Skip to main content
Log in

L- and M-cone driven large-field and multifocal electroretinograms in sector retinitis pigmentosa

  • Published:
Documenta Ophthalmologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose was to study long- (L-) and middle-wavelength-sensitive (M-) cone-driven ERGs and multifocal ERGs (mfERGs) in sector retinitis pigmentosa (sector RP). Two eyes of two patients with sector RP were measured. ERG responses were measured to stimuli which modulated exclusively the L- or the M-cones or the two simultaneously (both in-phase and in counter-phase) with predefined cone contrast leaving the S-cones unmodulated. For comparison, mfERGs were recorded with the visual evoked response imaging system, using a resolution of 61 hexagonal elements within a 30-degree visual field. The two sector RP patients exhibited a general reduction of the L-/M-cone driven ERG sensitivity. Patient 1 exhibited a slight delay of the M-cone driven ERG. In patient 2, L-cone driven ERG was moderately delayed. In both patients, the phases of the L- and the M-cone driven ERGs were positively correlated with cone contrast. The data of the L/M-cone driven ERGs, the mfERGs and the standard photopic ERGs matched each other qualitatively. We conclude that the sector RP patients were clearly different from normal for both the L- and M-cone driven large-field and the multifocal ERGs. Previously, we investigated L- and M-cone driven ERGs in patients with generalized RP and found several features that differ from the sector RP patients. Our data are in agreement with our previous proposition that amplitudes and phases of the L- and M-cone driven ERGs can be differently affected by retinal disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bietti GB. Su alcune forme atipiche o rare di degenerazione retina (degenerazioni tuppeto-retiniche e quardi morbosi similari). Boll Oculist 1937; 16: 1159–1244.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Grover S, Fishman GA, Alexander KR, Anderson RJ, Derlacki DJ. Visual acuity impairment in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology 1996; 103: 1593–1600.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Grover S, Fishman GA, Anderson RJ, Tozatti MS, Heckenlively JR, Weleber RG, Edwards AO, Brown J. Visual acuity impairment in patients with retinitis pigmentosa at age 45 years or older. Ophthalmology 1999; 106: 1780–1785.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krill AE, Archer D, Martin D. Sector retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Ophthalmol 1970; 69: 977–987.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vukovich V. Das ERG bei Retinitis pigmentosa (Retinopathia pigmentosa) mit bitemporalem Gesichtsfeldausfall. Albrecht von Graefes Arch Klin Ophthalmol 1959; 161: 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berson EL, Howard J. Temporal aspects of the electroretinogram in sector retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol 1971; 86: 653–665.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abraham FA. Sector retinitis pigmentosa. Electrophysiological and psychophysical study of the visual system. Doc Ophthalmol 1975; 39: 13–28.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Massof RW, Finkelstein D. Vision threshold profiles in sector retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 97: 1899–1904.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farber MD, Fishman GA, Weiss RA. Autosomal dominantly inherited retinitis pigmentosa. Visual acuity loss by subtype. Arch Ophthalmol 1985; 103: 524–528.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marmor MF. Visual loss in retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Ophthalmol 1980; 89: 692–698.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hellner KA, Rickers J. Familiary bilateral segmental retinopathia pigmentosa. Ophthalmologica 1973; 166: 327–341.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fulton AB, Hansen RM. The relation of rhodopsin and scotopic retinal sensitivity in sector retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Ophthalmol 1988; 105: 132–140.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moore AT, Fitzke FW, Kemp CM, Arden GB, Keen TJ, Inglehearn CF, Bhattacharya SS, Bird AC. Abnormal dark adaptation kinetics in autosomal dominant sector retinitis pigmentosa due to rod opsin mutation. Br J Ophthalmol 1992; 76: 465–469.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Berson EL, Kanters L. Cone and rod responses in a family with recessively inherited retinitis pigmentosa. Arch Ophthalmol 1970; 84: 288–297.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Berson EL, Gouras P, Hoff M. Temporal aspects of the electroretinogram. Arch Ophthalmol 1969; 81: 207–214.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Berson EL. Retinitis pigmentosa. The Friedenwald Lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34: 1659–1676.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kremers J, Usui T, Scholl HPN, Sharpe LT. Cone signal contributions to electroretinograms in dichromats and trichromats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 920–930.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Usui T, Kremers J, Sharpe LT, Zrenner E. Flicker cone electroretinogram in dichromats and trichromats. Vision Res 1998; 38: 3391–3396.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Usui T, Kremers J, Sharpe LT, Zrenner E. Response phase of the flicker electroretinogram (ERG) is influenced by cone excitation strength. Vision Res 1998; 38: 3247–3251.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scholl HPN, Kremers J. Large phase differences between L-cone and M-cone driven electroretinograms in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 3225–3233.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Seeliger M, Kretschmann U, Apfelstedt SE, Rüther K, Zrenner E. Multifocal electroretinography in retinitis pigmentosa. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 125: 214–226.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Marmor MF, Zrenner E. Standard for clinical electroretinography (1999 update). International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. Doc Ophthalmol 1998; 97: 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stockman A, MacLeod DIA, Johnson NE. Spectral sensitivities of the human cones. J Opt Soc Am A 1993; 10: 2491–2521.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kremers J, Scholl HPN, Knau H, Berendschot TTJM, Usui T, Sharpe LT. L-and M-cone ratios in human trichromats assessed by psychophysics, electroretinography and retinal densitometry. J Opt Soc Am A 2000; 17: 517–526.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sutter EE. The fast m-transform: a fast computation of crosscorrelations with binary m-sequences. Soc Ind Appl Math J Comput 1991; 20: 686–694.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sutter EE. A deterministic approach to nonlinear systems analysis; In: Pinter RB, Nabet B, eds. Nonlinear vision: determination of neural receptive fields, function, and networks. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1992: 171–220.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hood DC, Seiple W, Holopigian K, Greenstein V. A comparison of the components of the multifocal and full-field ERGs. Vis Neurosci 1997; 14: 533–544.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Scholl HPN, Kremers J, Apfelstedt-Sylla E, Zrenner E. L-and M-cone driven ERGs are differently altered in Best's macular dystrophy. Vision Res 2000; 40: 3159–3168.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sutter EE, Tran D. The field topography of ERG components in man – I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res 1992; 32: 433–446.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kretschmann U, Seeliger M, Ruether K, Usui T, Zrenner E. Spatial cone activity distribution in diseases of the posterior pole determined by multifocal electroretinography. Vision Res 1998; 38: 3817–3828.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Scholl HPN, Kremers J, Vonthein R, White K, Weber BH. Land M-cone driven electroretinograms in Stargardt's macular dystrophy-Fundus flavimaculatus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42: 1380–1389.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Williams DR, Roorda A. The trichromatic cone mosaic in the human eye; In: Gegenfurtner KR, Sharpe LT, eds. Color vision: From genes to perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999: 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scholl, H.P., Kremers, J. L- and M-cone driven large-field and multifocal electroretinograms in sector retinitis pigmentosa. Doc Ophthalmol 106, 171–181 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022505204826

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022505204826

Navigation