Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Oncologic Impact of Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a major complication of surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC), and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality; However, there are conflicting results on the impact of AL on long-term oncologic outcomes.

Objective

The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the oncologic outcomes of AL following restorative surgery for CRC.

Methods

Multiple comprehensive databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library, were searched for studies that assessed the oncologic effects of AL following surgery for CRC. The included studies evaluated local and distant recurrence, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Outcome data were pooled, and overall effect size was calculated using random effects models.

Results

Thirty-four nonrandomized studies including 78,434 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results show that AL was associated with increased local recurrence (relative risk [RR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48–2.44, I 2 = 78%) and reduced OS (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.24–1.50, I 2 = 74%), CSS (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.19–1.68, I 2 = 56%), and DFS (RR 1.40, 95% CI 1.20–1.63, I 2 = 86%). AL had no significant effect on distant recurrence (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.94–1.53, I 2 = 61%).

Conclusions

AL after restorative surgery for CRC is associated with increased local recurrence and reduced long-term survival, including OS, CSS, and DFS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koperna T. Cost-effectiveness of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resections for rectal cancer: a call for benchmarking. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1334–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boccola MA, Lin J, Rozen WM, Ho YH. Reducing anastomotic leakage in oncologic colorectal surgery: an evidence-based review. Anticancer Res. 2010;30:601–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1157–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P. Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2011;253:890–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Law WL, Choi HK, Lee YM, Ho JW, Seto CL. Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long-term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sauven P, Playforth MJ, Evans M, Pollock AV. Early infective complications and late recurrent cancer in stapled colonic anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989;32:33–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Akyol AM, McGregor JR, Galloway DJ, Murray GD, George WD. Anastomotic leaks in colorectal cancer surgery: a risk factor for recurrence? Int J Colorectal Dis. 1991;6:179–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujita S, Teramoto T, Watanabe M, Kodaira S, Kitajima M. Anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery: a risk factor for recurrence and poor prognosis. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1993;23:299–302.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Petersen S, Freitag M, Hellmich G, Ludwig K. Anastomotic leakage: impact on local recurrence and survival in surgery of colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1998;13:160–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Merkel S, Wang WY, Schmidt O, Dworak O, Wittekind C, Hohenberger W, et al. Locoregional recurrence in patients with anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Colorectal Dis. 2001;3:154–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJ, Sinclair G, Dent OF, Chapuis PH, et al. Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg. 2003;90:1261–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJ, Mehanna D, Dent OF, Chapuis PH, et al. Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2004;240:255–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Branagan G, Finnis D. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1021–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1150–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ptok H, Marusch F, Meyer F, Schubert D, Gastinger I, Lippert H, Study Group Colon/Rectum Carcinoma (Primary Tumour). Impact of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome after rectal cancer resection. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1548–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jung SH, Yu CS, Choi PW, Kim DD, Park IJ, Kim HC, et al. Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:902–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marra F, Steffen T, Kalak N, Warschkow R, Tarantino I, Lange J, et al. Anastomotic leakage as a risk factor for the long-term outcome after curative resection of colon cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:1060–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kube R, Mroczkowski P, Granowski D, Benedix F, Sahm M, Schmidt U, et al. Anastomotic leakage after colon cancer surgery: a predictor of significant morbidity and hospital mortality, and diminished tumour-free survival. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36:120–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boccola MA, Buettner PG, Rozen WM, Siu SK, Stevenson AR, Stitz R, et al. Risk factors and outcomes for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a single-institution analysis of 1576 patients. World J Surg. 2011;35:186–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Katoh H, Yamashita K, Wang G, Sato T, Nakamura T, Watanabe M. Anastomotic leakage contributes to the risk for systemic recurrence in stage II colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:120–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin JK, Yueh TC, Chang SC, Lin CC, Lan LT, Wang HS, et al. The influence of fecal diversion and anastomotic leakage on survival after resection of rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:2251–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang J, Choi GS, Oh JH, Kim NK., Park JS, Kim MJ, et al. Multicenter analysis of long-term oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Medicine. 2015;94:e1202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim IY, Kim BR, Kim YW. The impact of anastomotic leakage on oncologic outcomes and the receipt and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after colorectal cancer surgery. Int J Surg. 2015;22:3–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kulu Y, Tarantio I, Warschkow R, Kny S, Schneider M, Schmied BM, et al. Anastomotic leakage is associated with impaired overall and disease-free survival after curative rectal cancer resection: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:2059–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Law WL, Chu KW. Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision: a prospective evaluation of 622 patients. Ann Surg. 2004;240:260–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Norstein J, Haffner J, Wiig JN, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group. Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:51–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee WS, Yun SH, Roh YN, Yun HR, Lee WY, Cho YB, et al. Risk factors and clinical outcome for anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2008;32:1124–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. den Dulk M, Marijnen CA, Collette L, Putter H, Påhlman L, Folkesson J, et al. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2009;96:1066–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eberhardt JM, Kiran RP, Lavery IC. The impact of anastomotic leak and intra-abdominal abscess on cancer-related outcomes after resection for colorectal cancer: a case control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:380–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jørgensen T, Harling H, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection for rectal cancer: short and long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:e76–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jörgren F, Johansson R, Damber L, Lindmark G. Anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: a risk factor for local recurrence, distant metastasis and reduced cancer-specific survival? Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:272–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ebinger SM, Warschkow R, Tarantino I, Schmied BM, Marti L. Anastomotic leakage after curative rectal cancer resection has no impact on long-term survival: a propensity score analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:1667–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jannasch O, Klinge T, Otto R, Chiapponi C, Udelnow A, Lippert H, et al. Risk factors, short and long term outcome of anastomotic leaks in rectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6:36884–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lim SB, Yu CS, Kim CW, Yoon YS, Park IJ, Kim JC. The types of anastomotic leakage that develop following anterior resection for rectal cancer demonstrate distinct characteristics and oncologic outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:1533–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Nachiappan S, Askari A, Malietzis G, Giacometti M, White I, Jenkins JT, et al. The impact of anastomotic leak and its treatment on cancer recurrence and survival following elective colorectal cancer resection. World J Surg. 2015;39:1052–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lu ZR, Rajendran N, Lynch AC, Heriot AG, Warrier SK. Anastomotic leaks after restorative resections for rectal cancer compromise cancer outcomes and survival. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59:236–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.1.0. Vol. 5. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.

  39. Kulu Y, Ulrich A, Bruckner T, Contin P, Welsch T, Rahbari NN, et al. Validation of the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer definition and severity grading of anastomotic leakage. Surgery. 2013;153:753–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hayden JA, van der Windt DA, Cartwright JL, Cote P, Bombardier C. Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:280–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Thabane L, Akhtar-Danesh N. Guidelines for reporting descriptive statistics in health research. Nurse Res. 2008;15:72–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Patsopoulos NA, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP. Sensitivity of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: proposed metrics and empirical evaluation. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:1148–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Sutton AJ, Duval SJ, Tweedie RL, Abrams KR, Jones DR. Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. BMJ. 2000;320:1574–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Phillips RK, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L, Fry JS, Fielding LP. Local recurrence following ‘curative’ surgery for large bowel cancer: I-the overall picture. Br J Surg. 1984;71:12–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Pakkastie TE, Luukkonen PE, Järvinen HJ. Anterior resection controls cancer of the rectum as well as abdominoperineal excision. Eur J Surg. 1995;161:833–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Amato A, Pescatori M, Butti A. Local recurrence following abdominoperineal excision and anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34:317–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Cong ZJ, Hu LH, Bian ZQ, Ye GY, Yu MH, Gao YH, et al. Systematic review of anastomotic leakage rate according to an international grading system following anterior resection for rectal cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8:e75519.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010;147:339–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Umpleby HC, Fermor B, Symes MO, Williamson RC. Viablilty of exfoliated colorectal carcinoma cells. Br J Surg. 1984;71:659–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Salvans S, Mayol X, Alonso S, Messeguer R, Pascual M, Mojal S, et al. Postoperative peritoneal infection enhances migration and invasion capacities of tumor cells in vitro: an insight into the association between anastomotic leak and recurrence after surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2014;260:939–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Alonso S, Pascual M, Salvans S, Mayol X, Mojal S, Gil MJ, et al. Postoperative peritoneal infection increases colorectal cancer recurrence: a prospective matched cohort study of inflammatory and angiogenic responses as mechanisms responsible for this association. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:208–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Bohle B, Pera M, Pascual M, Alonso S, Mayol X, Salvado M, et al. Postoperative intra-abdominal infection increases angiogenesis and tumor recurrence after surgical excision of colon cancer in mice. Surgery. 2010;147:120–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. McMillan DC, Wotherspoon HA, Fearon KC, Sturgeon C, Cooke TG, McArdle CS. A prospective study of tumor recurrence and acute-phase response after apparently curative colorectal cancer surgery. Am J Surg. 1995;170:319–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. McMillan DC, Canna K, McArdle CS. Systemic inflammatory response predicts survival following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2003;90:215–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Skipper D, Cooper AJ, Marston JE, Taylor I. Exfoliated cells and in vitro growth in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1987;74:1049–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

Gi Won Ha, Jong Hun Kim, and Min Ro Lee have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Ro Lee MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ha, G.W., Kim, J.H. & Lee, M.R. Oncologic Impact of Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 3289–3299 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5881-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5881-8

Keywords

Navigation