Abstract
Increasing demand for energy, diminishing stocks of oil and natural gas, and the public’s desire to enhance environmental quality, particularly by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, all point to the need for improved materials. For example, generating electricity from the most abundant fossil fuel, coal, efficiently and with no environmental damage, presents notable challenges to develop higher performance materials. Technologies exist to transform one fossil fuel to other uses, such as coal to a gas or liquid. New materials that increase the efficiency of the transformation and lower its cost would provide valuable flexibility. Materials should be evaluated in terms of their entire life-cycle in order to discern which will make the greatest contribution. Because society has many pressing needs, both commercial value and contribution to fundamental materials science should guide priorities in materials research.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
C. Hendrickson, L. Lave, H. Matthews, Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Goods and Services: An Input-Output Approach (Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 2006).
U.S. Department of Energy, World Energy Use and Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 1980–2001 (Energy Information Administration, May 2004); www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/carbonemiss/energycarbon2004.pdf (accessed January 2008).
U.S. Department of Energy, Table A2 from Reference Case Projections Tables (1990–2030), Energy Information Administration; www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/ieo/ieorefcase.html (accessed January 2008).
U.S. Department of Energy, U.S.A. Energy Supply and Use in 2004, Energy Information Administration; www.eia.doe.gov/overview_hd.html (accessed January 2008).
See Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy; www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/carbonemiss/chapter1.html (accessed January 2008).
S.H. Schurr, B.C. Netschert, V. Elasberg, J. Lerner, H. Landsberg, Energy in the American Economy, 1850–1975 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1960).
U.S. Department of Energy, see Table in Energy Consumption by Primary Energy Source, 1949–2006, Energy Information Administration; www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/txt/ptb0103.html (accessed January 2008).
See Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy; www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/carbonemiss/chapter2.html (accessed January 2008).
J. Darmstadter, J. Dunkerley, J. Alterman, How Industrial Societies Use Energy (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 1977).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act, 1970 to 1990 (October 1997); www.epa.gov/air/sect812/retro.html (accessed January 2008).
See the Web site for the “Combined Heat and Power Partnership” of the Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy; www.epa.gov/CHP/basic/efficiency.html (accessed January 2008).
U.S. Department of Energy, see Table in Net Generation by Energy Source by Type of Producer, 1995 through 2006, Energy Information Administration; www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epat1p1.html (accessed January 2008).
P. Jaramillo, S. Samaras, Emissions from Coal-to-Liquids and Plug-in Hybrids (Working paper, Electricity Industry Center, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 2007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lave, L.B. The Economics of Energy Options. MRS Bulletin 33, 291–296 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2008.62
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2008.62