Summary
-
1.
The glycoside receptor in the lateral maxillary sensilla styloconica of the larvae ofMamestra brassicae L. was investigated with electrophysiological methods. Apart from the glycoside receptor the sensillum comprises three further contact chemoreceptors-a sugar, a cation, and an anion cell—as well as a mechanoreceptor.
-
2.
The glycoside receptor responds to 32 of 84 substances tested. Effective stimulants are glucosinolates, non-heterocyclic aryl glycosides possessing not more than two ring structures, convallatoxin and strychnine nitrate; less effective are the amino acids norleucine, methionine and phenylalanine. Ineffective are mono- and disaccharides, inorganic salts and the amino acids glycine, alanine and serine.
-
3.
The stimulating effectiveness can be attributed to the following components of the stimulating molecules: aglycon, glycosidic linkage, sugar constituent; most effective areβ-glucosides.
-
4.
Two strains stemming from genetically different populations differ with regard to the stimulating effectiveness of the aglycon-components of stimulants; this entails that the patterns of specificity are different for both strains.
-
5.
Experiments with mixtures of stimulating substances and the comparison of the stimulating effectiveness of diverse test substances for both strains reveal that at least two classes of sites per receptor cell exist independently from each other.
-
6.
Stimulus response curves for two especially efficient stimulants, sinigrin and 1-naphthyl-β-glucoside were measured for both strains: Hyperbolic as well as sigmoid kinetics were found, indicating simple relations between stimulus- and receptor-molecules on the one hand and cooperative interactions between diverse sites on the other hand.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, J.: Chemoreceptors in Bacteria. Science166, 1588–1597 (1969)
Bresch, W.E.: Der Zuckerrezeptor eines Rüsselhaares der BaumwollwanzeDysdercus intermedius. Eine elektrophysiologische Untersuchung. Dissertation, Heidelberg (1973)
Changeux, J.-P., Thiéry, J.: On the excitability and cooperativity of biological membranes. In: Regulatory functions of biological membranes (Järnefelt, J., ed.). BBA Library Amsterdam11, 116–138 (1968)
Chick, W.L., Like, A.: Ultramicro method for determination of glycogen and glucose by enzymic labelling with adenosine triphosphate-γ-32P. Analyt. Biochem.32, 340–347 (1969)
David, W.A.L., Gardiner, B.O.C.: RearingMamestra brassicae L. On semi-synthetic diets. Bull. ent. Res.57, 137–142 (1966)
Dixon, H.B.F.: Curves of ligand binding. Biochem. J.137, 443–447 (1974)
Freeman, A.R.: Electrophysiological analysis of the actions of strychnine, bicuculline and picrotoxin on the axonal membrane. J. Neurobiology4, 567–582 (1973)
Goodman, I., Fouts, J.R., Bresnick, E., Menegas, R., Hitchings, G.H.: A mammalian thioglucosidase. Science130, 450–451 (1959)
Hanamori, T., Shiraishi, A., Kijima, H., Morita, H.: Stimulation of labellar sugar receptor of the fleshfly by glucosides. Z. vergl. Physiol.76, 115–124 (1972)
Hansen, K.: α-Glucosidases as sugar receptor proteins in flies. In: Biochemistry of sensory functions (Jaenicke, L., ed.), p. 207–233. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1974
Hodgson, E.S., Roeder, K.D.: Electrophysiological studies of arthropod chemoreception I. J. cell. comp. Physiol.48, 51–76 (1956)
Ishikawa, S.: Electrical response and function of a bitter substance receptor associated with the maxillary sensilla of the larvae of the silkworm,Bombyx mori L. J. cell. comp. Physiol.67, 1–12 (1966)
Isono, K., Kikuchi, T.: Autosomal recessive mutation in sugar response ofDrosophila. Nature (Lond.)248, 243–244 (1974)
Kaissling, K.-E.: Insect olfaction. In: Handbook of sens, physiol. IV/1 (Beidler, L.M., ed.), p. 351–431. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer 1971
Kijima, H., Koizumi, O., Morita, H.: α-Glucosidase at the tip of the contact chemosensory hair of the blowfly,Phormia regina. J. Insect Physiol.19, 1351–1362 (1973)
Kjaer, A., Olesen Larsen, P.: Non-protein amino-acids, cyanogenic glycosides, and glucosinolates. Biosynthesis (Lond.)2, 71–105 (1973)
Koshland, D.E., Jr., Nemethy, G., Filmer, D.: Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. Biochemistry5, 365–385 (1966)
Ma, Wei Chun: Dynamics of feeding reponses inPieris brassicae Linn, as a function of chemosensory input: a behavioural, ultrastructural and electrophysiological study. Meded. Landbouwhogesch. Wageningen72, 1–162 (1972)
Mellon, D., Evans, D.R.: Electrophysiological evidence that water stimulates a fourth sensory cell in the blowfly taste receptor. Amer. Zoologist1, 372–373 (1961)
Monod, J., Wyman, J., Changeux, J.-P.: On the nature of allosteric transitions: a plausible model. J. molec. Biol.12, 88–118 (1965)
Morita, H.: Electrical signs of taste receptor activity. In: III. Internat. Symp. Olfaction and Taste New York 1968 (Pfaffmann, C., ed.), p. 370–381. New York: Rockefeller Univ. Press 1969
Morita, H.: Properties of the sugar receptor site of the blowfly. In: IV. Intern. Symp. Olfaction and Taste Starnberg 1971 (Schneider, D., ed.), p. 357–363. Stuttgart: Wiss. Verlagsges. 1972
Morita, H., Hidaka, T., Shiraishi, A.: Excitatory and inhibitory effects of salts on the sugar receptor of the fleshfly. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. Ser. E4, 123–135 (1966)
Morita, H., Shiraishi, A.: Stimulation of the labellar sugar receptor of the fleshfly by mono- and disaccharides. J. gen. Physiol.52, 559–583 (1968)
Nisizawa, K., Hashimoto, Y.: Glycoside hydrolases and glycosyl transferases. In: The carbohydrates IIa (Pigman, W., Horton, D., eds.), p. 241–300. New York-London: Academic Press 1970
Ohtsuru, M., Tsuruo, I., Hata, T.: Fungal myrosinase. III.β-glucosidase activity of fungal myrosinase and the relation of fungal and plant myrosinases toβ-glucosidases. Agr. Biol. Chem. (Tokio)33, 1320–1325 (1969)
Parsons, R.G., Hogg, R.W.: A comparison of the L-arabinose- and the D-galactose-binding proteins ofEscherichia coli B/r. J. biol. Chem.249, 3608–3614 (1974)
Rees, C.J.C.: Chemoreceptor specificity associated with choice of feeding site by the beetle,Chrysolina brunsvicensis on its foodplant,Hypericum hirsutum. Ent. exp. & appl.12, 565–583 (1969)
Schoonhoven, L.M.: Secondary plant substances and insects. Ree. Adv. Phytochem.5, 197–224 (1972)
Shimada, I.: Chemical treatments of the labellar sugar receptor of the fleshfly. J. Insect Physiol.21, 1565–1574(1975)
Shiraishi, A., Kuwabara, M.: The effects of amino acids on the labellar hair chemosensory cells of the fly. J. gen. Physiol.56, 768–782 (1971)
Starre, H. van der: Tarsal taste discrimination in the blowfly,Calliphora vicina Robineau-Desvoidy. Neth. J. Zool.22, 227–282 (1972)
Thurm, U.: Die Beziehungen zwischen mechanischen Reizgrößen und stationären Erregungszuständen bei Borstenfeld-Sensillen von Bienen. Z. vergl. Physiol.46, 351–382 (1963)
Tsuruo, I., Hata, T.: Myrosinase in mustard seed. IV. Sugars and glucosides as competitive inhibitors. Agr. Biol. Chem. (Tokio)32, 1420–1424 (1968)
Wieczorek, H.: Eigenschaften des Glykosidrezeptors der Kohleulenraupe. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. Stuttgart1974, 11–14 (1975)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I thank Prof. Dr. Kai Hansen for many helpful discussions and for critical reading of the manuscript. I am also greatly indebted to Dr. Ingrid de la Motte for her constructive help in improving the English text. The work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Schwerpunktprogramm Rezeptorphysiologie).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wieczorek, H. The glycoside receptor of the larvae ofMamestra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). J. Comp. Physiol. 106, 153–176 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00620496
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00620496