Abstract
This chapter discusses the productive aspect of morphological processing and the effect on reading proficiency in older children. The report summarizes the results of three main experiments using the semantic priming procedure plus an initial repetition priming experiment, all using reaction time measures, to explore ten- to twelve-year old ‘poor’ readers’ sensitivity to, and knowledge of, derivational morphology. There is some evidence from the accurate and rapid vocal production of complex derived or base words that the depth of derivational morphology and the converse of segmentation to base forms play a role in reading performance in these children.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, S. R.: 1990, ‘Sapir’s approach to typology and current issues in morphology’, in W. U. Dressler, H. C. Luschutzky, O. E. Pfeiffer and J. R. Rennison (eds.), Contemporary Morphology, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp. 277–295.
Aronoff, M.: 1976, Word Formation in Generative Grammar, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 1, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Baayen, H. and Lieber, R.: 1991, ‘Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study’, Linguistics 29, 801–843.
Bauer, L.: 1983, English Word Formation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Caramazza, A.: 1988, ‘Some aspects of language processing revealed through the analysis of acquired aphasia: The lexical system’, Annual Review of Neurosciences 11, 395–421.
Caramazza, A.: 1991, Issues in Reading, Writing and Speaking: A Neuropsychological Perspective, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A. and Romani, C.: 1988, ‘Lexical access and inflectional morphology’, Cognition 28, 297–332.
Carlisle, J. F.: 1987, ‘The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning disabled and normal students’, Annals of Dyslexia 37, 90–108.
Carlisle, J. F.: 1988, ‘Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eight graders’, Applied Psycholinguistics 9, 247–266.
Carlisle, J. F. and Liberman, I. Y.: 1987, Does the Study of Latin Affect Spelling Proficiency?, Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research SR-92, Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, pp. 127–136.
Carroll, J. B., Davies, P. and Richman, B.: 1971, The American Heritage Word Frequency Book, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, MA.
Chomsky, N. and Halle, M.: 1968, The Sound Pattern of English, Harper and Row, New York.
Cutler, A.: 1983, ‘Lexical complexity and sentence processing’, in G. B. Flores d’Arcais and R. J. Jarvella (eds.), The Process of Language Understanding, John Wiley, New York, pp. 43–79.
Elbro, C.: 1990, Differences in Dyslexia: A Study of Reading Strategies and Deficits in a Linguistic Perspective, Munksgaard, Copenhagen.
Elbro, C.: 1991, ‘Dyslexics and normal beginning readers read by different strategies: A comparison of strategy distributions in dyslexics and normal readers’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 1, 19–37.
Feldman, L. B.: 1991, ‘The contribution of morphology to word recognition’, Psychological Research 53, 33–41.
Feldman, L. B. and Bentin, S.: 1992, Morphological Analysis of Disrupted Morphemes: Evidence from Hebrew, Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research SR-109/110, Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, pp. 163–178.
Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E. and Feldman, L. B.: 1985, ‘Relations among regular and irregular, morphologically-related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming’, Memory and Cognition 13, 241–255.
Freyd, P. and Baron, J.: 1982, ‘Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 21, 282–295.
Frost, R. and Katz, L. (eds.): 1992, Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
Gordon, P.: 1989, ‘Levels of affixation in the acquisition of English morphology’, Journal of Memory and Language 28, 519–530.
Halle, M.: 1973, ‘Prolegomena to a theory of word formation’, Linguistic Inquiry 4, 3–16.
Hankamer, J.: 1989, ‘Morphological parsing and the lexicon’, in W. Marslen-Wilson (ed.), Lexical Representation and Process, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 392–408.
Hanson, V. L. and Wilkenfeld, D.: 1985, ‘Morphophonology and lexical organization in deaf readers’, Language and Speech 28, 269–280.
Henderson, L.: 1985, ‘Toward a psychology of morphemes’, in A. W. Ellis (ed.), Progress in the Psychology of Language, Lawrence Erlbaum, London, Vol. 1, pp. 15–72.
Henry, M. K.: 1988, ‘Beyond phonics: Integrated decoding and spelling instruction based on word origin and structure’, Annals of Dyslexia 38, 258–275.
Henry, M. K.: 1993, ‘Morphological structure: Latin and Greek roots and affixes as upper grade code strategies’, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5, 227–241.
Jarvella, R. J., Job, R., Sandström, G. and Schreuder, R.: 1987, ‘Morphological constraints on word recognition’, in A. Allport, D. G. Mackay, W. Prinz and E. Scheerer (eds.), Language Perception and Production, Academic Press, London, pp. 245–262.
Jarvella, R. J. and Snodgrass, J. G.: 1974, ‘Seeing ring in rang and retain in retention: On recognizing stem morphemes in printed words’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13, 590–598.
Jastak, S. and Wilkinson, G. S.: 1984, Wide Range Achievement Test, revised edition, Jastak Associates, Wilmington, DE.
Kempley, S. T. and Morton, J.: 1982, The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition’, British Journal of Psychology 73, 441–454.
King, E. M. (ed.): 1982, Canadian Tests of Basic Skills: Multilevel Edition/Levels 912/Forms 5 and 6, Nelson, Toronto.
Leong, C. K.: 1987, Children with Specific Reading Disabilities, Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse, the Netherlands.
Leong, C. K.: 1988, ‘A componential approach to understanding reading and its difficulties in preadolescent readers’, Annals of Dyslexia 38, 95–119.
Leong, C. K.: 1989, ‘The effects of morphological structure on reading proficiency–A developmental study’, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 1, 357–379.
Leong, C. K.: 1992, ‘Cognitive componential modelling of reading in ten-to twelve-year-old readers’, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4, 327–364.
Leong, C. K. and Parkinson, M. E.: 1992, ‘Sensitivity to orthotactic rules in visual word recognition by below average readers’, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4, 1–17.
Mackay, D. G.: 1978, ‘Derivational rules and the internal lexicon’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17, 61–71.
Matthews, P. H.: 1974, Morphology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Murrell, G. A. and Morton, J.: 1974, ‘Word recognition and morphemic structure’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 102, 963–968.
Perfetti, C. A.: 1985, Reading Ability, Oxford University Press, New York.
Rayner, K.: 1978, ‘Eye movements in reading, and information processing’, Psychological Bulletin 85, 618–660.
Rubin, H.: 1988, ‘Morphological knowledge and early writing ability’, Language and Speech 31, 337–355.
Scalise, S.: 1984, Generative Morphology, Foris, Dordrecht.
Scalise, S.: 1988, ‘Inflection and derivation’, Linguistics 26, 561–581.
Seidenberg, M. S.: 1985, ‘The time course of information activation and utilization in visual word recognition’, in D. Besner, T. G. Waller and G. E. Mackinnon (eds.), Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 5, pp. 199–252.
Seymour, P. H. K.: 1986, Cognitive Analysis of Dyslexia, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Stemberger, J. P.: 1985, The Lexicon in a Model of Language Production, Garland Publishing, New York.
Sterling, C. M.: 1982, ‘The psychological productivity of inflectional and derivational morphemes’, in D. Rogers and J. A. Sloboda (eds.), The Acquisition of Symbolic Skills, Plenum Publishing, New York, pp. 179–185.
Taft, M.: 1979, ‘Lexical access via an orthographic code: The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS)’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 21–39.
Taft, M.: 1987, ‘Morphographic processing: The BOSS re-emerges’, in M. Coltheart (ed.), Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading, Lawrence Erlbaum, London, pp. 265–279.
Taft, M.: 1988, ‘A morphological-decomposition model of lexical representation’, Linguistics 26, 657–668.
Tyler, A. and Nagy, W.: 1989, ‘The acquisition of English derivational morphology’, Journal of Memory and Language 28, 649–667.
Williams, E.: 1981, ‘On the notions of ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of word“, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 245–274.
Wysocki, K. and Jenkins, J.: 1987, ‘Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization’, Reading Research Quarterly 22, 66–81.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leong, C.K., Parkinson, M.E. (1995). Processing of English Morphological Structure by Poor Readers. In: Leong, C.K., Joshi, R.M. (eds) Developmental and Acquired Dyslexia. Neuropsychology and Cognition, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1241-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1241-5_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4473-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1241-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive