Abstract
The results of calibration measurements of the proton beam Cherenkov monitor are presented. A good agreement was obtained between the monitor measurements and the readings of the ionization chamber and the plastic monitor. The Cherenkov monitor does not register photons and electrons with energies below 170 keV, which is important for low-energy background suppression.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 INTRODUCTION
Calibration measurements of two Cherenkov monitors (Ch1, Ch2) of the proton beam [1] were carried out on the medical channel of the Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, shared use center in comparison with the ionization chamber (IC) Semiflex Ionization Chamber Type 31010 [2] with a volume of 0.14 cm3 used in conjunction with the PTW Multidos elektrometer clinical dosimeter and the Gafchromic EBT3 calibrated plastic monitor (RF) [3].
The proton accelerator with an energy of 169−209 MeV operates in a frequency range of 1−50 Hz, over a wide range of proton beam intensities–from small pulsed currents of 0.1 μA to 10 mA–while the duration of the proton pulse is in the range from 0.3 to 100 μs. The Cherenkov monitor has the fundamental ability to operate in this range of proton beam intensities under conditions of a strong low-energy electromagnetic background. Known detectors, such as ionization chambers [4–6] and inductive current sensors [7, 8], cannot operate in such a wide range of intensities. Ionization chambers work well in the region of relatively low currents, up to 10 μA. At high currents in ionization chambers, nonlinear effects arise associated with the space charge and recombination of ions in the chamber gas. Inductive current sensors work well in the region of relatively high currents, above 10 µA. An ionization chamber and a plastic monitor measure the absorbed dose of ionizing radiation. The Cherenkov monitor measures the Cherenkov light emitted by protons in the thin glass radiator of the monitor. Protons with an energy of 209 MeV emit an average of 0.5 photons/proton [1] in the sensitivity region of the XP2020 photomultiplier spectrum. The monitor does not detect photons and electrons with energies below 170 keV, which is important for low-energy background suppression. The absorbed dose in the substance of the detectors and the Cherenkov radiation are proportional to the number of detected protons.
2 CALIBRATION MEASUREMENTS ON THE PROTON BEAM
The layout of the detectors on the proton beam with an energy of 169 MeV is shown in Fig. 1. The proton beam was completely absorbed in the MR3-R T41029 water phantom 448 × 480 × 350 mm in size, in which the ionization chamber IC was placed in the region of maximum energy release (Bragg peak) of the proton beam. Cherenkov Ch1, Ch2, and plastic RF monitors were installed at the center of the proton beam in front of the phantom in the air gap.
The measurements were carried out on a proton beam with an energy of 169 MeV and a proton pulse duration of 35 µs for three modes of accelerator operation: cycle D1 of 140 pulses, D2 of 943 pulses, and D3 of 1561 pulses. The IC and RF detectors measure the total dose per cycle from all proton pulses. Detectors Ch1 and Ch2 measure the current pulse over time for each proton pulse. Integrating the current pulse over time gives a charge proportional to the number of protons for each pulse.
Figure 2a shows the dependences of the signal amplitude on time for three sample pulses. The signal amplitude from detectors Ch1 and Ch2 was measured using a CAEN DT5720 transducer [9]. The distribution histogram of the number of protons in each pulse for the D1 cycle, which consists of 140 pulses, is shown in Fig. 2b.
The results of measurements of the absorbed dose by the Ch1, IC, and RF detectors in three accelerator operating modes are presented in Table 1. The ionization chamber IC and the plastic monitor RF are calibrated in gray. The measured dose by the Cherenkov monitor is obtained by integrating the current pulse (see Fig. 2a) to determine the charge in each pulse (see Fig. 2b). The total values of the detector charge Ch1 for the entire measurement cycle in Table 1 are presented in arbitrary units.
Figure 3a shows the results of dose measurements by the RF plastic monitor as a function of the total dose measured by the IC ionization chamber in three accelerator operating modes. The solid line represents the result of fitting with a linear dependence. The result shows good agreement between the data obtained by the IC and RF detectors. This demonstrates the good calibration of the IC and RF detectors. The linear dependence of the total dose measured by the Cherenkov monitor Ch1 on the total dose received by the ionization chamber IC obtained as a result of fitting indicates that the detectors are in good agreement with each other (Fig. 3b). Thus, it is shown that the Cherenkov detector can measure the dose in the water phantom in the region of maximum energy release (Bragg peak) of the proton beam.
The measurements with Cherenkov monitors Ch1 and Ch2 are in good agreement with each other (Fig. 4). The relative accuracy of the Ch monitor dose measurements can be estimated from the point spread (see Fig. 4a) in the region of 20–25 Gy; its value is ~3%.
3 CONCLUSIONS
The results of calibration measurements with a Cherenkov proton beam monitor are presented. A good agreement was obtained between the results of measurements by the monitor and the readings of the ionization chamber and the plastic monitor. The Cherenkov monitor does not register photons and electrons with energies below 170 keV, which is important for low-energy background suppression.
REFERENCES
Djilkibaev, R.M., Instrum. Exp. Tech., 2021, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 508–515. https://doi.org/10.1134/S002044122104014X
Scanditronics Ionization Chamber. https://www.rpdinc.com.
An Efficient Calibration Protocol for Radiochromic Film, April 2011. www.gafchromic.com. www.filmqapro.com.
Boag, J.W., Ionization Chamber in Radiation Dosimetry, New York: Academic Press, 1968.
McDonald, J., Velissaris, C., Viren, B., Diwan, M., Erwin, A., Naples, D., and Ping, H., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A, 2003, vol. 496, p. 293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(02)01768-0
Abramov, A.I., Kazanskii, Yu.A., and Matusevich, E.S., Osnovy eksperimental’nykh metodov yadernoi fiziki (Fundamentals of Experimental Methods for Nuclear Physics), Moscow: Atomizdat, 1970.
Reinhardt-Nikoulin, P., Gaidash, V., Menshov, A., Mirzojan, A., and Feschenko, A., Probl. At. Sci. Technol., Ser.: Nucl. Phys. Invest., 2006, vol. 2, no. 46, p. 113.
D’yachenko, A.F., Vestn. Khar’k. Nats. Univ. im. V. N. Karazina. Ser. Fiz., 2010, vol. 887, no. 1 (45), p. 118.
CAEN DT5720. 4 Channel 12 Bit Waveform Digitizer. http://www.caen.it.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank I.I. Tkachev, D.A. Kokontsev, I.A. Yakovlev, and V.E. Postoev.
Funding
The work was carried out using the equipment of the Center for Collective Use Accelerator Center for Neutron Research on the Structure of Matter and Nuclear Medicine of the Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, with the support of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation under the Subsidy Agreement (no. 14.621.21.0014 08/28/2017), unique identifier RFMEFI62117X0014. The work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant no. 22-25-00211 Investigation of Cell Response to the Action of Record-Breaking Powerful Ultrashort Proton Pulses.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Akulinichev, S.V., Gavrilov, Y.K. & Djilkibaev, R.M. Calibration of the Proton Beam Cherenkov Monitor. Instrum Exp Tech 66, 365–368 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020441223020124
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020441223020124