Abstract
Features of Andreev reflection at the normal metal-superconductor interface in the presence of repulsive-interaction-induced pairing with a large total momentum K have been analyzed. When the direction of the motion of a hole arising upon the formation of a pair with K ≠ 0 by an incident electron corresponds to transmission, the intensity of Andreev reflection decreases compared to the case K = 0. Another cause of the decrease in the intensity is that, owing to the repulsive interaction, the superconducting order parameter has a zero line, and the quasiparticle energy minimum, which determines the turning point, does not coincide with the Fermi contour on which the quasiparticle charge changes its sign (charge asymmetry).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Guy Deutscher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 109 (2005).
V. I. Belyavskii, V. V. Kapaev, and Yu. V. Kopaev, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 118, 941 (2000) [JETP 91, 817 (2000)].
V. I. Belyavskii, Yu. V. Kopaev, Yu. N. Togushova, and S. V. Shevtsov, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 126, 672 (2004) [JETP 99, 585 (2004)].
V. I. Belyavskii, Yu. V. Kopaev, V. M. Sofronov, and S. V. Shevtsov, Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 124, 1149 (2003) [JETP 97, 1032 (2003)].
V. I. Belyavskii, V. V. Kapaev, and Yu. V. Kopaev, Pis’ma Zh. Éksp. Teor. Fiz. 81, 650 (2005) [JETP Lett. 81, 527 (2005)].
G. E. Blonder, M. Tinkham, and T. M. Klapwijk, Phys. Rev. B 25, 4515 (1982).
N. A. Mortensen, K. Flensberg, and A.-P. Jauho, Phys. Rev. B 59, 10176 (1999).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
__________
Translated from Pis’ma v Zhurnal Éksperimental’no\(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\smile}$}}{l}\) i Teoretichesko\(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\smile}$}}{l}\) Fiziki, Vol. 82, No. 9, 2005, pp. 652–656.
Original Russian Text Copyright © 2005 by Kopaev, Sofronov.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kopaev, Y.V., Sofronov, V.M. Manifestation of the superconducting pairing of repulsive particles with a large total momentum in Andreev reflection. Jetp Lett. 82, 575–579 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1134/1.2161284
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/1.2161284