Skip to main content

The Geometry of Morphogenesis and the Morphogenetic Field Concept

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pattern Formation in Morphogenesis

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics ((PROM,volume 15))

Abstract

The process of morphogenesis, which can be defined as an evolution of the form of an organism, is one of the most intriguing mysteries in the life sciences. The discovery and description of the spatial–temporal distribution of the gene expression pattern during morphogenesis, together with its key regulators, is one of the main recent achievements in developmental biology. Nevertheless, gene expression patterns cannot explain the development of the precise geometry of an organism and its parts in space. Here, we suggest a set of postulates and possible approaches for discovering the correspondence between molecular biological information and its realization in a given geometry of an organism in space–time.

First, we suggest that the geometry of the organism and its parts is coded by a molecular code located on the cell surfaces in such a way that, with each cell, there can be associated a corresponding matrix, containing this code. As a particular model, we propose coding by several types of oligosaccharide residues of glycoconjugates.

Second, we provide a notion of cell event, and suggest a description of development as a tree of cell events, where by cell event we understand the changing of cell state, e.g. the processes of cell division, cell growth/death, cell shifting or cell differentiation.

Next we suggest describing cell motion laws using the notion of a “morphogenetic field”, meaning an object in an “event space” over a “cell space”, which governs the transformation of the coded biological information into an instructive signal for a cell event for a given cell, depending on the position of the cell in the developing embryo. The matrix on a cell surface will be changed after each cell event according to the rule(s) dictated by the morphogenetic field of an organism.

Finally, we provide some ideas about the connections between the morphogenetic code on the cell surface, cell motion law(s), and the geometry of an embryo.

This paper presents a set of ideas concerning the connection between biological information, encoded in the cells, and the realization of the geometrical form of a developing organism. Some suggestions are made for mathematical formalization of this connection. The active discussion of this and similar questions at the IHES Workshop (2010) indicated a strong interest in the subject. Therefore, we believe that, although this work is still far from finalized, it is worthwhile publishing this paper in order to stimulate further discussion. Hence, we strongly encourage the reader to independently consider the ideas, concepts and statements presented here in the framework of an integrated model, as it is possible that some of them may turn out to be unviable, while others may be of some interest and importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Albersheim P, Darvill A, Augur C, Cheong J, Eberhard S, Hahn MG, Marfa V, Mohnen D, O’Neill M (1992) Oligosaccharins: oligosaccharide regulatory molecules. Acc Chem Res 25(2):77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolouri H, Davidson EH (2010) The gene regulatory network basis of the “community effect,” and analysis of a sea urchin embryo example. Dev Biol 340(2):170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bourrillon R, Aubery M (1989) Cell surface glycoproteins in embryonic development. Inter Rev Cytol 116:257–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Courant R, Hilbert D (1962) Methods of mathematical physics, vol 2. Interscience, New York ea

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Crossin KL, Edelman GM (1992) Specific binding of cytotactin to sulfated glycolipids. J Neurosci Res 33(4):631–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davidson E (1993) Later embryogenesis: regulatory circuitry in morphogenetic fields. Development 118(3):665–690

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davidson E (1998) Specification of cell fate in the sea urchin embryo: summary and some proposed mechanisms. Development 125:3269–3290

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davidson EH, Rast JP, Oliveri P, Ransick A, Calestani C, Yuh CH, Minokawa T, Amore G, Hinman V, Arenas-Mena C, Otim O, Brown CT, Livi CB, Lee PY, Revilla R, Schilstra MJ, Clarke PJ, Rust AG, Pan Z, Arnone MI, Rowen L, Cameron RA, McClay DR, Hood L, Bolouri H (2002) A provisional regulatory gene network for specification of endomesoderm in the sea urchin embryo. Dev Biol 246(1):162–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Driesch H (1892) The potency of the first two cleavage cells in echinoderm development. Experimental production of partial and double formations. In: Willer BH, Openheimer JM (eds) Foundations of experimental embryology. Hafner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Edelman GM (1988) Topobiology: an introduction to molecular embryology. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Friedlander DR, Hoffman S, Edelman GM (1988) Functional mapping of cytotactin: proteolytic fragments active in cell-substrate adhesion. J Cell Biol 107(6 Pt 1):2329–2340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fry SC, Aldington S, Hetherington PR, Aitken J (1993) Oligosaccharides as signals and substrates in the plant cell wall. Plant Physiol 103(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fry SC (1994) Oligosaccharins as plant growth regulators. Biochem Soc Symp 60:5–14

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gilbert SF (1991) Developmental biology, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gilbert SF (2000) Developmental biology, 6th edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harrison RG (1918) Experiments on the development of the forelimb of Amblystoma, a self-differentiating equipotential system. J Exp Zool 25:413–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Horstadius S (1939) The mechanics of sea urchin development studied by operative methods. Biol Rev 14:132–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ito M, Takata K, Saito S, Aoyaki T, Hirano H (1985) Lectin binding pattern in normal human gastric mucosa: a light and electron microscopy study. Histochemistry 83:189–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson SW, Alhadeff JA (1991) Mammalian alpha-L-fucosidases. Comp Biochem Physiol B 99(3):479–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McNeil M, Darvill AG, Fry SC, Albersheim P (1984) Structure and function of the primary cell walls of plants. Ann Rev Biochem 53:625–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohnen D, Hahn MG (1993) Cell wall carbohydrates as signals in plants. Semin Cell Biol 4(2):93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morozova N, Bragina E, Vasiljeva V (2006) Dynamics and role of glycoconjugates of plant cell wall in embryoidogenesis. Phytomorphology 56(3&4):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nemanic MK, Whitehead IS, Elias PM (1983) Alterations in membrane sugars during epidermal differentiation: visualization with lectins and role of glucosidases. J Histochem Cytochem 86(N4):415–419

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ponder BA (1983) Lectinhistochemistry. In: Polak IM, van Noorden S (eds) Immunocytochemistry:practical applications in pathology and biology. Wright-PSG, Bristol, pp 129–142

    Google Scholar 

  25. Riou IF, Darribere T, Boucaut IC (1986) Cell surface glycoproteins change during gastrulation in Pieurodeles waltlii. J Cell Sci 82:23–40

    Google Scholar 

  26. Suprasert A, Pongchairerk U, Pongket P, Nishida T (1999) Lectin histochemical characterization of glycoconjugates present in abomasal epithelium of the goat. Kasetsart J Nat Sci 33:234–242

    Google Scholar 

  27. Spemann H (1938) Embryonic development and induction. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tan SS, Crossin KL, Hoffman S, Edelman GM (1987) Asymmetric expression in somites of cytotactin and its proteoglycan ligand is correlated with neural crest cell distribution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84(22):7977–7981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Taatjes DJ, Roth J (1991) Glycosylation in intestinal epithelium. Int Rev Cytol 126:135–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Thom R (1983) Mathematical modeling of morphogenesis. Ellis Horwood, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  31. Thom R (1989) Structural stability and morphogenesis: an outline of a general theory of models. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Advanced Book Program, Redwood City, CA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Tran Thanh Van K, Tonbart P, Cousson A, Darvill AG, Gollin DJ, Chelf P, Albersheim P (1985) Manipulation of the morphogenetic pathways of tobaco by oligosaccharins. Nature 314(6012):615–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. de Vries SC, Booij H, Janssens RVR, Saris L, LoSchiavo F, Terzi M, van Kammen A (1988) Carrot somatic embryogenesis depends on phytohormone-controlled presence of correctly glycosylated extracellular proteins. Genes Dev 2:462–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Waddington CH (1956) Principles of embryology. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Weiss P (1939) Principles of development. Holt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wolpert L (1977) The development of pattern and form in animals. Carolina Biological, Burlington, NC

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zablackis E, York WS, Pauly M, Hantus S, Reiter WD, Chapple CC, Albersheim P, Darvill A (1996) Substitution of L-fucose by L-galactose in cell walls of Arabidopsis mur1. Science 272(5269):1808–1810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zuzack IS, Tasca RI (1985) Lectin-induced blocage of developing processes in preimplantation mouse embryos in vitro. Gamete Res 12(3):275–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadya Morozova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Morozova, N., Shubin, M. (2013). The Geometry of Morphogenesis and the Morphogenetic Field Concept. In: Capasso, V., Gromov, M., Harel-Bellan, A., Morozova, N., Pritchard, L. (eds) Pattern Formation in Morphogenesis. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics, vol 15. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20164-6_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics