Introduction

The mitochondrial-bound enzymes known as monoamine oxidases (MAOs) catalyze the oxidative deamination of biogenic amines. They play a pivotal role in the metabolism of hormones, dietary amines (p-tyramine), and potentially harmful exogenous amines such as 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine [1, 2]. MAO enzymes are classified into two isoforms, i.e., MAO-A and MAO-B, based on their tissue distribution, and inhibitor and substrate discrimination. In the case of MAO-B, the preferred substrates are tiny exogenous amines, i.e., like benzylamine and phenethylamine. It is mainly found in the hypothalamus, sites rich in dopamine (DA) neurons, and selectively metabolizes bulky endogenous amines such 5-hydroxytrypamne and noradrenaline. It is primarily expressed in the catecholaminergic neurons [3,4,5,6]. This makes human MAO-A and MAO-B targets for the treatment of major depressive disorders, anxiety, refractory depression, atypical depression, and neurodegenerative diseases [7,8,9].

Specifically, it has been shown that blocking MAO-B provides neuroprotection by reducing the reactive oxygen species generation, stabilizing the mitochondrial membrane, and promoting anti-apoptotic processes [10,11,12]. Furthermore, it is known that as people age, brain MAO-B activity increases and is typically higher than normal. It is directly linked to cognitive decline, affected by neurodegenerative illnesses, like as Parkinson’s disease (PD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and neurodegeneration [13,14,15]. Currently, MAO-B inhibitors are regarded as viable substitutes for L-DOPA and DA agonists during the first-line therapy of PD, but medical chemists still face challenges in finding strong and specific inhibitors [16, 17].

Recently, various chalcone compounds have been studied to create reversible and highly selective MAO inhibitors [18]. These molecules are open chain flavonoids (1,3-diphenyl-2-propenones) and are made up of two aryl rings that are separated by an unsaturated carbonyl linker (α, β). Additionally, the data point to the possibility that coplanarity between the neighboring conjugated ketone and the A ring in chalcones could promote MAO-B inhibition [19,20,21]. Furthermore, it has been found that multimodal inhibitors of MAO-B and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) maintain the specific inhibitory characteristics of chalcones on MAO-B [22,23,24].

Moreover, the use of 4-dimethylamino chalcone derivatives has been gaining increasing attention due to its importance in inhibiting MAO-A, MAO-B, and AChE [25,26,27]. Additionally, current research indicates that 4-dimethylamino chalcone derivatives are being studied extensively as imaging probes for ab aggregates; it appears that the dimethylamino group contributes to the significant binding affinity to Aβ aggregates [28,29,30]. By combining the two pharmacophores, a novel series of diethylamino and chalcone derivatives was created to investigate their structure-activity relationship in more detail.

Materials and methods

Synthesis

A solution of ethanol (10 mL) and 40% potassium hydroxide (5 mL) was stirred for 5 min using a magnetic stirrer. Equimolar amounts of the substituted acetophenone derivatives were dissolved in 5 mL ethanol with stirring, and 15 mL ethanolic KOH was added to this solution (Scheme 1). The solution was stirred for 5 min and equimolar of 4-dialkylamino benzaldehyde respectively, were added. Then, the mixture was stirred continuously for 2 h until a precipitate formed. After filtering and washing the mixture with ethanol and distilled water, methanol was recrystallized. All compounds were characterized by using 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra and yields were mentioned in Supplementary Information [Figs. S1S5].

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Synthesis of the AC derivatives

Enzyme assays and kinetics

Enzyme assays were carried out by continuous method and kynuramine and benzylamine were used as substrates for MAO-A and MAO-B, respectively [24]. The concentrations used were 0.06 and 0.3 mM, respectively. For enzyme kinetics, activity was analyzed at five substrate concentrations near the Km value, as determined by preliminary experiments.

Inhibition studies of MAO-A and MAO-B

Residual activities for MAO-A and MAO-B were preliminarily analyzed at 10 and 1 µM, respectively, and then, IC50 values were determined [31]. The upper limit of IC50 was 40 µM. The selectivity index (SI) for MAO-B over MAO-A was calculated by their IC50 values [32]. The inhibition type of AC4 for MAO-B was analyzed at three inhibitor concentrations around its IC50 value as well as five substrate concentrations around the Km value [33]. Its inhibition type and Ki value were determined by using Lineweaver-Burk (LB) and its secondary plot, respectively [34].

Reversibility studies

The reversibility of AC4 was analyzed by dialysis method, including the pre-incubation of MAO-B and an inhibitor for 30 min prior to measurement, residual activities were measured for the undialyzed (AU) and dialyzed (AD) steps at approximately 2 x the IC50. Reference MAO-B inhibitors used were safinamide mesylate as the reversible inhibitor and pargyline as the irreversible inhibitor [35].

SwissTarget prediction

A free web-based tool called SwissTarget prediction (www.swisstargetprediction.ch) was used to forecast targets for the chemical structure [36].

Swiss ADME

The Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB) created the web tool Swiss ADME (https://www.swissadme.ch/), which enables scientists to predict the pharmacokinetics, and drug-likeness of small compounds. This is a helpful tool for assessing potential drug candidates during drug development and discovery [37, 38].

Molecular docking studies

The hMAO-B structure (entry code 2V5Z) was retrieved from the PDB RCSB database. Maestro’s Protein Preparation Wizard preprocesses the crystal 3D structure by addressing bond ordering, eliminating unnecessary elements, and modifying structural issues, such as the absence of atoms, loops, or side chains [39, 40]. The 2D structures of AC1, AC2, AC3, and AC4 as well as low-energy 3D adherents with correct bond lengths and angles were discovered. The potential ionization states for every ligand structure were produced assuming a physiological pH of 7.2 ± 0.2. Docking was completed using the Glide module of the Schrödinger and all other parameters were maintained at their factory default values [41, 42].

Molecular dynamics (MD) studies

By using the Desmond MD simulation program possessing a minimum of negative score and highest docking poses, MD was carried out by running a 100-ns MD simulation to learn more about the interactions between MAO-B and AC4 [43,44,45]. Specifically, 100 ns of MD generation was carried out to produce trajectories of 1000 frames each [46,47,48]. The Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD) and Root Mean Square Fluctuation (RMSF) were calculated for every frame. Subsequently, a stability study was conducted using a simulated interaction diagram.

Cytotoxicity test of AC4 to L929 cell line

The L929 (Mouse Fibroblast cell line) was provided by the National Center for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune, India. The detailed protocol was explained in Supporting Information.

Results and discussion

Inhibition studies of MAO-A and MAO-B

All tested compounds exhibited low residual activity of less than 50% for MAO-B at 1 µM, while three compounds showed low residual activity (< 50%) for MAO-A at 10 µM (Table 1). Compound AC4 had an IC50 value of 0.020 µM, showing the highest inhibitory activity against MAO-B, followed by AC1 (IC50 = 0.068 µM) and AC3 (IC50 = 0.083 µM). The best MAO-A inhibitor was AC4 with an IC50 of 1.64 µM. All compounds showed more effective MAO-B inhibition than MAO-A inhibition, with high SI values for MAO-B, i.e., AC2 with 98.15, followed by AC3 (88.43) and AC4 (82.00). Comparing to the MAO-B reference inhibitors, AC4 had similar potency to safinamide (IC50 = 0.019 µM), and AC1 and AC3 showed better potency than pargyline. Especially, AC4 showed better or comparable inhibitory activity to other MAO-B reference inhibitors, such as lazabemide (IC50 = 0.11 µM) [49], rasagiline (IC50 = 0.028 ~ 0.068 µM) [50, 51], and selegiline (IC50 = 0.010 µM) [52].

Table 1 Inhibition of MAO-A and MAO-B by dimethylamino-based chalcone derivatives

All AC compounds are chalcone-based derivatives, with an N, N-dialkyl group bonded to the B-ring and a halogen bonded to the para position of ring A. Although the IC50 values of AC1‒AC4, containing an N, N-dimethyl group in ring B, were not significantly different, substituent -F in ring A (AC4) increased MAO-B inhibition degree, followed by -H (AC1), -Br (AC3), and -Cl (AC2). In the case of AC2, IC50 value was similar to that of AC9, containing an N, N-diethyl group instead of an N, N-dimethyl group.

Inhibition kinetics

After performing inhibition kinetics at five benzylamine concentrations and three AC4 concentrations, LB plot was constructed. In the plot, the lines met a point on X-axis, suggesting AC4 is a noncompetitive MAO-B inhibitor (Fig. 1A), and in the secondary plot, Ki value was calculated to be 0.011 ± 0.0036 μm, indicating it is a potent MAO-B inhibitor (Fig. 1B). Regarding inhibition types, most MAO-B inhibitors have been known to be competitive. Only a few noncompetitive MAO-B inhibitors were reported; 4-(O-benzylphenoxy)-N-methylbutylamine showed noncompetitive MAO-B inhibition; however, it had a much higher affinity for MAO-A and was more potent against MAO-A than MAO-B [53]. Curcumin inhibited MAO-B in a noncompetitive manner [54].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Lineweaver–Burke plots for MAO-B inhibition by AC4 (A), and the secondary plots (B) of the slopes vs. inhibitor concentrations

Reversibility studies

For the reversibility test of MAO-B inhibition by AC4, dialysis method was used involving 30 min of pre-incubation. Recovery patterns were considered by using undialyzed (AU) and dialyzed (AD) relative activities. In the results, inhibition of MAO-B by AC4 was recovered from 10.94 to 63.51%. The values of AC4 were similar those of safinamide (reversible type, from 21.50 to 66.95%) and it was distinguished from those of pargyline (irreversible type, 11.92–6.36%). These results suggested that AC4 is a reversible type MAO-B inhibitor (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Reversibility test of MAO-B inhibition by AC4 using dialysis experiments. The concentrations of AC4, safinamide, and pargyline used were 0. 040, 0.038, and 0.22 µM, respectively (~ 2 x their IC50 values)

SwissTarget prediction

Determining the correct molecular target for a given scaffold can be difficult, with many drug design attempts. Recently, ligand-based target prediction using SwissTarget Prediction (www.swisstargetprediction.ch), an online tool, was used to find comparable molecules among 376,342 compounds, which are already known to be active toward 3068 macromolecular targets experimentally [36]. Figure 3 presents the prediction for the AC4 compound, which shows that the molecule has a good chance of striking a specific hMAO-B target.

Fig. 3
figure 3

SwissTarget Prediction of compound AC4

Swiss ADME

For a molecule to be regarded as an effective drug, it must demonstrate significant biological activity at low therapeutic concentrations, have minimal toxicity, and remain effective until the desired outcome is achieved. During drug discovery, the ADME properties of potential drugs are considered to provide a superior pharmacokinetic profile. using the Swiss ADME database and pkCSM [37, 38]. In silico predictions of pharmacokinetic parameters were made. Intestinal permeability and dissolution were measured to evaluate drug absorption. The logarithm of molar concentration was used to express the proposed molecule’s solubility, which ranged from − 3.84 to -6.06 in an aqueous system. To achieve enhanced permeability, the Papp value of the compound must be greater than 8 × 10–6 cm/s. However, AC4 exhibited significant gastrointestinal absorption (96.5%). The drug distribution profile was estimated using the volume of distribution (VDss), unbound fraction, and blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability. The log VDss was 0.245, indicating a wider distribution of the medication in the tissues than in the plasma. The fraction-bound method of measuring drug effectiveness indicates that the drug is less bound to blood proteins, and may thus be distributed freely. Swiss ADME and pkSCM were used to assess BBB permeability. With a log BB value of 0.508, the lead chemical AC4 appears to be readily able to pass through the BBB (Table 2). Compounds with log BB values of one were found to be poorly distributed in the brain. Molecules having a log PS > − 2 are assumed to be penetrable to the central nervous system, while those with a log PS < − 3 are considered useless. In this study, AC4 penetrated the central nervous system (CNS) and inhibited CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6. This investigation also showed that AC4 had an overall clearance rate of 0.324 log mL/min/kg. It is a strong candidate owing to its advantageous ADME features.

Table 2 Docking scores of AC1-AC4 with hMAO-B protein structure

Molecular docking

Compounds AC1-AC4 were used in the docking investigations because of their strong activity. The molecular interactions of the chemicals with MAO-B and their in-silico ability to block the enzyme were assessed in silico. The compound AC4 was the most active with docking score − 9.510 kcal/mol (Table 2). The van der Waals interactions with the hydrophobic regions surrounded by TYR60, PHE99, PRO102, PHE103, PRO104, TRP119, LEU164, LEU167, PHE168,, LEU171, CYS172, ILE198, ILE199, GLN206, ILE316, TYR326, LEU328, PHE343, TYR398, and TYR435 were based on the docking position of hMAO-B (Fig. 4). Additionally, as demonstrated in the 3D docking pose, the fluoroacetophenone ring forms a sandwich between amino acids PHE343 and TYR435 and binds to the substrate cavity (close to FAD). However, as shown in Fig. 4, the dimethylaminobenzaldehyde group was bound to the entrance cavity. Overall, our results suggest that AC4 inhibits the enzymatic activity of MAO-B.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Binding interactions of AC4 to the hMAO-B active site (PDB ID: 2V5Z)

Molecular dynamics

A brief image of the interaction between a protein and ligand was generated through molecular docking, where molecular interactions are dynamic networks that underpin all biological systems. To examine the different confirmations, we used an explicit water model to mimic the dynamic behavior of the AC4-hMAO-B docked complex during a 100 ns time span. The main objectives were to maintain the ligand in the substrate-binding pocket of the hMAO-B enzyme and preserve the important connections observed in the optimally docked posture during the MD simulation. The hMAO-B with AC4 RMSD of hMAO-B ranged from 0.9 to 4.2 Å. The average RMSD value of the complex was around 2.407 Å. One fluctuation in the simulation trajectory was observed in the ligand RMSD at 18–52 ns intervals, which progressively converged for the remainder of the analysis (Fig. 5A). The RMSF of a protein is frequently used in addition to the RMSD to assess ligand-induced changes in a protein’s internal chains. The flexible area of the protein was described in depth using protein RMSF plot analysis. A high RMSF value indicates flexibility, whereas a low RMSF value indicates rigidity of the amino acid [45, 55]. According to the RMSF plot, AC4 came into touch with 18 amino acids of the hMAO-B protein, particularly, LEU88 (0.749 Å), PHE99 (0.976 Å), PRO104 (0.875 Å), TRP119 (0.804 Å), LEU164 (0.652 Å), LEU167 (0.683 Å), PHE168 (0.648 Å), LEU171 (0.761 Å), CYS172 (0.613 Å), TYR188 (0.512 Å), ILE198 (0.573 Å), ILE199 (0.698 Å), ILE316 (0.668 Å), TYR326 (0.648 Å), LEU328 (0.734 Å), PHE343 (0.552 Å), TYR398 (0.523 Å), and TYR435 (0.461 Å). All interacting residues in the AC4–hMAO–B complex exhibited RMSF values of less than 1 Å, suggesting that the residue’s conformation kept stable during the simulation (Fig. 5B). As shown by the Interaction pattern of AC4 with hMAO-B, AC4 showed a variety of interactions with different substrates in the binding sites during the simulation. Pi-Pi stacking bonds were present in both benzene rings, with TYR 326 and TYR 398 comprising 43% and 68% of them, respectively. In addition, the oxygen in the ketone group formed a hydrogen bond with CYS172 having 76% (Fig. 5C). The hydrophobic amino acids interacting with AC4, LEU88, PHE99, PRO104, TRP119, LEU164, LEU167, PHE168, LEU171, ILE198, ILE199, ILE316, TYR326, LEU328, PHE343, TYR398, and TYR435 were identified (Fig. 5D).

Fig. 5
figure 5

MD simulation of the AC4-MAO-B complex for RMSD (A), RMSF (B), 2D interaction diagram (C), and protein − ligand interaction analysis of the MD trajectory (D)

Effect of AC4 on cell viability in L929

Constant and fibroblast-like, the L929 cell line was isolated from the subcutaneous connective tissue of mice (Mus musculus). Because of their sensitivity, L929 cells are often used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of a variety of compounds, including chemicals, drugs, and biomaterials. Given that there was no discernible decrease (100 µg/mL with 90% cell viability) in any of the test sample concentrations, the provided sample can be regarded as non-cytotoxic to normal cells (Fig. 6). The fundamental morphological changes in the cells at each dose were observed under a microscope (Fig. S6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

The cell viability of AC4 on L929 cell line analyzed by MTT assay. X axis, concentration of AC4; Y axis, % viability

Collectively, the efficacy of five chalcone derivatives (AC) based on the ability of the dimethylamino group in inhibiting MAOs was evaluated. All AC compounds showed better inhibition degree against MAO-B than against MAO-A. AC4 is a selective MAO-B inhibitor with noncompetitive and reversible modes of action. The fluoro-acetophenone ring was found to be bound near FAD through docking investigations and was positioned between TYR435 and PHE343. In a simulation study, it was found that hydrophobic interactions (48–68%) and hydrogen bonding (76%) contributed to the stability of the AC4-MAO-B complex. These findings imply that AC4 may be used as a medicinal drug to treat neurological conditions such as PD.