Abstract
The superconducting tunneling effect in heterostructures, describing the process where single electrons or Cooper pairs tunnel through the barrier, can always play a significant role in understanding the phase coherence and pairing mechanisms in superconductors. Taking advantage of the easy cleavage to atomically-thin monolayer structure of layered superconductors and resulting quantum confinement of electrons or Cooper pairs at two-dimensional limit, van der Waals superconducting materials hosting superconducting order in monolayers or heterostructures can exhibit extensive emergent phenomena associated with quantum phase transitions of vortex and anti-vortex pairs. Examples of superconducting tunnel junctions (STJs) based on layered superconductors have been demonstrated to achieve novel phenomena, including Andreev bound states, Majorana bound states and 0/π-phase junctions. Since the characteristic parameters of quasiparticle tunneling through the barrier are directly associated with the energy gap values of superconductors, such critical parameter can be obtained within the STJ device geometry, which helps us understand and control the pairing states and emerging phenomena in superconductors. In this review, from the perspective of STJs with single electron tunneling and Cooper pair tunneling, we discuss Andreev reflection, Majorana bound states, photon-induced tunneling effects, non-reciprocal transport and superconducting diode phenomena, as well as prospects for layered-superconductor-based STJs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Superconducting tunnel junctions (STJs), being an efficient approach to investigating the quantum tunneling processes of quasiparticles in superconductors, can serve as an extraordinary platform for exploring novel electronic states and strong correlation phenomena of condensed matters [1–7]. The technological appeal of STJs is the exceptional sensitivity, precision, and speed in detecting and manipulating quantum-level phenomena. Examples of STJs have been demonstrated in understanding Majorana zero modes [8–20], exploring Andreev bound states [21–23], and probing superconducting diode physics [24–35], as well as developing superconducting single-photon detectors [7, 36–47]. Interestingly, the cleavable layered superconductors with reduced dimensionality and strong electron correlation can possess novel mechanisms beyond those in conventional Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) superconductors [48], including p- or d-wave pairing [49–55], Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition [56–60], Ising pairing [61–63], and flat-band superconductivity [64–67], as well as quantum Griffiths singularity [68–71]. Therefore, STJs with layered superconductors are of great significance for understanding novel superconducting pairing mechanisms and achieving phase-sensitive quantum phenomena in strongly correlated systems.
In superconductor/barrier/superconductor sandwiched STJ structures, the quasiparticles undergoing the tunneling process can be classified into the following two types: single electrons (Bogoliubov quasiparticles to be precise) or Cooper pairs, as shown in Fig. 1a, b. Generally, a quantitative criterion for distinguishing the two basic quasiparticle tunneling processes can be expressed by comparing the tunnel barrier thickness d and the coherence length ξ of Cooper pairs along the tunneling direction (Fig. 1c) [72]. For \(d>\xi \), only single electron tunneling occurs (Fig. 1a), while for \(\xi >d\), Cooper pair tunneling dominates the entire tunneling process (Fig. 1b, such an STJ is known as a Josephson junction). For the former case of \(d>\xi \) with a relatively thicker tunnel barrier, since the superconducting order parameter exponentially decreases within the barrier, the coherence between two superconductors through such a thick barrier is ignorable. Therefore, the direct tunneling of Cooper pairs through the tunnel barrier is forbidden, and a single electron tunneling process is expected (Fig. 1a). For the latter case with \(\xi >d\), when the thickness of the sandwiched tunnel barrier is small enough, the order parameters of the two superconductors can coherently interact with each other, and such thin tunnel barriers will always cause a phase shift between two superconducting order parameters, so Cooper pairs are expected to directly tunnel through the barrier (Fig. 1b), serving as the characteristics of Josephson junctions [73].
Experimentally, electronic transport measurements (for example, current-voltage I-V characteristics) are generally used to distinguish the single electron or Cooper pair tunneling processes [73–76]. Based on the definition of the superconducting gaps as \(\Delta _{1}\) and \(\Delta _{2}\) for the left and right superconductors, we can obtain the following understanding. (1) For the case of single electron tunneling where \(\xi < d\), when the bias potential exceeds \(( \Delta _{1} + \Delta _{2} )/e\) (e is the elementary charge), electrons below the superconducting gap from the left superconductor can tunnel through the barrier, entering the right superconductor, as demonstrated in the upper panel of Fig. 1d. However, the electrons can hardly tunnel through the barrier layer if the potential bias is smaller than \(( \Delta _{1} + \Delta _{2} )/e\) due to the lack of density of states at the Fermi level. As a result, the tunnel current is small for such a situation, as shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 1d. (2) For the case of Cooper pair tunneling where \(\xi >d\), even with zero bias voltage, a non-zero supercurrent through the Josephson junction can occur because of the superfluidity of Cooper pairs, showing as the evidence for the intrinsic difference between single-electron STJs and Josephson junctions. Further increasing the electrical current over the critical supercurrent \(I_{c }\) of the Josephson junction, the non-zero bias voltage between the two superconductors can be detected due to single electron tunneling (Fig. 1e).
The STJ device geometry using atomically-thin layered superconductors or their heterostructures can host the following notable advantages for understanding the underlying pairing mechanism in superconductors and quantum phase transitions therein. First, the quasiparticle tunneling feature within STJs can directly provide detailed information about the density of states of the superconductor, in particular for the superconducting gap values and the phase coherence between superconducting order parameters [77, 78]. Second, the “transfer and stack” technique to form high-quality van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures [79–81] can directly provide an atomically-flat and high-quality interface between the superconductor and the tunnel barrier in an STJ [78, 82, 83]. Third, unlike the conventional sandwiched STJ structure where an insulating barrier is necessary, an STJ can also be formed by stacking two exfoliated layered superconductors separated by an insulating vdW gap between them [52, 84], which provides a convenient approach to understanding the details of superconducting gap states. Fourth, the superconducting behavior of layered superconductors can be maintained even in the two-dimensional (2D) limit [51, 62, 85], so the phase-sensitive measurement based on STJ structures can be applied to determine the pairing symmetry therein [52].
This review focuses on recent forefront research involving STJs based on layered superconductors. The main topics we aim to cover here include Andreev scattering, Majorana bound states, single photon detection, 0/π-phase junctions and superconducting diodes [88–95], as shown in the content summary in Fig. 2. We also discuss several important topics, including the non-reciprocal transport phenomena by symmetry engineering and the Majorana bound states for topological quantum computation by the proximity effect in STJs.
2 Geometry of superconducting tunnel junctions
Since the coherence length ξ of layered superconductors is often be highly anisotropic along the in-plane and out-of-plane directions [62, 99], the characteristic length d of the tunnel barrier (for example, d represents the barrier thickness for the out-of-plane STJs) should be carefully selected to realize STJs with different quasiparticle tunneling. The device geometry of the out-of-plane or in-plane STJs and their distinct anisotropic transport properties are pivotal in understanding the symmetry breaking-induced nonlinear and non-reciprocal electronic transport phenomena therein.
In out-of-plane STJs where electron tunneling occurs perpendicular to the interface between the superconducting nanoflake and the barrier (Fig. 3), the selection of tunnel barrier thickness typically depends on the out-of-plane ξ value of layered superconductors [74, 87, 100, 101]. Regarding the fabrication process of out-of-plane STJs, the “bottom-up” method of multiple-layered vdW superconducting films is a widely used technique to form STJs with clean and flat interfaces. For example, large area and homogenous STJ devices can be fabricated by using metal evaporation (Al/InGaAs/Al, Fig. 3a) [97], epitaxial growth technique (La2-xSrxCuO4/La2CuO4/La2-xSrxCuO4, Fig. 3b) [98], or chemical vapor deposition (NbSe2/MoSe2/NbSe2, Fig. 3c) [87]. Considering that the atomically-thin superconducting nanoflakes can also be achieved via the “top-down” exfoliation technique [81, 102–104], stacking nanoflakes together can serve as an effective way to fabricate the STJ sandwiched structures. Since the large vdW gap between the stacked nanoflakes can directly serve as the tunnel barrier in STJ sandwiched structure, the stacked NbSe2/NbSe2 (Fig. 3d) or Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 + δ/Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 + δ homojunctions with the vdW gap tunnel barrier [52, 84] can function as typical STJ devices. Also, the NbSe2/Nb3Br8/NbSe2 STJ structure with inversion-symmetry-breaking tunnel barrier Nb3Br8 (Fig. 3e) can be used to form superconducting diodes and realize non-reciprocal supercurrents [24]. Such a stacking technique can offer an extra control degree of freedom to modulate the properties of STJs by changing the thickness or crystal symmetry of the barrier layer.
In in-plane STJs where the superconductors and the barrier layer are on the same plane of substrate surface, a designed weak link region between two layered superconductors (named as “Dayhem bridge”) can directly serve as the tunnel barrier for quasiparticle tunneling processes [86, 105, 106, 108–115], as demonstrated in Fig. 4a-c. Considering that the ξ value along the in-plane direction is normally much larger than that along the out-of-plane direction [98, 116–120], two advantages of such in-plane STJs should be addressed here: On the one hand, it is easy to achieve quantum interference among multiple STJs, which are the core component of superconducting quantum interference devices for precise detection of magnetic fields [121–124]. On the other hand, in-plane STJs can be easily incorporated in a circuit, making them excellent candidates for applications in topological quantum computation and quantum information processing [125–130]. For example, as shown in Fig. 4d, the nanoscale STJs fabricated by shadow evaporation technique can serve as qubits for superconducting quantum computation [107, 131, 132]. Remarkably, only based on such a planar structure (Fig. 4e), a tunable superconducting qubit called “Xmon” of quantum computation can reach an excellent energy coherence time exceeding 40 μs [91].
3 STJ with single electron tunneling
Normally, whether the single electrons can tunnel through the barrier or not depends on the energy gap values of the superconductors on both sides, and also on their relative position in the density of state. Since such a tunneling process can be clearly described by the typical tunneling process through a potential barrier with finite height in quantum mechanics, the detailed features of band structures and the superconducting gap can be reflected within the single electron tunneling process [74, 75, 101, 133–137], as shown in Fig. 1d. Interestingly, once we change the barrier layer to those semiconductors with strong spin-orbital coupling, 2D topological insulators, or Dirac/Weyl semimetals, such kind of electron tunneling process can help us investigate the topologically non-trivial phenomena, including the p-wave pairing mechanism, Majorana bound states, and unconventional Josephson effect [138–147]. In the subsequent subsections, we will explore novel quantum phenomena based on STJs with single electron tunneling.
3.1 Probing details of the superconducting gap with STJ devices
Generally, in a superconductor-insulator-superconductor structure, the Δ values for the two superconductors (\(\Delta = \Delta _{1} + \Delta _{2}\)) hinder the direct determination of each gap value of the two superconductors (Fig. 1d). While if we change the superconductor on one side to a normal metal (i.e., \(\Delta _{2} =0\)) to form superconductor-insulator-metal (S-I-N) structure, the gap value of the other superconductor can be precisely determined in such an STJ structure. Since there is only one superconductor in the S-I-N structure, the turning point in the I-V or \(\mathrm{d} I/ \mathrm{d} V\)-V characteristics of the S-I-N structure corresponds to \(\Delta / e= \Delta _{1} /e\) instead of \(( \Delta _{1} + \Delta _{2} )/e\), which can be well-explained by the BCS theory for electron pairing [74, 101, 134].
Based on this method, the Δ value of the layered superconductor NbSe2 and the evolution of Δ with external magnetic fields can be understood in a NbSe2/MoS2/Au structure with a MoS2 tunnel barrier, as shown in Fig. 5a, b [78]. In such a structure, the researchers demonstrated that vdW tunnel barriers could sustain stable currents with strong suppression of subgap tunneling and offer the opportunity to distinguish the two intrinsic superconducting gaps in such a multiband superconductor. Based on such an S-I-N structure, the researchers clearly confirmed the presence of two superconducting order parameters and found that the larger superconducting gap decreases monotonically with thickness and critical temperature \(T_{c }\). The left panel of Fig. 5a presents the evolution of the \(\mathrm{d} I/ \mathrm{d} V\) curve of bulk-form NbSe2 under an in-plane magnetic field, and the shortening of the conductance peaks under a higher field can be observed. The experimental results can be well fitted by the Suhl-Schopohl-McMillan model including the diffusive de-pairing process [150, 151], as shown in Fig. 5b. Such a technique can be generalized to other materials that have hitherto not been investigated using tunneling spectroscopy.
To capture the energy gap details in the band structures of superconductors, scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) measurements are carried out, where the testing geometry can be regarded as a generalized S-I-N STJ structure with vacuum tunneling barrier. Take superconducting 2H-NbS2 as an example [148], a peculiar superconducting density of states with two well-defined features at 0.97 and 0.53 meV can be observed, which are above and below the value for the superconducting gap expected from the single band s-wave BCS model (\(\Delta =1.76 k_{\mathrm{B}} T_{c } =0.9 \mathrm{meV}\), where \(k_{\mathrm{B}}\) is Boltzmann constant). Note that these two features in the differential of density of states can be clearly confirmed (highlighted by the black and gray arrows in the inset of Fig. 5c) in the differential conductance curve \(\mathrm{d} I/ \mathrm{d} V\)-V. Correspondingly, the temperature dependence of the two subgap values are shown in Fig. 5d, and such results are in good accordance with the first-principles calculations [149] in Fig. 5e. Unlike transport or specific-heat experimental methods that can only provide secondary evidence of multiband superconductivity [119, 152, 153], such a two-peak feature obtained by STM can directly indicate the existence of two superconducting subgaps and serve as smoking-gun evidence of multigap superconductivity and orbital-selective 2D superconductivity in 2H-NbS2. In unconventional multiband superconducting systems such as iron-based and nickelate superconductors, STM has been applied to successfully measure quasiparticle interference patterns based on the tunnelling spectra, aiding in understanding the pairing mechanism therein [154].
More interestingly, for the superconducting parameters and pairing mechanisms of pressure-induced superconductivity, which is hard to detect with the STM technique mentioned above within the diamond anvil cell chamber [155], an STJ could provide a possibility to probe the density of states and the superconducting gap of pressure-induced superconductors. Figure 5f shows a schematic illustration of the electronic transport measurement geometry for GeP/graphene/Au STJs inside a diamond anvil cell [77]. By stacking multilayer graphene on top of the studied material GeP, an out-of-plane STJ can be obtained at high pressure after GeP has gone through an insulator-to-superconductor transition. The bias voltage dependence of the tunneling conductance spectra can thus be obtained and well fitted by the Blonder-Tinkham-Klapwijk model for an Andreev reflection process, as shown in Fig. 5g (to be further discussed in Sect. 3.3). Therefore, the Δ value can be precisely determined by the fitting parameters, solving the problem of probing the superconducting gap value in high-pressure-induced superconductors.
3.2 Superconducting proximity effect in the STJ
The superconducting proximity effect describes the phenomenon that, when a metal or semiconductor is in contact with a superconductor and when the thickness of the non-superconducting material is less than the coherence length ξ of the superconductor, the initially non-superconducting material will also become a superconductor due to non-zero superconducting order parameters therein. In the induced superconducting region, the coherence length and the wavefunction of the Cooper pair distribution can be controlled by the barrier thickness, the type of barrier materials, and the \(T_{c }\) values of superconductors, as well as the strength of the applied magnetic fields. By adjusting these parameters in STJs, one can effectively modulate superconducting states for designed coherence length, specific transmission coefficients and Andreev bound states [9, 156–161]. Specifically, in a superconductor-normal metal (S-N) junction, Cooper pairs can emerge within the normal metal component, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 6a. This type of junction shows unusual conductance behavior and can provide an excellent platform for creating intrinsically shunted junctions [162]. More importantly, if two S-N junctions are connected together to form the S-N-S junction, a wide range of intriguing phenomena, including the emergence of supercurrent in the normal metal region and the modulation of conductance in Andreev interferometers by magnetic flux, can be realized [163, 164]. We will summarize the experimental phenomena of these structures in the following paragraphs.
Ultra-transparent S-N junctions based on NbSe2 and bilayer graphene were used to demonstrate a proximity-induced superconducting state (Fig. 6b) [165]. As shown in Fig. 6c, the normalized conductance \(G_{ns}\) clearly displays a distinct feature characterized by a “dome plus peak” structure, in which the onset of the dome (blue triangles) matches well with the superconducting gap of NbSe2. Since the enhancement in the \(G_{ns}\) peak observed in Fig. 6d provides strong evidence of an exceptionally transparent interface, the BCS superconducting gap \(\Delta (T)\) model can describe the temperature dependence of the triangle, diamond, and circle points shown in Fig. 6e very well, indicating that all three thresholds are directly associated with the superconducting gap (\(\Delta _{0}\)) in NbSe2 based on proximity effects. The induced gap \(\Delta _{\mathrm{BLG}}\) that arose in the bilayer graphene region directly in contact with NbSe2 is associated with the proximity effect (Fig. 6f). This study establishes the understanding of an all-vdW, high-performance superconducting junction and opens up possibilities to engineer emergent quantum phenomena.
The superconducting proximity effect in semiconductor-superconductor nanowires is expected to generate an induced superconducting gap in the semiconductor. The magnitude of this induced gap, together with semiconductor properties such as spin-orbit coupling and the Landé g-factor, depends on the coupling between the neighboring materials [167, 168]. For example, the InSb/Al/Pt hybrid structure can be tuned by applying a gate voltage such that the semiconductor and superconductor are strongly coupled [166]. The coupling can be suppressed, which leads to a strong reduction in the induced gap and critical magnetic field, and the closing and reopening of the induced gap can be observed at the crossover between the strong-coupling and weak-coupling regimes. According to the relation between the superconducting gap and gate voltage (\(V_{SG}\)) shown in the lower panel of Fig. 6g, the induced superconducting gap (\(\Delta _{i}\)) approaches 0 above \(V_{SG}> 6\) V, confirming that the hybrid structure becomes gapless. Bias voltages, \(V_{L }\) and \(V_{R }\), were individually applied to the left and right leads, and the differential conductance \(g_{ij}= \mathrm{d}I_{i}/\mathrm{d}V_{j}\), with \(i, j= L\), R was obtained using standard lock-in techniques shown in the upper panel of Fig. 6g. When the induced superconductivity (\(V_{SG}< 6\) V) exists in the hybrid, the parameters \(S_{RL}\) and \(S_{LR}\) (defined as \(S_{ij} = \frac{\mathrm{d}^{2} I_{i}}{\mathrm{d} V_{j}^{2}} | V_{j} =0\)), remain extremely close to 0, suggesting strong coupling between the superconductor and the semiconductor. This hybrid structure offers a platform for tuning the proximitized superconducting state, opening up opportunities for mapping the local charge of Andreev bound states [169], investigating the quasiparticle wavefunction composition [170, 171] and better understanding topological phase transition [172].
3.3 Andreev bound states in STJs with layered superconductors
Andreev scattering in STJ structures describes the process in which an incoming particle-like excitation can convert to an outgoing hole-like excitation at the interface between a superconductor and a non-superconducting material [175]. Two kinds of Bogoliubov quasiparticles are involved in such a process: particle-like excitations characterized by a group velocity \(\boldsymbol{v}_{p }\) aligned with the direction of the particle momentum p, \(\boldsymbol{v}_{p } \cdot \boldsymbol{p} > 0\), and hole-like excitations with reversed group velocity, \(\boldsymbol{v}_{p } \cdot \boldsymbol{p} < 0\) [23]. Different from the specular electron reflection at a metal-insulator interface (Fig. 7a), the reflected hole is retro-reflected in Andreev reflection (Fig. 7b). Andreev scattering is realized by the transport of charge and momentum by Cooper pairs in compliance with the conditions of charge neutrality and momentum conservation. Importantly, multiple Andreev scattering events occur when there are pronounced spatial variations in superconducting gap \(\Delta (\boldsymbol{r})\) (typically at the superconductor-metal interface or the cores of quantized vortices), leading to the formation of Andreev bound states. These bound states are localized near the region of significant spatial variations in \(\Delta (\boldsymbol{r})\), as shown in Fig. 7c. A corresponding schematic illustration of the Andreev reflection process in an STJ device is shown in Fig. 7d.
One key feature of Andreev bound states is the zero-bias conductance peak of the tunneling junction in the differential conductance measurements, which is similar to that of the Majorana bound state (to be discussed in Sect. 3.4). Therefore, it is important to distinguish the zero-bias conductance peak behavior caused by these two different mechanisms. A theoretical approach to classifying different underlying physical processes for the Andreev reflection and investigating their universal conductance scaling is given as follows [173]. One can see in Fig. 7e-g that the interaction-induced renormalization leads to significantly distinct universal zero-bias conductance behavior, i.e., a distinct characteristic power law in temperature, for different types of Andreev reflections, which show a sharp contrast to that of a Majorana zero mode. These exemplary studies set up a model consisting of semiconducting nanowires and superconducting shells in a superconductor-semiconductor-metal STJ structure (Fig. 7e). Multiple possible processes that might take place in such a structure are considered, and the temperature-dependent zero-bias conductance shows the scaling behavior (power-law relations in Fig. 7g) associated with a dimensionless value \(r=R e^{2} /h\), where R is the resistance of the lead resistor and h is Planck constant. Due to their distinct characteristic power laws caused by dissipation, Andreev bound states and Majorana peaks can exhibit different instances of scaling relations. Therefore, the suppression of Andreev bound states and the corresponding zero-bias conductance peak is crucial for the confirmation of Majorana bound states [176].
To effectively induce the Andreev reflection process within STJs, a superconductor-insulator-normal metal structure is always used to modulate the Andreev bound states under an in-plane magnetic field [174]. As depicted in Fig. 7h, i, the embedded defects within the tunnel barrier (semiconducting WSe2) can serve as quantum dots near the superconductor where Andreev reflection appears. Since the gap value Δ of layered superconductor NbSe2 is robust under an in-plane magnetic field (Fig. 7j), the degenerate doublet Andreev bound states can undergo Zeeman splitting by an in-plane magnetic field while maintaining the superconducting state of NbSe2. The subgap near the zero-bias region of a 4-layer NbSe2 nanoflake varies greatly under the external magnetic field, showing a splitting feature of subgaps (the black dashed lines in Fig. 7k), indicating the magnetic-field-tunable Andreev reflection process therein. This study showed that vdW tunnel junctions could serve as a platform to study the proximity-induced zero-field ground state of quantum dots and its magnetic field tunability.
3.4 Exploration of Majorana bound states in an STJ with layered superconductors
Majorana bound states are promising candidates for non-local and non-Abelian braiding for quantum computation. The Majorana fermion is a unique type of quasiparticle that emerges as its own antiparticle, and it occupies a kind of zero-energy Andreev bound state called the Majorana bound state or Majorana zero mode. Majorana bound states exhibit several captivating characteristics. (1) Majorana bound states can carry both zero spin and zero charge since they can be interpreted as being their own antiparticles (i.e., the creation and annihilation operators associated with a Majorana bound state are identical). (2) Majorana bound states appear precisely at zero energy and are separated from conventional quasiparticle excitations by a distinct energy gap [177]. Due to this property, they are often referred to as Majorana zero modes. (3) Majorana bound states in a 2D host material adhere to neither fermionic nor bosonic quantum exchange statistics [178]. Instead, they exhibit non-Abelian anyonic properties. In simpler terms, exchanging two Majorana bound states leads to a nontrivial rotation of the collective ground state within a degenerate subspace. More importantly, subsequent rotations of such a collective ground state do not necessarily commute. This particular feature makes non-Abelian anyons such as Majorana bound states promising candidates as building blocks for topological quantum computers, where logical operations are executed by exchanging these anyons [179].
In order to experimentally realize Majorana bound states, STJ structures consisting of superconductors and semiconductor nanowires with strong spin-orbital coupling and a large Landé g-factor exhibit great potential in topological quantum computation [167, 180, 182–185]. In the Au/InSb/NbTiN STJ with InSb nanowires (Fig. 8a) [180], the bound states that remained fixed to zero bias were observed even when magnetic fields and gate voltages were changed over considerable ranges. When applying an external field parallel to the one-dimensional (1D) semiconducting nanowire, the four-fold degenerate energy band therein will be split into 2 two-fold degenerate bands; meanwhile, if such a 1D nanowire contacts a superconductor, the proximity effect will induce a superconducting gap Δ in the 1D semiconducting nanowire. Combining the two-fold degenerate energy band and the induced superconducting gap can cause topological superconductivity in the nanowire where Majorana fermions exist. To search for evidence of the presence of Majorana bound states in such a structure, the bias voltage dependence of differential conductance \(\mathrm{d} I/ \mathrm{d} V\) under an external magnetic field was studied, as shown in Fig. 8b. Apart from the gap edges marked by green dashed lines, small peaks of differential conductance can be observed near the zero-bias region (highlighted by a green dashed oval). These observations support the hypothesis of Majorana fermions in nanowires coupled to superconductors. Similarly, in a thin InAs/Al hybrid semiconductor-superconductor nanowire device (Fig. 8c) using a four-terminal design [181], zero bias peaks in differential conductance on the order of \(2 e^{2} /h \) were observed using tunneling spectroscopy (Fig. 8d), and such a feature can be interpreted as signals of quasi-Majorana zero modes [181, 186–190]. This study suggests that future devices for Majorana bound state investigation should be aimed at longer, thinner, and more uniform InAs/Al wires with better gate and dielectric designs to minimize the level of disorder, which hopefully may lead to better quantization and a more conclusive demonstration of Majorana bound states.
The hybrid structure based on a topological insulator and superconductor is also a promising strategy to achieve Majorana bound states [9] for the following two reasons: on one hand, even when there is no applied magnetic field, the interface between the superconductor and the topological insulator is topologically nontrivial. This means that the induced superconductivity on the surface of the topological insulator remains robust even in the presence of disorder, making it feasible to achieve Majorana states at higher temperatures [191]. On the other hand, the surface states of a topological insulator, due to their topological properties, extend throughout the entire boundary of the material. Such extended surface states are essential for realizing Majorana states in topological insulator nanowires [191].
The layered semimetal WTe2 has recently been found to be a 2D topological insulator when thinned down to a single monolayer, with conducting helical edge channels [194]. In a vdW hybrid structure consisting of NbSe2 and WTe2, strong proximity-induced superconductivity in WTe2 with an ultralong superconducting proximity length was observed [147], and the temperature-dependent tunnel resistance shows two resistance drops at 7.2 K and 6.2 K (Fig. 8e). The former is associated with the superconducting transition of NbSe2, and the latter originates from the proximity-induced superconducting transition of WTe2. Note that the observed feature of the zero bias conductance peak (marked by black arrows in Fig. 8f) fades out as the temperature increases, suggesting the existence of Majorana bound states without an external magnetic field. Such observations form a basis in the search for superconducting phases in topological insulators and suggest that topological insulators may lead to intriguing phases of matter, such as Majorana fermions. Experimental results based on STM studies can also indicate the Majorana bound states in the same material system. The scanning tunneling spectroscopy obtained by STM can provide conclusive evidence for proximity-induced superconductivity in the quantum spin Hall edge state in WTe2 for realizing 1D topological superconductivity and Majorana bound states in these vdW material platforms [195].
4 Josephson junction with Cooper pair tunneling
Unlike the non-zero tunneling resistance observed in STJs with single electron tunneling, a supercurrent with zero resistance can be achieved in Josephson junctions (Fig. 1e). One technical appeal of Josephson junctions is their capability for the precise detection and ultrahigh sensitivity of the magnetic field by determining the critical supercurrent via Cooper pair tunneling therein. Another appeal of Josephson junctions is the non-reciprocal transport of the supercurrent flow in opposite directions and the realization of the superconducting diode effect, which can be achieved by breaking the spatial inversion or time reversal symmetry of the Josephson junction. In the upcoming subsections, we offer an in-depth introduction to the 0-phase or π-phase Josephson junctions, the Andreev reflection and Majorana bound states in Josephson junctions, and the photodetection with Josephson junctions as well as the superconducting diode effect in Josephson junctions.
4.1 Fundamental characteristics of the Josephson junction
To understand the superconducting phase coherence in Josephson junctions, we can represent the superconducting order parameter in the left and right superconductors with \(\Psi _{1} = \sqrt{\rho _{1}} \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i} \varphi _{1}}\) and \(\Psi _{2} = \sqrt{\rho _{2}} \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{i} \varphi _{2}}\), where \(\rho _{1}\) and \(\rho _{2}\) are the magnitudes, and \(\varphi _{1}\) and \(\varphi _{2}\) are the phases of order parameters \(\Psi _{1}\) and \(\Psi _{2}\) (Fig. 9a, b) [192]. Note that the difference between their phases, \(\Delta \varphi = \varphi _{1} - \varphi _{2}\), can be controlled by changing the thickness of the tunnel barrier. The Josephson junction with a phase difference of either \(\Delta \varphi = 0\) or π is referred to as a 0-phase or π-phase Josephson junction. Inside the barrier, the supercurrent \(I= I_{c } \sin ( \Delta \varphi )\) is caused by the coherence between the two superconductors, where \(I_{c }\) is the critical current (Fig. 9c). The Δφ value in \(I= I_{c } \sin ( \Delta \varphi )\) can be affected by a magnetic field (d.c. Josephson effect) and electromagnetic wave radiation (a.c. Josephson effect).
In the d.c. Josephson effect, when an external magnetic field is applied perpendicular to the direction of Cooper pair tunneling, the \(I_{c }\) value of the Josephson junction depends on the magnitude of the magnetic field B:
where \(I_{c } ( 0 )\) is the supercurrent of the Josephson junction under zero magnetic field, \(\Phi _{J } \propto B\) is the value of magnetic flux penetrating through the tunnel barrier, and \(\Phi _{0} =h/ 2e\) is the quantized magnetic flux. Equation (1) can provide a curve similar to the Fraunhofer diffraction results [196–199]. Interestingly, an asymmetric Fraunhofer pattern (the magnitude of \(I_{c }\) across the junction does not equal the critical current flowing in the opposite direction at fixed magnetic field B) is expected to exist when a topological material with inversion symmetry breaking serves as the tunnel barrier [193, 200, 201], as shown in Fig. 9d. Such a phenomenon is crucial for the realization of superconducting diodes (discuss in Sect. 4.5). For the a.c. Josephson effect typically achieved with the incidence of electromagnetic waves, one can clearly see the quantized voltage steps (Shapiro steps) in the I-V characteristics [202–204]. Taking the Nb/InSb/Nb Josephson junction as an example, when the junction is irradiated with a radio frequency \(f_{0}\) in the absence of an external magnetic field, the observed Shapiro steps with a height \(\Delta V = hf_{0}/2e\) are expected for conventional Josephson junctions, where the supercurrent is carried by charge-2e Cooper pairs. At high magnetic fields, the height of the first Shapiro step is doubled to \(hf_{0}/e\) (referred to as the fractional a.c. Josephson effect), suggesting that the supercurrent is carried by charge-e quasiparticles (Fig. 9e), serving as a unique signature of the Majorana fermions [16].
4.2 0-phase and π-phase Josephson junctions
In Josephson junctions, the interaction between ferromagnetism and superconductivity has led to the emergence of an unconventional π-phase ground-state junction in superconductor-ferromagnet-superconductor junctions. Such π-phase junctions can occur for ferromagnets with specific thicknesses due to the quantum intermixing of wavefunctions between spin-singlet Cooper pairs in the superconductor and spin-polarized electrons in the ferromagnet [205, 206]. At the interface between the ferromagnet and superconductor, when a Cooper pair penetrates into the ferromagnetic material, it possesses a measurable center-of-mass momentum. This particular momentum leads to fluctuations in the real part of the superconducting order parameter, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 10a. Since these fluctuations can be controlled by varying the ferromagnetic layer thickness (Fig. 10b) [161, 207], the wavefunctions of the Cooper pairs in the two superconductors flanking the ferromagnet can either have a phase difference of 0, resulting in “0-phase junctions” with positive Josephson coupling (Fig. 10c), or have a phase difference of π, forming “π-phase junctions” with negative Josephson coupling (Fig. 10d).
To investigate the interplay between ferromagnetism and superconductivity within the Josephson junction, giant oscillatory Gilbert damping in superconducting Nb/NiFe/Nb junctions has been demonstrated [93], and further suggests unconventional spin pumping and relaxation via zero-energy Andreev bound states that exist in 0-phase junctions and π-phase junctions (Fig. 10e). Based on the definition of the Gilbert damping constant (the rate at which a magnetic moment in a ferromagnetic material relaxes or dampens in response to an external magnetic field), the oscillatory Gilbert damping was found to be dependent on the thickness of the NiFe layer and was not influenced by changes in temperature. This substantial oscillation in Gilbert damping can be explained by the mechanism of spin pumping via Bogoliubov quasiparticle-mediated spin currents in superconductors. As the temperature decreases, there is a consistent and rapid decline in the population of Bogoliubov quasiparticles due to the expanding superconducting gap. Consequently, this reduction leads to lower Gilbert damping and results in smaller oscillations when compared to conditions observed in normal states. The most reasonable mechanism is spin pumping via the Andreev bound state.
For π-phase junctions, the Andreev bound states locate near zero energy levels within the superconducting gap. The Andreev bound states could penetrate into the superconducting Nb films with scale of superconducting coherent length, which is evanescent to dissipate the spin angular momentum [209, 210]. When spin angular momentum is transferred via these zero-energy Andreev bound states, it can provide an additional Gilbert damping constant \(\alpha _{\mathrm{SP}}\) to the Gilbert damping from the ferromagnet layer itself \(\alpha _{\mathrm{FM}} \) (Fig. 10g). For 0-phase junctions, the Andreev bound states are distributed near the edge of the superconducting gap (Fig. 10h). At lower temperatures, fewer Andreev bound states are available, so the efficiency of spin pumping is reduced. Therefore, as the thickness of the NiFe layer increases, there is an oscillatory pattern in the efficiency of spin pumping via Andreev bound states at the interface (Fig. 10f). Such findings could be important for further exploring emergent phenomena with ferromagnet π-phase junctions in quantum computing, such as half-quantum flux qubits.
Instead of modulating the thickness of the ferromagnetic layer to induce the phase shift from 0 to π mentioned above, the 0-to-π phase shift in STJs can also be achieved by controlling the temperature [208, 211]. For example, in Nb/CuxNi1 − x/Nb junctions (Fig. 10i), a phase change from 0 to π can be achieved when cooling down the temperature. The critical tunneling supercurrent \(I_{c }\) monotonically increases with decreasing temperature, but a maximum in \(I_{c }\) is achieved with a strong decrease down to zero. Such a sharp cusp in \(I_{c }\) can be explained only by assuming that the junction changes from a 0-phase state at high temperatures to a π-phase state at low temperatures. In this research, only the absolute value of the current was measured, and the 0-to-π phase shift was revealed as a sharp cusp in the \(I_{c }\)-T relation (Fig. 10j). This research offers an easy way to realize π-phase junctions and may be of significance to superconducting quantum computing since several schemes for the necessary qubits (quantum two-level systems) rely on phase shifts of π in a superconducting network.
4.3 Andreev reflection and Majorana bound states in Josephson junctions
The tunneling supercurrents in Josephson junctions are in principle enabled by Andreev scattering, making Josephson junctions an ideal platform for studying Andreev bound states (Fig. 11a) and Majorana bound states. In Nb/Cd3As2/Nb Josephson junctions (Fig. 11b), proximitized superconductivity can be induced in sandwiched Cd3As2. The observed critical current oscillations can be attributed to the existence of surface Fermi arcs in the band structure of Dirac semimetal Cd3As2 [212]. The proximity-induced supercurrent from bulk states of Cd3As2 is suppressed under an in-plane magnetic field of ∼0.1 T, while the supercurrent from the topological surface states of Cd3As2 survives up to 0.5 T. Contrary to the minimum normal-state conductance of Cd3As2, the supercurrent carried by Fermi-arc shows a maximum critical value near the Dirac point, which is consistent with the fact that the Fermi arcs have a maximum density of states at the Dirac point [212]. Note that the critical current exhibits periodic oscillations with a parallel magnetic field, which is well understood by considering the in-plane orbital effect from the surface states of Cd3As2. Such results suggest that the Dirac semimetal combined with superconductivity should be promising for topological quantum devices. Importantly, a series of dips at \(V_{n} = 2\Delta /ne\) in the differential resistance-\(V_{gs}\) curve can be attributed to multiple Andreev reflections at the interface (Fig. 11b). This work demonstrates flexible gate and magnetic field manipulations of Fermi-arc superconductivity and provides a good platform for the investigation of superconductivity of chiral polarized states [212].
Multiple Andreev reflections (introduced in Sect. 3.3) can serve as evidence of the high interface transparency of a Josephson junction. For example, in planar Josephson junctions made from InAs nanosheets (Fig. 11c), subharmonic peaks at \(n = \pm1\), ±2, and ±4 in the differential conductance were achieved, confirming the multiple Andreev reflections at the interface [22]. The central dark region in the differential resistance-bias current (\(I_{b}\)) relations (Fig. 11d) indicates that the junction is in the superconducting state, while the dark fringes caused by multiple Andreev reflections are easily visible on the outer edges of this central area. Distinct peaks with positions aligning closely with \(eV_{sd}(n) = 2\Delta /n\) can be clearly observed in the differential conductance-source-drain voltage relation (Fig. 11e) diagram, where n takes values such as ±1, ±2, and ±4. These peaks are also a consequence of multiple Andreev reflections. The observation of multiple Andreev reflections extending up to \(n = \pm 4\) suggests both excellent quality and high transparency at the interface of the Josephson junction with the InAs nanosheet. The excellent proximity-induced superconducting properties observed in these Josephson junctions with InAs nanosheet show that InAs nanosheet-based hybrid devices are desired systems for the realization and manipulation of topological superconducting quantum states.
A Josephson junction geometry with a topological insulator film as the tunnel barrier (Fig. 12a) was used to exploit the unique helical and extended nature of the topological insulator surface state [213]. When the magnetic flux through the junction is close to an integer number of flux quanta, Majorana states, present on both surfaces of the film, should give rise to a narrow peak-dip structure in the current-phase relation by hybridizing at the edge of the junction. In this theoretical model, superconductivity exists on both surfaces of the topological insulator film, which can be achieved by both surfaces contacting the superconductor, or by one surface contacting the superconductor and transmitting superconductivity to the other surface through bulk states or side surfaces [215]. According to the calculated current-phase (I-θ) relations under different magnetic fluxes through the junction, the presence of Majorana zero modes starts to remarkably affect the system when the magnetic flux is approximately within 5% of a single flux quantum \(\Phi _{0}\). Initially, this contribution is seen as a slight deviation from the background sinusoidal curve but gradually becomes more pronounced and becomes a bump within the 1% range of \(\Phi _{0}\) [213]. The relation between the critical current \(I_{c }\) and magnetic flux (Fig. 12b) closely resembles the Fraunhofer pattern described by Eq. (1) in Sect. 4.1. However, it deviates from the expected behavior at integer flux values because of the influence of Majorana fermion contributions to the Josephson current, causing a non-zero \(I_{c }\) value. Another theoretical calculation on Josephson junctions with topological insulators revealed a similar I-θ relation (Fig. 12c) [140]. The features shown in these studies point out a characteristic signature of Majorana states based entirely on supercurrents of the Josephson junction, adding a significant piece in the theoretical foundation for experimentally identifying Majorana bound states in Josephson junctions.
An essential step in the experimental hunt for the Majorana fermion is the unequivocal observation of supercurrent in a topological phase. In Nb/Bi2Te3/Nb junctions, as expected from theoretical predictions, both clear Shapiro steps in the I-V curve under microwave irradiation and a Fraunhofer-type critical current can be observed (Fig. 12d, e) [214]. Although the electronic transport therein is a ballistic process described by Eilenberger theory rather than a diffusive process (Fig. 12f), the mean free path of the charge carrier is only approximately 22 nm, which is too small to induce such a ballistic transport phenomenon. Therefore, the ballistic supercurrent in the Josephson junction is supposed to originate from the topologically protected surface state associated with Majorana bound states. The realization of supercurrents through topological surface states is an important step towards the detection of Majorana fermions.
Similar to vdW Josephson junctions, planar Josephson junctions offer an alternative approach for confining Majorana channels therein. The phase difference Δφ between the superconducting leads represents an additional tuning knob that is predicted to drive the system into the topological phase at lower magnetic fields than for a system without phase bias [216]. The phase and magnetic-field dependence of the zero-energy states in the Al/InAs/Al Josephson junction has been shown to be consistent with a model of Majorana zero modes in finite-size Josephson junctions [216]. A robust zero-bias peak exhibiting a strong dependence on Δφ was measured by tunneling spectroscopy using a laterally coupled quantum point contact. Biasing the junction to \(\Delta \varphi \approx \pi \) reduces the critical field at which the zero-bias peak appears with respect to \(\Delta \varphi = 0\). These experiments showing excellent agreement with theoretical investigations offer support for the potential creation of Josephson junctions that can accommodate Majorana fermions and underscore the importance of exploring Majorana bound states in topological surface states.
4.4 Photon radiation and photodetection based on Josephson junctions
Since the frequency emitted from Josephson junctions follows the mechanism of the a.c. Josephson effect, the subterahertz (sub-THz) radiation can be achieved based on Josephson junctions, showing great feasibility for non-destructive inspections, medical diagnostics, and high-speed communications [217]. In particular, the integer higher harmonics observed in all spectra imply that the a.c. Josephson effect plays the dominant role in the novel dual-source radiation mechanism. For conventional superconductors, due to the low \(T_{c }\) and small Δ value, the emitted photons can only have a frequency of several hundreds of GHz since 1 meV of the Δ value corresponds to approximately 483.6 GHz of a photon. However, the high-\(T_{c }\) superconductor Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 + δ has a gap value of ∼10 times that of conventional superconductors, thus being able to emit photons with a frequency of several THz [217]. The photon emission of the short rectangular-, square-, and disk-shaped mesas of intrinsic Josephson junctions based on Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 + δ (Fig. 13a) was fabricated to investigate the radiation spectra (Fig. 13b), where the second harmonic radiation frequency can be observed for each emitter, indicating the contribution from the a.c. Josephson effect. Based on THz (or sub-THz) radiation measurements from mesas of various geometrical shapes, a dual-source radiation mechanism is proposed: the uniform part of the a.c. Josephson current is the primary radiation source, and a single electromagnetic cavity mode is the secondary source. These experiments have effectively demonstrated sub-THz radiation using Josephson junctions, paving the way for innovative devices in quantum microwave generation.
Since the performance of Josephson junction is sensitive to photon-induced Cooper pair de-pairing, as observed in qubit relaxation [218, 219], high-sensitivity photodetection can be feasible based on such mechanism [41, 220–224], as illustrated in Fig. 13c. Single near-infrared photon detection has been realized by coupling photons to the localized surface plasmons of a NbN/graphene/NbN Josephson junction (Fig. 13d). Using the photon-induced switching statistics of the current-biased device, the quasiparticles generated by the absorbed photon were revealed to be critical in the detection mechanism [42], where a single near-infrared photon absorbed into the superconductor breaks Cooper pairs and generates decoupled electrons, which then become a noise source to switch the current-biased Josephson junction from the superconducting state to the normal state with a non-zero voltage across it [225]. Figure 13e shows the switching events registered when the Josephson junction was exposed to near-infrared photons and when it was not. After collecting 104-second time traces at various power levels, the data were used to create histograms to analyze the occurrence of switching events using 1-second bins (Fig. 13f). The experimental data closely follow a Poisson distribution (solid lines in Fig. 13f), which is expected for uncorrelated switching events. The inset in Fig. 13f also illustrates a key property of Poisson statistics: the variance in the count is equal to the mean. It was also observed that the probability of a switch occurring within a 20-millisecond time window, accounting for an offset caused by dark counts, is directly proportional to the average number of absorbed photons \(\langle N_{\mathrm{photon}} \rangle \) (Fig. 13g). This finding demonstrates that the designed STJ effectively detects single photons from a low-intensity coherent source [42].
4.5 Superconducting diode based on Josephson junctions
A superconducting diode refers to a device that allows for the flow of supercurrent in one direction but obstructs the flow of the supercurrent along the opposite direction (Fig. 14a). To achieve such a non-reciprocal transport process, a superconducting diode is usually associated with a broken space or time reversal symmetry. Superconducting diodes could be used in superconducting quantum electronics, similar to the situation in which regular diodes are currently utilized in electrical circuits [25, 126]. Josephson junction-based superconducting diodes enable directional charge transport without energy loss at low temperatures, leading to an ultrahigh sensitivity detection circuit and a modulator with ultralow power consumption [97, 227–231].
Superconducting diode with broken time reversal symmetry
An external magnetic field can break the time reversal symmetry of a Josephson junction (Fig. 14b) to generate non-reciprocal electronic transport behavior [25, 232]. The underlying mechanism is that, in non-centrosymmetric superconductors, Cooper pairs tend to acquire a center-of-mass momentum when subjected to an external magnetic field. Such finite-momentum pairing can result in an asymmetric critical current behavior, where a supercurrent can propagate along one direction but not in the opposite direction. For example, in Josephson junctions with a type-II Dirac semimetal NiTe2 (Fig. 14c), a giant Josephson diode effect has been demonstrated and explained by the finite-momentum Cooper pairing mechanism that largely originates from the Zeeman shift of spin-helical topological surface states. The d.c. I-V curve obtained under a magnetic field perpendicular to the current direction of 20 mT (Fig. 14d) presents four different critical current values: during the negative-to-positive current sweep, the device exhibited two critical current values, \(I_{\mathrm{r}-}\) and \(I_{c +}\), while during a positive-to-negative current sweep, the device exhibited two other critical current values, \(I_{\mathrm{r} +}\) and \(I_{c -}\). These distinct \(I_{c +}\) and \(| I_{c -} | \) values mean that when the absolute magnitude of the applied current falls between \(I_{c +}\) and \(| I_{c -} | \), the STJ behaves as a superconductor for current flowing in one direction while acting as a normal dissipative metal for current in the opposite direction, showing a rectification effect for currents larger than \(I_{c +}\) but smaller than \(| I_{c -} | \) (Fig. 14e). The observed giant magnitude of the asymmetry in critical current and the clear exposition of its underlying mechanism pave the way to build novel superconducting computing devices using the Josephson diode effect.
Superconducting diode with broken space/time symmetry
Since the Abrikosov vortices can break the space/time symmetry, an out-of-plane magnetic field applied on a type-II superconductor can also lead to the superconducting diode effect [130, 233]. In Nb/CuNi/Nb Josephson junctions (Fig. 14f), the trapped Abrikosov vortices have been demonstrated to break the space/time symmetry and result in the non-reciprocal supercurrent [130]. The nonreciprocity of critical current \(\vert \frac{I_{c +}}{I_{c -}} \vert \) in such diodes can reach up to a factor of 10 and can be easily switched on or off by trapping or removing the Abrikosov vortices. Such a switchable feature enables a memory functionality with three distinct states even without a magnetic field. Note that the rectification efficiency exceeds 70% at zero field, which is sufficient for realization of more complex logical Boolean devices needed for a digital superconducting computer. Such rectification behavior facilitates a memory functionality in superconducting diodes and can potentially be used for in-memory superconducting computers [234, 235].
Superconducting diode with broken space inversion symmetry
Unlike a superconducting diode with broken time reversal symmetry by an external magnetic field, a superconducting diode with broken space inversion symmetry can realize non-reciprocal supercurrent transport without the magnetic field. Theoretical analysis predicts that if the Josephson junction has a tunnel barrier with broken space inversion symmetry, the non-reciprocal transport behavior can be observed (Fig. 14g) [226]. Experimentally, the superconducting diode effect has been demonstrated in an inversion symmetry breaking vdW heterostructure of NbSe2/Nb3Br8/NbSe2 (Fig. 3e), which, even without a magnetic field, can be superconducting with a positive current while being resistive with a negative current [24]. The intentionally chosen 3-layer Nb3Br8 broke the inversion symmetry (confirmed by the antisymmetric second harmonic generation results), and the corresponding I-V characteristics indeed have different \(I_{c +}\) and \(\vert I_{c -} \vert \) values, as presented in Fig. 14h. Importantly, stable half-wave rectification of a square-wave excitation was achieved with a very low switching current density, high rectification ratio and high robustness. This non-reciprocal behavior opens the door to discover new mechanisms and physical phenomena through the integration of quantum materials with Josephson junctions and provides new avenues for superconducting quantum devices. Such a result is an excellent paradigm of “symmetry engineering” based on layered materials [236–239] and has sparked a large number of subsequent works [29, 240–242].
5 Summary and outlook
In this review, we comprehensively surveyed forefront research fields in layered STJs by covering Andreev scattering, Majorana zero modes, and the superconducting diode effect, as well as 0-phase and π-phase Josephson junctions. The typical layered superconductors for the formation of STJ structure include 2D crystalline van der Waals superconductors (2H-NbSe2, Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ, etc.) and thin layer of evaporated/sputtered superconductors (Al, Nb, NbTi, NbTiN, etc.). Since the superconducting gap and \(T_{c }\) values are different in these superconductors, the STJ devices have different working temperatures and different characteristic parameters. Also, the crystallinity of a superconductor also affects its properties. For the investigation of superconducting proximity effect, although sputtering a thick superconducting layer like Nb on the targeted material can form the STJ structure, the polycrystalline nature of sputtered material significantly weakens the proximity effect across the interface. Replacing the sputtered superconductor with crystalline superconductor like 2H-NbSe2 to form the STJ structure can effectively enhance the proximity effect therein. On the other hand, the typical tunnel barriers applied in STJ structures include quasi-1D semiconductors with large spin-orbital coupling effects and 2D van der Waals semiconductors, as well as topological semimetal and other materials, depending on the functionalities of the devices. To better understand the characteristics of each kind of tunnel barrier, we summarize the typical tunnel barrier materials used in STJs and their functionalities in Table 1. One can see that some tunnel barrier materials can have multiple capabilities due to their unique band structures therein.
Currently, STJs are not only recognized as a device geometry to fundamentally understand Cooper pair coherence, topological states and superconducting gaps, but also serve as an important component for non-reciprocal supercurrent transport, half-quantum flux qubits and photon detection. However, there is still plenty of room to develop STJs towards understanding emerging pairing states, phase coherence between superconducting order parameters, experimental realization of Majorana bound states, and quantum computation. The challenges and limitations of current STJ devices can be summarized as follows: For experimental setups, the fabrication of STJs with clean interface and high performance remains challenging. Besides, the precise measurement techniques (for instance, zero-bias conductance peak) to capture the exotic quantum states in the STJs, as well as accurate controlling of single quantum flux and the braiding of vortices in STJ devices remain elusive. Also, the growth of these crystalline heterostructures with clean and sharp interfaces based on molecular beam epitaxy and other approaches remains challenging and requires further exploration. However, it should also be addressed that the breakthroughs in fabrication and measurement of STJ devices have extremely large scalability. Since the STJ is a family member of tunnel junction devices, the techniques used in STJ devices can be applied for fabrication and measurement of magnetic tunnel junctions, ferroelectric tunnel junction and multiferroic tunnel junctions. Also, the highly precise techniques to measure the tunneling conductance is also helpful for the studies of other tunnel junction devices.
Although many challenges still exist in the mechanisms and applications of STJs, there are plenty of astonishing discoveries and rapid progress of this field. Potential breakthroughs of STJs can be expected in the following aspects. On the field of topological quantum computation, potential breakthroughs include: (a) In the aspect of theoretical exploration, the understanding and suppression of Andreev bound states in the investigated system, as well as finding other material systems for topological quantum computation like parafermions, fractional quantum Hall states, and possible Majorana quasiparticles in Kitaev model would be crucial for quantum computation. Besides, the methodology of quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computation require to be established; (b) In the aspect of device fabrication, apart from the Majorana zero modes in superconductor/semiconducting nanowire heterostructures, controllable growth of high-quality artificial heterojunctions of topological superconductors and planar Josephson junctions would be beneficial for high-quality quantum computation devices; (c) In the aspect of experimental measurements, precise measurements of quantized zero-bias differential conductance, generating and controlling the quantized vortex, as well as determining and tuning the number of electrons in Majorana island of STJ structure are crucial for the application of topological quantum computation; On the field of candidate materials of STJ devices, since STJs with high-\(T_{c }\) and highly crystalline superconductors can have higher working temperatures and more fascinating physical phenomena, the searching of high-\(T_{c }\) superconductors can provide potential breakthroughs in STJ devices. Besides, the pairing mechanisms of novel unconventional superconductors (for instance, Sr2RuO4, nickelates, and NaxCoO\(_{2}\cdot y\)H2O) remains unclear. Potential breakthroughs on the pairing mechanism and pairing symmetry may be achieved by forming STJ structures with these superconductors. We briefly summarize our perspectives on the key challenges and a few potential research directions in the research of STJs with layered superconductors as follows:
-
(1)
Experimental realization of Majorana bound states based on STJs. One captivating avenue where STJs promise to make significant contributions is the exploration of Majorana fermions based on topological superconductors [246]. The ultimate proof of topologically protected Majorana fermions can be offered by braiding experiments, which can reveal non-Abelian statistics [180]. Braiding can be implemented by using a variety of knobs, such as gate voltages, charging energies or supercurrents [8, 167, 247]. The most direct implementation relies on actually braiding Majorana states in real space [8, 248]. Alternatively, braiding can be performed in parameter space, using couplings to auxiliary Majorana, either by controlling the couplings directly or by using Coulomb blockade to mediate interactions [8, 249–251]. The non-abelian nature of Majorana bound states, combined with Coulomb charging effects, provides a starting point for numerous intriguing constructions including error-correcting networks in quantum computation and for realization of strongly interacting models such as the Kitaev spin models, Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev models or for realizations of supersymmetric models [8, 252–259].
-
(2)
Quantum computation utilizing STJs. Another field in which STJs show promising applications is quantum computation. The switching behavior of a current-biased Josephson junction around its critical current serves as a widely employed threshold discriminator of two qubit states [260], and the existence of Majorana bound states offers an avenue for the realization of topologically protected quantum gates [248, 261]. These gates enable robust quantum operations that are immune to perturbations, offering a potential solution to the decoherence problem. Experiments focused on the refinement and optimization of gate control are a highly compelling pursuit. This endeavor holds the potential to drive significant advancements in the field of quantum computing [262]. Nonetheless, the integration of STJs into quantum computation presents many challenges. Since the braiding in Majorana-based systems alone does not provide a universal gate set, a proposed solution for this problem involves the introduction of an additional single-qubit phase gate paired with the readout of states encoded by quartets of Majorana modes [263]. Assessing the fidelity of such a phase gate would constitute a worthwhile experimental endeavor.
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Chow KS, Browne DA, Ambegaokar V (1988) Quantum kinetics of a superconducting tunnel junction: theory and comparison with experiment. Phys Rev B 37:1624
Lee K-H, Chakram S, Kim SE et al. (2019) Two-dimensional material tunnel barrier for Josephson junctions and superconducting qubits. Nano Lett 19:8287–8293
Ren H, Pientka F, Hart S et al. (2019) Topological superconductivity in a phase-controlled Josephson junction. Nature 569:93–98
Rouco V, Hage RE, Sander A et al. (2020) Quasiparticle tunnel electroresistance in superconducting junctions. Nat Commun 11:658
Siddiqi I (2021) Engineering high-coherence superconducting qubits. Nat Rev Mater 6:875–891
Eckern U, Schön G, Ambegaokar V (1984) Quantum dynamics of a superconducting tunnel junction. Phys Rev B 30:6419
Bernazzani L, Marchegiani G, Giazotto F et al. (2023) Bipolar thermoelectricity in bilayer-graphene–superconductor tunnel junctions. Phys Rev Appl 19:044017
Flensberg K, von Oppen F, Stern A (2021) Engineered platforms for topological superconductivity and Majorana zero modes. Nat Rev Mater 6:944–958
Fu L, Kane CL (2008) Superconducting proximity effect and Majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator. Phys Rev Lett 100:096407
Houzet M, Meyer JS, Badiane DM et al. (2013) Dynamics of Majorana states in a topological Josephson junction. Phys Rev Lett 111:046401
Lee S-P, Alicea J, Refael G (2012) Electrical manipulation of Majorana fermions in an interdigitated superconductor-ferromagnet device. Phys Rev Lett 109:126403
Li Q, Han Y, Zhang K et al. (2020) Multiple Majorana edge modes in magnetic topological insulator–superconductor heterostructures. Phys Rev B 102:205402
Liu C-X, Trauzettel B (2011) Helical Dirac-Majorana interferometer in a superconductor/topological insulator sandwich structure. Phys Rev B 83:220510
Livanas G, Vanas N, Sigrist M et al. (2022) Platform for controllable Majorana zero modes using superconductor/ferromagnet heterostructures. Eur Phys J B 95:47–54
Pikulin D, Nazarov YV (2012) Phenomenology and dynamics of a Majorana Josephson junction. Phys Rev B 86:140504
Rokhinson LP, Liu X, Furdyna JK (2012) The fractional ac Josephson effect in a semiconductor–superconductor nanowire as a signature of Majorana particles. Nat Phys 8:795–799
Schrade C, Zyuzin A, Klinovaja J et al. (2015) Proximity-induced π Josephson junctions in topological insulators and Kramers pairs of Majorana fermions. Phys Rev Lett 115:237001
Van Heck B, Akhmerov A, Hassler F et al. (2012) Coulomb-assisted braiding of Majorana fermions in a Josephson junction array. New J Phys 14:035019
Virtanen P, Bergeret F, Strambini E et al. (2018) Majorana bound states in hybrid two-dimensional Josephson junctions with ferromagnetic insulators. Phys Rev B 98:020501
Wang Z, Feng J-J, Huang Z et al. (2022) Transport theory for topological Josephson junctions with a Majorana qubit. Phys Rev Lett 129:257001
Nichele F, Portolés E, Fornieri A et al. (2020) Relating Andreev bound states and supercurrents in hybrid Josephson junctions. Phys Rev Lett 124:226801
Yan S, Su H, Pan D et al. (2023) Supercurrent, multiple Andreev reflections and Shapiro steps in InAs nanosheet Josephson junctions. Nano Lett 23:6497–6503
Sauls J (2018) Andreev bound states and their signatures. Philos Trans R Soc A 376:20180140
Wu H, Wang Y, Xu Y et al. (2022) The field-free Josephson diode in a van der Waals heterostructure. Nature 604:653–656
Nadeem M, Fuhrer MS, Wang X (2023) The superconducting diode effect. Nat Rev Phys 5:558–577
Narita H, Ishizuka J, Kawarazaki R et al. (2022) Field-free superconducting diode effect in noncentrosymmetric superconductor/ferromagnet multilayers. Nat Nanotechnol 17:823–828
Davydova M, Prembabu S, Fu L (2022) Universal Josephson diode effect. Sci Adv 8:eabo0309
Turini B, Salimian S, Carrega M et al. (2022) Josephson diode effect in high-mobility InSb nanoflags. Nano Lett 22:8502–8508
Trahms M, Melischek L, Steiner JF et al. (2023) Diode effect in Josephson junctions with a single magnetic atom. Nature 615:628–633
Hu J-X, Sun Z-T, Xie Y-M et al. (2023) Josephson diode effect induced by valley polarization in twisted bilayer graphene. Phys Rev Lett 130:266003
Pal B, Chakraborty A, Sivakumar PK et al. (2022) Josephson diode effect from Cooper pair momentum in a topological semimetal. Nat Phys 18:1228–1233
Kawaguchi G, Bardin AA, Suda M et al. (2019) An ambipolar superconducting field-effect transistor operating above liquid helium temperature. Adv Mater 31:1805715
Paolucci F, De Simoni G, Strambini E et al. (2018) Ultra-efficient superconducting Dayem bridge field-effect transistor. Nano Lett 18:4195–4199
De Simoni G, Paolucci F, Solinas P et al. (2018) Metallic supercurrent field-effect transistor. Nat Nanotechnol 13:802–805
Giazotto F, Peltonen JT, Meschke M et al. (2010) Superconducting quantum interference proximity transistor. Nat Phys 6:254–259
Chen Y, Hover D, Sendelbach S et al. (2011) Microwave photon counter based on Josephson junctions. Phys Rev Lett 107:217401
Revin LS, Pankratov AL, Gordeeva AV et al. (2020) Microwave photon detection by an Al Josephson junction. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 11:960–965
Peacock A, Verhoeve P, Rando N et al. (1997) On the detection of single optical photons with superconducting tunnel junction. J Appl Phys 81:7641–7646
Kurakado M (2000) An introduction to superconducting tunnel junction detectors. X-Ray Spectrom 29:137–146
Friedrich S (2008) Superconducting tunnel junction photon detectors: theory and applications. J Low Temp Phys 151:277–286
Peacock A, Verhoeve P, Rando N et al. (1996) Single optical photon detection with a superconducting tunnel junction. Nature 381:135–137
Walsh ED, Jung W, Lee G-H et al. (2021) Josephson junction infrared single-photon detector. Science 372:409–412
Faivre T, Golubev D, Pekola JP (2014) Josephson junction based thermometer and its application in bolometry. J Appl Phys 116:094302
Feshchenko AV, Casparis L, Khaymovich IM et al. (2015) Tunnel-junction thermometry down to millikelvin temperatures. Phys Rev Appl 4:034001
Giazotto F, Solinas P, Braggio A et al. (2015) Ferromagnetic-insulator-based superconducting junctions as sensitive electron thermometers. Phys Rev Appl 4:044016
Soulen R Jr, Vechten DV, Seppä H (1982) Effect of additive noise and bandpass filter on the performance of a Josephson junction noise thermometer. Rev Sci Instrum 53:1355–1362
Zgirski M, Foltyn M, Savin A et al. (2018) Nanosecond thermometry with Josephson junctions. Phys Rev Appl 10:044068
Bardeen J, Cooper LN, Schrieffer JR (1957) Theory of superconductivity. Phys Rev 108:1175
Zhang Y, Zhao WM, Zhang C et al. (2022) Anomalous superconducting proximity effect in Bi2Se3/FeSe0.5Te0.5 thin-film heterojunctions. Adv Mater 34:2107799
Wang Z, Rodriguez JO, Jiao L et al. (2020) Evidence for dispersing 1D Majorana channels in an iron-based superconductor. Science 367:104–108
Yu Y, Ma L, Cai P et al. (2019) High-temperature superconductivity in monolayer Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ. Nature 575:156–163
Zhu Y, Liao M, Zhang Q et al. (2021) Presence of s-wave pairing in Josephson junctions made of twisted ultrathin Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+x flakes. Phys Rev X 11:031011
Erdenemunkh U, Koopman B, Fu L et al. (2016) Suppression of superfluid density and the pseudogap state in the cuprates by impurities. Phys Rev Lett 117:257003
Yang C, Liu Y, Wang Y et al. (2019) Intermediate bosonic metallic state in the superconductor-insulator transition. Science 366:1505–1509
Qiu D, Gong C, Wang S et al. (2021) Recent advances in 2D superconductors. Adv Mater 33:2006124
Guo J, Zhou Y, Huang C et al. (2020) Crossover from two-dimensional to three-dimensional superconducting states in bismuth-based cuprate superconductor. Nat Phys 16:295–300
Khestanova E, Birkbeck J, Zhu M et al. (2018) Unusual suppression of the superconducting energy gap and critical temperature in atomically thin NbSe2. Nano Lett 18:2623–2629
Park JM, Cao Y, Watanabe K et al. (2021) Tunable strongly coupled superconductivity in magic-angle twisted trilayer graphene. Nature 590:249–255
Wang H, Huang X, Lin J et al. (2017) High-quality monolayer superconductor NbSe2 grown by chemical vapour deposition. Nat Commun 8:394
Wang Z, Cheon C-Y, Tripathi M et al. (2021) Superconducting 2D NbS2 grown epitaxially by chemical vapor deposition. ACS Nano 15:18403–18410
Saito Y, Nakamura Y, Bahramy MS et al. (2016) Superconductivity protected by spin–valley locking in ion-gated MoS2. Nat Phys 12:144–149
Xi X, Wang Z, Zhao W et al. (2016) Ising pairing in superconducting NbSe2 atomic layers. Nat Phys 12:139–143
Lu J, Zheliuk O, Leermakers I et al. (2015) Evidence for two-dimensional Ising superconductivity in gated MoS2. Science 350:1353–1357
Cao Y, Fatemi V, Fang S et al. (2018) Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556:43–50
Jiang Y-X, Yin J-X, Denner MM et al. (2021) Unconventional chiral charge order in Kagome superconductor KV3Sb5. Nat Mater 20:1353–1357
Li H, Zhao H, Ortiz BR et al. (2022) Rotation symmetry breaking in the normal state of a Kagome superconductor KV3Sb5. Nat Phys 18:265–270
Ortiz BR, Sarte PM, Kenney EM et al. (2021) Superconductivity in the Z2 Kagome metal KV3Sb5. Phys Rev Mater 5:034801
Liu Y, Qi S, Fang J et al. (2021) Observation of in-plane quantum Griffiths singularity in two-dimensional crystalline superconductors. Phys Rev Lett 127:137001
Saito Y, Nojima T, Iwasa Y (2018) Quantum phase transitions in highly crystalline two-dimensional superconductors. Nat Commun 9:778
Shen S, Xing Y, Wang P et al. (2016) Observation of quantum Griffiths singularity and ferromagnetism at the superconducting LaAlO3/SrTiO3 (110) interface. Phys Rev B 94:144517
Xing Y, Zhang H-M, Fu H-L et al. (2015) Quantum Griffiths singularity of superconductor-metal transition in Ga thin films. Science 350:542–545
Cho D, Bastiaans K, Chatzopoulos D et al. (2019) A strongly inhomogeneous superfluid in an iron-based superconductor. Nature 571:541–545
Josephson BD (1962) Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling. Phys Lett 1:251–253
Giaever I (1960) Energy gap in superconductors measured by electron tunneling. Phys Rev Lett 5:147–148
Zhang Y, Liu H (1985) Critical thickness of Josephson junction. Acta Phys Temper Humilis Sin 7:12–26
Giaever I (1960) Electron tunneling between two superconductors. Phys Rev Lett 5:464–466
Zhang C, Huang J, Zhai K et al. (2022) Valence-skipping and quasi-two-dimensionality of superconductivity in a van der Waals insulator. Nat Commun 13:6938
Dvir T, Massee F, Attias L et al. (2018) Spectroscopy of bulk and few-layer superconducting NbSe2 with van der Waals tunnel junctions. Nat Commun 9:598
Liu X, Hao Z, Khalaf E et al. (2020) Tunable spin-polarized correlated states in twisted double bilayer graphene. Nature 583:221–225
Liu E, Barré E, van Baren J et al. (2021) Signatures of moiré trions in WSe2/MoSe2 heterobilayers. Nature 594:46–50
Geim AK, Grigorieva IV (2013) Van der Waals heterostructures. Nature 499:419–425
Wilt J, Gong Y, Gong M et al. (2017) Atomically thin Al2O3 films for tunnel junctions. Phys Rev Appl 7:064022
Idzuchi H, Pientka F, Huang K-F et al. (2021) Unconventional supercurrent phase in Ising superconductor Josephson junction with atomically thin magnetic insulator. Nat Commun 12:5332
Yabuki N, Moriya R, Arai M et al. (2016) Supercurrent in van der Waals Josephson junction. Nat Commun 7:10616
He S, He J, Zhang W et al. (2013) Phase diagram and electronic indication of high-temperature superconductivity at 65 K in single-layer FeSe films. Nat Mater 12:605–610
Goswami S, Mulazimoglu E, Monteiro AMRVL et al. (2016) Quantum interference in an interfacial superconductor. Nat Nanotechnol 11:861–865
Zhou Z, Hou F, Huang X et al. (2023) Stack growth of wafer-scale van der Waals superconductor heterostructures. Nature 621:499–505
Efetov DK, Wang L, Handschin C et al. (2016) Specular interband Andreev reflections at van der Waals interfaces between graphene and NbSe2. Nat Phys 12:328–332
Nichele F, Drachmann AC, Whiticar AM et al. (2017) Scaling of Majorana zero-bias conductance peaks. Phys Rev Lett 119:136803
Morozov DV, Casaburi A, Hadfield RH (2021) Superconducting photon detectors. Contemp Phys 62:69–91
Barends R, Kelly J, Megrant A et al. (2013) Coherent Josephson qubit suitable for scalable quantum integrated circuits. Phys Rev Lett 111:080502
Wang W, Kim S, Liu M et al. (2020) Evidence for an edge supercurrent in the Weyl superconductor MoTe2. Science 368:534–537
Yao Y, Cai R, Yu T et al. (2021) Giant oscillatory Gilbert damping in superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor junctions. Sci Adv 7:eabh3686
Galambos TH, Hoffman S, Recher P et al. (2020) Superconducting quantum interference in edge state Josephson junctions. Phys Rev Lett 125:157701
Uri A, Grover S, Cao Y et al. (2020) Mapping the twist-angle disorder and Landau levels in magic-angle graphene. Nature 581:47–52
Sarkar J, Salunkhe KV, Mandal S et al. (2022) Quantum-noise-limited microwave amplification using a graphene Josephson junction. Nat Nanotechnol 17:1147–1152
Baumgartner C, Fuchs L, Costa A et al. (2022) Supercurrent rectification and magnetochiral effects in symmetric Josephson junctions. Nat Nanotechnol 17:39–44
Zhou P, Chen L, Liu Y et al. (2019) Electron pairing in the pseudogap state revealed by shot noise in copper oxide junctions. Nature 572:493–496
Saito Y, Kasahara Y, Ye J et al. (2015) Metallic ground state in an ion-gated two-dimensional superconductor. Science 350:409–413
Bell C, Loloee R, Burnell G et al. (2005) Characteristics of strong ferromagnetic Josephson junctions with epitaxial barriers. Phys Rev B 71:180501
Blackford B, March R (1968) Temperature dependence of the energy gap in superconducting Al–Al2O3–Al tunnel junctions. Can J Phys 46:141–145
Novoselov K, Mishchenko A, Carvalho A et al. (2016) 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures. Science 353:aac9439
Castellanos-Gomez A, Duan X, Fei Z et al. (2022) Van der Waals heterostructures. Nat Rev Methods Primers 2:58
Liu Y, Weiss NO, Duan X et al. (2016) Van der Waals heterostructures and devices. Nat Rev Mater 1:16042
Mills SA, Shen C, Xu Z et al. (2015) Vortex crossing and trapping in doubly connected mesoscopic loops of a single-crystal type-II superconductor. Phys Rev B 92:144502
Cybart SA, Cho E, Wong T et al. (2015) Nano Josephson superconducting tunnel junctions in YBa2Cu3O7–δ directly patterned with a focused helium ion beam. Nat Nanotechnol 10:598–602
Bilmes A, Händel AK, Volosheniuk S et al. (2021) In-situ bandaged Josephson junctions for superconducting quantum processors. Supercond Sci Technol 34:125011
Yoshimori S, Kawamura M (1986) Nb-Pb-Nb planar Josephson junction fabricated by RIE. Jpn J Appl Phys 25:1011
Katz A, Sun A, Woods S et al. (1998) Planar thin film YBa2Cu3O7 − δ Josephson junctions via nanolithography and ion damage. Appl Phys Lett 72:2032–2034
Fan J, Jiang B, Zhao J et al. (2022) Homointerface planar Josephson junction based on inverse proximity effect. J Appl Phys 131:093903
Bergeal N, Grison X, Lesueur J et al. (2005) High-quality planar high-\(T_{c }\) Josephson junctions. Appl Phys Lett 87:102502
Elfeky BH, Lotfizadeh N, Schiela WF et al. (2021) Local control of supercurrent density in epitaxial planar Josephson junctions. Nano Lett 21:8274–8280
Dvir T, Zalic A, Fyhn EH et al. (2021) Planar graphene-NbSe2 Josephson junctions in a parallel magnetic field. Phys Rev B 103:115401
Cho E, Ma M, Huynh C et al. (2015) YBa2Cu3O7 − δ superconducting quantum interference devices with metallic to insulating barriers written with a focused helium ion beam. Appl Phys Lett 106:252601
Monteiro A, Groenendijk D, Manca N et al. (2017) Side gate tunable Josephson junctions at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface. Nano Lett 17:715–720
Wang Z-C, Liu Y, Wu S-Q et al. (2019) Giant anisotropy in superconducting single crystals of CsCa2Fe4As4F2. Phys Rev B 99:144501
Morosan E, Li L, Ong N et al. (2007) Anisotropic properties of the layered superconductor Cu0.07TiSe2. Phys Rev B 75:104505
Croitoru MD, Houzet M, Buzdin AI (2012) In-plane magnetic field anisotropy of the Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov state in layered superconductors. Phys Rev Lett 108:207005
Bi X, Li Z, Huang J et al. (2022) Orbital-selective two-dimensional superconductivity in 2H-NbS2. Phys Rev Res 4:013188
Arnault EG, Al-Tawhid AH, Salmani-Rezaie S et al. (2023) Anisotropic superconductivity at KTaO3 (111) interfaces. Sci Adv 9:eadf1414
Trabaldo E, Pfeiffer C, Andersson E et al. (2019) Grooved Dayem nanobridges as building blocks of high-performance YBa2Cu3O7 − δ SQUID magnetometers. Nano Lett 19:1902–1907
Keijers W, Baumans XD, Panghotra R et al. (2018) Nano-SQUIDs with controllable weak links created via current-induced atom migration. Nanoscale 10:21475–21482
Ivanov Z, Nilsson P, Winkler D et al. (1991) Weak links and dc SQUIDS on artificial nonsymmetric grain boundaries in YBa2Cu3O7 − δ. Appl Phys Lett 59:3030–3032
Hazra D, Pascal LM, Courtois H et al. (2010) Hysteresis in superconducting short weak links and μ-SQUIDs. Phys Rev B 82:184530
Whiteley S, Barker A, Mlinar E et al. (2022) Observations in use of a tunnel junction model in simulations of Josephson digital circuits. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 33:1–9
Strambini E, Spies M, Ligato N et al. (2022) Superconducting spintronic tunnel diode. Nat Commun 13:2431
Soloviev I, Bakurskiy S, Ruzhickiy V et al. (2021) Miniaturization of Josephson junctions for digital superconducting circuits. Phys Rev Appl 16:044060
Gyenis A, Di Paolo A, Koch J et al. (2021) Moving beyond the transmon: noise-protected superconducting quantum circuits. PRX Quantum 2:030101
Germanese G, Paolucci F, Marchegiani G et al. (2023) Phase control of bipolar thermoelectricity in Josephson tunnel junctions. Phys Rev Appl 19:014074
Golod T, Krasnov VM (2022) Demonstration of a superconducting diode-with-memory, operational at zero magnetic field with switchable nonreciprocity. Nat Commun 13:3658
Krantz P, Kjaergaard M, Yan F et al. (2019) A quantum engineer’s guide to superconducting qubits. Appl Phys Rev 6:021318
Martinis JM, Cooper KB, McDermott R et al. (2005) Decoherence in Josephson qubits from dielectric loss. Phys Rev Lett 95:210503
Giaever I (1965) Detection of the ac Josephson effect. Phys Rev Lett 14:904
Nicol J, Shapiro S, Smith PH (1960) Direct measurement of the superconducting energy gap. Phys Rev Lett 5:461
Rowell J, Feldmann W (1968) Excess currents in superconducting tunnel junctions. Phys Rev 172:393
Werthamer N (1966) Nonlinear self-coupling of Josephson radiation in superconducting tunnel junctions. Phys Rev 147:255
Dayem A, Martin R (1962) Quantum interaction of microwave radiation with tunneling between superconductors. Phys Rev Lett 8:246
Suominen H, Danon J, Kjaergaard M et al. (2017) Anomalous Fraunhofer interference in epitaxial superconductor-semiconductor Josephson junctions. Phys Rev B 95:035307
Hays M, De Lange G, Serniak K et al. (2018) Direct microwave measurement of Andreev-bound-state dynamics in a semiconductor-nanowire Josephson junction. Phys Rev Lett 121:047001
Kurter C, Finck AD, Hor YS et al. (2015) Evidence for an anomalous current–phase relation in topological insulator Josephson junctions. Nat Commun 6:7130
Van Woerkom DJ, Proutski A, Van Heck B et al. (2017) Microwave spectroscopy of spinful Andreev bound states in ballistic semiconductor Josephson junctions. Nat Phys 13:876–881
Sochnikov I, Maier L, Watson CA et al. (2015) Nonsinusoidal current-phase relationship in Josephson junctions from the 3D topological insulator HgTe. Phys Rev Lett 114:066801
Bastian G, Göbel E, Zorin A et al. (1998) Quasiparticle interference effects in a ballistic superconductor-semiconductor-superconductor Josephson junction. Phys Rev Lett 81:1686
Kjærgaard M, Suominen HJ, Nowak M et al. (2017) Transparent semiconductor-superconductor interface and induced gap in an epitaxial heterostructure Josephson junction. Phys Rev Appl 7:034029
Williams J, Bestwick A, Gallagher P et al. (2012) Unconventional Josephson effect in hybrid superconductor-topological insulator devices. Phys Rev Lett 109:056803
Hekking F, Nazarov YV (1994) Subgap conductivity of a superconductor–normal-metal tunnel interface. Phys Rev B 49:6847
Huang C, Narayan A, Zhang E et al. (2018) Inducing strong superconductivity in WTe2 by a proximity effect. ACS Nano 12:7185–7196
Guillamón I, Suderow H, Vieira S et al. (2008) Superconducting density of states and vortex cores of 2H-NbS2. Phys Rev Lett 101:166407
Heil C, Poncé S, Lambert H et al. (2017) Origin of superconductivity and latent charge density wave in NbS2. Phys Rev Lett 119:087003
Suhl H, Matthias B, Walker L (1959) Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer theory of superconductivity in the case of overlapping bands. Phys Rev Lett 3:552–554
McMillan W (1968) Tunneling model of the superconducting proximity effect. Phys Rev 175:537–542
Kačmarčík J, Pribulová Z, Marcenat C et al. (2010) Specific heat measurements of a superconducting NbS2 single crystal in an external magnetic field: energy gap structure. Phys Rev B 82:014518
Tissen V, Osorio M, Brison J-P et al. (2013) Pressure dependence of superconducting critical temperature and upper critical field of 2H-NbS2. Phys Rev B 87:134502
Duan W, Chen K, Hong W et al. (2021) Single-particle tunneling spectroscopy and superconducting gaps in the layered iron-based superconductor KCa2Fe4As4F2. Phys Rev B 103:214518
Li Y, Xu Z-A (2019) Exploring topological superconductivity in topological materials. Adv Quantum Technol 2:1800112
Ojeda-Aristizabal C, Ferrier M, Guéron S et al. (2009) Tuning the proximity effect in a superconductor-graphene-superconductor junction. Phys Rev B 79:165436
Stanescu TD, Sau JD, Lutchyn RM et al. (2010) Proximity effect at the superconductor–topological insulator interface. Phys Rev B 81:241310
Lee G-H, Lee H-J (2018) Proximity coupling in superconductor-graphene heterostructures. Rep Prog Phys 81:056502
Xu J-P, Liu C, Wang M-X et al. (2014) Artificial topological superconductor by the proximity effect. Phys Rev Lett 112:217001
Bergeret F, Volkov A, Efetov K (2001) Long-range proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet structures. Phys Rev Lett 86:4096
Buzdin AI (2005) Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures. Rev Mod Phys 77:935
Delin K, Kleinsasser A (1996) Stationary properties of high-critical-temperature proximity effect Josephson junctions. Supercond Sci Technol 9:227
Kozhevnikov A, Schoelkopf R, Prober D (2000) Observation of photon-assisted noise in a diffusive normal metal–superconductor junction. Phys Rev Lett 84:3398
Checkley C, Iagallo A, Shaikhaidarov R et al. (2011) Andreev interferometers in a strong radio-frequency field. J Phys Condens Matter 23:135301
Li J, Leng H-B, Fu H et al. (2020) Superconducting proximity effect in a transparent van der Waals superconductor-metal junction. Phys Rev B 101:195405
van Loo N, Mazur GP, Dvir T et al. (2023) Electrostatic control of the proximity effect in the bulk of semiconductor-superconductor hybrids. Nat Commun 14:3325
Lutchyn RM, Bakkers EPAM, Kouwenhoven LP et al. (2018) Majorana zero modes in superconductor–semiconductor heterostructures. Nat Rev Mater 3:52–68
Prada E, San-Jose P, de Moor MW et al. (2020) From Andreev to Majorana bound states in hybrid superconductor–semiconductor nanowires. Nat Rev Phys 2:575–594
Danon J, Hellenes AB, Hansen EB et al. (2020) Nonlocal conductance spectroscopy of Andreev bound states: symmetry relations and BCS charges. Phys Rev Lett 124:036801
Wang G, Dvir T, Van Loo N et al. (2022) Nonlocal measurement of quasiparticle charge and energy relaxation in proximitized semiconductor nanowires using quantum dots. Phys Rev B 106:064503
Pöschl A, Danilenko A, Sabonis D et al. (2022) Nonlocal conductance spectroscopy of Andreev bound states in gate-defined InAs/Al nanowires. Phys Rev B 106:L241301
Banerjee A, Lesser O, Rahman M et al. (2023) Local and nonlocal transport spectroscopy in planar Josephson junctions. Phys Rev Lett 130:096202
Liu D, Zhang G, Cao Z et al. (2022) Universal conductance scaling of Andreev reflections using a dissipative probe. Phys Rev Lett 128:076802
Dvir T, Aprili M, Quay CH et al. (2019) Zeeman tunability of Andreev bound states in van der Waals tunnel barriers. Phys Rev Lett 123:217003
Andreev A (1964) The thermal conductivity of the intermediate state in superconductors. Sov Phys JETP 46:1228–1234
Zhang S, Wang Z, Pan D et al. (2022) Suppressing Andreev bound state zero bias peaks using a strongly dissipative lead. Phys Rev Lett 128:076803
Moore G, Read N (1991) Nonabelions in the fractional quantum Hall effect. Nucl Phys B 360:362–396
Senthil T, Fisher MP (2000) Quasiparticle localization in superconductors with spin-orbit scattering. Phys Rev B 61:9690
Nayak C, Simon SH, Stern A et al. (2008) Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation. Rev Mod Phys 80:1083
Mourik V, Zuo K, Frolov SM et al. (2012) Signatures of Majorana fermions in hybrid superconductor-semiconductor nanowire devices. Science 336:1003–1007
Song H, Zhang Z, Pan D et al. (2022) Large zero bias peaks and dips in a four-terminal thin InAs-Al nanowire device. Phys Rev Res 4:033235
Van Weperen I, Tarasinski B, Eeltink D et al. (2015) Spin-orbit interaction in InSb nanowires. Phys Rev B 91:201413
Qu F, Van Veen J, De Vries FK et al. (2016) Quantized conductance and large g-factor anisotropy in InSb quantum point contacts. Nano Lett 16:7509–7513
Gül Ö, Zhang H, Bommer JD et al. (2018) Ballistic Majorana nanowire devices. Nat Nanotechnol 13:192–197
Deng M, Yu C, Huang G et al. (2012) Anomalous zero-bias conductance peak in a Nb–InSb nanowire–Nb hybrid device. Nano Lett 12:6414–6419
Albrecht SM, Higginbotham AP, Madsen M et al. (2016) Exponential protection of zero modes in Majorana islands. Nature 531:206–209
Wang Z, Song H, Pan D et al. (2022) Plateau Regions for Zero-Bias Peaks within 5% of the Quantized Conductance Value 2\(e^{2}\)/h. Phys Rev Lett 129:167702
Deng M, Vaitiekėnas S, Hansen EB et al. (2016) Majorana bound state in a coupled quantum-dot hybrid-nanowire system. Science 354:1557–1562
Das A, Ronen Y, Most Y et al. (2012) Zero-bias peaks and splitting in an Al–InAs nanowire topological superconductor as a signature of Majorana fermions. Nat Phys 8:887–895
Pientka F, Kells G, Romito A et al. (2012) Enhanced zero-bias Majorana peak in the differential tunneling conductance of disordered multisubband quantum-wire/superconductor junctions. Phys Rev Lett 109:227006
Potter AC, Lee PA (2011) Engineering a p + ip superconductor: comparison of topological insulator and Rashba spin-orbit-coupled materials. Phys Rev B 83:184520
Vettoliere A, Granata C (2023) Highly sensitive tunable magnetometer based on superconducting quantum interference device. Sensors 23:3558
Chen C-Z, He JJ, Ali MN et al. (2018) Asymmetric Josephson effect in inversion symmetry breaking topological materials. Phys Rev B 98:075430
Sajadi E, Palomaki T, Fei Z et al. (2018) Gate-induced superconductivity in a monolayer topological insulator. Science 362:922–925
Lüpke F, Waters D, de la Barrera S et al. (2020) Proximity-induced superconducting gap in the quantum spin Hall edge state of monolayer WTe2. Nat Phys 16:526–530
Parmentier R, Costabile G, Rissman P et al. (1976) Temperature dependence of the maximum Josephson current in Nb-NbOx-Sn junctions. J Low Temp Phys 22:529–533
Bulaevskii L, Clem J, Glazman L (1992) Fraunhofer oscillations in a multilayer system with Josephson coupling of layers. Phys Rev B 46:350–355
Baxevanis B, Ostroukh V, Beenakker C (2015) Even-odd flux quanta effect in the Fraunhofer oscillations of an edge-channel Josephson junction. Phys Rev B 91:041409
Balsamo E, Paterno G, Barone A et al. (1976) Temperature and magnetic field dependence of the critical current in Sn-SnxOy-In Josephson junctions. Phys Status Solidi A 35:K173–K175
Fan J, Jiang B, Zhao J et al. (2022) Asymmetric Fraunhofer pattern in Josephson junctions from heterodimensional superlattice V5S8. Chin Phys B 31:057402
Díez-Mérida J, Díez-Carlón A, Yang S et al. (2023) Symmetry-broken Josephson junctions and superconducting diodes in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene. Nat Commun 14:2396
Shapiro S, Janus AR, Holly S (1964) Effect of microwaves on Josephson currents in superconducting tunneling. Rev Mod Phys 36:223
Shapiro S (1963) Josephson currents in superconducting tunneling: the effect of microwaves and other observations. Phys Rev Lett 11:80–82
Grimes C, Shapiro S (1968) Millimeter-wave mixing with Josephson junctions. Phys Rev 169:397
Linder J, Robinson JW (2015) Superconducting spintronics. Nat Phys 11:307–315
Eschrig M, Kopu J, Cuevas J et al. (2003) Theory of half-metal/superconductor heterostructures. Phys Rev Lett 90:137003
Kontos T, Aprili M, Lesueur J et al. (2001) Inhomogeneous superconductivity induced in a ferromagnet by proximity effect. Phys Rev Lett 86:304–307
Ryazanov V, Oboznov V, Rusanov AY et al. (2001) Coupling of two superconductors through a ferromagnet: evidence for a π junction. Phys Rev Lett 86:2427
Silaev M (2020) Large enhancement of spin pumping due to the surface bound states in normal metal–superconductor structures. Phys Rev B 102:180502
Ahari MT, Tserkovnyak Y (2021) Superconductivity-enhanced spin pumping: role of Andreev resonances. Phys Rev B 103:L100406
Fornieri A, Timossi G, Virtanen P et al. (2017) 0–π phase-controllable thermal Josephson junction. Nat Nanotechnol 12:425–429
Li C-Z, Wang A-Q, Li C et al. (2020) Fermi-arc supercurrent oscillations in Dirac semimetal Josephson junctions. Nat Commun 11:1150
Potter AC, Fu L (2013) Anomalous supercurrent from Majorana states in topological insulator Josephson junctions. Phys Rev B 88:121109
Veldhorst M, Snelder M, Hoek M et al. (2012) Josephson supercurrent through a topological insulator surface state. Nat Mater 11:417–421
Wang M-X, Liu C, Xu J-P et al. (2012) The coexistence of superconductivity and topological order in the Bi2Se3 thin films. Science 336:52–55
Fornieri A, Whiticar AM, Setiawan F et al. (2019) Evidence of topological superconductivity in planar Josephson junctions. Nature 569:89–92
Tsujimoto M, Yamaki K, Deguchi K et al. (2010) Geometrical resonance conditions for THz radiation from the intrinsic Josephson junctions in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ. Phys Rev Lett 105:037005
Ristè D, Bultink C, Tiggelman MJ et al. (2013) Millisecond charge-parity fluctuations and induced decoherence in a superconducting transmon qubit. Nat Commun 4:1913
Vepsäläinen AP, Karamlou AH, Orrell JL et al. (2020) Impact of ionizing radiation on superconducting qubit coherence. Nature 584:551–556
Sadleir JE, Smith SJ, Bandler SR et al. (2010) Longitudinal proximity effects in superconducting transition-edge sensors. Phys Rev Lett 104:047003
Korzh B, Zhao Q-Y, Allmaras JP et al. (2020) Demonstration of sub-3 ps temporal resolution with a superconducting nanowire single-photon detector. Nat Photonics 14:250–255
Karasik BS, Pereverzev SV, Soibel A et al. (2012) Energy-resolved detection of single infrared photons with \(\lambda = 8 \mu \)m using a superconducting microbolometer. Appl Phys Lett 101:052061
Gol’Tsman G, Okunev O, Chulkova G et al. (2001) Picosecond superconducting single-photon optical detector. Appl Phys Lett 79:705–707
Echternach P, Pepper B, Reck T et al. (2018) Single photon detection of 1.5 THz radiation with the quantum capacitance detector. Nat Astron 2:90–97
Tinkham M (2004) Introduction to superconductivity. Courier Co., North Chelmsford
Zhang Y, Gu Y, Li P et al. (2022) General theory of Josephson diodes. Phys Rev X 12:041013
Bauriedl L, Bäuml C, Fuchs L et al. (2022) Supercurrent diode effect and magnetochiral anisotropy in few-layer NbSe2. Nat Commun 13:4266
Itahashi YM, Ideue T, Saito Y et al. (2020) Nonreciprocal transport in gate-induced polar superconductor SrTiO3. Sci Adv 6:eaay9120
Lyu Y-Y, Jiang J, Wang Y-L et al. (2021) Superconducting diode effect via conformal-mapped nanoholes. Nat Commun 12:2703
Ideue T, Iwasa Y (2020) One-way supercurrent achieved in an electrically polar film. Nature 584:349–350
Ando F, Miyasaka Y, Li T et al. (2020) Observation of superconducting diode effect. Nature 584:373–376
Daido A, Ikeda Y, Yanase Y (2022) Intrinsic superconducting diode effect. Phys Rev Lett 128:037001
Abrikosov AA (1957) The magnetic properties of superconducting alloys. J Phys Chem Solids 2:199–208
Bravyi S, Dial O, Gambetta JM et al. (2022) The future of quantum computing with superconducting qubits. J Appl Phys 132:160902
Gambetta JM, Chow JM, Steffen M (2017) Building logical qubits in a superconducting quantum computing system. npj Quantum Inf 3:2
Zheng X, Wei Y, Zhang X et al. (2022) Symmetry engineering induced in-plane polarization in MoS2 through Van der Waals interlayer coupling. Adv Funct Mater 32:2202658
Du L, Hasan T, Castellanos-Gomez A et al. (2021) Engineering symmetry breaking in 2D layered materials. Nat Rev Phys 3:193–206
Dong Y, Yang M-M, Yoshii M et al. (2023) Giant bulk piezophotovoltaic effect in 3R-MoS2. Nat Nanotechnol 18:36–41
Akamatsu T, Ideue T, Zhou L et al. (2021) A van der Waals interface that creates in-plane polarization and a spontaneous photovoltaic effect. Science 372:68–72
Tanaka Y, Lu B, Nagaosa N (2022) Theory of giant diode effect in d-wave superconductor junctions on the surface of a topological insulator. Phys Rev B 106:214524
Daido A, Yanase Y (2022) Superconducting diode effect and nonreciprocal transition lines. Phys Rev B 106:205206
Chiles J, Arnault EG, Chen C-C et al. (2023) Nonreciprocal supercurrents in a field-free graphene Josephson triode. Nano Lett 23:5257–5263
Cao Q, Telford EJ, Benyamini A et al. (2022) Tunneling spectroscopy of two-dimensional materials based on via contacts. Nano Lett 22:8941–8948
Baumgartner C, Fuchs L, Costa A et al. (2022) Supercurrent rectification and magnetochiral effects in symmetric Josephson junctions. Nat Nanotechnol 17:39–44
Hou Y, Nichele F, Chi H et al. (2023) Ubiquitous superconducting diode effect in superconductor thin films. Phys Rev Lett 131:027001
Vaezi A (2013) Fractional topological superconductor with fractionalized Majorana fermions. Phys Rev B 87:035132
Beenakker C (2020) Search for non-Abelian Majorana braiding statistics in superconductors. SciPost Phys Lect Notes 15:1–29
Alicea J, Oreg Y, Refael G et al. (2011) Non-Abelian statistics and topological quantum information processing in 1D wire networks. Nat Phys 7:412–417
Hyart T, Van Heck B, Fulga I et al. (2013) Flux-controlled quantum computation with Majorana fermions. Phys Rev B 88:035121
Aasen D, Hell M, Mishmash RV et al. (2016) Milestones toward Majorana-based quantum computing. Phys Rev X 6:031016
Sau JD, Clarke DJ, Tewari S (2011) Controlling non-Abelian statistics of Majorana fermions in semiconductor nanowires. Phys Rev B 84:094505
Sagi E, Ebisu H, Tanaka Y et al. (2019) Spin liquids from Majorana zero modes in a Cooper-pair box. Phys Rev B 99:075107
Plugge S, Landau L, Sela E et al. (2016) Roadmap to Majorana surface codes. Phys Rev B 94:174514
Pikulin D, Franz M (2017) Black hole on a chip: proposal for a physical realization of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model in a solid-state system. Phys Rev X 7:031006
Landau L, Plugge S, Sela E et al. (2016) Towards realistic implementations of a Majorana surface code. Phys Rev Lett 116:050501
Kells G, Lahtinen V, Vala J (2014) Kitaev spin models from topological nanowire networks. Phys Rev B 89:075122
Ebisu H, Sagi E, Oreg Y (2019) Supersymmetry in the insulating phase of a chain of Majorana Cooper pair boxes. Phys Rev Lett 123:026401
Chew A, Essin A, Alicea J (2017) Approximating the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model with Majorana wires. Phys Rev B 96:121119
Vijay S, Hsieh TH, Fu L (2015) Majorana fermion surface code for universal quantum computation. Phys Rev X 5:041038
Ansmann M, Wang H, Bialczak RC et al. (2009) Violation of Bell’s inequality in Josephson phase qubits. Nature 461:504–506
Aasen D, Hell M, Mishmash RV et al. (2016) Milestones toward Majorana-based quantum computing. Phys Rev X 6:031016
Yavilberg K, Ginossar E, Grosfeld E (2015) Fermion parity measurement and control in Majorana circuit quantum electrodynamics. Phys Rev B 92:075143
Sarma SD, Freedman M, Nayak C (2015) Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation. npj Quantum Inf 1:15001
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge to Dr. Feng Qin, Dr. Junwei Huang, and Dr. Caiyu Qiu for fruitful discussions.
Funding
H.T.Y. acknowledges the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 92365203, 52072168, 51861145201).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XB, GC prepared the draft under the supervision of HTY. XB and ZL reproduced the figures. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bi, X., Chen, G., Li, Z. et al. Superconducting tunnel junctions with layered superconductors. Quantum Front 3, 6 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44214-024-00053-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44214-024-00053-5