Skip to main content

Processing of English Morphological Structure by Poor Readers

  • Chapter
Developmental and Acquired Dyslexia

Part of the book series: Neuropsychology and Cognition ((NPCO,volume 9))

Abstract

This chapter discusses the productive aspect of morphological processing and the effect on reading proficiency in older children. The report summarizes the results of three main experiments using the semantic priming procedure plus an initial repetition priming experiment, all using reaction time measures, to explore ten- to twelve-year old ‘poor’ readers’ sensitivity to, and knowledge of, derivational morphology. There is some evidence from the accurate and rapid vocal production of complex derived or base words that the depth of derivational morphology and the converse of segmentation to base forms play a role in reading performance in these children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, S. R.: 1990, ‘Sapir’s approach to typology and current issues in morphology’, in W. U. Dressler, H. C. Luschutzky, O. E. Pfeiffer and J. R. Rennison (eds.), Contemporary Morphology, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York, pp. 277–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, M.: 1976, Word Formation in Generative Grammar, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 1, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, H. and Lieber, R.: 1991, ‘Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study’, Linguistics 29, 801–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, L.: 1983, English Word Formation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A.: 1988, ‘Some aspects of language processing revealed through the analysis of acquired aphasia: The lexical system’, Annual Review of Neurosciences 11, 395–421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A.: 1991, Issues in Reading, Writing and Speaking: A Neuropsychological Perspective, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A. and Romani, C.: 1988, ‘Lexical access and inflectional morphology’, Cognition 28, 297–332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F.: 1987, ‘The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning disabled and normal students’, Annals of Dyslexia 37, 90–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F.: 1988, ‘Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eight graders’, Applied Psycholinguistics 9, 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. and Liberman, I. Y.: 1987, Does the Study of Latin Affect Spelling Proficiency?, Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research SR-92, Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, pp. 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B., Davies, P. and Richman, B.: 1971, The American Heritage Word Frequency Book, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. and Halle, M.: 1968, The Sound Pattern of English, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A.: 1983, ‘Lexical complexity and sentence processing’, in G. B. Flores d’Arcais and R. J. Jarvella (eds.), The Process of Language Understanding, John Wiley, New York, pp. 43–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C.: 1990, Differences in Dyslexia: A Study of Reading Strategies and Deficits in a Linguistic Perspective, Munksgaard, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C.: 1991, ‘Dyslexics and normal beginning readers read by different strategies: A comparison of strategy distributions in dyslexics and normal readers’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 1, 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. B.: 1991, ‘The contribution of morphology to word recognition’, Psychological Research 53, 33–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. B. and Bentin, S.: 1992, Morphological Analysis of Disrupted Morphemes: Evidence from Hebrew, Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research SR-109/110, Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, pp. 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E. and Feldman, L. B.: 1985, ‘Relations among regular and irregular, morphologically-related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming’, Memory and Cognition 13, 241–255.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freyd, P. and Baron, J.: 1982, ‘Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 21, 282–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. and Katz, L. (eds.): 1992, Orthography, Phonology, Morphology, and Meaning, North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, P.: 1989, ‘Levels of affixation in the acquisition of English morphology’, Journal of Memory and Language 28, 519–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halle, M.: 1973, ‘Prolegomena to a theory of word formation’, Linguistic Inquiry 4, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankamer, J.: 1989, ‘Morphological parsing and the lexicon’, in W. Marslen-Wilson (ed.), Lexical Representation and Process, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 392–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V. L. and Wilkenfeld, D.: 1985, ‘Morphophonology and lexical organization in deaf readers’, Language and Speech 28, 269–280.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L.: 1985, ‘Toward a psychology of morphemes’, in A. W. Ellis (ed.), Progress in the Psychology of Language, Lawrence Erlbaum, London, Vol. 1, pp. 15–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M. K.: 1988, ‘Beyond phonics: Integrated decoding and spelling instruction based on word origin and structure’, Annals of Dyslexia 38, 258–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, M. K.: 1993, ‘Morphological structure: Latin and Greek roots and affixes as upper grade code strategies’, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5, 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvella, R. J., Job, R., Sandström, G. and Schreuder, R.: 1987, ‘Morphological constraints on word recognition’, in A. Allport, D. G. Mackay, W. Prinz and E. Scheerer (eds.), Language Perception and Production, Academic Press, London, pp. 245–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvella, R. J. and Snodgrass, J. G.: 1974, ‘Seeing ring in rang and retain in retention: On recognizing stem morphemes in printed words’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13, 590–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jastak, S. and Wilkinson, G. S.: 1984, Wide Range Achievement Test, revised edition, Jastak Associates, Wilmington, DE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempley, S. T. and Morton, J.: 1982, The effects of priming with regularly and irregularly related words in auditory word recognition’, British Journal of Psychology 73, 441–454.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King, E. M. (ed.): 1982, Canadian Tests of Basic Skills: Multilevel Edition/Levels 912/Forms 5 and 6, Nelson, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K.: 1987, Children with Specific Reading Disabilities, Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K.: 1988, ‘A componential approach to understanding reading and its difficulties in preadolescent readers’, Annals of Dyslexia 38, 95–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K.: 1989, ‘The effects of morphological structure on reading proficiency–A developmental study’, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 1, 357–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K.: 1992, ‘Cognitive componential modelling of reading in ten-to twelve-year-old readers’, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4, 327–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. and Parkinson, M. E.: 1992, ‘Sensitivity to orthotactic rules in visual word recognition by below average readers’, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, D. G.: 1978, ‘Derivational rules and the internal lexicon’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17, 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, P. H.: 1974, Morphology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murrell, G. A. and Morton, J.: 1974, ‘Word recognition and morphemic structure’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 102, 963–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A.: 1985, Reading Ability, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K.: 1978, ‘Eye movements in reading, and information processing’, Psychological Bulletin 85, 618–660.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H.: 1988, ‘Morphological knowledge and early writing ability’, Language and Speech 31, 337–355.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scalise, S.: 1984, Generative Morphology, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scalise, S.: 1988, ‘Inflection and derivation’, Linguistics 26, 561–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S.: 1985, ‘The time course of information activation and utilization in visual word recognition’, in D. Besner, T. G. Waller and G. E. Mackinnon (eds.), Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 5, pp. 199–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. H. K.: 1986, Cognitive Analysis of Dyslexia, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemberger, J. P.: 1985, The Lexicon in a Model of Language Production, Garland Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, C. M.: 1982, ‘The psychological productivity of inflectional and derivational morphemes’, in D. Rogers and J. A. Sloboda (eds.), The Acquisition of Symbolic Skills, Plenum Publishing, New York, pp. 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M.: 1979, ‘Lexical access via an orthographic code: The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS)’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M.: 1987, ‘Morphographic processing: The BOSS re-emerges’, in M. Coltheart (ed.), Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading, Lawrence Erlbaum, London, pp. 265–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M.: 1988, ‘A morphological-decomposition model of lexical representation’, Linguistics 26, 657–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, A. and Nagy, W.: 1989, ‘The acquisition of English derivational morphology’, Journal of Memory and Language 28, 649–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1981, ‘On the notions of ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of word“, Linguistic Inquiry 12, 245–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wysocki, K. and Jenkins, J.: 1987, ‘Deriving word meanings through morphological generalization’, Reading Research Quarterly 22, 66–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leong, C.K., Parkinson, M.E. (1995). Processing of English Morphological Structure by Poor Readers. In: Leong, C.K., Joshi, R.M. (eds) Developmental and Acquired Dyslexia. Neuropsychology and Cognition, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1241-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1241-5_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-4473-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1241-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics