Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A componential approach to understanding reading and its difficulties in preadolescent readers

  • Part II Theoretical Seeds
  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study is predicated on the logic of interrelated functional information processing components as an approach to understanding reading and its difficulties in preadolescent readers. The structural equation modelling (and its variants) involved these three latent components: (a) orthographic/phonological component, (b) morphological component, and (c) sentence and paragraph comprehension component. These components were subserved by a total of ten measurable tasks, all administered on-line via the microcomputer under laboratory conditions with reaction time measures as indices of mental representation of word knowledge and sentence/paragraph comprehension. The latent dependent component of reading performance was subserved by standardized vocabulary and reading comprehension tests. The total sample consisted of 298 children in grades, 4, 5, and 6. Maximum likelihood analyses using LISREL show that the data in general do not disconfirm the proposed model for grade 4 readers. The three-component model, with some variables set free, provides a reasonable fit for the grade 5 data but less claim could be made about the goodness of fit for grade 6. The results show the mutually reinforcing and mutually facilitating effects of multilevels and multicomponents of reading. Word structure and word knowledge are particularly predictive of reading. The present Phase 1 work would be validated in a follow-up of another cohort of readers and would also lead to the systematic training of some of the components with poor readers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaronson, D. 1984. Computer methods and ecological validity in reading research.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 16: 102–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, M. 1976.Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. and Strawson, C. 1976. Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2:386–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L. and Carpenter, P. A. 1986. Cognitive approaches to understanding reading: Implications for instructional practice.American Psychologist 41:1098–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. 1980. Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling.Annual Review of Psychology 31:419–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. 1986. Structural modeling and Psychometrika: An historical perspective on growth and achievements.Psychometrika 51:35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berko, J. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology.Word 14:150–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, R. 1982. Cognitive models of reading: Implications for assessment and treatment of reading disability.In R. N. Malatesha and P. G. Aaron (eds.).Reading Disorders: Varieties and treatments (pp. 151–176). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. 1985. The relationship between knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders.Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research SR-82/83, 151–174.

  • Carlisle, J. F. 1987. The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning disabled and normal students.Annals of Dyslexia 37:90–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. and Chase, W. G. 1972. On the process of comparing sentences against pictures.Cognitive Psychology 3:472–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, N. 1983. Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods.Multivariate Behavioral Research 18:115–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. 1980. Reading, phonological recoding, and deep dyslexia.In M. Coltheart, K. Patterson, and J. C. Marshall (eds.).Deep Dyslexia (pp. 197–226). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P. and Tanaka, J. S. (eds.). 1987. Structural equation modeling [Special section].Child Development 58(1):1–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, R. G. 1984. Is it just reading? Comments on the papers by Mann, Morrison, and Wolford and Fowler.Developmental Review 4:48–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing J. and Leong, C. K. 1982.Psychology of Reading. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, C. D., Murray, D. J., and Pearson, L. S. 1978.British Ability Scales: Manual 3: Directions for administration and scoring and Manual 4: Tables of abilities and norms. Windsor, Berks: NFER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. W., Shankweiler, D., and Liberman, I. Y. 1985. Spelling proficiency and sensitivity to word structure.Journal of Memory and Language 24: 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. I. 1976. Accessing the mental lexicon.In R. J. Wales and E. Walker (eds.).New Approaches to Mental Mechanisms (pp. 257–287). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E., and Feldman, L. B. 1985. Relations among regular and irregular, morphologically-related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming.Memory & Cognition 13: 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R. 1981. Sources of process interactions in reading.In A. M. Lesgold and C. A. Perfetti (eds.).Interactive Processes in Reading (pp. 361–386). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R. 1982. A componential theory of reading skills and their interactions.In R. J. Sternberg (ed.),Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence (Vol. 1) (pp. 125–180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R. and Warren, B. M. 1987. A cognitive framework for developing expertise in reading.In R. Glaser (ed.).Advances in Instructional Psychology (Vol. 3) (pp. 1–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R., Warren, B. M., and Rosebery, A. S. 1985a. A componential approach to training reading skills: Part 1. Perceptual units training.Cognition and Instruction 2:91–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R., Warren, B. M., and Rosebery, A. S. 1985b. A componential approach to training reading skills: Part 2. Decoding and use of context.Cognition and Instruction 2:271–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. J. and Levin, H. 1975.The Psychology of Reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haines, L. and Leong, C. K. 1983. Coding processes in skilled and less skilled readers.Annals of Dyslexia 33: 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. L., Kruithof, A., Terwogt, M. M., and Visser, T. 1981. Children’s detection and awareness of textual anomaly.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 31: 212–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L. 1982.Orthography and Word Recognition in Reading. London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. 1985. Toward a psychology of morphemes.In A. W. Ellis (ed.).Progress in the Psychology of Language (Vol. 1) (pp. 15–72). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, G. W. and Evett, L. J. 1985. Are there independent lexical and nonlexical routes in word processing? An evaluation of the dual route theory of reading.The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8: 689–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. 1981. Analysis of covariance structure.Scandinavia Journal of Statistics 8: 65–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. and Sörbom, D. 1982. Recent developments in structural equation modeling.Journal of Marketing Research 19: 404–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. and Sörbom, D. 1984.LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: Scientific Software, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieras, D. and Just, M. (eds.). 1985.New Methods in Reading Comprehension Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, E. M. (ed.). 1982.Canadian Tests of Basic Skills: Multilevel edition/Levels 9–12/Forms 5 & 6. Toronto: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klima, E. S. 1972. How alphabets might reflect language. In J. F. Kavanagh and I. G. Mattingly (eds.).Language by Ear and by Eye (pp. 57–80). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. 1984. Cognitive processing, language awareness, and reading in grade 2 and grade 4 children.Contemporary Educational Psychology 9: 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. 1987.Children with Specific Reading Disabilities. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong C. K. 1988.Morphological structure and its effect on reading proficiency. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Luszcz, M. A., Bungey, J., and Geffen, G. 1984. Orthographic-morphemic factors in reading: A developmental study.Australian Journal of Psychology 36: 355–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, E. M. 1979. Realizing that you don’t understand: Elementary school children’s awareness of inconsistencies.Child Development 50: 643–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, E. M. 1985. Comprehension monitoring: Developmental and educational issues.In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, and R. Glaser (eds.).Thinking and Learning Skills, Vol. 2: Research and open questions (pp. 275–291). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, M. G. and Curtis, M. E. (eds.). 1987.The Nature of Vocabulary Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. and Gildea, P. M. 1987. How children learn words.Scientific America 257: 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, F. J. 1984. Reading disability: A problem in rule learning and word decoding.Developmental Review 4: 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K. 1985. Disabled reading processes and cognitive profiles.In D. B. Gray and J. F. Kavanagh (eds.),Biobehavioral Measures of Dyslexia (pp. 215–243). Baltimore, MD: York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K. and Keenan, J. M. 1985. Segmentation in models of reading.The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8:719–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K., Kliegl, R., Davidson, B. J., and Folts, G. 1985. Individual and developmental differences in reading disability.In G. E. Mackinnon and T. G. Waller (eds.).Reading Research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 4) (pp. 1–64). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palincsar, A. S. and Brown, A. L. 1984. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities.Cognition and Instruction 1: 117–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, J., MacLeod, C. M., Hunt, E., and Davidson, J. E. 1985. Information processing correlates of reading.Journal of Memory and Language 24: 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perera, K. 1984.Children’s Writing and Reading. London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. 1985.Reading Ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. 1986. Cognitive and linguistic components of reading ability.In B. R. Foorman and A. W. Siegel (eds.).Acquisition of Reading Skills: Cultural constraints and cognitive universals (pp. 11–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polich, J., McCarthy, G., Wang, W. S., and Donchin, E. 1983. When words collide: Orthographic and phonological interference during word processing.Biological Psychology 16: 155–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saffran, E. M. and Marin, O. S. M. 1977. Reading without phonology: Evidence from aphasia.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 29: 515–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S. 1985a. The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.Cognition 19: 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S. 1985b. The time course of information activation and utilization in visual word recognition.In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, and G. E. Mackinnon (eds.).Reading Research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol. 5. (pp. 199–252). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. 1985. The decoding of words in lexical access: A review of the morphological approach.In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, and G. E. Mackinnon (eds.).Reading Research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5) (pp. 83–123). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, B.Y.L. 1985. Self-questioning instructional research: A review.Review of Educational Research 55: 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. and Garrett, M. 1984. Lexical decision in sentences: Effects of syntactic structure.Memory and Cognition 12: 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

    Che Kan Leong

Authors
  1. Che Kan Leong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This study was supported by a grant (No. 410-86-0048) from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leong, C.K. A componential approach to understanding reading and its difficulties in preadolescent readers. Annals of Dyslexia 38, 95–119 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648250

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648250

Keywords

Search

Navigation