Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic-assisted resection-rectopexy for rectal prolapse

Early and medium follow-up

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Objectives of this study were to describe the technique of laparoscopic-assisted resection rectopexy and audit the clinical outcomes, including review of functional results. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected for duration of operation, time to passage of flatus and feces postoperatively, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. Follow-up was performed by an independent assessor using a standardized questionnaire. Patients were also assessed by clinical review or telephone interview. RESULTS: During a four-year period, 34 patients underwent laparoscopic repair for rectal prolapse, of which 30 patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted resection rectopexy. Median duration of the operations was 185 minutes, median time for passage of flatus was two days postoperatively, and median length of hospital stay was five days. Morbidity was 13 percent and mortality rate was 3 percent. Comparison between the first ten patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted resection rectopexy and the last ten revealed a significant reduction in both median duration of operating time (224vs. 163 minutes;P<0.005) and length of stay (6vs. 4 days;P<0.015). Follow-up study conducted at a median time of 18 months revealed that most patients (92 percent) felt that the operation had improved their symptoms, that incontinence was improved in 14 of 20 patients with impaired continence (70 percent), and that constipation was improved in 64 percent. Symptoms of incomplete emptying and the need to strain at stool were both improved in 62 and 59 percent of patients, respectively. No full-thickness recurrences have occurred, but two patients have had mucosal prolapse detected (7 percent) and treated. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-assisted resection rectopexy is feasible and safe, with acceptable recurrence rates and functional results compared with the open procedure in the surgical literature. There is rapid return of intestinal function associated with an early discharge from hospital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deen KI, Grant E, Billingham C, Keighley MR. Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repairversus perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994;81:302–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kupfer CA, Goligher JC. One hundred consecutive cases of complete prolapse of the rectum treated by operation. Br J Surg 1970;57:481–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lockhart-Mummery HE. Symposium. Procidentia: recent experiences in the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1972;15:347–50.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buls JG. Rectal prolapse. In: Fazio VW, ed. Current therapy in colon and rectal surgery. Philadelphia: BC Decker, 1990:92–7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fryckman HM, Goldberg SM. The surgical treatment of rectal procidentia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1969;129:125–30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sayfan J, Pinho M, Alexander-Williams J, Keighley MR. Sutured posterior abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy compared with Marlex mesh rectopexy. Br J Surg 1990;77:143–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques. Br J Surg 1992;79:107–13.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. A comparison between Marlex and resection rectopexy. Neth J Surg 1989;41:136–9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McKee RF, Lauder JC, Poon FW, Aitchison MA, Finlay IG. A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;174:145–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Solomon MJ, Eyers AA. Laparoscopic rectopexy using mesh fixation with a spiked chromium staple. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:279–84.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Henry LG, Cattey RP. Rectal prolapse. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:357–60.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baker R, Senagore AJ, Lutchtefeld MA. Laparoscopic-assistedvs. open resection: rectopexy offers excellent results. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kwok SP, Carey DP, Lau WY, Li AK. Laparoscopic rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:947–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Graf W, Stefansson T, Arvidson D, Pahlmann L. Laparoscopic suture rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:211–2.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cuschieri A, Shimi SM, Vander Velpen G, Banting S, Wood R. Laparoscopic prosthesis fixation rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994;81:138–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Darzi A, Henry MM, Guillou PJ, Shorvon P, Monson JR. Stapled laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Surg Endosc 1995;9:301–3.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ballantyne GH. Laparoscopically assisted anterior resection for rectal prolapse. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992;2:230–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Teoh T-A, Reissman P, Weiss EG, Verzaro R, Wexner SD. Enhancing cosmesis in laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:213–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Falk PM Beart RW Jr, Wexner SD,et al. Laparoscopic colectomy: a critical appraisal. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Senagore AJ, Lutchefeld MA, MacKeigan JM, Mazier WP. Open colectomyversus laparoscopic colectomy: are there differences? Am Surg 1993;59:549–54.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eger EI, Saidman LJ. Hazards of nitrous oxide anaesthesia in bowel obstruction and pneumothorax. Anesthesiology 1965;26:61–6.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Scheinin B, Lindgren L, Scheinin TM. Peroperative nitrous oxide delays bowel function after colonic surgery. Br J Anaesth 1990;64:154–8.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Erkola O. Nitrous oxide: laparoscopic surgery, bowel function, and PONV. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994;38:767–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Altmeier WA, Culbertson WR, Schowengerdy C, Hunt J. Nineteen years experience with the one-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse. Ann Surg 1971;173:993–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Watts JD, Rothenberger DA, Buls JG, Goldberg SM, Nivatvongs S. The management of procidentia: 30 years experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:96–102.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Prasad ML, Pearl RK, Abcarian H, Orsay CP, Nelson RL. Perineal proctectomy, posterior rectopexy, and postanal levator repair for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:547–52.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Christiansen J, Kirkegaard P. Delorme's operation for complete rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1981;68:537–8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ejerblad S, Krause U. Repair of rectal prolapse by rectosacral suture fixation. Acta Chir Scand 1988;154:103–5.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Keighley MR, Fielding JW, Alexander-Williams J. Results of Marlex mesh abdominal rectopexy for rectal prloapse in 100 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 1983;70:229–32.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hiltunen KM, Matikainen M. Improvement of continence after abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;7:8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Huber FT, Stein H, Siewert JR. Functional results after treatment of rectal prolapse with rectopexy and sigmoid resection. World J Surg 1995;19:138–43.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mann CV, Hoffman C. Complete rectal prolapse: the anatomical and functional results of treatment by extended abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 1988;75:34–7.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Thompson JP, Ross AH. Management of infection after prosthetic abdominal rectopexy (Wells procedure). Br J Surg 1989;76:610–2.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Madoff RD, Williams JG, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Long-term functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapse. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:101–4.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gordon PH, Hoexter B. Complications of the Ripstein procedure. Dis Colon Rectum 1978;21:277–80.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Broden G, Dolk A, Holmstrom B. Evacuation difficulties and other characteristics of rectal function associated with procidentia and the Ripstein operation. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:283–6.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrences: results of a prospective, randomised study. Br J Surg 1991;78:1431–3.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Scaglia M, Fasth S, Hallgren T, Nordgren S, Oresland T, Hutlen L. Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: influence of surgical technique on functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:805–13.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Farouk R, Duthie GS, MacGregor AB, Bartolo DC. Rectoanal inhibition and incontinence in patients with rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994;81:743–6.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Farouk R, Duthie GS, Bartolo DC, MacGregor AB. Restoration of continence following rectopexy for rectal prolapse is associated with recovery of the internal anal electromyogram. Br J Surg 1992;79:439–40.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Neill ME, Parks AG, Swash M. Physiological studies of the anal sphincter musculature in feacal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1981;68:531–6.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cirocco WC, Brown AC. Anterior resection for the treatment of rectal prolapse: a 20 year experience. Am Surg 1993;5:265–9.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Atkinson KG, Taylor DC. Wells procedure for complete rectal prolapse: a ten-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:96–8.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Penfold JC, Hawley PR. Experiences of Ivalon-sponge implant for complete rectal prolapse at St. Mark's Hospital, 1960–1970. Br J Surg 1972;59:846–8.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Solla JA, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Surgical techniques in prolapse of the rectum. Langenbecks Arch Chir 1989;6:370–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. From the Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

    Andrew R. L. Stevenson M.B., B.S. (F.R.A.C.S.), Russell W. Stitz M.B., B.S. (F.R.C.S., F.R.A.C.S.) & John W. Lumley M.B., B.S. (F.R.A.C.S.)

Authors
  1. Andrew R. L. Stevenson M.B., B.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Russell W. Stitz M.B., B.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John W. Lumley M.B., B.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Read at the meeting of The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Brisbane, Australia, May 11 to 15, 1997.

About this article

Cite this article

Stevenson, A.R.L., Stitz, R.W. & Lumley, J.W. Laparoscopic-assisted resection-rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 41, 46–54 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236895

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236895

Key words

Search

Navigation