Skip to main content
Log in

Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse

  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

We investigated the functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse in 29 patients at least 12 months postoperatively. Twenty patients were evaluated completely pre- and postoperatively (median 22 months postoperatively, range 12 to 54 months). Six patients were interviewed by telephone, two patients were lost to follow-up, and one patient died of causes unrelated to rectal prolapse. Patients underwent a proctologic examination, anoscopy, rigid sigmoidoscopy, fluoroscopic defecography, and anorectal manometry pre- and postoperatively, and an additional standardized interview postoperatively. Anorectal manometry showed a significant increase in maximum anal resting and squeeze pressures postoperatively (resting pressure 72 ±8 vs. 95 ±13 mm Hg, pre- vs. postoperatively; P = 0.046; squeeze pressure 105 ±17 vs. 142 ±19 mm Hg, pre- vs. postoperatively; P = 0.035), and continence improved postoperatively (Wexner incontinence score 6.0 ±1.0 vs. 3.9 ± 0.8 pre- vs. postoperatively, P = 0.02). Twenty (77%) of 26 patients were satisfied with the operative result, but functional morbidity was observed in four patients, with two patients complaining of severe evacuation problems. Rectal prolapse recurred in one patient 42 months postoperatively (recurrence rate 1 [3.8%] of 26 patients). Functional results were very similar to those obtained after open rectopexy, with symptoms of prolapse and incontinence improved in the great majority of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrews NJ, Jones DJ. Rectal prolapse and associated condi- tions. Br Med J 1992;305:243–246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Keighley MRB. Rectal prolapse. In Keighley MRB, Williams NS, eds. Surgery of the Anus, Rectum and Colon. London: WB Saunders, 1993, pp 675–719.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Corman ML. Rectal prolapse, solitary rectal ulcer, syndrome of the descending perineum, and rectocele. In Corman ML, ed. Colon and Rectal Surgery, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippin- cott-Raven, 1998, pp 401–448.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Madaff RD. Rectal prolapse and intussusception. In Beck DE, Wexner SD, eds. Fundamentals of Anorectal Surgery, 2nd ed. London: WB Saunders, 1998, pp 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Senapati A. Rectal prolapse. In Phillips RKS, ed. Colorectal Surgery. London: WB Saunders, 1998, pp 217–236.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Agachan F, Reissman P, Pfeifer J, Weiss E, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Comparison of three perineal procedures for the treatment of rectal prolapse. South Med J 1997;90:925–932.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pescatori M, Intcrisano A, Stolfi VM, Zoffoli M. Delorme’s operation and sphincteroplasty for rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis 1998;13:223–227.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Deen KI, Grant E, Billingham C, Keighley MRB. Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994;81:302–304.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuijpers HO. Treatment of complete rectal prolapse: To nar- row, to wrap, to suspend, to fix, to encircle, to plicate or to re-sect? World J Surg 1992;16:826–830.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wells C. New operation for rectal prolapse. Proc R Soc Med 1959;52:602–603.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Baker R, Senagore AJ, Luchtefeld MA. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open resection. Rectopexy offers excellent results. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:199–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Solomon MJ, Eyers AA. Laparoscopic rectopexy using mesh fixation with a spiked chromium staple. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:279–284.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal in- continence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:76–97.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jehle EC, Haehnel T, Starlinger MJ, Becker HD. Level of the anastomosis does not influence functional outcome after an- terior rectal resection for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 1995; 169:147–153.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Banerjee AK, Jehle EC, Kreis ME, Schott UG, Claussen CD, Becker HD, Starlinger M, Buess GF. Prospective study of the proctographic and functional consequences of transanal en- doscopie microsurgery. Br J Surg 1996;83:211–213.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kreis ME, Jehle EC, Haug V, Manncke K, Buess GF, Becker HD, Starlinger MJ. Functional results after transanal endo- scopie microsurgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1116–1121.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moreira H, Wexner SD. Anorectal physiologic testing. In Beck DE, Wexner SD, eds. Fundamentals of Anorectal Sur- gery, 2nd ed. London: WB Saunders, 1998, pp 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Braunschweig R, Schott U, Starlinger M. Evakuationsprok- tographie. Untersuchungstechnik und Auswertemethodik. Ra- diol Diagn 1993;34:389–395.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goei R, Kemerink G. Radiation dose in defecography. Ra- diology 1990;176:137–139.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: Results and impli- cations. Gut 1989;30:1737–1749.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mellgren A, Bremmer S.Johansson C, Dolk A, Uden R, Ahlbäck S-O, Holmström B. Defecography. Results of inves- tigations in 2816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1133–1141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Allen-Mersh TG, Henry MM, Nicholls RJ. Natural history of anterior mucosal prolapse. Br J Surg 1987;74:679–682.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Delemarre JBVM, Kruyt RH, Doornbos J, Buyze-Westerweel M, Trimbos B, Hermans J, Gooszen HG. Anterior rectocele: Assessment with radiographie defecography, dynamic mag- netic resonance imaging, and physical examination. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:249–259.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Berman IR. Sutureless laparoscopic rectopexy for prociden- tia. Technique and implications. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:689–693.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cuesta MA, Borgstein PJ, de Jong D, Meijer S. Laparoscopic rectopexy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993;3:456–458.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Poen AC, de Brauw M, Felt-Bersma RJF, de Jong D, Cuesta MA. Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Clinical outcome and anorectal function tests. Surg Endosc 1996;10:904–908.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Herold A, Burch HP. Laparoskopische Rektopexie. Zentralbl Chir 1997;122:578–585.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stevenson ARL, Stitz RW, Lumley JW. Laparoscopic-assisted resection-rcctopexy for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Recrum 1998;41:46–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Himpens J, Cadiere GB, Bruyns J, Vertruyen M. Laparoscopic rectopexy according to Wells. Surg Endosc 1999; 13:139–141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Winde G, Reers B, Nottberg H, Berns T, Meyer J, Bunte H. Clinical and functional results of abdominal rectopexy with absorbable mesh-graft for treatment of complete rectal pro- lapse. Eur J Surg 1993;159:30l-305.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cuschieri A, Shimi SA1, van der Velpen G, Banting S, Wood RAB. Laparoscopie prothesis fixation rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994;81:138–139.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Darzi A, Henry MM, Guillou PJ, Shorvon P, Monson JRT. Stapled laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Surg En- dosc 1995;9:301–303.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Graf W, Stefansson T, Arvidsson D, Pahlman L. Laparoscopic suture rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:211–212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Atkinson KG, Taylor DC. Wells procedure for complete rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:96–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Blatchford GJ, Perry RE, Thorson AG, Christensen MA. Rectopexy without resection for rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 1989;158:574–576.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Broden G, Dolk A, Holmström B. Recovery of the internal anal sphincter following rectopexy: A possible explanation for continence improvement. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:23–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Huber FT, Stein H, Siewert JR. Functional results after treat- ment of rectal prolapse with rectopexy and sigmoid resection. World J Surg 1995;19:138–143.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Parks AG, Swash M, Urich H. Sphincter denervation in anorec- tal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Gut 1977;18:656–665.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Neill ME, Parks AG, Swash M. Physiological studies of the anal sphincter musculature in faecal incontinence and rectal prolapse. BrJ Surg 1981;68:S31–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kiff ES, Barnes PRH, Swash M. Evidence of pudendal neu- ropathy in patients with perineal descent and chronic straining at stool. Gut 1984;25:1279–1282.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Metcalf AM, Loening-Baucke V. Anorectal function and defe- cation dynamics in patients with rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 1988;155:206–210.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Birnbaum EH, Stamm L, Rafferty JF, Fry RD, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency influ- ences surgical outcome in treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1215–1221.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Williams GJ, Wong WD, Jensen L, Rothenberger DA, Gold-berg SM. Incontinence and rectal prolapse: A prospective manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:209–216.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Yoshioka K, Hyland G, Keighley MRB. Anorectal function af- ter abdominal rectopexy: Parameters of predictive value in identifying return of continence. Br J Surg 1989;76:64–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Hiltunen K-M, Matikainen M. Improvement of continence after abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;7:8–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Briel JW, Schouten WR, Boerma MO. Long-term results of suture rectopexy in patients with fecal incontinence associated with rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1228–1232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Farouk R, Duthie GS, Bartolo DCC, MacGregor AB. Restoration of continence following rectopexy for rectal pro- lapse and recovery of the internal anal sphincter electromyo- gram. Br J Surg 1992;79:439–440.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Athanasiadis S, Heiligers J, Kuprian A, Heumüller L. Chirur- gische Therapie des Rektumprolapscs mittels Rectopexie und Resektion. Chirurg 1995;66:27–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. SayfanJ, PinhoM, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MRB. Su- tured posterior abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy compared with Marlex rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1990;77:143–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Delemarre JBVM, Gooszen HG, Kruyt RH, Soebhag R, Maas Geesteranus A. The effect of posterior rectopexy on fe- cal continence. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:311–316.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Bartolo DCC. Rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1996;83:3–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Siproudhis L, Ropert A, Gosselin A, Bretagne J-F, Heresbach D, Raoul J-L, Gosselin M. Constipation after rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Dig Dis Sei 1993;38:1801–1808.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Madoff RD, Williams JG, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Long-term functional results of colon resec- tion and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapse. Am J Gastroen- terol 1992;87:101–104.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Keighley MRB, Shouler PJ. Abnormalities of colonie function in patients with rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1984;71:892–895.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Karlbom U, Pahlman L, Nilsson S, Graf W. Relationship be- tween defecographic findings, rectal emptying, and colonic transit time in constipated patients. Gut 1995;36:907–912.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Spence-Jones C, Kamm MA, Henry MM, Hudson CN. Bowel dysfunction: A pathogenic factor in uterovaginal pro- lapse and urinary stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984;25:1279–1282.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Scaglia M, Fasth S, Hallgren T, Nordgren S, Oresland T, Hulten L. Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:805–813.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. McKee RF, Lauder JC, Poon FW, Aitchison M, Finlay IG. A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;174:145–148.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Luukkonen P, Mikkonen U, Järvinen H. Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: A prospective randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;7:219–222.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tilman T. Zittel M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zittel, T.T., Manncke, K., Haug, S. et al. Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. J Gastrointest Surg 4, 632–641 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(00)80114-6

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1091-255X(00)80114-6

Key words

Navigation