Abstract
Motivated by an Conjecture in the literature “Dynamics of Second Order Rational Difference Equations with Open Problems and Conjecture”, we introduce a difference equation system:
where x i ,y i ∈(0,∞),i∈{−2,−1,0}. If the initial value satisfy x i =y i ,i={−2,−1,0}, then the system reduces into the Conjecture. In this paper, we investigate the asymptotic behaviors, periodicity and oscillatory of the system.
AMS Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)
39B82,47H10
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Recently, there has been great interest in studying difference equation systems. One of the reasons for this is the necessity for some techniques that can be used in investigating equations arising in mathematical models describing real life situations in population biology, economics, probability theory, etc. There are many papers related to the difference equations system for example, such as [1–10].
Cinar [1] studied the solutions of the system of difference equations:
Camouzis and Papaschinnopoulos [2] studied the global asymptotic behavior of positive solution of the system of rational difference equations:
Ozban [3] studied the system of rational difference equations:
Kurbanli et al. [4] studied the behavior of positive solutions of the system of rational difference equations:
In the monograph of Dynamics of second order rational difference equations with open problems and conjecture[11], Kulenović and Ladas give a conjecture (see [11] p196) as following:
Conjecture 11.4.10. Show that every positive solution of the equation
converges to a period-four solution.
Stević [12] has solved the Conjecture.
In this paper, we introduce the difference equation system
where x i ,y i ∈(0,∞),i∈{−2,−1,0}.
Obviously, we can see that if the initial value satisfy x i =y i for i∈{−2,−1,0}, then the system (6) reduces into the Eq. (5). Hence, we can also solve the Conjecture 11.4.10. However, we study the system (6).
In this paper, we can obtain the solution of system (6) converges to periodic solution. At the same time, we can get the oscillatory of the system (6).
Before giving some results of the system (6), we need some definitions as follows [5]:
Definition 1. A pair of sequences of positive real numbers that satisfies system (6) is a positive solution of system (6). If a positive solution of system (6) is a pair of positive constants , that solution is the equilibrium solution.
Definition 2. A ‘string’ of consecutive terms {x s ,⋯, x m }(resp. {y s ,⋯,y m }),(s≥−3, m≤∞) is said to be a positive semicycle if (resp. ), {i∈s,⋯,m}, (resp. ), and (resp. ). Otherwise, that is said to be a negative semicycle.
A ‘string’ of consecutive terms {(x s ,y s ),⋯,(x m ,y m )} is said to be a positive(resp.negative) semicycle if {x s ,⋯,x m }, {y s ,⋯,y m } are positive (resp.negative) semicycle.
A solution {x n }(resp. {y n }) oscillates about if for every i∈N, there exist s,m∈N, s≤i, m≥i, such that (resp. (y s −c)(y m −c)<0). We say that a solution of system oscillates about if {x n } oscillates about or {y n } oscillates about .
Some Lemmas
We now present some Lemmas which will be usefully in the proof of the following Theorems.
Lemma 1. The system of (6) has a unique positive equilibrium.
The proof of Lemma 1 is very easy, thus we omit it.
Lemma 2. Assume that p> 0, q > 0, pm > 1, r >0, m >0, rq > 1. Then {p,q}, {r,m}, , , ⋯, {p,q}, {r,m},, is a period-four solution of the system (6).
Proof. Let {p1,p2}, {p3,p4}, {p5,p6}, {p7,p8}, ⋯, {p1,p2}, {p3,p4}, {p5,p6}, {p7,p8} ⋯ be a period-four solution of system (6).
Then by Eq. (6), we obtain
Noting that Eq. (7) can be changed into
We suppose that p1=p, p2=q, p3=r, p4=m.
Then by Eq. (8) we can get
Hence, we complete the proof. □
Lemma 3. Assume that the initial points x i ,y i ∈(0, ∞), i ∈ {−2,−1,0}, is a positive solution of system (6). Then the following statements are true:
-
(a)
If , , thenis decreasing, where i ∈ {− 2, − 1, 0, 1}.
-
(b)
If, , then x4n−2=x−2, x4n−1=x−1, x4n=x0 and x4n+1=x1; y4n−2=y−2, y4n−1=y−1, y4n=y0 and y4n+1=y1, n=0,1,⋯.
-
(c)
If, , thenis increasing, where i ∈ {− 2, − 1, 0, 1}.
-
(d)
If, , then, , , is decreasing, and, , , is increasing.
-
(e)
If, , then, , , is increasing, and, , , is decreasing.
Proof. Part(a):
By system (6), we can get
i.e.
for n≥0.
By the condition , , we can obtain
Next, by Eq. (9), we can get
Therefore by induction, we can get is decreasing for i∈{−2,−1,0,1}.
Part(b): By system (6), we can easily prove that part(b) holds. Hence, we omit the proof of part(b).
Using the same method in the proof of part(a), we can prove part(c) also holds.
Part(d): By the condition , , we obtain
Then, by Eq. (9), we can get
Therefore by induction, we can get part(d) also holds.
Part(e): The proof is similar with the part(d), so we omit it.
Hence, we complete the proof of Lemma 3. □
Lemma 4. Assume that x i , y i ∈ (2, ∞), i ∈ {− 2, − 1, 0}. Then there does not exist a positive solution of the system (6) such that is increasing, where i ∈ {− 2, − 1, 0, 1}.
Proof. Assume, for the sake of contradiction, that there exists a positive solution , such that is increasing, where i∈{−2,−1,0,1}, x i ,y i ∈(2,∞),i∈{−2,−1,0}.
By system (6), we can get
Then, we can get
Because of xn−5<xn−1, we can get xn+1≤ max{xn−1,xn−3}.
More, we can get
which can be written as
If xn−1≥xn−3, then xn+3≤xn−1, which is contradiction;
If xn−3≥xn−1, then xn+1≤xn−3, which is contradiction;
If x n ≥xn−2, then xn+4≤x n , which is contradiction;
If xn−2≥x n , then xn+2≤xn−2, which is contradiction.
They are contradictions and we complete the proof. □
Lemma 5. Assume that x i , y i ∈ (0, 2), i = {− 2, − 1, 0}. Then there does not exist a positive solution of the system (6) such that is decreasing, where i ∈ {− 2, − 1, 0, 1}.
The proof of Lemma 5 is similar with the proof of Lemma 4, so we omit it.
Results and discussion
In this section, we study five cases of the solution of the system (6). We get the solution of system (6) eventually converges to period-four solution.
Theorem 1. Assume that the initial points x i , y i ∈ (0, ∞), i ∈ {− 2, − 1, 0}, is a positive solution of the system (6). Then the following statement are true:
If, , thenis decreasing, where i ∈ {− 2, − 1, 0, 1}, andconverges to a period-four solution as following
Proof. By Lemma 3(a), we can get
Because ‘Monotone bounded sequence must have limit,’ we can set
With no loss of generality, we consider these three cases as followings:
-
(a)
p1=p2=p3=p4=p5=p6=p7=p8=0
-
(b)
-
(c)
Now, if we can prove case(a) and cade(b) do not hold, then we can obtain only case(c) holds.
By Lemma 5, we know that case(a) does not hold.
Next we try to prove the case(b) do not hold.
By the system (6), we can get
By limiting both sides of Eq. (12), we can get
If , the identical Equation (12) do not hold. Hence, case(b) does not hold.
At last, only case(c) holds. We complete the proof. □
Corollary 1. Suppose that is a positive solution of system (6). Then the following statement is true:
If , , then the solution of system (6) oscillates about equilibrium . Besides the positive semicycle have at most three terms, at least one term; the negative semicycle have at most three terms and at least one term.
Theorem 2. Assume that the initial points x i , y i ∈ (0, ∞), i ∈ {− 2, − 1, 0}, are a positive solution of the system (6). Then the following statements are true:
If, , then {x−2,y−2}, {x−1,y−1}, {x0,y0}, {x1,y1}, ⋯, {x−2,y−2}, {x−1,y−1}, {x0,y0}, {x1,y1}, ⋯ is a period-four solution of the system (6), where, .
Proof. By the Lemma 8 and Lemma 3(b), we can prove the Theorem 2. Hence, we omit it. □
Theorem 3. Assume that the initial points x i , y i ∈ (0, ∞), i ∈ {− 2, − 1, 0}, are a positive solution of the system (6). Then the following statements are true:
If, , thenis decreasing, where i ∈ {− 2, − 1, 0, 1} andconverges to a period-four solution as following:
Proof. By Lemma 3(c), we can get:
Then, by Eq. (3), we can get
i.e.
Next, we can get:
Besides, if 0<a<b<c<d, we can get a c<b c<b d. Hence by induction and the above inequality, we can get:
We can set =p2, , , ,.
From Lemma 10, we know that there at least one p i <2. Then by Limiting Theorem, we can get at least one of the limiting of p i must exist. With no loss ordinary, we set the limit of {x4n+1} exists, i.e. p1<2.
By limiting the inequation (17), we can get
Hence, we can get the limits of {y4n+2}, {x4n+3} and {y4n+4} are all exists. We can prove p3<∞, p6<∞, and p8<∞.
From Eq (18), we can get:
Hence, we can obtain , , and 0<k<∞, 0<l<∞
Assume that , , , .
By the system (6), we can get
which can be changed into
By limiting the both side of Eq. (20), we can get the right side of equation is , which is contradiction.
Hence, use the same method, we can get , , , .
i.e.
Therefore, we complete the proof. □
Corollary 2. Suppose that is a positive solution of system (6). Then the following statement is true:
If , , then the solution of system (6) oscillates about equilibrium . Besides, the positive semicycle have at most three terms, at least one term; the negative semicycle have at most three terms, at least one term.
Theorem 4. Assume that the initial points x i , y i ∈ (0, ∞), i ∈ {− 2, − 1, 0}, are a positive solution of the system (6). Then, the following statements are true:
If, , then the solution of system (6) converges to a period-four solution as following
Proof. By the Theorem 1 and Theorem 3, we can get Theorem 4 holds. Hence, we omit it. □
Theorem 5. Assume that the initial points x i , y i ∈ (0, ∞), i ∈ {− 2, − 1, 0}, are a positive solution of the system (6). Then the following statements are true:
If, , then the solution of system (6) converges to a period-four solution as following:
Proof. By the Theorem 1 and Theorem 3, we can get Theorem 5 holds. Hence, we omit it. □
References
Cinar C:On the positive solutions of the difference equation system , . Appl. Math. Comput 2004, 158: 303–305. 10.1016/j.amc.2003.08.073
Camouzis E, Papaschinopoulos G:Global asymptotic behavior of positive solutions on the system of rational difference equations . Appl. Math. Lett 2004, 17: 733–737. 10.1016/S0893-9659(04)90113-9
Ozban AY: On the system of rational difference equations $x_{n}=\frac {a}{y_{n-3}}\,y_n=\frac {by_{n-3}}{x_{n-q}y_{n-q}}$xn=ayn−3yn=byn−3xn−qyn−q. Appl. Math. Comput 2007, 188: 833–837. 10.1016/j.amc.2006.10.034
Kurbanli AS, Cinar C, Yalcinkaya I:On the behavior of positive solutions of the system of rational difference equations , . Math. Comput. Model 2011, 53: 1261–1267. 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.12.009
Papaschinopoulos G: On a system of two nonlinear difference equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl 1998, 219: 415–426. 10.1006/jmaa.1997.5829
Papaschinopoulos G, Radin M, Schinas CJ: Study of the asymptotic behavior of the solutions of three systems of difference equations of exponential form. Appl. Math. Comput 2012, 218: 5310–5318. 10.1016/j.amc.2011.11.014
Elsayed EM, El-Dessoky MM: Dynamics and behavior of a higher order rational recursive sequence. Adv. Difference Equations 2012, 2012: 69. 10.1186/1687-1847-2012-69
Elabbasy EM, El-Metwally H, Elsayed EM: Global behavior of the solutions of difference equation. Adv. Difference Equations 2011, 2011: 28. 10.1186/1687-1847-2011-28
Camouzis E, Kent CM, Ladas G, Lynd CD: On the global character of solutions of the system: . J. Difference Equations Appl 2012, 18: 1205–1252. 10.1080/10236198.2011.555406
Camouzis E, Drymonis E, Ladas G, Tikjha W: Patterns of boundedness of the rational system . J. Difference Equations Appl 2012, 18: 89–110. 10.1080/10236198.2010.515591
Kulenović MRS, Ladas G: Dynamics of second order rational difference equation with open problems and conjectures. Virginia Beach: Chapman Hall/CRC Press; 2002.
Stevo S: Periodic character of a class of difference equation. J. Difference Equations Appl 2004, 6: 615–619.
Acknowledgements
Research supported by Distinguished Expert Foundation and Youth Science Foundation of Naval Aeronautical and Astronautical University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
All authors have almost equal contributions to the article. All authors read, checked, and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Ji, W., Zhang, D. & Wang, L. Dynamics and behaviors of a third-order system of difference equation. Math Sci 7, 34 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-7456-7-34
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-7456-7-34