Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cognitive componential modelling of reading in ten- to twelve-year-old readers

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The longitudinal project attempts to estimate the parameters of a priori postulates with their measurement errors, and the goodness-of-fit of model-implied population covariance sigma matrices with observed sample covariance matrices, using linear structural equation modelling (LISREL). The present report deals with Phase 2 of the project (see Leong 1988 for Phase 1 results) and involved 252 ten-to twelve-year-old readers. Three latent exogenous components were postulated: (a) orthographic/phonological component, (b) morphological component, and (c) sentence comprehension component. These constructs were subserved by 8 measurable indicators (5 lexical decision and 3 vocalization tasks). These 8 independent tasks were all administered on-line via the microcomputer under laboratory conditions with combined, scaled accuracy and latency measures as indices of efficiency in processing the reading related tasks. The latent endogenous or dependent component Reading Performance was subserved by standardized vocabulary and reading comprehension tests. Maximum likelihood analyses using LISREL VI to test the approximation of the hypothesized model show a good fit for the grade 4 data, a reasonable fit for grade 5, and a less unambiguous fit for grade 6. These results are generally confirmed with the simultaneous structural analyses of Phase 2 and Phase 1 (N=298 students) multisamples. Multi-components and multi-levels of reading for these age groups are emphasized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. J. & Huggins, A. W. F. (1985). The growth of children's sight vocabulary: A quick test with educational and theoretical implications.Reading Research Quarterly 20: 262–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C. (1987). Structural equation models in the social and behavioral sciences: Model building.Child Development 58: 49–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C. & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin 103: 411–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, D. J. & Satz, P., eds. (1970).Specific reading disability: Advances in theory and method. Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B., Cornelius, S. W. & Nesselroade, J. R. (1979). Cohort effects in developmental psychology, pp. 61–87, in: J. R. Nesselroade & P. B. Baltes (eds.),Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling.Annual Review of Psychology 31: 419–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1986). Structural modeling and Psychometrika: An historical perspective on growth and achievements.Psychometrika 51: 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W. (1989). Orchestration of multiple codes in developing readers: An alternative model of lexical access.International Journal of Neuroscience 48: 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. W., Chen, A. C. N. & Abbott, R. D. (1988). A test of the multiple connections model of reading acquisition.International Journal of Neuroscience 42: 283–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwisch, M. (1983). How on-line is language processing?, pp. 113–168, in: G. B. Flores d'Arcais & R. J. Jarvella (eds.),The process of language understanding. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, R. C. (1977). Assessment of independent reading skills: Basic research and practical applications, pp. 289–323, in: A. S. Reber & D. L. Scarborough (eds.),Toward a psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, R. C. (1982). Cognitive models of reading: Implications for assessment and treatment of reading disability, pp. 151–176, in: R. N. Malatesha & P. G. Aaron (eds.),Reading disorders: Varieties and treatments. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, R. C., Chapman, R. & Venezky, R. (1972). How a child needs to think to learn to read, pp. 139–182, in: L. W. Gregg (ed.),Cognition in learning and memory. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, R. C. & Drum, P. A. (1978). Learning to read: Theory, research and practice.Curriculum Inquiry 8: 183–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (1987). The use of morphological knowledge in spelling derived forms by learning disabled and normal students.Annals of Dyslexia 37: 90–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders.Applied Psycholinguistics 9: 247–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, P. A. & Just, M. A. (1975). Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification.Psychological Review 82: 45–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, T. H. (1981). Building theories of reading ability: On the relation between individual differences in cognitive skills and reading comprehension.Cognition 9: 73–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, T. H. & Levy, B. A., eds. (1990).Reading and its development: Component skills approaches. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B., Davies, P. & Richman, B. (1971).The American heritage word frequency book. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. & Chase, W. G. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures.Cognitive Psychology 3: 472–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, N. (1983). Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods.Multivariate Behavioral Research 18: 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrey, A. L. (1985). A method for removing outliers to improve factor analytic results.Multivariate Behavioral Research 20: 273–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P., & Tanaka, J. S., eds. (1987). Structural equation modeling [Special section].Child Development 58: 1–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. (1983). Lexical complexity and sentence processing, pp. 43–79, in: G. B. Flores D'Arcais & R. J. Jarvella (eds.),The process of language understanding. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donders, F. C. (1969). On the speed of mental processes, in: W. G. Koster (ed. & trans.), Attention and Performance II.Acta Psychologica 30: 412–431 [Tr. original: Over de snelheid van psychische processen. Onderzoekingen in het Physiologisch Laboratorium der Utrecht Hoogeschool (1868–1869) 2: 92–120].

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, C. D., Murray, D. J. & Pearson, L. S. (1978).British Ability Scales: Manual 3: Directions for administration and scoring / Manual 4: Tables of abilities and norms. Windsor, Berks.: NFER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F. W., Shankweiler, D. & Liberman, I. Y. (1985). Spelling proficiency and sensitivity to word structure.Journal of Memory and Language 24: 423–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. M., Satz, P. & Morris, R. (1984). The Florida longitudinal project: A review, pp. 280–304, in: S. A. Mednick, M. Harway & K. M. Finello (eds.),Handbook of longitudinal research. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R. (1981). Sources of process interactions in reading, pp. 361–386, in: A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (eds.),Interactive processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R. (1982). A componential theory of reading skills and their interactions, pp. 125–180, in: R. J. Sternberg (ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R. & Warren, B. M. (1987). A cognitive framework for developing expertise in reading, pp. 1–39, in: R. Glaser (ed.),Advances in instructional psychology, Vol. 3. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R., Warren, B. M. & Rosebery, A. S. (1985a). A componential approach to training reading skills: Part 1. Perceptual units training.Cognition and Instruction 2: 91–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R., Warren, B. M. & Rosebery, A. S. (1985b). A componential approach to training reading skills: Part 2. Decoding and use of context.Cognition and Instruction 2: 271–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5: 674–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduck, L. A. (1987).Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, L., Coltheart, M., Cutler, A. & Vincent, N., eds. (1988). Linguistic and psychological approaches to morphology [Special issue].Linguistics 26(4): 519–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzog, C. (1990). On the utility of structural equation models for developmental research, pp. 257–290, in: P. B. Baltes, D. L. Featherman & R. M. Lerner (eds.),Life-span development and behavior Vol. 10. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelter, J. W. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices.Sociological Methods & Research 11: 325–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, E., Lunneborg, C. & Lewis, J. (1975). What does it mean to be highly verbal?Cognitive Psychology 7: 194–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., Mulaik, S. A. & Brett, J. M. (1982).Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvella, R. J. & Snodgrass, J. G. (1974). Seeing ring in rang and retain in retention: On recognizing stem morphemes in printed words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13: 590–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1981). Analysis of covariance structure.Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 8: 65–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1985). Simultaneous analysis of longitudinal data from several cohorts, pp. 323–370, in: W. M. Mason & S. E. Fienberg (eds.),Cohort analysis in social research: Beyond the identification problem. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1982). Recent development in structural equation modeling.Journal of Marketing Research 19: 404–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1984).LISREL 6: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: Scientific Software, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1989).LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications, 2nd ed. Chicago: IL; SPSS Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, E. M., ed. (1982).Canadian Tests of Basic Skills: Multilevel edition/Levels 9–12/Forms 5 & 6. Toronto: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970).The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed. enlarged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. (1988). A componential approach to understanding reading and its difficulties in preadolescent readers.Annals of Dyslexia 38: 95–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. (1989a). The effects of morphological structure on reading proficiency — A developmental study.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 1: 357–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. (1989b). Productive knowledge of derivational rules in poor readers.Annals of Dyslexia 39: 94–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. (1991). Modelling reading as a cognitive and linguistic skill, pp. 161–173, in: R. F. Mulcahy, R. H. Short & J. Andrews (eds.),Enhancing learning and thinking. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. (in press). A framework for diagnosis and remediation of reading disorders, in: R. M. Joshi & C. K. Leong (eds.),Reading disabilities: Diagnosis and Component processes. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Leong, C. K., Cheng, S. C., Lundberg, I., Olofsson, Å. & Mulcahy, R. (1989). The effects of cognitive processing, language access on academic performance — Linear structural equation modelling.International Journal of Experimental Research in Education 26: 15–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. & Lock, S. (1989). The use of microcomputer technology in a modular approach to reading and reading difficulties.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2: 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leong, C. K. & Parkinson, M. E. (1992). Sensitivity to orthotactic rules in visual word recognition by below average readers.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, S. & Leong, C. K. (1991). An algorithmic implementation of Rasch approach to item analysis with graphical interpretation.Educational Research Journal 6: 40–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancini, G., Mulcahy, R. & Leong, C. K. (1990). Metalinguistic and specific language abilities in nine- and eleven-year-old good and poor readers, pp. 131–149, in: G. Th. Pavlidis (ed.),Perspectives on dyslexia, Vol. 2:Cognition, language, and treatment. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. & Gildea, P. M. (1987). How children learn words.Scientific American 257: 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesselroade, J. R. & Baltes, P. B. (1984). Sequential strategies and the role of cohort effects in behavioral development: Adolescent personality (1970–72) as a sample case, pp. 55–87, in: S. A. Mednick, M. Harway & K. M. Finello (eds.),Handbook of longitudinal research, Vol. 1:Birth and childhood cohorts. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R. K., Kliegl, R., Davidson, B. J. & Foltz, G. (1985). Individual and developmental differences in reading disability, pp. 1–64, in: G. E. Mackinnon & T. G. Waller (eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R., Wise, B., Conners, F. & Rack, J. (1990). Organization, heritability, and remediation of component word recognition and language skills in disabled readers, pp. 261–322, in: T. H. Carr & B. A. Levy (eds.),Reading and its development: Component skills approaches. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information-processing research, pp. 41–82, in: B. H. Kantowitz (ed.),Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, A. J. (1982). Phonological recoding in lexical decision: Effects of spelling-to-sound regularity depend on how regularity is defined.Memory & Cognition 10: 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J. W. & Kail, R. (1982). Process analyses of spatial aptitude, pp. 311–365, in: R. J. Sternberg (ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perera, K. (1984).Children's writing and reading. London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polich, J., McCarthy, G., Wang, W. S. & Donchin, E. (1983). When words collide: Orthographic and phonological interference during word processing.Biological Psychology 16: 155–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1935/1959).The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1972).Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasch, G. (1960/1980).Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogosa, D. (1979). Causal models in longitudinal research: Rationale, formulation, and interpretation, pp. 263–302, in: J. R. Nesselroade & P. B. Baltes (eds.),Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satz, P. & Ross, J. J., eds. (1970).The disabled learner: Early detection and intervention. Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency.Reading Research Quarterly 16: 32–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1977).Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1980). Sketch of a componential subtheory of human intelligence.The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 573–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. & Rifkin, B. (1979). The development of analogical reasoning processes.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 27: 195–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (1979). Lexical access via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS).Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (1985). The decoding of words in lexical access: A review of the morphographic approach, pp. 83–123, in: D. Besner, T. G. Waller & G. E. Mackinnon (eds.),Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, M. (1988). A morphological-decomposition model of lexical representation.Linguistics 26: 657–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. A. (1976). Stage analysis of reaction time.Psychological Bulletin 83: 161–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G. S. & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time course and decision criteria.Memory & Cognition 13: 557–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widaman, K. F., Geary, D. C., Cormier, P. & Little, T. D. (1989). A componential model for mental addition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15: 898–919.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department for the Education of Exceptional Children, College for Education, University of Saskatchewan, S7N 0W0, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

    Che Kan Leong

Authors
  1. Che Kan Leong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Che Kan Leong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leong, C.K. Cognitive componential modelling of reading in ten- to twelve-year-old readers. Read Writ 4, 327–364 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027712

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01027712

Key words

Search

Navigation