Skip to main content
Log in

A multi-needle-assisted transformation of soybean cotyledonary node cells

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biotechnology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 07 November 2006

Abstract

A new and simple method for wounding cotyledonary node cells of soybean [Glycine max (L) Merrill] was developed for obtaining a high frequency of transformants. Soybean seeds were germinated for 1 day, and the cotyledonary node cells of half-seeds were wounded mechanically by using a multi-needle consisting of thin 30 fibers. The wounded half-seeds were inoculated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells harboring a recombinant DNA that contained the bar and sgfp genes conferring phosphinothricin (PPT)-resistance and green fluorescent protein (GFP) activity, respectively. The inoculated explants were selected on medium containing 5 or 3 mg PPT/l. The transformation efficiency of soybean was up to 12%. Polymerase chain reaction and genomic Southern blot analysis confirmed stable integration of the transgenes in the genome of the PPT-resistant plants. GFP analysis revealed that the transgenes were highly expressed in the plantlets. Adult plants were resistant to 100 mg PPT/l applied on the leaves, demonstrating their herbicide-resistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Binns AN, Thomashow MF (1988) Cell biology of Agrobacterium infection and transformation of plants. Ann Rev Microbiol 42:575–606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chee PP, Fober KA, Slightom JL (1989) Transformation of soybean (Glycine max) by infecting germinating seeds with Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiol 91:1212–1218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clemente TE, LaVallee BJ, Howe AR, Conner-Ward D, Rozman RJ, Hunter PE, Broyles DL, Kasten DS, Hinchee MA (2000) Progeny analysis of glyphosate selected transgenic soybean derived from Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Crop Sci 40:797–803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finer JJ, McMullen MD (1991) Transformation of soybean via particle bombardment of embryogenic suspension culture tissue. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 27:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazel CB, Klein TM, Anis M, Wilde HD, Parrott WA (1998) Growth characteristics and transformability of soybean embryogenic cultures. Plant Cell Rep 17:765–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1994) Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J 6:271–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hinchee MA, Connor-Ward DV, Newell CA, McDonnell RE, Sato SJ, Gasser CS, Fischhoff DA, Re DB, Fraley RT, Horsch RB (1988) Production of transgenic soybean plants using Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer. BioTechnology 6:915–922

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lippincott JA, Lippincott BB (1975) The genus Agrobacterium and plant tumorigenesis. Ann Rev Microbiol 29:377–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meurer DA, Dinkins RD, Collins GB (1998) Factors affecting soybean cotyledonary node transformation. Plant Cell Rep 18:180–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olhoft PM, Flagel LE, Donovan CM, Somers DA (2003) Efficient soybean transformation using hygromycin B selection in the cotyledonary-node method. Planta 216:723–735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olhoft PM, Lin K, Galbraith J, Nielsen NC, Somers DA (2001) The role of thiol compounds increasing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean cotyledonary-node cells. Plant Cell Rep 20:731–737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olhoft PM, Somers DA (2001) l-Cysteine increases Agrobacterium-mediated T-DNA delivery into soybean cotyledonary-node cells. Plant Cell Rep 20:706–711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Lab Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarem ER, Finer JJ (1999) Transformation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] using proliferative embryogenic tissue maintained on semisolid medium. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 35:451–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santarém ER, Trick HN, Essig JS, Finer JJ (1998) Sonication-assisted Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean immature cotyledons: optimization of transient expression. Plant Cell Rep 17:752–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trick HN, Finer JJ (1997) SAAT: Sonication-assisted Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Transgenic Res 6:329–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trick HN, Finer JJ (1998) Sonication-assisted Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] embryogenic suspension culture tissue. Plant Cell Rep 17:482–488

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng P, Vadnais DA, Zhang Z, Polacco JC (2003) Refined glufosinate selection in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Plant Cell Rep 22:478–482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Xing A, Staswick PE, Clemente TE (1999) The use of glufosinate as a selective agent in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 56:37–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from Shandong Provincial Education Department and from Laiyang Agricultural College, China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ren-Gao Xue.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10529-006-9229-x

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xue, RG., Xie, HF. & Zhang, B. A multi-needle-assisted transformation of soybean cotyledonary node cells. Biotechnol Lett 28, 1551–1557 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-006-9123-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-006-9123-6

Keywords

Navigation