Skip to main content
Log in

Design by Morphogenesis

  • Published:
BT Technology Journal

Abstract

The process of morphogenesis is a natural example of genotype to phenotype mapping. As such it is relevant to evolutionary computation. A simulation of morphogenesis and cell interaction is presented, which allows embryogenesis to be addressed as an engineering problem. A space of cell control functions is defined by identifying the controlling variables and the degrees of freedom of each individual cell. These functions receive inputs dependent on a cell's context, and determine its responses to that context. Multiple cells are coupled through a simulation of a 3-D reaction-diffusion fluid matrix in order to generate interactive behaviour. The parameterised control function for the individual cells is tuned using a genetic algorithm to maximise the fitness of their collective behaviour. With use of an appropriate fitness function, the simulation is capable of producing the forms of early embryogenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tateson R: ‘The role of development in computational systems’, BT Technol J, 18, No 4, pp 85-94 (October 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bäck T, Hammel U and Schwefel H P: ‘Evolutionary computation: comments on the history and current state’, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 1, No 1 (July 1997).

  3. Thompson A and Layzell P: ‘Evolution of robustness in an electronics design’, in Proc 3rd Int Conf on Evolvable Systems, Springer Verlag (in press) (2000).

  4. Shipman R, Shackleton M, Ebner M and Watson R: ‘Neutral search spaces for artificial evolution: a lesson from life’, in Artificial Life VII: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference, Bedau M, McCaskill J, Packard N and Rasmussen S (Eds) (2000).

  5. Furusawa C and Kaneko K: ‘Emergence of differentiation rules leading to hierarchy and diversity’, in Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life, pp 172-181, Husbands P and Harvey I (Eds), MIT Press (1997).

  6. Eggenberger P: ‘Evolving morphologies of simulated 3d organisms based on differential gene expression’, in Proceedings of Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life, pp 205-213, Husbands P and Harvey I (Eds), MIT Press (1997).

  7. Savill N J and Hogeweg P: ‘Modelling morphogenesis: from single cells to crawling slugs’, J Theor Biol, 184, pp 229-235 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Glazier J A and Graner F: ‘Simulation of the differential adhesion driven rearrangements of biological cells’, Physical Review E, 47, No 3 (March 1993).

  9. Weliky M and G Oster: ‘The mechanical basis of cell rearrangement — 1: Epithelial Morphogenesis during Fundulus Epiboly’, Development, 109, pp 373-386 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kitano H, Hamahashi S, Kitazawa J, Takao K and Imai S: ‘Virtual biology laboratories’, in Proceedings of Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life, pp 274-283, Husbands P and Harvey I (Eds), MIT Press (1997).

  11. Slack J M W: ‘From Egg to Embryo’, Cambridge University Press (1991).

  12. Bonsma E, Shackleton M and Shipman R: ‘Eos — an evolutionary and ecosystem research platform’, BT Technol J, 18, No 4, pp 24-31 (October 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Edelman G M: ‘Bright air, brilliant fire: on the matter of the mind’, BasicBooks, New York (1992).

    Google Scholar 

Bibliography

  1. Alt A, Deutsch A and Dunn G (Eds): ‘Dynamics of cell and tissue motion’, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews E L: ‘Computer maker says tiny software flaw caused phone disruptions’, NY Times (July 1991).

  3. Gleick J: ‘Chaos — making a new science’, Heinemann (1988).

  4. Harvey I and Bossomaier T: ‘Time out of joint: attractors in asynchronous random Boolean networks’, in Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life, pp 67-75, Husbands P and Harvey I (Eds), MIT Press.

  5. Kauffman S: ‘The Origins of Order’, Oxford University Press, New York (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lyu M R (Ed): ‘Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering’, Institute of Electrical & Electronic Engineers, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meinhardt H: ‘The Algorithmic Beauty of Seashells’, Springer Verlag, Berlin (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Painter K J: ‘Chemotaxis as a mechanism for morphogenesis’, DPhil Thesis, University of Utah (1997).

  9. Pittenger M F, Mackay A M, Beck S C, Jaiswal R K, Douglas R, Mosca J D, Moorman M A, Simonetti D W, Craig S and Marshak D R: ‘Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells’, Science, 284, pp 143-147 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Slotine J J E: ‘Stability in adaptation and learning’, Animals to Animats, 3, pp 30-34, MIT Press (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stewart I: ‘Life's Other Secret’, Penguin (1998).

  12. Turing A: ‘The chemical basis of morphogenesis’, Phil Trans R Soc, B237, pp 37-72 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ward M and Seligsohn D: ‘Missing tests sent Ariane on path to doom’, New Scientist, p 10 (July 1990).

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Hoile, C., Tateson, R. Design by Morphogenesis. BT Technology Journal 18, 112–121 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026766911297

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026766911297

Keywords

Navigation