Skip to main content
Log in

DNA methylation analysis during the optimization of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean

  • Plant Genetics
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soybean is recognized as one of the plants which are very difficult to be transformed. Considering the low transformation efficiency of soybean, we aimed to determine the effect of 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA), shoot induction time, and infection time of Agrobacterium on the clonal propagation of Glycine max. Results showed that 1.6 mg/L 6-BA could be optimal to promote the induction of adventitious shoots. An induction time of 15 d was considered optimal for the actual experiment involving soybean shoot induction. Agrobacterium was cultured until an OD600 = 0.8 was reached for an infection time of 30 min; this infection time may be optimal to promote soybean transformation. Whole genome DNA methylation was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-assisted quantification, and DNA methylation result is consistent with the phenotypic data of shoot development. In addition, two methylation-related genes (decrease in DNA methylation 1 and DNA methyl transferases chromomethylase 2) were analyzed to determine expression differences by qRT-PCR in the shoots that were developed under different experimental conditions. In general, the expression values of these genes were normally downregulated under the recommended experimental conditions of soybean regeneration. This study showed the overall methylation changes in the in vitro culture of soybean, as affected by several variable parameters, which is useful to promote the transformation efficiency of soybean.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cassidy, A. and Faughnan, M., Phyto-oestrogens through the life cycle, Proc. Nutr. Soc., 2000, vol. 59, pp. 489–496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Natarajan, S., Luthria, D., Bae, H., et al., Transgenic soybeans and soybean protein analysis: an review, J. Agric. Food Chem., 2013, vol. 61, pp. 11736–11743.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. De Bruin, J.L. and Pederson, P., Yield improvement and stability for soybean cultivars with resistance to Heterodera glycines Ichinohe, Agron. J., 2008, vol. 100, pp. 1354–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ray, D.K., Mueller, N.D., West, P.C., et al., Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050, PloS One, 2013, vol. 19. e66428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Olhoft, P.M., Flagel, L.E., Donocan, C.M., et al., Efficient soybean transformation using hygromycin B selection in the cotyledonary-node method, Planta, 2003, vol. 216, pp. 723–735.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Xue, R.G., Xie, H.F., and Zhang, B., A multi-needleassisted transformation of soybean cotyledonary node cells, Biotechnol. Lett., 2006, vol. 28, pp. 1551–1557.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, Z.H., Jin, H., Plaha, P., et al., An improved regeneration protocol using cotyledonary explants from inbred lines of Chinese cabbage (Brasica rapa ssp. pekinensis), J. Plant Biotechnol., 2004, vol. 6, pp. 235–239.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Olhoft, P.M., Lin, K., Galbraith, J., et al., The role of thiol compounds increasing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean cotyledonary-node cells, Plant Cell Rep., 2001, vol. 20, pp. 731–737.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, S.J., Wei, Z.M., and Huang, J.Q., The effect of cocultivation and selection parameters on Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Chinese soybean varieties, Plant Cell Rep., 2008, vol. 27, pp. 489–498.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miguel, C. and Marum, L., An epigenetic view of plant cells cultured in vitro: somaclonal variation and beyond, J. Exp. Bot., 2011, vol. 62, pp. 3713–3725.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Us-Camas, R., Rivera-Solis, G., Duarte-Ake, F., et al., In vitro culture: an epigenetic challenge for plants, Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 2014. doi 10.1007/s11240014-0482-8

    Google Scholar 

  12. Henderson, I.R. and Jacobsen, S.E., Epigenetic inheritance in plants, Nature, 2007, vol. 447, pp. 418–424.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feng, S., Cokus, S.J., Zhang, X., et al., Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 2010, vol. 107, pp. 8689–8694.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Chinnusamy, V. and Zhu, J.K., Epigenetic regulation of stress responses in plants, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 2009, vol. 12, pp. 133–139.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fraga, M. and Esteller, M., DNA methylation: a profile of methods and applications, BioTechniques, 2002, vol. 33, pp. 636–649.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smykal, P., Valledor, L., Rodriguez, R., et al., Assessment of genetic and epigenetic stability in long-term in vitro shoot culture of pea (Pisum sativum L.), Plant Cell Rep., 2007, vol. 26, pp. 1985–1998.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kour, G., Kour, B., Kaul, S., et al., Genetic and epigenetic instability of amplification-prone sequences of a novel B chromosome induced by tissue culture in Plantago lagopus L., Plant Cell Rep., 2009, vol. 28, pp. 1857–1867.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dann, A.L. and Wilson, C.R., Comparative assessment of genetic and epigenetic variation among regenerants of potato (Solanum tuberosum) derived from long-term nodal tissue-cultured and cell selection, Plant Cell Rep., 2011, vol. 30, pp. 631–639.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neelakandan, A.K. and Wang, K., Recent progress in the understanding of tissue culture-induced genome level changes in plants and potential applications, Pant Cell Rep., 2012, vol. 31, pp. 597–620.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Demeulemeester, M.A.C., Stallen, N.V., and De Proft, M.P., Degree of DNA methylation in chicory (Cichorium intybus L.): influence of plant age and vernalization, Plant Sci., 1999, vol. 142, pp. 101–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rival, A., Ilbert, P., Labeyrie, A., et al., Variations in genomic DNA methylation during the long-term in vitro proliferation of oil palm embryogenic suspension cultures, Plant Cell Rep., 2012, vol. 32, pp. 359–368.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Plitta, B.P., Michalak, M., Naskret-Barciszewska, M.Z., et al., DNA methylation of Quercus robur L. plumules following cryopretreatment and cryopreservation, Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 2014, vol. 117, pp. 31–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, H.K., Yang, C., and Wei, Z.M., Efficient Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of soybeans using an embryonic tip regeneration system, Planta, 2004, vol. 219, pp. 1042–1049.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Boyko, A. and Kovalchuk, I., Epigenetic controls of plant stress response, Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 2008, vol. 49, pp. 61–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Y. Wang or V. Sokolov.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, J., Wang, Y., Xie, T. et al. DNA methylation analysis during the optimization of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean. Russ J Genet 52, 56–63 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795416010087

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795416010087

Keywords

Navigation