Skip to main content
Log in

A study of the cellular response to orientated fibronectin material in healing extensor rat tendon

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

3D orientated fibronectin (Fn) mats have been used as biocompatible and biodegradeable scaffolds to provide orientated cues using contact guidance for cell migration/adhesion and deposition of extracellular matrix. We have implanted Fn scaffolds in an established rat tendon(partial tenotomy) injury model to test its efficacy and monitor the early cellular and inflammatory response. Tendons were harvested at 0, 6 h, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14 days for H&E, immunohistochemistry and TEM. Total cell counts within the window increased progressively with time with no significant differences between the Fn scaffolds and controls. CD45 (pan leukocyte) positive cell numbers peaked at 6 h and when expressed as a percentage of total cell counts as determined by H&E staining constituted 20% of the total cell number at 6 h but decreased to 5% of total number by 72 h. There were no significant differences in the inflammatory response between the control and implanted groups. Few CD44 (mesenchymal stem cell) positive cells identified had a surface location. A novel cell with long exaggerated cytoplasmic processes was identified by TEM. Our results show that the Fn scaffold did not degrade or elicit any untoward inflammatory response at the time points tested and has potential use in guiding the repair process.

© 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Langer and J. P. Vacanti, Science 280 (1993) 920-926

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. A. F. Clark, J. M. Lanigan and P. Dellapelle, Invest. Dermatol. 79 (1982) 264-269.

    Google Scholar 

  3. O. S. Ejim, G. W. Blunn and R. A. Brown, Biomaterials 14 (1993) 743-748.

    Google Scholar 

  4. I. H. Whitworth, R. A. Brown and C. Dore, J. Hand Surg. 4 (1995) 429-436.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Z. A. Ahmed and R. A. Brown, Cell Motil. Cytoskel. 42 (1999) 331-343.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. A. Brown, G. W. Blunn and O. S. Ejim, Biomaterials 15(6) (1994)

  7. C. A. Matthew, M. J. Moore and L. Campbell, J. Hand Surg. 12B(3) (1997), 313-320.

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. Roitt, J. Brostoff and D. Male, in “Immunology” (Mosby International Ltd, London, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. F. Pettinger, A. M. Mackay, S. C. Beck, R. K. Jaiswal and R. Douglas, Science 284 (1999) 143-147.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. H. Gelberman, J. S. Vandeburg, P. R. Manske and W. H. Akeson, J. Hand Surg. 10A (1985) 776-784.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. P. Mass and R. J. Tuel, J. Hand Surg. 16A (1991) 24-31.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. C. Iwuagwu and D. A. Mcgrouther, Plastic and Reconst. Surg. 102(6) (1998) 2064-2071.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. A. F. Clark, in “Molecular and Cell Biology of Wound Repair” Second edition (Plenum Press, New York, 1993) 3-50.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Wojciak-Stothard, M. Denyer, M. Mishra and R. A. Brown, In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 33 (1997) 110-117.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Amiel, R. Gelberman, F. Harwood and D. Siegel, Matrix. 11 (1991) 184-189.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. H. Gelberman, D. Steinberg, D. Amiel and W. Akesin, J. Hand Surg. 16A(4) (1991) 686-693.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Kakar, U. Khan and D. A. Mcgrouther, J. Hand Surg. 23B(5) (1998) 627-632.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. M. Frish and H. Francis, J. Cell Biol. 124(4) (1994) 619-626.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. A. Elliott Jr., in “Plastic Surgery” (WB Saunders and Company, New York, 1990) 4567.

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. O. Abrahamsson, Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 23(Suppl.) (1991) 1-51.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. R. R. Bjornson, R. L. Rietza, B. A. Reynolds, M. C. Magh and A. L. Vascovi, Science 283 (1999) 534-537.

    Google Scholar 

  22. P. Seale and M. A. Rudwick, Dev. Biol. 218 (2000) 115-124.

    Google Scholar 

  23. B. E. Peterson, W. C. Bowan, K. D. Patrane, W. M. Mars, A. K. Sullivan, N. Murane, S. S. Briggs and J. S. Greenburger, Science 284 (1999) 1168-1170.

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. Francis, R. Ramakirishna, W. Holloway and Palsson, Blood 92(10) 3616-3623.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Mudera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zavahir, F., Mcgrouther, D.A., Misra, A. et al. A study of the cellular response to orientated fibronectin material in healing extensor rat tendon. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 12, 1005–1011 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012877504092

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012877504092

Keywords

Navigation