Skip to main content
Log in

The role of thiol compounds in increasing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean cotyledonary-node cells

  • Genetic Transformation and Hybridization
  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean cells and the production of fertile transgenic soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] plants using the cotyledonary-node (cot-node) method were improved by amending the solid co-cultivation medium with L-cysteine. The goal of this study was to investigate the role of cysteine and other thiol compounds in increasing the frequency of transformed soybean cot-node cells. The frequency of transformed cells was increased only when L-cysteine was present during co-cultivation of Agrobacterium and cot-node explants. This effect was due to the thiol group since D-cysteine and other thiol compounds also increased the frequency of transformed cells. Copper and iron chelators also increased the frequency of transformed cells, indicating an association with inhibition of polyphenol oxidases and peroxidases. Thiol compounds likely inhibit wound- and pathogen-induced responses, thereby increasing the capacity for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean cells. The increases in transformed cot-node cells were independent of soybean genotype, Agrobacterium strain, and binary plasmid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Revision received: 14 August 2001

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Olhoft, P., Lin, K., Galbraith, J. et al. The role of thiol compounds in increasing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of soybean cotyledonary-node cells. Plant Cell Rep 20, 731–737 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990100388

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990100388

Navigation