Abstract
Propagation of nonlinear waves in the magnetized quantum Thomas–Fermi dense plasma is analyzed. The Zakharov–Kuznetsov–Burgers equation is derived by using the theory of reductive perturbation. The exact solution contains both solitary and shock terms. Also, it is shown that rarefactive waves propagate in most cases. Both the associated electric field and the wave energy have been derived. The effects of dust and electrons temperature, dust density, magnetic field magnitude, and direction besides the effect of the kinematic viscosity on the amplitude, width, and energy of the formed waves are discussed. It is shown that the negative energy wave is formed and its value is enhanced due to the increase of the kinematic viscosity and the ambient magnetic field which lead to an increase in the instability. The present results are helpful in controlling the stabilization of confined Thomas–Fermi dense magnetoplasma that are found in white dwarfs and in the high-intensity laser-solid matter interaction experiments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The dusty plasma waves investigations occur when the dust-acoustic waves (DAWs) were theoretically predicted first by Rao et al. 19901 and were later confirmed experimentally2,3,4,5,6. Since then numerous studies have been presented on different types of waves in the dusty plasma5,6,7. The linear and nonlinear properties of plasma were investigated experimentally and have been confirmed to depend on the plasma particles’ velocity distribution functions. Moreover, the contamination due to charged micron or submicron-sized dust grains affects the properties of electron-ion plasma and new oscillation modes released and can be studied in plasmas, e.g., DAWs1, dust ion-acoustic (DIA) mode8.
The electron density in fluid hydrodynamic equations was considered as Boltzmann distribution in most of the works that were used to investigate DAWs. However, in white dwarfs as an example of astrophysical environments, the electron and ion density numbers are about \(10^{30}\,{\rm cm}^{-3}\) and exhibit relatively weak interactions. In this case, we can use the Thomas–Fermi approximation to describe inertialess degenerate electrons9,10,11. The dust is taken as classical and dynamic, while electrons and ions are taken to be Thomas–Fermi density distribution. The Thomas–Fermi distribution for electrons is employed by Dubinov and Dubinova11. They investigated the subsonic periodic and supersonic solitary waves occurrence. The cylindrical and spherical KdV equation was derived for nonplanar solitary waves12. The unmagnetized Thomas–Fermi electron-positron-ion plasma was also considered to study the solitary waves13. Sabry et al.14 studied the obliquely explosive propagating solitary waves in dense magnetoplasma with Thomas–Fermi degenerate electrons. The solitary waves and double layer properties of dusty magnetoplasma have been also investigated15,16. Later, derivation of the Zakharov–Kuznetsov (ZK) and Zakharov–Kuznetsov–Burger (ZKB) equations found that the DA shock and solitary waves are affected by the variation of the concentration, viscosity, and temperature of the dust17. The propagations of solitary and rogue waves are investigated in a degenerate Thomas–Fermi thermal dusty plasma through the transverse effects of velocity perturbation18. Hafez et al. also investigated ion-acoustic waves in an unmagnetized Thomas–Fermi plasma for both non-relativistic and ultra-relativistic degenerate electrons systems by the derivation of KdV equation and using the Riccati equation mapping method to solve it19. Obliquely propagating waves in a dense degenerate cold Thomas–Fermi magnetoplasma were investigated by Irfan et al.20. They employed the Sagdeev pseudopotential theory to derive an energy-balance equation. It was demonstrated that the wave characteristics depend upon the system parameters. The degenerate electrons in dense magnetoplasma were taken into consideration in the study of overtaking collision of unidirectional DAWs in the Thomas–Fermi dense magnetoplasma21.
The negative energy wave emerges when a reduction of the total energy of the system accompanied the wave excitation. The reduction or removal of the energy from the wave can be achieved by dissipation or coupling to another wave of positive energy results in the instability of the system due to the wave growth22. The reduction in the wave energy occurs when the energy becomes negative and signifies an increase in both the wave amplitude and, the energy absolute value. These negative energy waves are adequate to occur only in nonequilibrium systems and, in systems containing neutral fluid shear flows or charged-particle beams.
The negative energy waves were introduced by Cairns to describe the stability of fluid flows23. Two instability forms, reactive and dissipative were illustrated, which leads to the emergence of the negative energy wave24. Also, negative energy waves were taken in the resistive wall mode, which is magnetically confined plasma instability25. It is different from the resistive wall amplifier, but a subtle link between them in the presence of plasma flow26.
Ryutova shows that negative energy wave is important for the energy transfer to the higher solar atmosphere27. The boundary of discontinuous shear flow in an incompressible plasma system was investigated by Ruderman and Goossens28 . The Alfvén surface wave propagation and the solution for its negative energy were derived by considering constant flow on one side and viscosity on the other side. They obtained two copropagating modes of phase speed, with the fact that the negative energy was associated with the slower one. Also, they found that the increase in viscosity coefficient leads to an increase in the growth rate of the instability. Ruderman found that the standing surface wave growth rate equals the difference between the propagating backward negative energy wave and the propagating forward positive energy wave, this means that the negative energy wave exceeds the positive energy wave by the growth rate29. The appearance of negative energy surface waves in an incompressible cylindrical Plasma was investigated by Yu and Nakariakov30. They found that the instability depends strongly on the shear flow speed and on the plasma temperature.
However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, no attempt has been made considering the negative energy waves propagation in the magnetized quantum Thomas–Fermi plasma. Therefore, in this work, we derive the ZKB equation to study the negative energy waves associated with the DAWs. This manuscript is organized as follows. The governing equations and the derivation of the magnetized ZKB equation is in Derivation of the ZKB equation section. The wave solution, the associated electric field, and the wave energy are in The ZKB equation solution section. The numerical investigations and discussions are provided in Numerical investigations and discussion section. Finally, Conclusions section is devoted to the conclusions.
Derivation of the ZKB equation
We consider magnetized quantum Thomas–Fermi dense plasma consisting of negatively charged dust particles with degenerate electrons and ions obeying the Fermi-Dirac distributions. The external magnetic field \(\mathbf{B}_{0}\) has confined the plasma system and it is along the z-direction, i.e., \(\mathbf{B}_{0}=\hat{z}B_{0}\) where \(\hat{z}\) is the unit vector along the z-axis and \(B_{0}\) is the strength of the magnetic field. The quasineutrality condition is \(N_{e0}=N_{i0}-N_{d0}Z_{d0}\) at equilibrium, where \(N_{s0}\) is the sth species equilibrium density(\(s=e\), i, and d for electrons, ions, and negatively charged dust grains, respectively), \(Z_{d0}\) is the equilibrium state dust charge. The dynamics of the DA for the Thomas–Fermi magnetoplasma are governed by21
where \(N_{s}\) is the normalized number density, \(U_{d}\) dust fluid velocity that normalized by the DA speed \(C_{d}=\left( 2Z_{d0}k_{B}T_{Fi} /m_{d}\right) ^{1/2},\) \(\psi \) is the wave potential that normalized by \(2k_{B}T_{Fi}/e\). \(\Omega =\omega _{cd}/\omega _{pd}\) is the normalized dust gyro-frequency with \(\omega _{cd}=eZ_{d0}B/m_{d}\) and \(\omega _{pd}=\left( 4\pi Z_{d0}^{2}n_{d0}e^{2}/m_{d}\right) ^{1/2}\). Also, \(\sigma _{d}=T_{d}/T_{Fi}Z_{d0}\), \(\mu _{i}=n_{i0}/Z_{d}n_{d0}\), and \(\mu _{e}=n_{e0}/Z_{d}n_{d0},\) are the dust temperature-to-ion Fermi temperature ratio, the ion concentration, and electron concentration, divided by \(n_{d0}Z_{d0}\), respectively, with e is the electronic charge, \(k_{B}\) is the Boltzmann constant. \(\sigma _{i}=T_{Fi}/T_{Fe}\) is the ion-to-electron Fermi temperature ratio. The charge-neutrality condition at equilibriumbecomes \(\mu _{i=}\mu _{e+1}\). The space variable is normalized by \(\lambda _{0}=\left( 2k_{B}T_{Fi}/4\pi Z_{d}n_{d0}e^{2}\right) ^{1/2},\) and the time variable t is normalized by \(\omega _{pd}^{-1}\).
To derive the ZKB equation, the stretching of the independent variables x, y, and t is defined as7
where \(\epsilon \) is a formal small expansion parameter measuring the strength of the system nonlinearity, \(v_{0}\) is the phase velocity. The dependent variables can be expanded in power series of \(\epsilon \) as follows:
Substituting Eqs. (2) and (3) into Eqs. (1) and the same powers of \(\epsilon \) are collected, which gives for the lowest orders perturbed quantities;
The propagation phase speed of the DA waves in the magnetized dusty plasma is given by
We investigate the influence of important plasma parameters on the phase speed because we are interested in analysing the characteristics of acoustic modes in the plasma system under consideration. The phase speed of the acoustic wave is dependent on many system parameters, as shown by Eq. (5). Accordingly, Fig. 1 illustrates the dependence of \(v_{0}\) on the ion-to-electron Fermi temperatures ratio, \(\sigma _{i}\), the dust temperature-to-ion Fermi temperature ratio, \(\sigma _{d}\). Combining the next higher-orders contributions lead to
Now, the next higher order of \(\epsilon \) gives rise to the following equation
Substitute in the Poisson’s equation, we obtain a partial differential equation (PDE) in the form
This PDE is recognized as the ZKB equation. The nonlinearity coefficient A, the dispersive, B, and the transverse, C terms are given by the expressions
The effects of \(\sigma _{i}\), and \(\sigma _{d}\) on these A, B, and, C coefficients are illustrated in Fig. 2. This figure depicts that the nonlinear coefficient is negative and its absolute value increases as \(\sigma _{i}\), and \(\sigma _{d}\) increase. Both B and C decrease as \(\sigma _{i}\) increase while B(C) decreases (increases) as \(\sigma _{d}\) increases. Figure 2d show that the transverse term, C, decreases as \(\mu _{e}\), and the magnetic field through \(\Omega \) increases, which mathematically related to the inverse proportionality relation between C and \(\Omega \) as mentioned in Eq. (9).
The ZKB equation solution
To transform the planar partial ZKB equations (8) into ordinary differential equations, we introduce the variable \(\chi =lX+mY+nZ-u_{o}T\) where \(\chi \) is the transformed coordinate relative to a frame that moves with the velocity \(u_{o}\). l, m, and n are direction cosines of the wave propagation vector k with respect to X;Y, and Z axes, respectively. \(u_{o}\) is the velocity of the moving frame normalized by dust acoustic speed.
Considering this transformation, Eq. (8) takes the form of an ordinary differential equation given by
Now, the general exact solution of Eq. (10) comprising both the dispersion and dissipative terms can be obtained by employing the hyperbolic tangent (tanh) method31, which is a method for deriving the traveling wave solutions of distinct types of nonlinear evolution equations. Therefore, the solution can be derived to be32
This ZKB equation, Eq. (10), contains both dispersion and dissipative effects contribution from which affect the wave potential eventual shape. It is noticed that this solution has been obtained in the region of parameter values where the nonlinearity, dispersion, and dissipative coefficients in the ZKB equation (10) are affected by the parameters’ values. Therefore, the solution covers the range of plasma parameters. The associated electric field can be represented according to the relation (\(E^{(1)}=-\nabla \psi ^{(1)}\))33 and it takes the form
In addition to the above, the energy is also an important feature, which can be calculated as reported by Ko and Kuehl34,35 as
Motivated by these theoretical works, according to the energy equation, Eq. (13), the role of viscosity, dust temperature, and magnetic field effects may significantly play on the energy carried by the formed DA waves.
Numerical investigations and discussion
In this section, we present numerical investigations of equations (5, 9, 11–13 to evaluate the phase velocity, amplitude, and width of the nonlinear dust acoustic structures in a magnetized quantum Thomas–Fermi dense plasma. For the numerical results, environments like white dwarfs parameters are used. Particularly, we analyze the effect of the unperturbed density ratio of ions-to-dust, \(\mu _{i}\), electron-to-dust, \(\mu _{e}\), the ion-to-electron Fermi temperatures ratio, \(\sigma _{i}\), the dust temperature-to-ion Fermi temperature ratio, \(\sigma _{d}\), the direction cosines of the wave vector along the z-axis, viscosity and magnetic field on the energy of the nonlinear DAWs and the associated electric field. It is realized from Fig. 1 that \(v_{0}\) increases as electron Fermi temperature and dust temperature increase, while \(v_{0}\) decreases as the ion Fermi temperature increases. This can be physically attributed to the fact that the restoring force is provided by the inertialess electrons. Accordingly, the increase of electrons energies and the dusts thermal pressure lead to an increase in the electron Fermi temperature \(T_{Fe}\), and dust temperature, \(T_{d}\)36, respectively. This results in the increase of the phase velocity.
The nonlinearity coefficient A, the dispersive, B, and the transverse, C terms are dependent on \(\sigma _{i}\), and \(\sigma _{d}\) as depicted in Fig. 2a–c. The transverse term C is the only factor that depends on the magnetic field as depicted in Fig. 2. In comparison with Fig. 1, only the transverse term, \(\mathbf{C}\) takes the same behavior of the phase velocity against \(\sigma _{i} \), and \(\sigma _{d}\) as it is directly proportional to \(v_{0} \). The behavior of \(\mathbf{A}\) and \(\mathbf{B}\) is altered by comparing with the phase velocity against \(\sigma _{i}\), and \(\sigma _{d}\) as shown in Fig. 2a,b as they depend on \(\sigma _{i}\), and \(\sigma _{d}\) in the opposite way.
Figure 3 depicts the effect of various data values of \(\sigma _{i}\), \(\sigma _{d}\), \(\eta \), n, and \(\Omega \) on the profile of the DAWs of the ZKB equation, Eq. (11), against the coordinate \(\chi \). It is clear that the dissipative term is dominant and a rarefactive shock profile is obtained. The amplitude of the formed shock waves decreases as \(\sigma _{i}\), \(\sigma _{d}\), and n increase. While, the amplitude increases as \(\eta \), and \(\Omega \) increase. All these parameters appear in A, B, C, and D where they affect the wave amplitude as presented in the \(D^{2}/An^{2}\left[ Bn^{2}+C\left( 1-n^{2}\right) \right] \) term. It is concluded that the effect of increasing \(\sigma _{i}\) and \(\sigma _{d}\) on the nonlinear term is dominant in affecting the shock wave amplitude. Since A is inversely proportional to the amplitude and it inceases drastically in comparison with the behavior of B and C against \(\sigma _{i}\) and \(\sigma _{d}\). Accordingly, energetic electrons leads to larger phase velocity and larger amplitude shock waves, while inertial dusts with smaller temperature and smaller phase velocity results in larger amplitude shock waves. The width in our system, \(10n\left[ Bn^{2}+C\left( 1-n^{2}\right) \right] /D)\), is affected by \(\mathbf{B}\), \(\mathbf{C}\), and \(\mathbf{D}\) in different manners as they are multiplied by \(\mathbf{n}\). According to Fig. 2, the dominant effect is attributed to the change in \(\mathbf{D}\) since it emerges larger values against \(\eta \) on comparing with those from \(\mathbf{B}\) and \(\mathbf{C} \). The associated electric field is depicted in Fig. 4. The electric field shows the same behavior where it increases (decreases) as \(\eta \) and \(\Omega \) (\(\sigma _{i}\), \(\sigma _{d}\) and n) increase. This means physically that, more energetic electrons (electrons with higher \(T_{Fe}\) or lower \(\sigma _{i}\)) lead to an increase in the restoring force and in situ increase in the amplitude as shown in Figs. 3a and 4a. The dusts temperature \(T_{d}\) increases as their thermal pressure increases, which leads the waves to be less negative that results in the decrease in the amplitude as depicted in Figs. 3a and 4a. The dissipation leads also to an increase in the amplitude as depicted also in these figures. Physically, this behavior is because the kinematic viscosity increase leads to an increase in dissipation and consequently causes strong shock waves and strong associated electric field structures. Also, one can predict that when the nonlinear DAWs approach the direction parallel to the magnetic field (n increases), the amplitude and the width of it shrink as shown in 3b and 4b, and from this point, we can predict physically that the DAWs are confined in the field direction. Also, the magnetic field increase leads to an increase in the force and in situ increase in the amplitude as depicted in the same figures. This results from the fact that the waves propagate across the magnetic field, where the compression of magnetic field lines provides the acoustic restoring force for the wave propagation37.
The variation of wave energy, \(E_{n}\), versus \(\sigma _{d}\) for different values of \(\sigma _{i}\) is depicted in Fig. 5a. On the other hand, Fig. 5b shows the variation of \(E_{n}\) versus \(\mu _{e}\) for different values of \(\Omega \). The variation of \(E_{n}\) against n for different values of \(\eta \) is depicted in Fig. 5c. We see in Figure 5 that the wave energy of obliquely propagating DAWs is higher for higher values of \(\Omega \) and \(\eta \). on the other side, the wave energy shrinks for higher values of n, \(\mu _{e} \), \(\sigma _{d}\), and \(\sigma _{i}\). This can be inferred as previously mentioned due to the magnitude and the direction of the magnetic field, and dust inertia on the formed DAWs. Kinematic viscosity plays a key role in dissipation for the propagation of DA shocks. This coincides with the postulation that the growth of the wave by increasing the dissipation results in negative energy increase that is an indication of instability increase38. Also, the restoring force and inertia are affected by the electron and dust concentrations, respectively. Accordingly, \(\mu _{e}\) affects significantly the energy of the DAWs.
Conclusions
Based on the hydrodynamic model of magnetized quantum Thomas–Fermi dense plasma and rigorous development of nonlinear wave theory we have described DAWs evolution by the ZKB equation. The solution of this ZKB equation has been used to explore the development of the DAWs’ potential, electric field, and energy. The DAWs propagating in the background magnetic field direction are confined. While the field increase leads to larger energy. Our results coincide with those obtained by Infeld and Frycz39 that planar waves propagating parallel to the magnetic field become more unstable if the field is robust enough.
The dissipation involving plasma viscosity with wave dispersion and nonlinearity leads to nonlinear excitations in the form of shocks in plasmas. Also, we demonstrated that finite viscosity causes the formation of dissipative negative energy wave instability30. The increase of the electron density through \(\mu _{e}\) leads to decelerating them32, as those obtained due to the increase of \(\sigma _{i}\) and \(\sigma _{d}\). Consequently, a decrease in the restoring force results in the reduction of wave energy. The theory was examined and the valid ranges were also investigated rigorously in the numerical simulations .The idea of negative energy waves is an essential scheme for classifying instabilities into dissipative and reactive40. Accordingly, This prooof of the existence of the negative energy waves helps control the stabilization of confined plasma41.
Our present results may be useful in understanding the nonlinear localized structures in the laboratory such as the high-intensity laser-solid matter interaction experiments and white dwarfs as an example of the space plasmas where Thomas–Fermi dense magnetoplasma occurs42,43.
Data availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article and available in ref.21
References
Rao, N. N., Shukla, P. K. & Yu, M. Y. Dust-acoustic waves in dusty plasmas. Planet. Space Sci. 38, 543–546 (1990).
Barkan, A., Merlino, R. L. & D’Angelo, N. Laboratory observation of the dust-acoustic wave mode. Phys. Plasmas 2, 3563–3565 (1995).
Pieper, J. B. & Goree, J. Dispersion of plasma dust acoustic waves in the strong-coupling regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3137–3140 (1996).
Prabhuram, G. & Goree, J. Experimental observation of very low-frequency macroscopic modes in a dusty plasma. Phys. Plasmas 3, 1212–1219 (1996).
Shukla, P. K. & Mamun, A. A. Introduction to Dusty Plasma Physics (Institute of Physics, 2002).
Fortov, V. E. & Morfill, G. E. Complex and Dusty Plasmas (Taylor and Francis, 2009).
Atteya, A., El-Borie, M. A., Roston, G. D. & El-Helbawy, A. S. Nonlinear dust acoustic waves in an inhomogeneous magnetized quantum dusty plasma. Waves Random Complex Med.https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2021.1880030 (2021).
Shukla, P. K. & Silin, V. P. Dust ion-acoustic wave. Phys. Scr. 45, 508–508 (1992).
Girifalco, L. A. Statistical Physics of Materials (Wiley, 1975).
Lundqvist, S. & March, N. H. Theory of the Inhomogeneous Electron Gas, New York (1983) (Mir, Moscow, 1987).
Dubinov, A. E. & Dubinova, A. A. Nonlinear theory of ion-acoustic waves in an ideal plasma with degenerate electrons. Plasma Phys. Rep. 33, 859–870 (2007).
Abdelsalam, U. M., Moslem, W. M. & Shukla, P. K. Localized electrostatic excitations in a Thomas–Fermi plasma containing degenerate electrons. Phys. Plasmas 15, 052303 (2008).
Abdelsalam, U. M., Moslem, W. M. & Shukla, P. K. Ion-acoustic solitary waves in a dense pair-ion plasma containing degenerate electrons and positrons. Phys. Lett. A 372, 4057–4061 (2008).
Sabry, R., Moslem, W. M. & Shukla, P. K. Explosive and solitary excitations in a very dense magnetoplasma. Phys. Lett. A 372, 5691–5694 (2008).
Chatterjee, P., Saha, T. & Ryu, C. M. Obliquely propagating ion acoustic solitary waves and double layers in a magnetized dusty plasma with anisotropic ion pressure. Phys. Plasmas 15, 123702 (2008).
Saha, T. & Chatterjee, P. Obliquely propagating ion acoustic solitary waves in magnetized dusty plasma in the presence of nonthermal electrons. Phys. Plasmas 16, 013707 (2009).
Rahim, Z., Ali, S. & Qamar, A. Dust acoustic solitary and shock excitations in a Thomas–Fermi magnetoplasma. Phys. Plasmas 21(7), 072305 (2014).
Irfan, M., Ali, S. & Mirza, A. M. Dust-acoustic solitary and rogue waves in a Thomas–Fermi degenerate dusty plasma. Astrophys. Space Sci.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-014-2079-4 (2014).
Hafez, M. G., Talukder, M. R. & Ali, M. H. New analytical solutions for propagation of small but finite amplitude ion-acoustic waves in a dense plasma. Waves Random Complex Med.https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2015.1111543 (2015).
Irfan, M., Ali, S., Ata-ur-Rahman & Mirza, A. M. Arbitrary amplitude oblique electrostatic solitary waves in a degenerate cold dusty magnetoplasma. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.47, 4151–4158 (2019).
Abd-Elzaher, M. & Atteya, A. Obliquely overtaking collisions of electrostatic N-soliton in the Thomas–Fermi dense magnetoplasma. Waves Random Complex Med.https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2021.1974121 (2021).
Ostrovskii, L. A., Rybak, S. A. & Tsimring, L. S. Negative energy waves in hydrodynamics. Usp. Fiz. Nauk. 150, 417–437 (1986).
Cairns, R. A. The role of negative energy waves in some instabilities of parallel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 92, 1–14 (1979).
Lashmore-Davies, C. N. A possible mechanism for instability in a perpendicular collisionless shock wave. J. Phys. A 3, L40 (1970).
Pfirsch, D. & Tasso, H. A theorem on MHD-instability of plasmas with resistive walls. Nucl. Fusion 11, 259 (1971).
Lashmore-Davies, C. N. The resistive wall instability and critical flow velocity. Phys. Plasmas 8, 151 (2001).
Ryutova, M. P. Negative-energy waves in a plasma with structured magnetic fields. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 67, 1594–1601 (1988).
Ruderman, M. S. & Goossens, M. Surface Alfvén waves of negative energy. J. Plasma Phys. 54, 149–155 (1995).
Ruderman, M. S. Negative energy standing wave instability in the presence of flow. J. Plasma Phys. 84(905840101), 1–7 (2018).
Yu, D. J. & Nakariakov, V. M. Excitation of negative energy surface magnetohydrodynamic waves in an incompressible cylindrical plasma. Astrophys. J. 896(21), 1–9 (2020).
El-Borie, M. A., Abd-Elzaher, M. & Atteya, A. Obliquely propagating ion-acoustic solitary and shock waves in magnetized quantum degenerate multi-ions plasma in the presence of trapped electrons. Chin. J. Phys. 63, 258–270 (2020).
El-Bedwehy, N. A. & Moslem, W. M. Zakharov–Kuznetsov–Burgers equation in superthermal electron–positron–ion plasma. Astrophys. Space Sci. 335, 435–442 (2011).
Arab, N., Amour, R. & Bacha, M. Contribution of higher order corrections to the dust acoustic soliton energy in non-Maxwellian dusty plasma. Eur. Phys. J. D 73(121), 1–7 (2019).
El-Monier, S. Y. & Atteya, A. Propagation and energy of bright and dark solitons in magnetized quantum semiconductor plasmas in the presence of Bohm potential effect. Waves Random Complex Med.https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2021.1989516 (2021).
Ko, K. & Kuehl, H. H. Korteweg-de Vries soliton in a slowly varying medium. Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 233–236 (1978).
Mamun, A. A. & Ashrafi, K. S. Effects of polarization force and effective dust temperature on dust-acoustic solitary and shock waves in a strongly coupled dusty plasma. Phys. Rev. E 82(026405), 1–6 (2010).
Irfan, M., Ali, S. & Mirza, A. M. Magnetoacoustic solitons and shocks in dense astrophysical plasmas with relativistic degenerate electrons. J. Plasma Phys. 82(905820106), 1–16 (2016).
Ostrovskii, L. A., Rybak, S. A. & Tsimring, L. S. Negative energy waves in hydrodynamics. Sov. Phys. Usp. 29, 11 (1986).
Infeld, E. & Frycz, P. Self-focusing of nonlinear ion-acoustic waves and solitons in magnetized plasmas. J. Plasma Phys. 37, 97–106 (1987).
Hasegawa, A. Theory of longitudinal plasma instabilities. Phys. Rev. 169, 204 (1968).
Taylor, J. B. & Lashmore-Davies, C. N. Plasma stabilization by feedback. Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 1340 (1970).
Zedan, N. A., Atteya, A., El-Taibany, W. F. & El-Labany, S. K. Stability of ion-acoustic solitons in a multi-ion degenerate plasma with the effects of trapping and polarization under the influence of quantizing magnetic field. Waves Random Complex Med.https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2020.1798560 (2020).
Jehan, N., Salahuddinin, M., Mahmood, S. & Mizra, A. M. Electrostatic solitary ion waves in dense electron–positron–ion magnetoplasma. Phys. Plasmas 16, 042313 (2009).
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Contribution statement: All authors contributed to the study meaningfully, providing feedback on the interpretation of the results and on the writing of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Abd-Elzaher, M., Atteya, A. Negative energy dust acoustic waves evolution in a dense magnetized quantum Thomas–Fermi plasma. Sci Rep 12, 15890 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20174-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20174-y
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Unraveling the dynamics of Lorentzian excitations in an ultra-relativistic degenerate plasma
Optical and Quantum Electronics (2024)