Abstract
This mixed-method study explored the characteristics of professional learning communities (PLCs) in Chinese schools. Informed by the existing literature on PLCs, the authors conducted a questionnaire survey of teachers in seven schools in Shanghai to explore the characteristics of Chinese PLCs. Follow-up qualitative interviews were also conducted to examine the underlying reasons for such characteristics perceived by teachers. Results show that PLCs in the Chinese schools can be conceptualized in terms of collaborative learning, professional competency, facilitative leadership, structural support, and cultural barriers, which can be attributed to school education system, traditional social cultures, and ways of teacher recognition. Practical implications as well as suggestions for future research are also provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen, G. (2006). A commentary on the Teaching Research Group phenomenon in China. Nantong University Journal, 22(4), 1–4. (in Chinese).
DuFour, R. (2003). Building a professional learning community. School Administrator, 60(5), 13–18.
Dufour, R. & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Education Service; Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Fullan, M. (2003). Change forces with a vengeance. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Hairon, S., & Dimmock, C. (2012). Singapore schools and professional learning communities: teacher professional development and school leadership in an Asian hierarchical system. Educational Review, 64(4), 405–424.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London: Cassell.
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2010). Professional learning communities and system improvement. Improving Schools, 13(2), 172–181.
Hipp, K. K., & Huffman, J. B. (2010). Demystifying professional learning communities: school leadership at its best. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Little field Education.
Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Lab.
Hord, S. M., & Sommers, W. A. (2008). Leading professional learning communities: voices from research and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hu, Y. (2013). On the construction of the Teaching Research Group from the perspective of professional learning community. Educational Research, 10, 37–43. (in Chinese).
Huffman, J. B., & Jacobson, A. L. (2003). Perceptions of professional learning communities. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice, 6(3), 239–250.
Kilbane, J. F. (2010). Factors in sustaining professional learning community. NASSP Bulletin, 93(184), 184–205.
Lindahl, R. A. (2011). Professional learning communities: A feasible reality or a chimera? In J. Alford, G. Perreault, L. Zellner, & W. Ballenger (Eds.), Blazing new trails: Preparing leaders to improve access and equity in today’s schools (pp. 47–58). Lancaster: DEStech Publications Inc.
Little, J. W. (2002). Professional community and the problem of high school reform. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 693–714.
Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757–798.
Malone, A., & Smith, G. (2010). Developing schools as professional learning communities: The TL21 experience. US-China Education Review, 7(9), 106–114.
Paine, L. W., & Ma, L. P. (1993). Teachers working together: A dialogue on organizational and cultural perspectives of Chinese teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(8), 675–697.
Ryan, J., Kang, C., Mitchell, I., & Erickson, G. (2009). China’s basic education reform: an account of an international collaborative research and development project. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29(4), 427–441.
Sargent, T. C., & Hannum, E. (2009). Doing more with less: teacher professional learning communities in resource-constrained primary schools in rural China. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 258–276.
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Tan, C. (2013). Learning from Shanghai: Lessons on Achieving Educational Success. Dordrecht: Springer.
Tsui, A. & Wong, J. (2009). In search of a third space: Teacher development in Mainland China. In C. K. K. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education (pp. 281–311). Hong Kong: Springer, Comparative Education Research Centre, Hong Kong University.
Wang, Jianjun. (2008). The approach and effect of teacher professional development in Chinese urban elementary schools. Shanghai Educational Research, 3, 17–18. (in Chinese).
Wells, C., & Feun, L. (2007). Implementation of learning community principles: A study of six high schools. NASSP Bulletin, 91(2), 141–160.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wong, K. (2005). Conditions and practices of successful principalship in Shanghai. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 552–562.
Wong, J. L. N. (2010). Searching for good practice in teaching: A comparison of two subject-based professional learning communities in a secondary school in Shanghai. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(5), 623–639.
Ye, L. (2009). The effect of university professionals on collaborative research on schools. Chinese Journal of Education, 9, 1–7. (in Chinese).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, J., Pang, N.SK. Exploring the Characteristics of Professional Learning Communities in China: A Mixed-Method Study. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 25, 11–21 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0228-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0228-3