Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a conceptual model for understanding professional learning communities in China: a mixed-method study

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This mixed-method study developed a conceptual model for understanding the characteristics of professional learning communities (PLCs) in Chinese context. Exploratory qualitative interviews were first conducted to examine the characteristics of PLCs in several schools in Shanghai, China, through which an initial conceptual model was resulted. Based on the qualitative findings, a questionnaire was developed and then administered in 31 schools in Shanghai to adjust the conceptual model. Results show that rooted in the Chinese institutional (i.e., the accountability system and the Teaching Research System) and cultural (i.e., the collective and harmonious culture) context, PLCs in China could be operationalized in terms of eight characteristics at two levels, including collective inquiry and sharing, shared purpose and responsibility, informal collaborative learning, supportive leadership, organizational structure, collaborative relationship, institutional barriers, and cultural barriers. Practical implications and suggestions for future research are put forward.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In Chinese schools, teachers of the same subject form a Teaching Research Group which aims to improve teaching and learning through teachers’ collective work.

References

  • Achinstein, B. (2002). Conflict amid community: The micropolitics of teacher collaboration. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 421–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. (2013). Reconstructing professional learning community as collective creation. Improving Schools, 16(3), 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blitz, C. (2013).Can online learning communities achieve the goals of traditional professional learning communities? What the literature says. (REL2013-003). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Mid-Atlantic. Retrieved December 31, 2013, from http://i3es.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.

  • Capers, M. (2004). Teaching and shared professional practice- A history of resistance; a future dependent on its embrace. In S. M. Hord (Ed.), Learning together, leading together: Changing Schools through Professional Learning Communities (pp. 151–162). New York, Oxford, Ohio: Teachers College Press, National Staff Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranston, J. (2009). Holding the reins of the professional learning community: Eight themes from research on principals’ perceptions of professional learning communities. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 90, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuFour, R. (1999). Help wanted: Principals who can lead professional learning communities. NASSP Bulletin, 83(614), 12–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, Alexandria: National Education Service, ASCD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, C. (2002). Learning from Japanese approaches to professional development: The case of lesson study. Journal of Teacher Education, 53, 393–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hairon, S., & Dimmock, C. (2012). Singapore schools and professional learning communities: Teacher professional development and school leadership in an Asian hierarchical system. Educational Review, 64(4), 405–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2010). Leading system transformation. School Leadership and Management, 30(30), 197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2014). Distributed leadership matters: Perspectives, practicalities, and potential. California: Corwin press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2010). Professional learning communities and system improvement. Improving Schools, 13(2), 172–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipp, K. K., & Huffman, J. B. (2010). Demystifying professional learning communities: School leadership at its best. Lanham: Rowman & Little field Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hord, S. M., & Sommers, W. A. (2008). Leading professional learning communities: Voices from research and practice. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press, National Association of Secondary School Principals (NSDC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, I. S., & Little, J. W. (2010). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers’ workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y. (2011). Exploration of the function and character of teaching and research groups of primary and secondary schools in 17 years since 1949. Teacher Education Research, 6, 50–55. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, J. (2003). The role of shared values and vision in creating professional learning communities. NASSP Bulletin, 87(637), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, J. B., & Hipp, K. K. (2003). Reculturing schools as professional learning communities. Publisher Lanham: Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K. (1997). Guanxi and Mientze: Conflict resolution in Chinese society. Intercultural Communication Studies, 7, 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilbane, J. F. (2010). Factors in sustaining professional learning community. NASSP Bulletin, 93(184), 184–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, R. A. (2011). Professional learning communities: A feasible reality or a chimera? In J. Alford, G. Perreault, L. Zellner, & W. Ballenger (Eds.), Blazing new trails: preparing leaders to improve access and equity in todays schools (pp. 47–58). The 2011 Yearbook of the National Council of Professors of Educational Administration. ERIC, ED523595.

  • Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W. (2002). Professional community and the problem of high school reform. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 693–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W. (2006). Professional community and professional development in the learning-centered school. Washington, DC: National Education Association of the United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomos, C., Hofman, R. H., & Bosker, R. J. (2011). Professional communities and student achievement: A meta-analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 22(2), 121–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S., Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehring, J., & Fitzsimons, G. (2011). The professional learning community as subversive activity: Countering the culture of conventional schooling. Professional Development in Education, 37(4), 513–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. W., & Fang, Y. (2006). Reform as hybrid model of teaching and teacher development in China. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piggot-Irvine, E. (2006). Sustaining excellence in experienced principals? Critique of a professional learning community approach. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 10(16), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichstetter, R. (2006). Defining a professional learning community: A literature review. E&R Research Alert, #06.05. Retrieved January 2, 2014, from http://www.wcpss.net/evaluation-research/reports/2006/0605plc_lit_review.pdf.

  • Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J., Kang, C., Mitchell, I., & Erickson, G. (2009). China’s basic education reform: An account of an international collaborative research and development project. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29(4), 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, T. C., & Hannum, E. (2009). Doing more with less: teacher professional learning communities in resource-constrained primary schools in rural China. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 258–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday/Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, L., & Louis, K. S. (2007). Professional learning communities: Elaborating new approaches. In L. Stoll & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas (pp. 1–13). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supovitz, J. (2002). Developing communities of instructional practice. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1591–1626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbert, J. E. (2010). Professional learning communities at the crossroads: How systems hinder or engender change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 555–572). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C. (2013). Learning from Shanghai: Lessons on Achieving Educational Success. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. C., Gregg, L., & Niska, J. M. (2004). Professional learning communities, leadership, and student learning. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 28(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39, 308–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 80–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D., Wang, J., Li, H., & Li, L. (2017). School context and instructional capacity: A comparative study of professional learning communities in rural and urban schools in China. International Journal of Educational Development, 52, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T. (2015). Contrived collegiality versus genuine collegiality: Demystifying professional learning communities in Chinese schools. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(6), 908–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. L. N. (2010a). What makes a professional learning community to be possible? A case study of a Mathematics department in a junior secondary school of China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(2), 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. L. N. (2010b). Searching for good practice in teaching: A comparison of two subject-based professional learning communities in a secondary school in Shanghai. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(5), 623–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. (2005). Conditions and practices of successful principalship in Shanghai. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 552–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, R. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. (2008). The role of teacher appraisal in teacher professional development: a case study in schools in Shanghai. Doctor’s thesis, University of Hong Kong.

  • Zhang, J., & Pang, N. S. K. (2016). Exploring the characteristics of professional learning communities in China: A mixed-method study. The Asia Pacific Educational Researcher, 25(1), 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Yuan, R., & Yu, S. (2017). What impedes the development of professional learning communities in China? Perceptions from school leaders and frontline teachers in three schools in Shanghai. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 45(2), 219–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, the teaching and scientific research project for liberal arts teachers in Zhejiang University, and research project of Collaborative Innovation Center for Excellent Teacher Training of Zhejiang Province.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuantao Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Sun, Y. Development of a conceptual model for understanding professional learning communities in China: a mixed-method study. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 19, 445–457 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9548-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9548-3

Keywords

Navigation