Skip to main content
Log in

Extinction, recolonization, and the genetic structure of tidepool copepod populations

  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Extinction and recolonization in metapopulations may either increase or decrease genetic differentiation among populations, but recent genetic models predict increased differentiation under most circumstances of recolonization. I examine this prediction empirically using tidepool populations of the marine tidepool copepodTigriopus californicus. The probability of extinction of tidepool populations was sufficiently high to invoke the model's predictions, but varied among populations. Nearly 75% of colonizing groups consisted of 10 or fewer individuals. The genetic effective size of colonizing groups might be as high as 18, depending on assumptions, but colonists probably originated from a subset of local populations. In contrast to my predictions, genetic differentiation was smaller among younger tidepool populations than among older populations on each of three rock outcrops, suggesting that genetic differentiation was reduced by metapopulation dynamics. The discrepancy between the prediction and the results may be explained by the unmet assumptions of classical metapopulation structure underlying the genetic models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dybdahl, M. F. (1989) Evolutionary consequences of limited dispersal and environmental heterogeneity inTigriopus californicus life histories. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egloff, D. A. (1966) Biological aspects of sex ratio in experimental and field populations of the marine copepodTigriopus californicus. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M. (1991) The genetic effective size of a metapopulation.Biol. J Linn. Soc.,42, 165–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski, I. (1991) Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations.Biol. J. Linn. Soc.,42, 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S. J. (1991) Local extinction in a metapopulation context: an empirical evaluation.Biol. J. Linn. Soc.,42, 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins, R. (1970) Extinction. InSome Mathematical Problems in Biology (M. Gerstenhaber, ed.), pp. 77–107. American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, D. E. (1991a) Genetic consequences of local population extinction and recolonization.Trends Ecol. Evol.,6, 5–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, D. E. (1991b) The effect of host plant patch size variation on the population structure of specialist herbivore insect,Tetraopes tetraophthalmus.Evolution,45, 1675–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B. F. (1991)Randomization and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. Chapman & Hall, New York. NY, USA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olivieri, I., Couvet, D. and Bouyon P.-H. (1990) The genetics of transient populations: research at the metapopulation level.Trends Ecol. Evol.,5, 207–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W. and Spiller, D. A. (1987) High population persistence in a system with high turnover.Nature,330, 474–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin, M. (1977) Gene flow and genetic drift in a species subject to frequent local extinctions.Theor. Pop. Biol.,12, 253–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slatkin, M. (1987) Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations.Science,236, 787–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smouse, P. E., Long, J. C. and Sokal, R. R. (1986) Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence.System. Zool.,35, 627–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vittor, B. A. (1971) Effects of the environment on fitness-related life history characters inTigriopus californicus. PhD Dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M. J. and McCauley, D. E. (1988) Extinction and recolonization: their effects on the genetic differentiation of local populations.Evolution,42, 995–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir, B. S. (1990)Genetic Data Analysis. Sinauer Assoc. Inc., Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, B. S. and Cockerham, C. C. (1984) EstimatingF-statistics for the analysis of population structure.Evolution,38, 1358–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock, M. C. (1992) Nonequilibrium population structure in forked fungus beetles: extinction, colonization, and the genetic variance among populations.Am. Nat.,139, 952–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock, M. C. and McCauley, D. E. (1990) Some population genetic consequences of colony formation and extinction: genetic correlations within founding groups.Evolution,44, 1717–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Workman, P. L. and Niswander, J. D. (1970) Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago.Am. J. Human Genet.,22, 24–49.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1940) Breeding structure of populations in relation to speciation.Am. Nat.,74, 232–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dybdahl, M.F. Extinction, recolonization, and the genetic structure of tidepool copepod populations. Evol Ecol 8, 113–124 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01238245

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01238245

Keywords

Navigation