Biotechnology for Biofuels

, 10:108

Development of a core Clostridium thermocellum kinetic metabolic model consistent with multiple genetic perturbations

  • Satyakam Dash
  • Ali Khodayari
  • Jilai Zhou
  • Evert K. Holwerda
  • Daniel G. Olson
  • Lee R. Lynd
  • Costas D. Maranas
Open Access



Clostridium thermocellum is a Gram-positive anaerobe with the ability to hydrolyze and metabolize cellulose into biofuels such as ethanol, making it an attractive candidate for consolidated bioprocessing (CBP). At present, metabolic engineering in C. thermocellum is hindered due to the incomplete description of its metabolic repertoire and regulation within a predictive metabolic model. Genome-scale metabolic (GSM) models augmented with kinetic models of metabolism have been shown to be effective at recapitulating perturbed metabolic phenotypes.


In this effort, we first update a second-generation genome-scale metabolic model (iCth446) for C. thermocellum by correcting cofactor dependencies, restoring elemental and charge balances, and updating GAM and NGAM values to improve phenotype predictions. The iCth446 model is next used as a scaffold to develop a core kinetic model (k-ctherm118) of the C. thermocellum central metabolism using the Ensemble Modeling (EM) paradigm. Model parameterization is carried out by simultaneously imposing fermentation yield data in lactate, malate, acetate, and hydrogen production pathways for 19 measured metabolites spanning a library of 19 distinct single and multiple gene knockout mutants along with 18 intracellular metabolite concentration data for a Δgldh mutant and ten experimentally measured Michaelis–Menten kinetic parameters.


The k-ctherm118 model captures significant metabolic changes caused by (1) nitrogen limitation leading to increased yields for lactate, pyruvate, and amino acids, and (2) ethanol stress causing an increase in intracellular sugar phosphate concentrations (~1.5-fold) due to upregulation of cofactor pools. Robustness analysis of k-ctherm118 alludes to the presence of a secondary activity of ketol-acid reductoisomerase and possible regulation by valine and/or leucine pool levels. In addition, cross-validation and robustness analysis allude to missing elements in k-ctherm118 and suggest additional experiments to improve kinetic model prediction fidelity. Overall, the study quantitatively assesses the advantages of EM-based kinetic modeling towards improved prediction of C. thermocellum metabolism and develops a predictive kinetic model which can be used to design biofuel-overproducing strains.


Clostridium thermocellum Genome-scale metabolic model Kinetic model Ensemble modeling Nitrogen limitation Ethanol stress 



consolidated bioprocessing


genome-scale model


ensemble modeling


ordinary differential equations


phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase


gene to protein to reaction


flux balance analysis


13C-metabolic flux analysis


malic enzyme


growth-associated maintenance


pentose phosphate








NADH-dependent reduced ferredoxin NADP oxidoreductase


non-growth-associated maintenance


oxaloacetate decarboxylase


malate dehydrogenase


lactate dehydrogenase


pyruvate kinase


pyruvate formate lyase


pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase


glutamate dehydrogenase


acetaldehyde dehydrogenase


2-aceto-2-hydroxybutanoate synthase


acetolactate synthase


aspartate transaminase


isopropyl malate synthase


aspartate semialdehyde dehydrogenase


INORGANIC diphosphatase






ensemble modeling for robustness analysis


ketol-acid reductoisomerase




formate dehydrogenase


thermodynamically infeasible cycle


phosphoglycerate kinase


Cellulose is the most abundant carbon source available on earth and constitutes the primary food source of several species [1]. Producing biofuel from cellulose has been proposed as a promising strategy to help us reduce our dependency on fossil fuel [2]. However, utilization of cellulose as an industrial carbon source has been hindered by the high processing costs associated with overcoming recalcitrance [1]. A cost-effective strategy to deal with recalcitrance is the use of a microbe or a consortium, which can simultaneously break down cellulose and ferment the released sugars, known as consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) [3]. C. thermocellum is an anaerobic Gram-positive bacterium, having an extracellular enzyme complex, the cellulosome [4], capable of breaking down cellulose into carbohydrates such as cellobiose and cellodextrins [5]. The produced carbohydrates can then be fermented into several products such as ethanol and acetate [6]. The simultaneous presence of these two capabilities makes C. thermocellum a promising CBP candidate [1]. In order to successfully deploy C. thermocellum for converting cellulosic substrates to a desired biochemical, a detailed understanding of its metabolism and underlying regulatory networks which control the carbon flow towards competing fermentation products such as acetate, lactate, and amino acids [7] is needed. Kinetic models have the potential to address these requirements by providing a mechanistic description of cellular metabolism capable of combining several layers of regulatory events into an integrated framework [8].

An earlier kinetic model of C. thermocellum included a simplified Monod-based model with four ordinary differential equations (ODE) to describe growth rate, cellobiose, ethanol, and acetate production rates [9]. The model was used to compare the toxic effects of Populus hydrolysate on the wild-type and Populus hydrolysate-tolerant C. thermocellum strain [9]. While this model was able to explain the effect of carbon source on growth rate, it was limited in terms of metabolism coverage. Several kinetic models of C. thermocellum [10, 11, 12] have also been put forth to identify key inhibitory metabolites that limit cellulosome activity. For example, the inhibitory effect of glucose was analyzed by modeling only the kinetics of reactions accounting for cellulosome metabolism [11]. The model was parameterized with measured cellulose hydrolysis rate and glucose concentration but without accounting for fermentation products. Consequently, key metabolic drivers that underpin the production of desired chemicals in C. thermocellum remained unexplored. Construction of predictive kinetic models of C. thermocellum is still plagued by a number of challenges chief among which are a lack of multiple concentration and/or flux datasets of perturbed mutants for unbiased model parameterization.

In general, the underlying stoichiometric description of the metabolic network on which the kinetic model is built is retrieved from a GSM model. The first C. thermocellum GSM model (iSR432) was constructed by Roberts et al. [13] spanning 432 genes, 577 reactions, and 525 intracellular metabolites. This model has been used in metabolic engineering efforts [14] to identify knockout strategies leading to the overproduction of several biochemicals [14, 15]. Unique cofactor requirements in C. thermocellum for several key glycolytic enzymes [16] and elemental/charge imbalances [17] were addressed in a recently published core metabolic network (iATcore: 53 metabolites and 59 reactions) of C. thermocellum [18]. Thompson et al. advanced the scope of iATcore by constructing an expanded GSM (iAT601) model containing 601 genes, 872 reactions, and 904 intracellular metabolites [19]. However, in iAT601 some reactions were associated with unreviewed genes (based on the UniPROT database) [19], resulting in the formation of thermodynamically infeasible cycles that allow reactions to carry unbounded metabolic flux with no energy cost [20, 21]. Further, none of the existing models account for the reversibility of key central metabolism enzymes phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) and malic enzyme (ME) which was recently observed experimentally [16, 22]. In addition, the growth-associated maintenance (GAM) value was overestimated in the iSR432 model and underestimated in the iAT601 model which led to incorrect growth rate predictions under Δack conditions [23]. Overestimated GAM value (iSR432) reduces growth rate significantly because of its dependence on acetate pathway to produce energy (ATP), whereas an underestimated GAM value (iAT601) does not affect growth rate because the acetate pathway is no longer necessary to meet energy requirements for growth. Thus, incorrect GAM value leads to erroneous predictions due to the close interplay between energy demand and carbon flux distribution in fermentative pathways.

In this study, we compare and contrast stoichiometric and kinetic model predictions for nitrogen-limited and ethanol-stressed C. thermocellum metabolism informed by fermentation data for 19 C. thermocellum mutants. Results indicate that the incorporation of kinetic descriptions to stoichiometric models increases prediction fidelity.

Results and discussion

Genome-scale model comparison and testing

The updated GSM model for C. thermocellum (iCth446) contains 446 genes and includes 598 metabolites and 637 reactions along with gene–protein–reaction (GPR) associations (see Table 1). iCth446 resolves 150 elemental and charge balance inconsistencies present in iSR432 [13] due to imported reactions from KEGG database [17]. Specifically, iCth446 contains an updated pentose phosphate (PP) pathway where the transaldolase was absent and instead replaced by pyrophosphate (ppi)-dependent phosphofructokinase (PFK) and aldolase as observed in phylogenetically close anaerobic thermophile Clostridium stercorarium [24]. C. thermocellum lacks a standard acetyl-carboxylase, and thus iCth446 recruits a putative transcarboxylase (Clo1313_1523-Clo1313_1526) for malonyl-CoA formation [25]. C. thermocellum also lacks a functional formate dehydrogenase (FDH) [26], and thus FDH was removed from iCth446. The model iCth446 also contains NADPH-linked ketopantoate reductase for pantothenate synthesis (as observed in Corynebacterium glutamicum [27]) based on experimental observations of pantothenate production [28]. In addition, iCth446 resolved several reaction cofactor preferences (see Fig. 1) in the central metabolism based on recent experimental evidence [16]. For example, PFK uses ppi instead of ATP for the phosphorylation of fructose-6-phosphate (f6p) in the preparatory phase of glycolysis [16]. Likewise, hexokinase (HEX1) uses GTP instead of ATP, phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) uses both GTP and ATP, and malic enzyme (ME) uses NADP instead of NAD [16]. Reaction cofactor corrections are consequential as they directly affect the cofactors’ pool sizes and thereby the rate of the associated reactions [29, 30]. ME and PEPCK were also allowed to operate reversibly in iCth446 in accordance with experimental evidence [16, 22]. Note that all updated reactions represent the key glycolytic steps that control the flux towards terminal fermentation products.
Table 1

Model statistics comparison of GSMs

Model statistics

iSR432 [13]

iAT601 [19]














Fig. 1

Summary of modifications in the iCth446 GSM model after updating it from the previous iSR432 reconstruction. Updated reactions in iCth446: The cofactors highlighted in green (in reactions HEX1, PFK, PGK, and ME) were added in the model and those in red (for reactions HEX1, PFK, and ME) were removed. In addition, reactions ME and PEPCK were made reversible. Dashed lines in gray indicate an example of thermodynamically infeasible cycle of three reactions (ODC, MDH, and ME). The cycle was resolved by removing ODC. NFN was added to the model to allow electron transfer between reducing equivalents. The values alongside the reactions are their FBA-predicted fluxes (in mmol/gDW/h) consistent with the wild-type experimental cellobiose uptake and growth rates [65]

In addition to reaction-specific changes, the value of GAM was reduced from 150 mmol ATP/gDCW/h [13] to 40 mmol ATP/gDCW/h based on the assumed GAM value in GSM models of phylogenetically close organisms such as C. cellulolyticum and C. acetobutylicum [31, 32]. While this change did not alter the model’s ability to predict experimentally measured wild-type biomass yield [33], it affected the flux distribution in several fermentation pathways. The high GAM value in iSR432 necessitated a very high flux through the ATP-generating acetate production pathway precluding the formation of other fermentation products in contrast to experimental evidence [33]. Reduction of the GAM value in iCth446 allows for the production of all fermentation products including ethanol consistent with experimental observations [33] (see Fig. 1). iCth446 accurately predicts the range of ethanol and acetate production only upon the addition of an NADH-dependent reduced ferredoxin NADP oxidoreductase (NFN) [34]. NFN reaction along with the bifurcating hydrogenases is integral to C. thermocellum’s energy metabolism for transferring electrons from ferredoxin and NADH to NADPH [34].

The non-growth-associated maintenance (NGAM) value, absent in iSR432, was set to 2.2 mmol ATP/gDCW/h based on an experimentally reported NGAM value for C. thermocellum growing on cellobiose [35]. In addition, iCth446 was manually curated to eliminate all thermodynamically infeasible cycles. All the infeasible cycles were eliminated either by removing the reactions from the model (five reactions) or by restricting their directionality (six reactions) based on literature evidence [16] (see Additional file 2 for a complete list of cycles). As an example, the reactions catalyzed by oxaloacetate decarboxylase (ODC), malate dehydrogenase (MDH), and malic enzyme (ME) formed a thermodynamically infeasible cycle. ODC was inactivated in the model to resolve this thermodynamically infeasible cycle as the enzyme activity for ODC was not detected in the wild-type strain [36] (see Fig. 1). While the removal of the thermodynamically infeasible cycles did not specifically affect growth rates or product yields, they mitigate modeling challenges faced in the implementation of strain design protocols, such as OptForce [37]. Contrary to iSR432, iCth446 was able to predict the production of proline and lactate secretion based on experimental fermentation data [38]. This is due to the reduction of the GAM value and modification of the sodium symport (iSR432 lacked sodium ion importer) to a proton symport for the metabolite transporters as reported for related clostridia (see Fig. 1) [39, 40].

The predictive capability of iCth446 was contrasted against iSR432 for a few designed mutants. First, a three-locus metabolic engineering intervention [41] [i.e., knockout of malic enzyme (me) and lactate dehydrogenase (ldh), and the addition of an exogenous pyruvate kinase (pyk)] was simulated to compare ethanol and growth yield predictions with experimental data. Model iCth446 predicted a twofold reduction (from 0.23 to 0.12 h−1) for biomass and an approximately 30% increase (from 1.57 to 2.07 mol/mol cellobiose) for the maximum ethanol yield. The predicted feasible yield ranges for ethanol encompassed the experimental yield values [41]. In contrast, as discussed previously, iSR432 must route all available flux towards the ATP-generating acetate pathway to meet the imposed GAM requirement, thus preventing any ethanol production. In a more comprehensive evaluation, both GSM models were tested using fermentation data for 19 different C. thermocellum mutant strains with mutations in the lactate, malate, acetate, and hydrogen production pathways (see Fig. 2). This dataset includes the measured final extracellular concentrations of various fermentation products such as acetate, lactate, formate, ethanol, hydrogen, carbon dioxide, amino acids, and cellobiose for batch cultures grown in MTC medium (19 measured concentrations per mutant). The comparison revealed that as expected iSR432 significantly under-predicts fermentation product yields even after the inclusion of missing transporters and exchange reactions for several metabolites [33].
Fig. 2

List of 19 fermentation mutants [36]. The figure shows the corresponding gene knockout (X), downregulation (↓), or upregulation (↑) followed by a comparison of ethanol yield ranges predicted by the GSM and the kinetic model with the experimentally reported values. The iCth446 predictions were performed by restricting all the metabolite yields to their measured ranges except for ethanol. Table 3 enumerates the strains associated with specific mutants

Measured yields for fermentation products were in general within the predicted feasible ranges of iCth446. Figure 2 summarizes the ethanol yield prediction while restricting all the remaining metabolite yields to the experimental ranges [33]. We note that the predicted wide ranges of ethanol flux/yield (i.e., mutants 1, 4–6, 12, 15, 16, 18, and 19) were due to the wide confidence ranges in their experimental measurements, particularly for cellobiose uptake, amino acids, and fermentation products (i.e., an average 50% error in measurement). The high experimental error can be attributed to the presence of secondary mutations which are unaccounted for in the various strains (see Table 3) pooled together for this study. This error can be resolved by analyzing the sequences of all the pooled strains to ensure that all mutations are accounted for and that different genotypes are not pooled together. iCth446 predictions also confirm that ethanol becomes the major carbon and redox-regenerating sink for the majority of mutants (i.e., mutants 2–4, 7–11, 13–16, 18, and 19). In contrast, for mutants with no or low accuracy in experimental measurements for exported metabolites, ethanol production essentiality (e.g., mutants 1, 5, 6, 12, and 17) cannot be established. iCth446 predictions also pinpointed mutants with mass-imbalanced experimental measurements (i.e., mutants 4, 7, 9, and 13) where the measured ranges do not fall within the solution space in the model. The excess carbon was accounted for in some cases (i.e., mutant 9) by hypothesizing fumarate production, which was not experimentally measured.

Model iCth446, however, could not predict flux redirections when specific regulatory events, and not simple stoichiometry, controlled flux redistribution. For example, limiting nitrogen source in the media has been shown to increase the secretion of pyruvate, lactate, and amino acids (EK Holwerda and LR Lynd, unpublished data). A stoichiometric model, however, will only be able to capture the stoichiometric effect of nitrogen leading to simply a proportional reduction in the production of amino acids but no effect on fermentation products. Thus, upon restricting the ammonia uptake flux (by downregulating its enzyme level to 10–90% of the wild-type level), iCth446 did not predict any increase in amino acid production. Instead, the amount of amino acid production was reduced in proportion to the availability of nitrogen (see Fig. 3). System-level responses governed by regulation, metabolite/cofactor pools, and limitation of pathway throughput due to enzyme activity and level limitations motivated the need to build a kinetic model which can capture perturbations in cytosolic concentrations and account for metabolic flux redirection in response to them.
Fig. 3

Impact of limiting nitrogen source in the media on C. thermocellum metabolism. The iCth446 simulations were performed by restricting the ammonia uptake flux to 20% of its wild-type value and maximizing the yield of specific metabolites one at a time

Core kinetic model: k-ctherm118

We used iCth446 as the basis to construct a core metabolic model of C. thermocellum’s central metabolism. We limited our coverage to a core model due to the nature of the available measurements and mutant datasets. The model contains 118 reactions and 93 metabolites with cellobiose as the sole carbon source under anaerobic respiration. It captures all the major biomass precursors, cellobiose degradation pathway, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, PP pathway, TCA cycle, major pyruvate metabolism and anaplerotic reactions, alternative carbon metabolism, and nucleotide salvage pathway (see Fig. 4). We extracted 22 substrate-level regulatory interactions from BRENDA [42] associated with the genus Clostridia (see Additional file 3). The EM procedure [43] was subsequently used to estimate the kinetic parameters for the reactions in the core model using 21 experimental datasets which include metabolite yields in 19 mutant strains (see Fig. 2), intracellular metabolite concentrations for Δgldh mutant (Table 2) (D Amador-Noguez, unpublished data), and ten experimentally measured kinetic parameters (Table 3) as training datasets (see “Methods”). The trained kinetic model, k-ctherm118, had an average relative error of 40% in the prediction of flux distributions towards the training phenotype data while also being consistent with the wild-type flux distribution (see “Methods” for details of error estimation). Note that for 10 out of 19 mutants, ethanol production flux was predicted with less than 20% error (see Fig. 2). However, ethanol production prediction for strains with pyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase (pfor), malic enzyme (me), and hydrogenase (hydG) knockouts was divergent. Analysis of the flux predictions for these mutants showed that PFOR, malate shunt, and hydrogenase are the major flux-carrying pathways in wild-type as well as in many other mutants (see Fig. 2). Therefore, upon their knockout, these pathways are replaced with new routes such as pyruvate kinase (PYK) which is devoid of any flux information in the training datasets leading to insufficiently characterized kinetic parameters. While the error in concentration predictions by k-ctherm118 was around 40%, the kinetic parameter prediction errors were much higher (76%), which alludes to missing secondary activity [44] in the core model’s description of the PP pathway as well as the lack of training data with mutations in the PP pathway.
Fig. 4

Core metabolic map of C. thermocellum. The arrows in orange represent the extracellular metabolites, the concentrations and molar yields of which were experimentally measured

Table 2

List of mutants and the associated strain numbers

Mutant #

Strain #


LL1010, LL1112


LL1036, LL372


LL1041, LL373


LL1011, LL1042, LL1044, LL374, LL375, LL1043




LL1038, LL1067














LL1113, LL1137






LL1148, LL1149




LL345, LL376





Table 3

Experimentally measured kinetic parameters (data ± standard deviation) (R Sparling, unpublished data; [42])



Km [mM]

kcat [1/s]


d-Glucose 6-phosphate

1.92 ± 0.57

1637.50 ± 798.25


alpha-d-Glucose 1-phosphate

0.41 ± 0.04

190 ± 19



0.43 ± 0.04




0.23 ± 0.02

30.14 ± 3.01



0.25 ± 0.02




17 ± 1.7

51998 ± 5199.8

Statistical significance of the estimated parameters using a cross-validation analysis

We first performed a leave-one-out cross-validation test [43] to assess the robustness of the estimated model parameters. In each cross-validation test, a single dataset was excluded from the training dataset and the constructed kinetic model was then used to predict the fluxes of the excluded mutant. In all the 20 mutant strains, the reactions catalyzed by the perturbed enzymes are located in proximity to pyruvate metabolizing pathways, thereby the remaining mutant datasets appear to provide flux information backup during model parameterization. With the exception of two mutants (i.e., mutant 13 and 17), the results revealed that the reduction in the model prediction accuracy was within 10% for all mutant cross-validation tests implying robust model parameterization even upon exclusion of mutant datasets (see Fig. 5). These two mutants have unique phenotypes non-replicated in any other ones rendering their flux dataset information essential for a robust parameterization. For example, the two mutants (i.e., mutants 13 and 17) had mutations in major flux-carrying pathways with the alternate pathways being not well characterized in any of the remaining training datasets. These include mutant 13 involving the me knockout and mutant 17 with the pfor knockout. Dataset 21 contained experimentally measured kinetic parameters in pathways distal to the mutations in the remaining datasets making them unique and essential during model training. This demonstrates both the power of kinetic models in translating information from experimental datasets into accurate kinetic expression parameterization but also their susceptibility to erroneous prediction whenever knowledge of how the network responds to a unique perturbation is lacking. Integration of additional flux datasets representing similar metabolic phenotypes along with accurate regulatory information is required to achieve a robust model parameterization.
Fig. 5

Cross-validation analysis of k-ctherm118 model. The gray bars represent the average scaled deviation of the predicted steady-state fluxes upon cross-validation of the training dataset. The first 19 datasets represent mutants with experientially measured fermentation yields, the penultimate dataset represents Δgldh mutant with measured intracellular concentrations, and the final dataset represents the experimentally measured Michaelis–Menten constants. The white bars correspond to the average scaled deviation of the predicted steady-state flux distribution from the experimental measurements while including all datasets. The difference between two bars represents the reduction in the accuracy of the model predictions upon excluding the flux dataset of the corresponding mutant

Effect of nitrogen limitation on model-predicted phenotype

k-ctherm118 was next tasked with predicting flux changes in C. thermocellum metabolism under nitrogen-limiting conditions which as seen earlier was beyond the scope of a GSM model. Nitrogen limitation was simulated in the kinetic model by reducing the total enzyme level (\(\tilde{e}_{{\rm tot}}\)) of the ammonium transporter [EXCH_nh4(e)] in successive steps of 10% reduction in the wild-type enzyme activity (i.e., 0.9 \(\tilde{e}_{{\rm tot}}\), 0.8 \(\tilde{e}_{{\rm tot}}\), 0.7 \(\tilde{e}_{{\rm tot}}\)). k-ctherm118 showed maximum changes in yield predictions for simulation with 20% ammonium transporter enzyme activity. The model recapitulated the experimental observation that the reduction in nitrogen availability reduces the activity of fermentation pathways and reroutes additional flux towards amino acid production (EK Holwerda and LR Lynd, unpublished data). Reduction of EXCH_nh4(e) enzyme activity causes a (0.5-fold) reduction in ammonium uptake flux. This reduction in ammonium downregulates the only ammonium-consuming glutamate dehydrogenase (GLUDy) reaction (from 1.1 to 0.59 mol/mol cellobiose) along with the associated cofactor conversion from NADPH to NADP. Subsequently, NADPH accumulation causes product inhibition of ME1 and downregulates the transhydrogenase activity of malate shunt resulting in a 2.02-fold build-up of NADH pool. NADH as well as α-ketoglutarate accumulation downregulates serine production due to strong product inhibition. Finally, higher NADH levels also inhibit ethanol production (from 1.26 to 1.14 mol/mol cellobiose) due to substrate-level inhibition [45] of the acetaldehyde dehydrogenase (ALCDH) reaction (see Fig. 6a). This downregulation of serine and ethanol production led to upregulation of the competing amino acid pathways and pyruvate secretion not only to maintain overall stoichiometric balance but also to alleviate redox imbalance.
Fig. 6

Impact of limiting nitrogen source in the media on C. thermocellum metabolism. a Change in pathway fluxes and metabolite concentration on reducing ammonium uptake activity to 20% of the wild-type activity. The numbers represent the flux values (mol/mol cellobiose) normalized to cellobiose uptake (except for those in parentheses represent concentration change) for the wild-type (gray color) to ammonia-limited (green or red color representing upregulation or downregulation, respectively) conditions. All fluxes were normalized to cellobiose uptake. b Comparison of model-predicted yield change with the experimentally measured values

The k-ctherm118 predictions for glutamate, lactate, and ethanol yields are consistent with experimental measurements (see Fig. 6b) though significant experimental uncertainty precludes more quantitative comparisons. k-ctherm118 overestimated the fumarate yield and underestimated the increase in pyruvate and valine yields (see Fig. 6b). However, k-ctherm118 failed to capture the increase in leucine production (see Fig. 6b). This indicates a discrepancy between our model assumptions and in vivo metabolic regulations which can be resolved by targeted experiments to elucidate the underlying regulatory interactions in amino acid synthesis pathways. For example, the reduced leucine yield prediction alludes to the presence in C. thermocellum of NADH-independent activities towards leucine directly from isovalerate as observed in other organisms [46] that decouple the biosynthetic pathway from NADH metabolism. Overall, in the case of nitrogen limitation k-ctherm118 was able to capture significant system-wide flux redirections driven by substrate-level regulation and rebalancing of cofactor pools. These predictions include increased pools of pentose phosphate pathway metabolites due to feedback from f6p accumulation which has also been observed in other organisms [47, 48].

Effect of ethanol stress on wild-type C. thermocellum

The metabolic impact of ethanol stress on C. thermocellum phenotype and its underlying mechanism was studied using k-ctherm118. There are several experimental studies that show that ethanol stress limits maximum ethanol titer in wild-type C. thermocellum [21, 49]. This inhibition can be partially resolved through adaptive evolution [49]. Experimental data have shown that a high ethanol concentration in the external environment leads to the accumulation of sugar phosphates [50]. While proteomic analyses of the ethanol-stressed phenotype have revealed perturbations in several pyruvate metabolizing pathways [50], no direct connection with sugar phosphate accumulation has been established. The ethanol stress on C. thermocellum was simulated in k-ctherm118 by modifying the enzyme levels of the key altered reactions in proportion to their proteomic fold changes [50] (see Fig. 7a). The key downregulated reactions were 2-aceto-2-hydroxybutanoate synthase (ACHBS), acetolactate synthase (ACLS), and aspartate transaminase (ASPTA) by 38%, while a few amino acid synthesis pathways such as isopropyl malate synthase (IPPS) and aspartate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (ASAD) were upregulated by 140 and 80%, respectively. The proteomic data also showed upregulation of diphosphate- and phosphate-generating reactions (such as histidyl-tRNA synthase (HISTRS) and glutamine synthase (GLNS) which were not included in the core model, details in Additional file 3). This effect was simulated in the model by increasing the diphosphate and phosphate pool sizes by 670 and 730% proportional to the upregulated reactions, respectively.
Fig. 7

Overall impact of ethanol stress on C. thermocellum metabolism. a Affected pathway fluxes and metabolite concentrations under ethanol stress condition. The numbers represent the flux values (mol/mol cellobiose) normalized to cellobiose uptake (except for those in brackets represent concentration change) for the wild-type (gray color) to ammonia-limited (green or red color representing up- or downregulation, respectively) conditions. All fluxes were normalized to cellobiose uptake. b Comparison of model-predicted cytosolic concentration changes with the experimentally measured values

Following the perturbations, k-ctherm118 showed elevated levels of upper glycolytic metabolites such as fructose-6-phosphate (f6p) and glucose-6-phosphate (g6p) recapitulating experimental observations (see Fig. 7b). The mechanism for this effect was primarily due to an increase in the diphosphate and phosphate pools, consequently increasing the glycolytic flux activity. This leads to an increase in pool size of all glycolytic metabolites from cellobiose (1.09-fold) to pyruvate (1.05-fold). Therefore, k-ctherm118 was able to capture the regulatory effect induced by ethanol stress for most metabolites except for the accumulation of isocitrate. This is likely because the signal transduction pathways that control citrate metabolism [50] are not captured in k-ctherm118. Overall, k-ctherm118 does a good job of recapitulating the experimentally observed trends. For cases where there is a discrepancy between model and experiment, additional scrutiny revealed missing elements from the model.

Robustness analysis of the kinetic model

Model k-ctherm118 was parameterized using yield data for a number of exported metabolites for a range of mutants involving primarily single or multiple knockouts. The cross-validation analysis revealed that in most cases parameterization was robust to the absence of a single mutant flux dataset. However, there existed cases (i.e., mutants 13 and 17) where robustness inference was not possible due to the indispensability of some of the mutant flux datasets whose information could not be complemented by the remaining ones. Enzymes associated with non-robust kinetic parameters often lead to model instabilities in response to even small enzyme-level perturbations. These instabilities are manifested as excess accumulation or depletion of substrate or product as recently demonstrated by the ensemble modeling for robustness analysis (EMRA) [51, 52]. Robustness analysis showed that all the k-ctherm118 kinetic parameters were robust (see Additional file 3) except for those associated with ketol-acid reductoisomerase (KARA1). For example, if carbon dioxide export is upregulated by twofold, we observe an increase in the flux of CO2-producing pathways such as PEPCK and PFOR (see Fig. 4). Under these conditions, k-ctherm118 also predicts excess accumulation of its substrate acetolactate (alac-s), which implies that either the kinetic parameters of the reactions associated with KARA1 are non-robust or the regulation/stoichiometry of the metabolite node is incomplete and thus unable to efficiently metabolize the substrate [51]. A plausible resolution for this non-robustness is that KARA1 is bifunctional (see Fig. 8) and that it also catalyzes ketopantoate reductase reaction (dehydropantoate to pantoate) as observed in Corynebacterium glutamicum [27]. This secondary activity was absent in the kinetic model. In addition to this, valine and leucine have been shown to be the regulators of ketol-acid reductoisomerase in C. glutamicum [53]. Therefore, it is possible that these regulations apply in C. thermocellum as well (see Fig. 8). This example highlights how robustness analysis of a kinetic model can be used to pinpoint incomplete descriptions.
Fig. 8

Carbon dioxide export upregulation revealing the ketol-acid reductoisomerase reaction with non-robust kinetic parameters. Possible substrate-level regulation (I) and secondary function (II) observed in C. glutamicum can improve the parameter robustness


In this study, we constructed a kinetic model of C. thermocellum’s core metabolism using the ensemble modeling approach [43]. Model parameterization was carried out using 21 experimental datasets containing fermentation data for 19 unique C. thermocellum mutant strains, intracellular metabolite concentration for Δgldh mutant (D Amador-Noguez, unpublished data) as well as experimentally measured Michaelis–Menten kinetic parameters (R Sparling, unpublished data; [42]). First, we updated the iSR432 model and constructed a second-generation genome-scale model of C. thermocellum, iCth446 incorporating fourteen missing gene annotations, correcting 150 mass and charge imbalances in reactions, and modifying cofactor specificity and directionality for 20 reactions. Comparisons against the experimental data showed that iCth446 predicts ethanol yield with greater consistency than iSR432 [33]. Next, iCth446 was used as a scaffold for constructing the core kinetic model (k-ctherm118). It includes 118 reactions and 93 metabolites covering central carbon metabolism and fermentation pathways and accounts for 22 substrate-level regulatory interactions extracted from BRENDA [42] for the clostridia genus and other closely related species with similar cofactor preference. Testing with experimental data showed that while a purely stoichiometric description is insensitive to limiting nitrogen availability, k-ctherm118 was able to capture the upregulating effect on amino acid production due to product inhibition of competing fermentation pathways by the elevated NADH pools. k-ctherm118 was also able to predict the direction and extent of changes in cytosolic concentrations under ethanol stress due to an increase in phosphate and diphosphate pools causing a system-wide effect mediated through cofactor pool balances. Overall, this study demonstrated that the developed kinetic model k-ctherm118 predicts phenotypes under genetic perturbations with a higher degree of accuracy than stoichiometric model as well as provides insight into missing metabolic pathways and regulations.

However, unlike stoichiometric models that are largely parameter free, kinetic model predictions are highly dependent on the parameterization datasets. Kinetic models “learn” metabolic redirections through careful parameterization that aims to recapitulate metabolic responses seen in multiple datasets. Therefore, flux datasets capturing metabolic perturbations that the kinetic model is expected to reproduce must be part of the training set for robust parameterization. This implies that experimentally elucidating the flux split ratios and enzyme activity with the aid of 13C-metabolic flux analysis (13C-MFA) data [43] are needed as existing datasets do not provide sufficient information to k-ctherm118 for correct parameterization of the enzymes. For example, the lack of accurate PP pathway fluxes in training datasets led to error in predictions of kinetic parameters associated with the PP pathway. In an earlier study [54], we have observed that the inclusion of accurately measured metabolite concentrations led to an accurate estimation of kinetic parameters. Metabolomic databases such as MetaboLights [55] provide metabolomic data under various conditions which can be integrated to improve the quality of model parameterization. However, kinetic model parameterization and validation for non-standard organisms such as C. thermocellum are also limited by the lack of complete metabolomic datasets (intracellular concentrations under mutant conditions). Ongoing studies with a focus on resolving flux distribution [36] and intracellular concentration changes (D Amador-Noguez, unpublished data) in C. thermocellum mutants promise to bridge this gap. Additional omics datasets such as transcriptomic and proteomic data are also necessary to recapitulate the changes in enzyme levels (i.e., vmax) in response to genetic and/or environment perturbations [54] and can improve model parametrization. Thus, kinetic models require complete metabolic knowledge involving specific pathways collected using 13C-MFA, transcriptomic, and proteomic studies for wild-type and mutant strains to accurately capture the pathway activity for robust model parametrization.

Alternatively, erroneous predictions can a posteriori be used to guide future carbon labeling or enzyme activity experiments to correct the model. For example, the robustness analysis has revealed the secondary activity of ketol-acid reductoisomerase which can be tested experimentally. Likewise, k-ctherm118 predicted low ethanol yield (see Fig. 2) for mutants with ΔhydG mutation (e.g., mutant 19). However, recent experimental studies have shown that the ΔhydG mutation in C. thermocellum is associated with another mutation in the adhE gene which broadens cofactor specificity of the alcohol dehydrogenase to both NADH and NADPH as opposed to only NADH-dependent activity in the wild-type strain [56]. We note that k-ctherm118 was constructed based on the cofactor specificity of the reference (wild-type) strain and was unable to alter cofactor dependence of reactions under mutant conditions leading to inaccurate predictions for mutant 19. This limitation can be addressed by the inclusion of alternate cofactors for the reaction and additional metabolic regulations [22] in follow-up investigations. Thus, error in kinetic model predictions directs our attention towards the incomplete metabolic knowledge involving specific pathways which can be resolved using experiments to study enzyme activity and allosteric regulations to accurately represent the cellular metabolism and thus improve prediction fidelity.

In the past, stoichiometric models such as iSR432 and iAT601 identified strain designs by perturbing redox balances to enhance ethanol production [57]. However, this study has shown that phenotypic changes in C. thermocellum metabolism are largely controlled by cofactor and metabolite pool sizes either through product inhibition (e.g., glutamate accumulation downregulates GLUDy) or distal substrate-level regulation (e.g., NADH levels inhibit ALCDH activity) and not simply through mass balances. Therefore, k-ctherm118 puts forth a new paradigm for systematically improving our knowledge of non-standard organisms such as C. thermocellum through model-driven discovery (e.g., valine and leucine levels inhibit KARA1) guided not only by metabolic fluxes but also more importantly metabolite pools and regulatory interactions. Errors in prediction often directly translate into discrepancies in branching ratios, metabolite concentrations, or missing secondary enzymatic functions that can be ascertained experimentally, thus closing the prediction–correction loop. Recent experimental studies have shed light on the importance of cofactor pools on biofuel production levels in C. thermocellum [58]. Kinetic models such as k-ctherm118 can already be used to assess the computationally designed mutants in terms of predicted metabolite concentrations, needed enzyme levels, and unforeseen regulatory effects such as the nitrogen limitation case study showing increased amino acid yields due to changes in cofactor pools. In addition, computational strain design protocols such as k-OptForce [59] and SMET [60] that make use of kinetic information to overproduce a target metabolite can be applied to k-ctherm118 to increase biofuel production. Furthermore, k-ctherm118 lays the foundation for building genome-scale or consortia-based kinetic models of potential CBP organisms inclusive of substrate uptake and product toxicity kinetics to engineer high-performing industrial strains.


Genome-scale model reconstruction and testing

Model iCth446 was built by appending missing metabolic information into the existing GSM by Roberts et al. [13]. All the reactions are elementally and charge balanced based on the ModelSEED database information [61]. Thermodynamically infeasible cycles (TICs) were identified using network analysis [20, 62] and resolved by modifying the reaction directionality of only sixteen reactions (Additional file 1 for complete list) based on experimental evidence. C. thermocellum contains enzymes which can use alternate cofactors (e.g., phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) [16]) as well as enzymes with similar catalytic activity using different cofactors (e.g., hydrogenases [56]). Reactions catalyzed by these enzymes along with cofactor exchange systems (e.g., transhydrogenases) can cause TICs. Previous TIC removal methods have disabled fluxes of reactions with minimal activity [42]. This would not work in C. thermocellum where alternate reactions often have comparable activity [16]. Instead, we have introduced a separate constraint that allows for all reversible reactions with different cofactors to be active simultaneously while eliminating TICs. This constraint exploits the idea that for a given metabolite the flux value of at least one of the reactions causing the TIC is greater than the sum of the non-cycle forming reaction fluxes. Consider for a given metabolite \(i\) there is Mic number of reactions which perform similar metabolic function with alternate cofactors and thus participate in TICs. We define this set of reactions as \(J_{i}^{c} = \left\{ {j^{*} |j^{*} = 1, \ldots ,M_{i}^{c} } \right\}\). We then constrain the absolute flux value of all the reactions in this set Jic to be less than the absolute value of sum of all fluxes involving the metabolite i except the TIC participating reactions as shown in constraint (1). This constraint is applied for a set of metabolites denoted by \(I^{c} = \left\{ {i |i = 1, \ldots ,N^{c} } \right\},\) where each i represents the metabolite associated with a TIC and \(N^{c}\) represents the total number of TICs. The elements of Ic are predetermined by choosing metabolites unique to each cycle (e.g., hydrogen for the case of infeasible cycles using hydrogenases).
$$\left| {\mathop \sum \limits_{{j \in J/J_{i}^{c} }} S_{ij} v_{j } } \right| \, \ge \, \left| {v_{{j^{*} }} } \right|, \forall j^{*} \in J_{i}^{c} \, , \, \forall i \in I^{c}$$

Here Sij is the stoichiometric coefficient for metabolite i in reaction j, vj represents the flux of reaction j, and \(J\) represents the complete set of reactions in the GSM model. This constraint was incorporated into flux balance analysis (FBA) [63] to eliminate flux through TICs. Note that the incorporation of the absolute values in the FBA model can in general be achieved using binary variables [64]. Binary variables can be avoided if the directionality of the reactions entering/leaving the loop is known.

For the case of model testing, the GSM-predicted ethanol flux range was evaluated by performing flux variability analysis (FVA) while constraining the model to other experimentally measured metabolites for specific mutants. The model-predicted yield ranges were consequently calculated by evaluating the minimum and maximum ratios of predicted ethanol flux to the cellobiose uptake flux.

Core kinetic model construction and testing

The stoichiometric representation of k-ctherm118 was obtained by selecting a subset of reactions from the GSM associated with the central metabolism. C. thermocellum contains several hydrogenases, bifurcating hydrogenases, and transhydrogenases, which were simplified in the core model by three reversible hydrogenases with varying cofactors (i.e., NAD, NADP, and Ferredoxin). The pentose phosphate (PP) pathway was also simplified to exclude sedoheptulose 1,7-bisphosphate from the model because the PP pathway did not carry significant flux (<0.1% of cellobiose uptake flux) in the wild-type and mutant strains. We followed the existing framework developed by Khodayari et al. [16] for k-ctherm118 reconstruction. In essence, the reactions were first decomposed into their elementary steps and then the elementary reaction parameters (i.e., enzyme fractions and reaction reversibility) were sampled [43]. An ensemble of models is then generated which all converge to the same steady-state yield data of the wild-type (i.e., reference) strain. Next, a genetic algorithm machine-learning approach was used to identify the optimal combination of the sampled kinetic parameters by minimization of deviation from the experimental data (see Additional file 3). We also implemented the enzyme-level changes by allowing the total pool of the normalized enzyme to vary between a tenfold downregulation and the wild-type level (\(0.1 \le \tilde{e}_{{\rm tot}} \le 1\)) for reported enzyme downregulations and the wild-type level and a tenfold upregulation (\(1 \le \tilde{e}_{{\rm tot}} \le 10\)) for enzyme upregulations. This is because the quantitative enzyme-level information was not reported in the knockout mutant library. Gene deletions were implemented by setting the \(\tilde{e}_{{\rm tot}}\) of the encoded enzyme to zero. The deviation in model predictions was calculated by normalizing the deviation of the predicted product yield/concentration/kinetic parameter (vi) from the experimental value (viexp.) by the coefficient of variation in the experimental data (CVi) for metabolite i. The convergence criteria were determined by evaluating the relative deviation of model predictions over the set of measured metabolites N from experimental yield measurements [43], which is an average of average scaled standard deviations evaluated over the set of all mutants M.
$${\text{Relative deviations }} = \frac{1}{M}\sum\limits_{m = 1}^{M} {\frac{1}{N}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} {\left( {\frac{1}{{{\text{CV}}_{i}^{{}} }}\left( {\frac{{v_{i}^{{}} - v_{i}^{ \exp } }}{{v_{i}^{ \exp } }}} \right)} \right)} }$$

The robustness of the estimated kinetic parameters was tested using a leave-one-out cross-validation test by excluding one dataset from the training datasets and comparing the error in product yield predictions for the excluded set against yield predictions by the optimal parameter set. This procedure was performed iteratively for all the 21 datasets. k-ctherm118 was also used to predict the changes in the intracellular metabolite concentrations and metabolite yields under various mutant conditions by modifying the enzyme level as per the mutant genotype. For example, a twofold downregulation of enzyme level from its wild-type level was simulated by changing the total enzyme fraction \(\tilde{e}_{{\rm tot}}\) to 0.5.


Authors’ contributions

SD and AK developed the models. JZ, EKH, and DGO performed the experiments and provided the data for this manuscript. SD performed the model simulations and prepared the manuscript. CDM and LRL supervised the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


The authors would like to thank Dr. Stephen Fong’s lab for building the first C. thermocellum GSM model, Dr. Richard Sparling for the kinetic parameter measurements, and Dr. Daniel Amador-Noguez for the concentration measurements, which were used in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of supporting data

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and its supplementary information files.


This work was supported by the US Department of Energy (DE-SC0012377).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

13068_2017_792_MOESM1_ESM.xml (961 kb)
Additional file 1. The genome-scale model iCth446 with GPRs and metabolite information in COBRA toolbox compatible SBML format.
13068_2017_792_MOESM2_ESM.xls (270 kb)
Additional file 2. The genome-scale model iCth446 with GPRs and metabolite information, list of TICs.
13068_2017_792_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (1.2 mb)
Additional file 3. The core kinetic model k-ctherm118 with list of regulations and kinetic parameters as well as fermentation yields for 19 C. thermocellum mutants.


  1. 1.
    Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002;66:506–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fulton LM, Lynd LR, Korner A, Greene N, Tonachel LR. The need for biofuels as part of a low carbon energy future. Biofuel Bioprod Bior. 2015;9:476–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lynd LR, Elander RT, Wyman CE. Likely features and costs of mature biomass ethanol technology. Appl Biochem Biotech. 1996;57–8:741–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lynd LR, van Zyl WH, McBride JE, Laser M. Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005;16:577–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Demain AL, Newcomb M, Wu JHD. Cellulase, clostridia, and ethanol. Microbiol Mol Biol R. 2005;69:124–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schwarz WH. The cellulosome and cellulose degradation by anaerobic bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;56:634–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ellis LD, Holwerda EK, Hogsett D, Rogers S, Shao XJ, Tschaplinski T, Thorne P, Lynd LR. Closing the carbon balance for fermentation by Clostridium thermocellum (ATCC 27405). Bioresour Technol. 2012;103:293–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chowdhury A, Khodayari A, Maranas CD. Improving prediction fidelity of cellular metabolism with kinetic descriptions. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015;36:57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Linville JL, Rodriguez M Jr, Mielenz JR, Cox CD. Kinetic modeling of batch fermentation for Populus hydrolysate tolerant mutant and wild type strains of Clostridium thermocellum. Bioresour Technol. 2013;147:605–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang YH, Lynd LR. Kinetics and relative importance of phosphorolytic and hydrolytic cleavage of cellodextrins and cellobiose in cell extracts of Clostridium thermocellum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:1563–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang P, Wang B, Xiao Q, Wu S. A kinetics modeling study on the inhibition of glucose on cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum. Bioresour Technol. 2015;190:36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olsen JP, Alasepp K, Kari J, Cruys-Bagger N, Borch K, Westh P. Mechanism of product inhibition for cellobiohydrolase Cel7A during hydrolysis of insoluble cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016;113:1178–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roberts SB, Gowen CM, Brooks JP, Fong SS. Genome-scale metabolic analysis of Clostridium thermocellum for bioethanol production. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010;4(1):31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Choon YW, Mohamad MS, Deris S, Illias RM, Chong CK, Chai LE. A hybrid of bees algorithm and flux balance analysis with OptKnock as a platform for in silico optimization of microbial strains. Bioproc Biosyst Eng. 2014;37:521–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gowen CM, Fong SS. Applications of systems biology towards microbial fuel production. Trends Microbiol. 2011;19:516–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhou J, Olson DG, Argyros DA, Deng Y, van Gulik WM, van Dijken JP, Lynd LR. Atypical glycolysis in Clostridium thermocellum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:3000–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dash S, Ng CY, Maranas CD. Metabolic modeling of clostridia: current developments and applications. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016. doi:10.1093/femsle/fnw004.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thompson RA, Layton DS, Guss AM, Olson DG, Lynd LR, Trinh CT. Elucidating central metabolic redox obstacles hindering ethanol production in Clostridium thermocellum. Metab Eng. 2015;32:207–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thompson RA, Dahal S, Garcia S, Nookaew I, Trinh CT. Exploring complex cellular phenotypes and model-guided strain design with a novel genome-scale metabolic model of Clostridium thermocellum DSM 1313 implementing an adjustable cellulosome. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9:194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dash S, Mueller TJ, Venkataramanan KP, Papoutsakis ET, Maranas CD. Capturing the response of Clostridium acetobutylicum to chemical stressors using a regulated genome-scale metabolic model. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7:144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shao X, Raman B, Zhu M, Mielenz JR, Brown SD, Guss AM, Lynd LR. Mutant selection and phenotypic and genetic characterization of ethanol-tolerant strains of Clostridium thermocellum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;92:641–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Taillefer M, Rydzak T, Levin DB, Oresnik IJ, Sparling R. Reassessment of the transhydrogenase/malate shunt pathway in Clostridium thermocellum ATCC 27405 through kinetic characterization of malic enzyme and malate dehydrogenase. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:2423–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Biswas R, Zheng T, Olson DG, Lynd LR, Guss AM. Elimination of hydrogenase active site assembly blocks H2 production and increases ethanol yield in Clostridium thermocellum. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Colby J, Zatman LJ. Enzymological aspects of the pathways for trimethylamine oxidation and C1 assimilation of obligate methylotrophs and restricted facultative methylotrophs. Biochem J. 1975;148:513–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wood HG, Stjernholm R. Transcarboxylase. II. Purification and properties of methylmalonyl-oxaloacetic transcarboxylase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1961;47:289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xiong W, Lin PP, Magnusson L, Warner L, Liao JC, Maness PC, Chou KJ. CO2-fixing one-carbon metabolism in a cellulose-degrading bacterium Clostridium thermocellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:13180–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Merkamm M, Chassagnole C, Lindley ND, Guyonvarch A. Ketopantoate reductase activity is only encoded by ilvC in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biotechnol. 2003;104:253–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mori Y. Nutritional interdependence between Thermoanaerobacter-thermohydrosulfuricus and Clostridium thermocellum. Arch Microbiol. 1995;164:152–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhong XT, Tai PC. When an ATPase is not an ATPase: at low temperatures the C-terminal domain of the ABC transporter CvaB is a GTPase. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:1347–53.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Buckstein MH, He J, Rubin H. Characterization of nucleotide pools as a function of physiological state in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:718–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Salimi F, Zhuang K, Mahadevan R. Genome-scale metabolic modeling of a clostridial co-culture for consolidated bioprocessing. Biotechnol J. 2010;5:726–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Senger RS, Papoutsakis ET. Genome-scale model for Clostridium acetobutylicum: Part II. Development of specific proton flux states and numerically determined sub-systems. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008;101:1053–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Holwerda EK, Thorne PG, Olson DG, Amador-Noguez D, Engle NL, Tschaplinski TJ, van Dijken JP, Lynd LR. The exometabolome of Clostridium thermocellum reveals overflow metabolism at high cellulose loading. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7(1):155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Buckel W, Thauer RK. Energy conservation via electron bifurcating ferredoxin reduction and proton/Na(+) translocating ferredoxin oxidation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1827:94–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bothun GD, Knutson BL, Berberich JA, Strobel HJ, Nokes SE. Metabolic selectivity and growth of Clostridium thermocellum in continuous culture under elevated hydrostatic pressure. Appl Microbiol Biot. 2004;65:149–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Olson DG, Hörl M, Fuhrer T, Cui J, Zhou J, Maloney MI, Amador-Noguez D, Tian L, Sauer U, Lynd LR. Glycolysis without pyruvate kinase in Clostridium thermocellum. Metab Eng. 2017;39:169–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ranganathan S, Suthers PF, Maranas CD. OptForce: an optimization procedure for identifying all genetic manipulations leading to targeted overproductions. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010;6:e1000744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    van der Veen D, Lo J, Brown SD, Johnson CM, Tschaplinski TJ, Martin M, Engle NL, van den Berg RA, Argyros AD, Caiazza NC, et al. Characterization of Clostridium thermocellum strains with disrupted fermentation end-product pathways. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;40:725–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Milne CB, Eddy JA, Raju R, Ardekani S, Kim PJ, Senger RS, Jin YS, Blaschek HP, Price ND. Metabolic network reconstruction and genome-scale model of butanol-producing strain Clostridium beijerinckii NCIMB 8052. BMC Syst Biol. 2011;5:130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Driessen AJ, Ubbink-Kok T, Konings WN. Amino acid transport by membrane vesicles of an obligate anaerobic bacterium, Clostridium acetobutylicum. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:817–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Deng Y, Olson DG, Zhou JL, Herring CD, Shaw AJ, Lynd LR. Redirecting carbon flux through exogenous pyruvate kinase to achieve high ethanol yields in Clostridium thermocellum. Metab Eng. 2013;15:151–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chang A, Schomburg I, Placzek S, Jeske L, Ulbrich M, Xiao M, Sensen CW, Schomburg D. BRENDA in 2015: exciting developments in its 25th year of existence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D439–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Khodayari A, Zomorrodi AR, Liao JC, Maranas CD. A kinetic model of Escherichia coli core metabolism satisfying multiple sets of mutant flux data. Metab Eng. 2014;25:50–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rydzak T, McQueen PD, Krokhin OV, Spicer V, Ezzati P, Dwivedi RC, Shamshurin D, Levin DB, Wilkins JA, Sparling R. Proteomic analysis of Clostridium thermocellum core metabolism: relative protein expression profiles and growth phase-dependent changes in protein expression. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Smith LT, Kaplan NO. Purification, properties, and kinetic mechanism of coenzyme a-linked aldehyde dehydrogenase from Clostridium kluyver. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1980;203:663–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Allison MJ, Baetz AL, Wiegel J. Alternative pathways for biosynthesis of leucine and other amino acids in Bacteroides ruminicola and Bacteroides fragilis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984;48:1111–7.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Miller R, Wu G, Deshpande RR, Vieler A, Gartner K, Li X, Moellering ER, Zauner S, Cornish AJ, Liu B, et al. Changes in transcript abundance in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii following nitrogen deprivation predict diversion of metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2010;154:1737–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Reaves ML, Rabinowitz JD. Metabolomics in systems microbiology. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2011;22:17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lynd LR, Guss AM, Himmel ME, Beri D, Herring CD, Holwerda EK, Murphy SJ, Olson DG, Paye J, Rydzak T, Shao X. Advances in consolidated bioprocessing using Clostridium thermocellum and Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum. Industrial Biotechnology: Microorganisms. 2017:365–94. doi:10.1002/9783527807796.ch10
  50. 50.
    Yang S, Giannone RJ, Dice L, Yang ZK, Engle NL, Tschaplinski TJ, Hettich RL, Brown SD. Clostridium thermocellum ATCC27405 transcriptomic, metabolomic and proteomic profiles after ethanol stress. Bmc Genomics. 2012;13:336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lee Y, Lafontaine Rivera JG, Liao JC. Ensemble modeling for robustness analysis in engineering non-native metabolic pathways. Metab Eng. 2014;25:63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Theisen MK, Lafontaine Rivera JG, Liao JC. Stability of ensemble models predicts productivity of enzymatic systems. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016;12:e1004800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Leyval D, Uy D, Delaunay S, Goergen JL, Engasser JM. Characterisation of the enzyme activities involved in the valine biosynthetic pathway in a valine-producing strain of Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biotechnol. 2003;104:241–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Khodayari A, Maranas CD. A genome-scale Escherichia coli kinetic metabolic model k-ecoli457 satisfying flux data for multiple mutant strains. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Haug K, Salek RM, Conesa P, Hastings J, de Matos P, Rijnbeek M, Mahendraker T, Williams M, Neumann S, Rocca-Serra P, et al. MetaboLights-an open-access general-purpose repository for metabolomics studies and associated meta-data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D781–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Biswas R, Zheng TY, Olson DG, Lynd LR, Guss AM. Elimination of hydrogenase active site assembly blocks H-2 production and increases ethanol yield in Clostridium thermocellum. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Schuster BG, Chinn MS. Consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulosic feedstocks for ethanol fuel production. Bioenerg Res. 2013;6(2):416–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lo J, Olson DG, Murphy SJ, Tian L, Hon S, Lanahan A, Guss AM, Lynd LR. Engineering electron metabolism to increase ethanol production in Clostridium thermocellum. Metab Eng. 2017;39:71–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chowdhury A, Zomorrodi AR, Maranas CD. k-OptForce: integrating kinetics with flux balance analysis for strain design. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10:e1003487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Flowers D, Thompson RA, Birdwell D, Wang T, Trinh CT. SMET: systematic multiple enzyme targeting—a method to rationally design optimal strains for target chemical overproduction. Biotechnol J. 2013;8:605–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Devoid S, Overbeek R, DeJongh M, Vonstein V, Best AA, Henry C. Automated genome annotation and metabolic model reconstruction in the SEED and model SEED. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;985:17–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Schellenberger J, Lewis NE, Palsson BO. Elimination of thermodynamically infeasible loops in steady-state metabolic models. Biophys J. 2011;100:544–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson BO. What is flux balance analysis? Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28:245–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Maranas CD, Zomorrodi AR. Optimization methods in metabolic networks. Hoboken: Wiley; 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Holwerda EK, Hirst KD, Lynd LR. A defined growth medium with very low background carbon for culturing Clostridium thermocellum. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;39:943–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Satyakam Dash
    • 1
  • Ali Khodayari
    • 1
  • Jilai Zhou
    • 2
  • Evert K. Holwerda
    • 2
  • Daniel G. Olson
    • 2
  • Lee R. Lynd
    • 2
  • Costas D. Maranas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Thayer School of Engineering at Dartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA

Personalised recommendations