1994) Thedam anddcm strains ofEscherichia coli — a review.Gene 143, 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pintor-Toro, J.A. (1987) Adenine methylation in zein genes.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 147, 1082–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J.C. and Rogers, S.W. (1995) Comparison of the effects of N6-methyldeoxyadenosine and N5-methyldeoxycytosine on transcription from nuclear gene promoters in barley.Plant J. 7, 221–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook, J., Fritsh, E.F. and Maniatis, T., eds. (1989) Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scowcroft, W.R. and Adamson, J.A. (1976) Organogenesis from callus cultures of the legumeStylosanthes hamata.Plant Sci. Lett. 7, 39–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B.H. and Larkin, P.J. (1988) Analysis of electroporation efficiency in plant protoplasts.Aust. J. Biotech. 1, 52–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres, J.T., Block, A., Hahlbrook, K. and Somssich, I.E. (1993) Influence of bacterial strain genotype on transient expression of plasmid DNA in plant protoplasts.Plant J. 4, 587–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truss, M., Bartsch, J., Chalepakis, J. and Beato, M. (1992) Artificial steroid hormone response element generated bydam-methylation.Nucl. Acids Res. 20, 1483–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, H., Ziechmann, C. and Graessmann, A. (1990)In vitro methylation inhibits gene expression in transgenic tobacco.EMBO J. 9, 4409–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M.J., Kelly, L., Larkin, P.J., Waterhouse, P.M. and Gerlach, W.L. (1989) Infectiousin vitro transcripts from a cloned cDNA of barley yellow drawf virus.Virology 180, 372–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graham, M.W., Larkin, P.J. Adenine methylation atdam sites increases transient gene expression in plant cells. Transgenic Research 4, 324–331 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01972529

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01972529

Keywords

Navigation