Abstract
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a family of pattern recognition receptors involved in cardiovascular diseases. Notably, numerous studies have demonstrated that TLR4 activates the expression of several of pro-inflammatory cytokine genes that play pivotal roles in myocardial inflammation, particularly myocarditis, myocardial infarction, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and heart failure. In addition, TLR4 is an emerging target for anti-inflammatory therapies. Given the significance of TLR4, it would be useful to summarize the current literature on the molecular mechanisms and roles of TLR4 in myocardial inflammation. Thus, in this review, we first introduce the basic knowledge of the TLR4 gene and describe the activation and signaling pathways of TLR4 in myocardial inflammation. Moreover, we highlight the recent progress of research on the involvement of TLR4 in myocardial inflammation. The information reviewed here may be useful to further experimental research and to increase the potential of TLR4 as a therapeutic target.
Similar content being viewed by others
Facts
-
Human TLR4 was the first mammalian Toll protein to be characterized and is secreted from the endoplasmic reticulum.
-
TLR4 initiates the expression of a number of pro-inflammatory genes, cell surface molecules, and chemokines through the MyD88-dependent pathway.
-
TLR4 performs a wide variety of functions in various pathological conditions, including cardiovascular disease, allergic diseases, obesity-associated metabolic diseases, neuronal degeneration, apoptosis, autoimmune disorders, infectious diseases, and inflammatory bowel diseases.
Open Questions
-
What is the exact molecular mechanism of TLR4 in myocardial inflammation?
-
How is TLR4 related to diagnosis and prognosis of diseases related to myocardial inflammation?
-
Which therapeutic strategy would be the most effective against TLR4-associated myocardial inflammation in clinical settings?
Myocardial inflammation has been widely accepted to play a pivotal role in the physiological and pathological mechanisms of cardiac function and dysfunction. Efficient inflammation is required for host defense against damage and tissue repair. However, excessive or chronic myocardial inflammation, which is reported to induce severe damage to the myocardium, is involved in a number of cardiac disorders, such as myocarditis,1 myocardial infarction (MI),2 ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury,3 heart failure,4 aortic valve diseases,5 atherosclerosis,6 and hypertension.7 During myocardial inflammation, cardiac myocytes express various molecules that contribute to the infiltration of neutrophils into the myocardium, including pro-inflammatory cytokines, cell surface molecules, and chemokines. The regulatory mechanisms of myocardial inflammation are multifaceted. The host inflammation is initiated by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), which are essential components of the innate immune system.8 PRRs recognize and respond to damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), including exogenous pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) that are conserved structures of the pathogenic micro-organisms and endogenous alarmins that are released in response to stress or tissue damage.9
Among PRRs, Toll-like receptors (TLRs) were first described and have been studied most intensively. Engagement of TLRs by DAMPs activates inflammatory responses of cardiac myocytes, which represents the first line of innate host defense and modulates the adaptive immune responses.10 TLR4, a key member of the TLRs, has been reported to perform a wide variety of functions in various pathological conditions, including cardiovascular disease,4 allergic diseases,11 obesity-associated metabolic diseases,12 neuronal degeneration,13 apoptosis,14 autoimmune disorders,15 infectious diseases,16 and inflammatory bowel diseases.17 Most importantly, TLR4, whose levels are the highest compared with other TLRs in the heart, plays a critical role in myocardial inflammation, including myocarditis,18 MI,19 I/R injury,20 heart failure,4 aortic valve diseases,21 atherosclerosis,22 and hypertension.23
In this review, we present the elaborate network of roles that TLR4 plays in myocardial inflammation. First, we introduce the basic knowledge of TLR4. We then describe the activation and signaling pathways of TLR4 in myocardial inflammation. Finally, we highlight the involvement of TLR4 in myocardial inflammation, including myocarditis, MI, and I/R injury, and the clinical prospective of TLR4 inhibition. This review presents a comprehensive picture of the roles that TLR4 plays in myocardial inflammation and may contribute to the promotion of TLR4 as a new therapeutic target.
General Background on TLRs
TLRs are a family of PRRs initially identified as Toll proteins in 1984 for their roles in the early embryogenesis of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.24 TLRs are expressed in various types of heart cells, including cardiac myocytes, smooth muscle cells, and endothelial cells.25 The relative expression levels for TLR messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in the human heart rank as TLR4 > TLR2 > TLR3 > TLR5 > TLR1 > TLR6 > TLR7 > TLR8 > TLR9 > TLR10. Notably, the relative mRNA expression for TLR2, TLR3, or TLR4 is ~10-fold higher than TLR1 or TLR5–10.26 In addition, TLR expression has also been observed in brain, kidney, liver, lung, small intestine, spinal cord, spleen, and reproductive organs.27
Although extracellular and endosomal TLRs have similar ectodomain sequences, they provide a platform for the recognition of a different set of TLR ligands respectively. One mechanism of ligand discrimination is dependent on the different ectodomain residues of distinct TLRs. The leucine-rich repeat motifs located in the ectodomains of TLRs consist of 20–30 amino acids including the consensus sequence LxxLxLxxN. Amino acid variations within these motifs lead to variations in structural conformation that allows for ligand interaction.28 Another mechanism relies on the formation of homodimers and heterodimers. Most TLRs form homodimers, with a few exceptions. For instance, TLR2 forms heterodimers with TLR1 or TLR6, thus enabling differential recognition of lipopeptides: TLR1–TLR2 recognizes triacylated lipopeptides, whereas TLR2-TLR6 recognizes diacylated lipopeptides.29, 30 Besides, cofactors can also reflect the diversity of TLR ligand composition, since they ensure proper detection of DAMPs and discrimination between self and non-self. Take TLR4 for an example, TLR4 homodimers bind to cofactors, such as CD14, myeloid differentiation factor 2 (MD2), and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein (LBP), which can further deliver particular molecules while avoiding other ligands. To ensure TLR4 can reach the assigned subcellular compartments to bind to ligands and initiate signaling, these cofactors also play roles in proper folding of TLR4 in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), localization to the appropriate subcellular compartment, and protein processing.31
Interestingly, the risk for excessive inflammation is particularly low over the first few years of life but rises with advancing age. Accumulating evidence has suggested that TLR sensor function is well developed in newborns. The expression of TLRs and their downstream targets in mononuclear cells of healthy infants appears to be stable at adult-like levels over the first 5 years of life. In other words, differential TLR expression appears unlikely to be a main cause for the altered susceptibility to inflammation in early versus adult life. Although TLR expression and signaling in early life appear similar to those in adults, TLR-mediated production of innate immune effectors is significantly decreased in early life. Virtually, TLR4 mostly confers an anti-inflammatory effect on the hearts of newborns via high production of IL-10, whereas all other innate responses are low. In older individuals, TLR4 is generally expressed in monocytes at lower levels. In addition, older adults may exhibit a decrease in nearly all innate TLR-induced responses and higher basal levels of many pro-inflammatory cytokines.32
Characterization of TLR4
Human TLR4 was the first mammalian Toll protein to be characterized,33 and it is secreted from the ER. In association with its chaperone molecules, coreceptors, and adapter proteins, TLR4 is trafficked to the cis-Golgi in a coat protein complex II-coated vesicle. Subsequently, TLR4 is exported to the plasma membrane, where it responds to its ligands and triggers a series of inflammatory cascades.14 TLR4 is activated by LPS, which involves the cofactors CD14, MD2, and LBP. TLR4 interacts with LBP to form a complex that is recognized by CD14. CD14 is a protein that binds LBP and delivers LPS-LBP to the TLR4-MD2 complex on the cell surface.31, 34, 35 In addition, TLR4 is also involved in the recognition of exogenous ligands PAMPs, such as the fusion protein from respiratory syncytial virus and glycerophosphatidylinositol anchors from parasites. Endogenous ligands alarmins, such as heat shock protein, high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), the extra domain A of fibronectins, oligosaccharides of hyaluronic acid, heparan sulfate, and fibrinogen, are released in response to tissue injury and further activate TLR4 thereby triggering the innate immune system (Table 1).36, 37 Recent research suggests that macrophage scavenger receptor class A (SR-A) is a co-receptor for TLR4 to facilitate inflammatory responses, suppress cell survival, and promote cell apoptosis.38 However, further studies are needed to determine how TLR4 interacts with SRs during myocardial inflammation.
Growing amounts of data suggest that the ability of certain individuals to respond properly to TLR4 ligands may be impaired by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the TLR4 gene, resulting in an altered susceptibility to infectious and inflammatory diseases. Among them, two cosegregating SNPs in TLR4 have been studied the most extensively: Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile.39 Ameziane et al.40 have revealed that the Asp299Gly polymorphism of the human TLR4 receptor has a protective effect on acute coronary events. This is confirmed by Balistreri et al.41 that have found patients with Asp299Gly have a reduced risk of MI. The underlying mechanism may involve the altered composition and structure of TLR4 ectodomain by the Asp299Gly polymorphism, leading to a decrease in the interaction of TLR4 with DAMPs and thereby attenuated TLR4-mediated myocardial inflammation. However, clinical studies that have attempted to link the risk of myocardial inflammation with TLR4 polymorphisms have yielded inconsistent results. The largest study involving nearly 5000 individuals has shown no association between the TLR4 Asp299Gly polymorphism and MI.42 Interestingly, Edfeldt et al. have found that Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile TLR4 genotypes exhibit an increased risk of MI in men, instead of women.43 Therefore, studies regarding the association of TLR4 genetic variants with susceptibility to myocardial inflammation remain conflicting. This may be attributed to a simplistic view of these haplotypes, as revealed by the possibility to inherit both Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile polymorphisms.44 All of these studies are still faced with challenges due to wide range of allele frequencies possibly caused by population and ethnic differences in the control groups, making replication studies more difficult.26 Hence, the roles of TLR4 genotypes in myocardial inflammation require to be further clarified.
TLR4 Signaling Pathways
The activation of TLR4 by LPS induces two signaling pathways: the myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88)-dependent and the MyD88-independent pathways. These signaling pathways activate many transcription factors, such as nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and interferon-regulatory factors (IRFs), and subsequently induce the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and interferons (IFNs), respectively. Remarkably, a recent study has shown that TLR4 and some other signaling pathways, such as the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt (also known as protein kinase B) signaling pathway counter-regulate each other.45, 46, 47 However, the precise regulatory mechanisms are still unknown. Herein, we mainly present the elaborate network of the two classical TLR4 signaling pathways.
The MyD88-dependent pathway
The MyD88-dependent pathway is initiated via MyD88 after TLR4 activation. MyD88, an adapter protein with a death domain, is crucial for TLR4 signaling pathways. MyD88-adapter like (also known as Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain-containing adapter protein) connects the cytoplasmic TIR domain of TLR4 and MyD88. Afterwards, the death domain of MyD88 binds to the IL-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4), which activates one of the other IRAK family members, IRAK1 or IRAK2.48, 49 The complex of the MyD88-IRAKs family has been called the ‘Myddosome’ and is especially essential for inflammation and the host immune response.50 The IRAK complex then dissociates from the Myddosome and interacts with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6). TRAF6 forms a complex with transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1), TAK1-binding protein 1 (TAB1), and TAB2. Afterwards, the complex binds to ubiquitin ligases, including ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 13 and ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme variant 1A. TAK1 then activates the complex of inhibitory κB (IκB) kinase α (IKKα)/IKKβ/IKKγ (also known as IKK1, IKK2, and NEMO, respectively) and induces IκB phosphorylation. Phosphorylated IκB dissociates from the complex and is directly targeted for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation, thus activating the transcription factor NF-κB. The released NF-κB translocates into the nucleus and mediates the expression of a number of pro-inflammatory cytokine genes.51, 52 In addition to the activation of the IKK complex, TAK1 can activate mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways, such as the extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway, the c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathway, and the p38 pathway.53 MAPK signaling pathways can activate the transcription factor activator protein-1 (AP-1). The activation of NF-κB and AP-1 contributes to the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, IL-1, and TNF-α (Figure 1).54
The MyD88-independent pathway
The MyD88-independent pathway, also known as the TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing IFN-β (TRIF)-dependent pathway or the TIR-containing adapter molecule-1-dependent pathway, can lead to the activation of both IRF and NF-κB and the subsequent expression of IFNs and pro-inflammatory cytokines, respectively.
The MyD88-independent pathway is initiated by the TRIF-related adapter molecule (TRAM) and TRIF. TRAM is a particular bridging adapter protein in the TLR4-mediated MyD88-independent pathway, which is localized to the cytosolic surface of the plasma membrane.14 After being recruited, TRIF interacts with TRAF family member-associated NF-κB activator-binding kinase 1 (TBK1) and IKK-ɛ for the phosphorylation of the transcription factor IRF3.55 TRIF can also interact with IRAK1 and IKK-ɛ for the activation of the transcription factor IRF7. Activated IRFs then translocate into nucleus, bind with DNA, and produce such antiviral molecules as IFN-β.51, 56 In addition, TRIF can also promote MyD88-independent NF-κB activation in TLR4 signaling pathways. Similar to the MyD88-dependent pathway, TRIF recruits TRAF6 and activates TAK1 through ubiquitination-dependent mechanisms, which in turn activates the NF-κB and the MAPK pathways.57 Moreover, TRIF also activates MyD88-independent NF-κB activation by recruiting the adapter receptor-interacting protein 1 (RIP1).58 Furthermore, RIP1 can bind to TRIF, which causes both Fas-associated death domain-dependent apoptosis and NF-κB activation.14 Thus, TRIF activates IRFs by interacting with TBK1 and IRAK1 and activates NF-κB by interacting with RIP1 (Figures 2a and b).
Involvement of TLR4 in Myocardial Inflammation
Myocarditis
Current evidence has demonstrated that the host immune response and inflammation mainly mediate myocarditis, where TLR4 participates in the induction of pro-inflammatory and antiviral cytokines.
Viral myocarditis (VMC)
Viral infection is thought to be the most common cause of myocarditis, a leading pathogen of which can be Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3). There is compelling evidence for the contribution of the inhibition of TLR4 system to ameliorating myocardial inflammation in VMC. In a mouse model of CVB3 infection, Fairweather et al. reported that TLR4-deficient mice are more resistant to CVB3 infection with decreased inflammatory responses, viral replication, and myocarditis compared with wild-type mice.18 CVB3 infection increases the cardiac levels of IL-1β and IL-18 in wild type but not TLR4-deficient mice. In contrast, Riad et al. reported that TRIF-deficient mice display a TLR4-dependent suppression of antiviral cytokine IFN-β, which can lead to the induction of severe heart failure and 100% mortality.59 Notably, MyD88 knockout leads to reduced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and IL-18, but increased expression of IRF3 and IFN-β, which shows a dramatically higher survival rate than wild-type mice.60 Thus, TLR4 can not only augment the severity of VMC through the MyD88-dependent pathway but can also limit the severity of VMC through the MyD88-independent pathway. However, the MyD88-dependent pathway has a more leading role than the MyD88-independent pathway in most cases of VMC.
Autoimmune myocarditis (AM)
AM is a T-helper 17-mediated autoimmune cardiac disease characterized by inflammatory infiltration that mostly involves lymphocytes and macrophages.61 It remains poorly understood what effect the effector T cells and inflammatory macrophages may exert in the course of AM. In particular, the role of TLR4 in AM has been controversially discussed.
Reportedly, TLR4 induces the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines in DCs, such as IL-6, and leads to Th-17 differentiation and exacerbates the myocardial inflammation.62 In addition, Jenke and colleagues revealed that adiponectin administration attenuates inflammatory activation and interaction of cardiac and immune cells by diminishing TLR4 signaling pathways, thereby exerting a cardioprotective effect in AM.63 However, there is currently no hard evidence that TLR4 inhibition may result in beneficial effects on clinically meaningful end points. Interestingly, Bachmaier et al. studied a mouse experimental AM model and reported that the administration of the TLR4 agonist LPS significantly decreases the severity and prevalence of AM and reduces the number of autoantigen reactive effector T cells.61 This suggests that the innate immunity and inflammatory responses might also confer beneficial effects by activating cardioprotective signaling pathways via TLR4 signaling.
Therefore, myocardial inflammation is a generic process. It is not always clear whether inflammation is beneficial or detrimental since there is a broad spectrum of inflammatory reactions. From an evolutionary perspective, it is likely that the fundamental role of TLR4 is to protect the heart against DAMPs, but on the other hand, TLR4 is also associated with deleterious inflammatory effects that exacerbate heart damage.
MI
Although effective treatment of MI has greatly improved cardiac function and survival, MI is still a major cause of morbidity and mortality around the world. Necrotic cardiac myocytes due to MI release a wide range of endogenous DAMPs, associated with significant TLR4 induction.64 Activation of TLR4 causes increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which can lead to inflammatory responses and additional damage to the already injured myocardium. Notably, the TLR4 signaling pathways correlate with infarct severity but not with the extent of inflammation.65
TLR4 and downstream gene expression profiles are upregulated in both infarcted and remote myocardium following MI.4 Several studies have shown that the inhibition of TLR4 signaling pathways is beneficial for alleviating inflammatory responses and additional damage to the already injured myocardium. For instance, the injection of lentivirus short hairpin RNA against TLR4 into the infarcted heart can significantly decrease infarct size and improve cardiac function in vivo.4 Besides, the TLR4 inhibitor metformin leads to minor expression of mediators implicated in MI and damage, including TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10.19
Several studies explored the multiple DAMPs released from necrotic cardiac myocytes that activate TLR4 following MI. S100 calcium-binding protein A1 (S100A1) has been reported to be a TLR4 agonist and also an endogenous alarmin. Rohde et al. reported that S100A1 is induced in mice with MI.66 Intracardial injection of S100A1 enlarges infarct size and worsens left ventricular functional performance post-MI.66 S100A8/A9, also an endogenous ligand of TLR4, is released following MI and amplifies the inflammatory responses.67 In addition, HMGB1, galectin-3, S100β, and IL-1α released by necrotic cardiac myocytes can induce myocardial inflammation through TLR4 signaling pathways.68 Thus, DAMPs and TLR4 might be useful biomarkers and therapeutic targets in myocardial inflammation.
Although TLR4 signaling pathways classically induce NF-κB activation and further lead to the expression of pro-inflammatory genes, a recent study showed that patients with ST-segment elevation MI have increased the expression of a series of genes that implicate NF-κB activity, including hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), NF-κBIα, IL-18R1/2, matrix metalloproteinase 9, and IL-8, but reduced the expression of TLR4-induced genes, such as TNF-α.69 Hence, besides the two classical TLR4 signaling pathways, there might be a novel HIF-1-dependent non-canonical TLR4 signaling pathway, the precise mechanisms of which have not been determined. Further studies are still required to devise methods to protect the myocardium from additional damage and to contribute to the treatment of MI.
Myocardial I/R injury
Recent studies using mouse myocardial I/R injury models have revealed that TLR4 and NF-κB expression levels are significantly increased in both the ischemic zone and the potential danger region and that cardiac myocyte apoptosis is induced during the early period following I/R injury.70, 71 Interestingly, during the late period, TLR4 and pro-inflammatory cytokine levels rise significantly again, which remodels the ventricular myocardium and affects the structure and function of the injured myocardium.72
Numerous studies have demonstrated that inhibiting TLR4 signaling pathways can attenuate inflammatory responses and cardiac myocyte apoptosis following myocardial I/R injury. Wang and colleagues reported that pterostilbene decreases TNF-α production via suppressing TLR4-NF-κB signaling pathways, which effectively inhibits the infiltration of neutrophils and subsequently attenuates inflammatory responses and cell apoptosis following myocardial I/R injury.73 Furthermore, cytokines that can be increased by TLR4 and its related pathways, such as TNF-α and IL-6, regulate the apoptosis of cardiac myocytes.74
Promising findings reveal that some ligands of TLR4 or its downstream genes could be used as pre-conditioning inducers, which would enhance resistance to severe myocardial I/R injury. The mice pretreated with intravenous injection of eritoran, a TLR4 antagonist, for 10 min before myocardial I/R show significantly reduced infarction.75 Similarly, pretreatment with follistatin, a binding protein downstream of TLR4, could significantly reduce apoptosis and infarcts of epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and cardiac myocytes due to myocardial I/R injury via inhibition of the MyD88-dependent pathway.76 These data suggest that TLR4 and its downstream genes may be potential therapeutic targets and that pre-conditioning with these molecules may decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with MI.
Interestingly, the levels of activated Akt are significantly increased in the myocardia of TLR4-deficient mice compared with wild-type mice after myocardial I/R injury,77, 78 suggesting that the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway may act as a compensatory regulator in myocardial inflammation. Hua and colleagues reported that administration of PI3K inhibitors completely abrogates cardioprotection in TLR4-deficient mice after I/R injury.78 In addition, Li and colleagues reported that glucan phosphate, a ligand of TLR4, may shift TLR4 signaling pathways from a predominant NF-κB pathway to the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, which serves a protective role in myocardial I/R injury.79 The related mechanisms may involve TLR4 stimulation that leads to tyrosine phosphorylation of the TIR domain. The TIR domain subsequently disassociates from MyD88, binds the p85 regulatory subunit of PI3K, and phosphorylates Akt. Afterwards, activated Akt promotes survival and inhibits the apoptosis of cardiac myocytes. These data strongly indicate that there is reciprocal regulation between the NF-κB and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways during myocardial I/R injury.
The Clinical Prospective of TLR4 Inhibition
To enable the potential of TLR4 signaling pathways as therapeutic targets to be realized, regulatory and scientific issues concerning both basic and clinical development require diligent consideration. Currently, the unresolved key question is whether it is possible to attenuate deleterious myocardial inflammation and preserve the advantages of innate immunity at the same time during the regulation of TLR4 signaling. Fortunately, although sustaining TLR4 activation may have dangerous effects on innate immunity and lead to deleterious myocardial inflammation, there still exist several approaches to the negative regulation of TLR4 to counteract those effects. For instance, exploring the clinical role of immune suppression might be contributive to attenuating TLR4-mediated myocardial inflammation. Moreover, further studies should also facilitate the development of new therapies directed at the innate immunity components in myocardial inflammation. The potential of these approaches is illustrated by the development and application of a series of antagonists and inhibitors of TLR4, some of which have already been researched in the hearts of animals. Representative clinical trials targeting TLR4 and related pathways in myocardial inflammation have been fully summarized in the table attached to this review (Table 2).
One of the TLR4 antagonists, eritoran, is reported to be effective in an in vivo murine model of transverse aortic constriction-induced cardiac hypertrophy, as shown by decreased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-6 and increased production of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10.80 In addition, radioprotective 105 (RP105), a TLR4 homolog that lacks the TIR domain and competitively inhibits TLR4 signaling, has shown promise in the treatment of cardiac dysfunction after MI. RP105 can hamper the role of TLR4 signaling pathways in post-infarction remodeling and confer protective effects on cardiac function after MI.81
However, the prevention or treatment of cardiac diseases with TLR4 inhibitors or antagonists to date has not been launched in human clinical trials. Still, the clinical applications of TLR4 inhibition have been attempted in other systems or organs. Kanzler et al. revealed that the most obvious role of a TLR4 antagonist is to inhibit the recognition of LPS by TLR4, the key triggering event in Gram-negative bacterial sepsis.82 Though the drug E5564 (eritoran) showed well toleration in phase II clinical trials of the cure for sepsis, it did not result in an ideal reduction of 28-day mortality in phase III clinical trial.83, 84 Multiple possible aspects might explain why eritoran administration failed to demonstrate a significant effect in phase III clinical trial. For instance, this study was designed to capture patients in the early stages of sepsis-induced organ dysfunction, but did not select patients with established severe sepsis as before. Besides, there are differential outcomes compared with the phase II trial in gram-positive bacterial sepsis, and future trials with eritoran or other MD2-TLR4 inhibitors should proceed with caution if patients with Gram-positive infections are included in the study population.
Furthermore, the TLR4-specific inhibitor TAK-242 is reported to promote hematoma absorption and significantly improve neurologic deficits following intracerebral hemorrhage in spite of the unknown target of the pathway.85 Another novel TLR4 antagonist Ibudilast can suppress the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF and IL-6 and induce the production of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in central nervous system and is undergoing phase II trials of opioid dependence.86 NovImmune’s NI-0101 is a humanized monoclonal antibody for the treatment of acute and chronic inflammation still in preclinical phase. It binds specifically and selectively to an epitope on human TLR4 and interferes with the dimerization required for intracellular signaling and induction of numerous pro-inflammatory pathways.87 Apart from these, a viral protein-derived peptide OPN-401 is able to inhibit TLR4 signaling but still in preclinical development.88
On the other hand, targeting the molecules of TLR4 downstream signaling pathways is also feasible. A variety of endogenous inhibitors that negatively regulate TLR4 downstream signaling pathways are reviewed (Figure 3).
Conclusions
This review elaborates on the emerging roles of TLR4 in myocardial inflammation, including myocarditis, MI, myocardial I/R injury, and heart failure (Figure 4). In summary, increasing lines of evidence suggest that TLR4 initiates the expression of a number of pro-inflammatory genes, cell surface molecules, and chemokines through the MyD88-dependent pathway, which exacerbates the damage to myocardium. Inhibiting TLR4 signaling pathways appears to be a promising method for alleviating myocardial inflammation. Moreover, pretreatment that targets TLR4 signaling pathways might effectively protect the myocardium from damage.
However, direct inhibition of TLR4 may not be a promising therapeutic avenue to improve the prognosis of myocardial inflammation to some extent, since TLR4 inhibition may lead to a functional loss of the innate immune mechanism. TLR4 can also play a beneficial role in myocardial inflammation, especially in myocarditis. TLR4 activates the MyD88-independent pathway and further promotes IFN-β expression, exerting an antiviral effect on myocardial inflammation. Thus, although excessive pro-inflammatory cytokine production exerts detrimental effects in myocardial inflammation, some cytokines also drive the host defense and tissue repair process within the heart.
Notably, some other signaling pathways can crosstalk with the TLR4 signaling pathways and exert regulatory effects on myocardial inflammation. The PI3K/Akt signaling pathway may serve as an endogenous negative feedback regulator of TLR4 signaling in myocardial inflammation and contribute to less maladaptive remodeling in TLR4-deficient mice. A shift from predominant TLR4-NF-κB signaling pathway to the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway may serve a protective role in myocardial inflammation. Apart from the classical TLR4 and related signaling pathways, there might be a novel HIF-1-dependent non-canonical TLR4 signaling pathway during myocardial inflammation, as evidenced by an increase in the expression of a series of genes that implicate NF-κB activity, such as HIF-1α, and a decrease in the expression of TLR4-induced genes, such as TNF-α.
Despite substantial progress, there remain many unresolved questions as to the complete transition towards clinical application, which are critical for our comprehensive understanding of the roles of TLR4 signaling pathways. For example, what is the exact role of TLR4 in the pathogenesis of cardiac diseases, pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory? Detrimental or protective? How would immune suppression influence TLR4 system? What are the specific TLR4 inhibitors peculiar to myocardial inflammation? How could the innate immunity components be clinically targeted? These questions will have to be settled before TLR4 can be considered a valuable therapeutic target for myocardial inflammation.
Abbreviations
- AP-1:
-
activator protein-1
- AM:
-
autoimmune myocarditis
- CVB3:
-
Coxsackievirus B3
- DAMP:
-
damage-associated molecular pattern
- HIF-1:
-
hypoxia-inducible factor-1
- HMGB1:
-
high mobility group box 1
- IFN:
-
interferon
- IκB:
-
inhibitory κB
- I/R:
-
ischemia/reperfusion
- IRAK:
-
interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase
- IRF:
-
interferon-regulatory factor
- LBP:
-
lipopolysaccharide binding protein
- LPS:
-
lipopolysaccharide
- LRR:
-
leucine-rich repeat
- MAPK:
-
mitogen-activated protein kinase
- MD2:
-
myeloid differentiation factor 2
- MI:
-
Myocardial infarction
- mRNA:
-
messenger RNA
- MyD88:
-
myeloid differentiation factor 88
- NF-κB:
-
nuclear factor-κB
- PAMP:
-
pathogen-associated molecular pattern
- PRRs:
-
pattern recognition receptors
- RIP1:
-
receptor-interacting protein 1
- RP105:
-
radioprotective 105
- SNP:
-
single nucleotide polymorphisms
- SR:
-
scavenger receptor
- TAB:
-
transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1-binding protein
- TBK1:
-
TRAF family member-associated NF-κB activator-binding kinase 1
- TIR:
-
Toll/interleukin-1 receptor
- TLR:
-
Toll-like receptor
- TNF:
-
tumor necrosis factor
- TRAF:
-
tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor
- TRAM:
-
TRIF-related adapter molecule
- UBC13:
-
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 13
- UEV1A:
-
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme variant 1A
- VMC:
-
viral myocarditis
References
Pollack A, Kontorovich AR, Fuster V, Dec GW . Viral myocarditis-diagnosis, treatment options, and current controversies. Nat Rev Cardiol 2015; 12: 670–680.
Saxena A, Russo I, Frangogiannis NG . Inflammation as a therapeutic target in myocardial infarction: learning from past failures to meet future challenges. Transl Res 2015; 167: 152–166.
Timmers L, Pasterkamp G, de Hoog VC, Arslan F, Appelman Y, de Kleijn DP . The innate immune response in reperfused myocardium. Cardiovasc Res 2012; 94: 276–283.
Liu L, Wang Y, Cao ZY, Wang MM, Liu XM, Gao T et al. Up-regulated TLR4 in cardiomyocytes exacerbates heart failure after long-term myocardial infarction. J Cell Mol Med 2015; 19: 2728–2740.
Venardos N, Nadlonek NA, Zhan Q, Weyant MJ, Reece TB, Meng X et al. Aortic valve calcification is mediated by a differential response of aortic valve interstitial cells to inflammation. J Surg Res 2014; 190: 1–8.
Husain K, Hernandez W, Ansari RA, Ferder L . Inflammation, oxidative stress and renin angiotensin system in atherosclerosis. World J Biol Chem 2015; 6: 209–217.
McMaster WG, Kirabo A, Madhur MS, Harrison DG . Inflammation, immunity, and hypertensive end-organ damage. Circ Res 2015; 116: 1022–1033.
Janeway CA Jr, Medzhitov R . Introduction: the role of innate immunity in the adaptive immune response. Semin Immunol 1998; 10: 349–350.
Bianchi ME . DAMPs, PAMPs and alarmins: all we need to know about danger. J Leukoc Biol 2007; 81: 1–5.
Takeuchi O, Akira S . Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation. Cell 2010; 140: 805–820.
Fairweather D, Frisancho-Kiss S . Mast cells and inflammatory heart disease: potential drug targets. Cardiovasc Hematol Disord Drug Targets 2008; 8: 80–90.
de Laat MA, Gruntmeir KJ, Pollitt CC, McGowan CM, Sillence MN, Lacombe VA . Hyperinsulinemia down-regulates TLR4 expression in the mammalian heart. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2014; 5: 120.
Gawri R, Rosenzweig DH, Krock E, Ouellet JA, Stone LS, Quinn TM et al. High mechanical strain of primary intervertebral disc cells promotes secretion of inflammatory factors associated with disc degeneration and pain. Arthritis Res Ther 2014; 16: R21.
Gay NJ, Symmons MF, Gangloff M, Bryant CE . Assembly and localization of Toll-like receptor signalling complexes. Nat Rev Immunol 2014; 14: 546–558.
Xu D, Yan S, Wang H, Gu B, Sun K, Yang X et al. IL-29 enhances LPS/TLR4-mediated inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Cell Physiol Biochem 2015; 37: 27–34.
Li H, Huang LF, Wen C, Yang ZC, Chen CY . Roles of cardiac mast cells and Toll-like receptor 4 in viral myocarditis among mice. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi 2013; 15: 896–902.
Senhaji N, Diakite B, Serbati N, Zaid Y, Badre W, Nadifi S . Toll-like receptor 4 Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile polymorphisms: new data and a meta-analysis. BMC Gastroenterol 2014; 14: 206.
Fairweather D, Yusung S, Frisancho S, Barrett M, Gatewood S, Steele R et al. IL-12 receptor beta 1 and Toll-like receptor 4 increase IL-1 beta- and IL-18-associated myocarditis and coxsackievirus replication. J Immunol 2003; 170: 4731–4737.
Soraya H, Clanachan AS, Rameshrad M, Maleki-Dizaji N, Ghazi-Khansari M, Garjani A . Chronic treatment with metformin suppresses toll-like receptor 4 signaling and attenuates left ventricular dysfunction following myocardial infarction. Eur J Pharmacol 2014; 737: 77–84.
Ding HS, Yang J, Chen P, Yang J, Bo SQ, Ding JW et al. The HMGB1-TLR4 axis contributes to myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury via regulation of cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Gene 2013; 527: 389–393.
Zeng Q, Song R, Ao L, Weyant MJ, Lee J, Xu D et al. Notch1 promotes the pro-osteogenic response of human aortic valve interstitial cells via modulation of ERK1/2 and nuclear factor-kappaB activation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2013; 33: 1580–1590.
Bagheri B, Sohrabi B, Movassaghpour AA, Mashayekhi S, Garjani A, Shokri M et al. Hydrocortisone reduces Toll-like receptor 4 expression on peripheral CD14+ monocytes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Iran Biomed J 2014; 18: 76–81.
Satoh S, Yada R, Inoue H, Omura S, Ejima E, Mori T et al. Toll-like receptor-4 is upregulated in plaque debris of patients with acute coronary syndrome more than Toll-like receptor-2. Heart Vessels 2014; 31: 1–5.
Steward R, McNally FJ, Schedl P . Isolation of the dorsal locus of Drosophila. Nature 1984; 311: 262–265.
Mitchell JA, Ryffel B, Quesniaux VF, Cartwright N, Paul-Clark M . Role of pattern-recognition receptors in cardiovascular health and disease. Biochem Soc Trans 2007; 35: 1449–1452.
Mann DL . The emerging role of innate immunity in the heart and vascular system: for whom the cell tolls. Circ Res 2011; 108: 1133–1145.
Nishimura M, Naito S . Tissue-specific mRNA expression profiles of human toll-like receptors and related genes. Biol Pharm Bull 2005; 28: 886–892.
Kang JY, Lee JO . Structural biology of the Toll-like receptor family. Annu Rev Biochem 2011; 80: 917–941.
Takeuchi O, Sato S, Horiuchi T, Hoshino K, Takeda K, Dong Z et al. Cutting edge: role of Toll-like receptor 1 in mediating immune response to microbial lipoproteins. J Immunol 2002; 169: 10–14.
Takeuchi O, Kawai T, Muhlradt PF, Morr M, Radolf JD, Zychlinsky A et al. Discrimination of bacterial lipoproteins by Toll-like receptor 6. Int Immunol 2001; 13: 933–940.
Lee CC, Avalos AM, Ploegh HL . Accessory molecules for Toll-like receptors and their function. Nat Rev Immunol 2012; 12: 168–179.
Kollmann TR, Levy O, Montgomery RR, Goriely S . Innate immune function by Toll-like receptors: distinct responses in newborns and the elderly. Immunity 2012; 37: 771–783.
Medzhitov R, Preston-Hurlburt P, Janeway CA Jr . A human homologue of the Drosophila Toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity. Nature 1997; 388: 394–397.
Jiang Z, Georgel P, Du X, Shamel L, Sovath S, Mudd S et al. CD14 is required for MyD88-independent LPS signaling. Nat Immunol 2005; 6: 565–570.
Nagai Y, Akashi S, Nagafuku M, Ogata M, Iwakura Y, Akira S et al. Essential role of MD-2 in LPS responsiveness and TLR4 distribution. Nat Immunol 2002; 3: 667–672.
Takeda K, Akira S . Toll-like receptors in innate immunity. Int Immunol 2005; 17: 1–14.
Liew FY, Xu D, Brint EK, O'Neill LA . Negative regulation of toll-like receptor-mediated immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 2005; 5: 446–458.
Seimon TA, Obstfeld A, Moore KJ, Golenbock DT, Tabas I . Combinatorial pattern recognition receptor signaling alters the balance of life and death in macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 19794–19799.
Schroder NW, Schumann RR . Single nucleotide polymorphisms of Toll-like receptors and susceptibility to infectious disease. Lancet Infect Dis 2005; 5: 156–164.
Ameziane N, Beillat T, Verpillat P, Chollet-Martin S, Aumont MC, Seknadji P et al. Association of the Toll-like receptor 4 gene Asp299Gly polymorphism with acute coronary events. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003; 23: e61–e64.
Balistreri CR, Candore G, Colonna-Romano G, Lio D, Caruso M, Hoffmann E et al. Role of Toll-like receptor 4 in acute myocardial infarction and longevity. JAMA 2004; 292: 2339–2340.
Koch W, Hoppmann P, Pfeufer A, Schomig A, Kastrati A . Toll-like receptor 4 gene polymorphisms and myocardial infarction: no association in a Caucasian population. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 2524–2529.
Edfeldt K, Bennet AM, Eriksson P, Frostegard J, Wiman B, Hamsten A et al. Association of hypo-responsive toll-like receptor 4 variants with risk of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 1447–1453.
Paul-Clark MJ, George PM, Gatheral T, Parzych K, Wright WR, Crawford D et al. Pharmacology and therapeutic potential of pattern recognition receptors. Pharmacol Ther 2012; 135: 200–215.
Ha T, Liu L, Kelley J, Kao R, Williams D, Li C . Toll-like receptors: new players in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Antioxid Redox Signal 2011; 15: 1875–1893.
Laird MH, Rhee SH, Perkins DJ, Medvedev AE, Piao W, Fenton MJ et al. TLR4/MyD88/PI3K interactions regulate TLR4 signaling. J Leukoc Biol 2009; 85: 966–977.
Williams DL, Ozment-Skelton T, Li C . Modulation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase signaling pathway alters host response to sepsis, inflammation, and ischemia/reperfusion injury. Shock 2006; 25: 432–439.
Flannery S, Bowie AG . The interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinases: critical regulators of innate immune signalling. Biochem Pharmacol 2010; 80: 1981–1991.
Yamamoto T, Tsutsumi N, Tochio H, Ohnishi H, Kubota K, Kato Z et al. Functional assessment of the mutational effects of human IRAK4 and MyD88 genes. Mol Immunol 2014; 58: 66–76.
Lin SC, Lo YC, Wu H . Helical assembly in the MyD88-IRAK4-IRAK2 complex in TLR/IL-1R signalling. Nature 2010; 465: 885–890.
Takeda K, Akira S . TLR signaling pathways. Semin Immunol 2004; 16: 3–9.
O'Neill LA, Bowie AG . The family of five: TIR-domain-containing adaptors in Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol 2007; 7: 353–364.
Vallejo JG . Role of toll-like receptors in cardiovascular diseases. Clin Sci (Lond) 2011; 121: 1–10.
Terrell AM, Crisostomo PR, Wairiuko GM, Wang M, Morrell ED, Meldrum DR . Jak/STAT/SOCS signaling circuits and associated cytokine-mediated inflammation and hypertrophy in the heart. Shock 2006; 26: 226–234.
Tatematsu M, Ishii A, Oshiumi H, Horiuchi M, Inagaki F, Seya T et al. A molecular mechanism for Toll-IL-1 receptor domain-containing adaptor molecule-1-mediated IRF-3 activation. J Biol Chem 2010; 285: 20128–20136.
O'Neill LA . How Toll-like receptors signal: what we know and what we don't know. Curr Opin Immunol 2006; 18: 3–9.
Sato S, Sugiyama M, Yamamoto M, Watanabe Y, Kawai T, Takeda K et al. Toll/IL-1 receptor domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-beta (TRIF) associates with TNF receptor-associated factor 6 and TANK-binding kinase 1, and activates two distinct transcription factors, NF-kappa B and IFN-regulatory factor-3, in the Toll-like receptor signaling. J Immunol 2003; 171: 4304–4310.
Meylan E, Burns K, Hofmann K, Blancheteau V, Martinon F, Kelliher M et al. RIP1 is an essential mediator of Toll-like receptor 3-induced NF-kappa B activation. Nat Immunol 2004; 5: 503–507.
Riad A, Westermann D, Zietsch C, Savvatis K, Becher PM, Bereswill S et al. TRIF is a critical survival factor in viral cardiomyopathy. J Immunol 2011; 186: 2561–2570.
Fuse K, Chan G, Liu Y, Gudgeon P, Husain M, Chen M et al. Myeloid differentiation factor-88 plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of Coxsackievirus B3-induced myocarditis and influences type I interferon production. Circulation 2005; 112: 2276–2285.
Bachmaier K, Toya S, Malik AB . Therapeutic administration of the chemokine CXCL1/KC abrogates autoimmune inflammatory heart disease. PLoS One 2014; 9: e89647.
Machino-Ohtsuka T, Tajiri K, Kimura T, Sakai S, Sato A, Yoshida T et al. Tenascin-C aggravates autoimmune myocarditis via dendritic cell activation and Th17 cell differentiation. J Am Heart Assoc 2014; 3: e001052.
Jenke A, Wilk S, Poller W, Eriksson U, Valaperti A, Rauch BH et al. Adiponectin protects against Toll-like receptor 4-mediated cardiac inflammation and injury. Cardiovasc Res 2013; 99: 422–431.
Frangogiannis NG . Inflammation in cardiac injury, repair and regeneration. Curr Opin Cardiol 2015; 30: 240–245.
Haas B, Leonard F, Ernens I, Rodius S, Vausort M, Rolland-Turner M et al. Adenosine reduces cell surface expression of toll-like receptor 4 and inflammation in response to lipopolysaccharide and matrix products. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2011; 4: 790–800.
Rohde D, Schon C, Boerries M, Didrihsone I, Ritterhoff J, Kubatzky KF et al. S100A1 is released from ischemic cardiomyocytes and signals myocardial damage via Toll-like receptor 4. EMBO Mol Med 2014; 6: 778–794.
Schiopu A, Cotoi OS . S100A8 and S100A9: DAMPs at the crossroads between innate immunity, traditional risk factors, and cardiovascular disease. Mediators Inflamm 2013; 2013: 828354.
Zhang W, Lavine KJ, Epelman S, Evans SA, Weinheimer CJ, Barger PM et al. Necrotic myocardial cells release damage-associated molecular patterns that provoke fibroblast activation in vitro and trigger myocardial inflammation and fibrosis in vivo. J Am Heart Assoc 2015; 4: e001993.
van der Pouw Kraan TC, Bernink FJ, Yildirim C, Koolwijk P, Baggen JM, Timmers L et al. Systemic toll-like receptor and interleukin-18 pathway activation in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2014; 67: 94–102.
Lu M, Tang F, Zhang J, Luan A, Mei M, Xu C et al. Astragaloside IV attenuates injury caused by myocardial ischemia/reperfusion in rats via regulation of Toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor-kappaB signaling pathway. Phytother Res 2015; 29: 599–606.
Cai W, Zhang Y, Li J, Wang J . Kappa-opioid receptor agonist U50, 488H attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusionvia modulating Toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor-kappaB signaling in rat. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 2014; 42: 866–872.
Liu QP, Pan KY, Zhou X, Yu HL, Han GL, Li YM et al. Dynamic expression of toll like receptor 2 and 4 in a rat model of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. Zhongguo Ying Yong Sheng Li Xue Za Zhi 2013; 29: 326–330.
Wang C, Sun H, Song Y, Ma Z, Zhang G, Gu X et al. Pterostilbene attenuates inflammation in rat heart subjected to ischemia-reperfusion: role of TLR4/NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015; 8: 1737–1746.
Hamacher-Brady A, Brady NR, Gottlieb RA . The interplay between pro-death and pro-survival signaling pathways in myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury: apoptosis meets autophagy. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2006; 20: 445–462.
Shimamoto A, Chong AJ, Yada M, Shomura S, Takayama H, Fleisig AJ et al. Inhibition of Toll-like receptor 4 with eritoran attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Circulation 2006; 114: I270–I274.
Chen Y, Rothnie C, Spring D, Verrier E, Venardos K, Kaye D et al. Regulation and actions of activin A and follistatin in myocardial ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Cytokine 2014; 69: 255–262.
Ha T, Li Y, Hua F, Ma J, Gao X, Kelley J et al. Reduced cardiac hypertrophy in toll-like receptor 4-deficient mice following pressure overload. Cardiovasc Res 2005; 68: 224–234.
Hua F, Ha T, Ma J, Li Y, Kelley J, Gao X et al. Protection against myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in TLR4-deficient mice is mediated through a phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent mechanism. J Immunol 2007; 178: 7317–7324.
Li C, Ha T, Kelley J, Gao X, Qiu Y, Kao RL et al. Modulating Toll-like receptor mediated signaling by (1—>3)-beta-D-glucan rapidly induces cardioprotection. Cardiovasc Res 2004; 61: 538–547.
Ehrentraut H, Weber C, Ehrentraut S, Schwederski M, Boehm O, Knuefermann P et al. The toll-like receptor 4-antagonist eritoran reduces murine cardiac hypertrophy. Eur J Heart Fail 2011; 13: 602–610.
Louwe MC, Karper JC, de Vries MR, Nossent AY, Bastiaansen AJ, van der Hoorn JW et al. RP105 deficiency aggravates cardiac dysfunction after myocardial infarction in mice. Int J Cardiol 2014; 176: 788–793.
Kanzler H, Barrat FJ, Hessel EM, Coffman RL . Therapeutic targeting of innate immunity with Toll-like receptor agonists and antagonists. Nat Med 2007; 13: 552–559.
Tidswell M, Tillis W, Larosa SP, Lynn M, Wittek AE, Kao R et al. Phase 2 trial of eritoran tetrasodium (E5564), a toll-like receptor 4 antagonist, in patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 72–83.
Opal SM, Laterre PF, Francois B, LaRosa SP, Angus DC, Mira JP et al. Effect of eritoran, an antagonist of MD2-TLR4, on mortality in patients with severe sepsis: the ACCESS randomized trial. JAMA 2013; 309: 1154–1162.
Fang H, Chen J, Lin S, Wang P, Wang Y, Xiong X et al. CD36-mediated hematoma absorption following intracerebral hemorrhage: negative regulation by TLR4 signaling. J Immunol 2014; 192: 5984–5992.
Jacobsen JH, Watkins LR, Hutchinson MR . Discovery of a novel site of opioid action at the innate immune pattern-recognition receptor TLR4 and its role in addiction. Int Rev Neurobiol 2014; 118: 129–163.
Basith S, Manavalan B, Lee G, Kim SG, Choi S . Toll-like receptor modulators: a patent review (2006-2010). Expert Opin Ther Pat 2011; 21: 927–944.
Wagner KB, Felix SB, Riad A . Innate immune receptors in heart failure: Side effect or potential therapeutic target? World J Cardiol 2014; 6: 791–801.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81422004, 81500263, 81470480, 81470477, 81100137, and 81100081), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M572681), National High-tech R&D Program of China (2014AA020514, 2015AA020919), and Technological New Star Program of Shaanxi Province (2014KJXX-56).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Edited P Di Nardo
Rights and permissions
Cell Death and Disease is an open-access journal published by Nature Publishing Group. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, Y., Lv, J., Jiang, S. et al. The emerging role of Toll-like receptor 4 in myocardial inflammation. Cell Death Dis 7, e2234 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2016.140
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2016.140
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Immunomodulation and immunopharmacology in heart failure
Nature Reviews Cardiology (2024)
-
Complement C3 mediates podocyte injury through TLR4/NFΚB-P65 signaling during ischemia–reperfusion acute kidney injury and post-injury fibrosis
European Journal of Medical Research (2023)
-
Sodium Glucose Transporter-2 Inhibitors (SGLT2Is)-TLRs Axis Modulates Diabetes
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics (2023)
-
Dapagliflozin protects against dilated cardiomyopathy progression by targeting NLRP3 inflammasome activation
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology (2023)
-
Hypertension: Potential Player in Cardiovascular Disease Incidence in Preeclampsia
Cardiovascular Toxicology (2022)