Skip to main content
Log in

Functional results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: Compared with traditional operations, superior results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for rectal tumors have been demonstrated in terms of morbidity and mortality. However, no data were available on functional outcome after TEM. We, therefore, studied 42 patients who were undergoing TEM. METHODS: Patients were examined by anorectal manometry and participated in a standardized interview preoperatively and three months and one year after surgery. RESULTS: Anorectal function as assessed by manometry was impaired three months after surgery but improved again during the first postoperative year. In parallel, some patients complained of impaired continence or defecation disorders in the interview three months postoperatively. These functions improved during the first year after surgery, too. CONCLUSIONS: Correct comparison of our results with functional outcome after anterior rectal resection is impossible. We feel, however, that functional results after TEM are likely to be superior to those after anterior resection for rectal tumors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975;36:2251–70.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hermanek P, Frühmorgen P, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Altendorf A, Matek W. The malignant potential of colorectal polyps—a new statistical approach. Endoscopy 1983;15:16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boland CR. The biology of colorectal cancer: implications for pretreatment and follow-up management. Cancer 1993;71(12 Suppl):4180–6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gilbertsen VA. Proctosigmoidoscopy and polypectomy in reducing the incidence of rectal cancer. Cancer 1974;34:936–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hermanek P, Gall FP. Early (microinvasive) colorectal carcinoma—pathology, diagnosis, surgical treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986;1:79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kessler H, Hermanek P, Wiebelt H. Operative mortality in carcinoma of the rectum. Int J Colorectal Dis 1993;8:158–66.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Fung C,et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:480–6. Comment in: Dis Colon Rectum 1996;38:486–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kirwan WO, O'Riordain MG, Waldron R. Declining indications for abdominoperineal resection. Br J Surg 1990;77:510–2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ. Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1993;341:457–60.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kraske P. Zur exstirpation hochsitzender mast-darmkrebse. Verh Dtsch Ges Chir 1885;14:464–74.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mason AY. Malignant tumors of the rectum: local excision. Clin Gastroenterol 1975;4:582–93.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mason AY. Trans-sphincteric surgery of the rectum. Prog Surg 1974;13:66–97.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parks AG. A technique for excising extensive villous papillomatous change in the lower rectum. J R Soc Med 1968;61:441–2.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buess G, Mentges B, Manncke K, Starlinger M, Becker HD. Technique and results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in early rectal cancer. Am J Surg 1992;163: 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mayer J, Mortensen NJ. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a forgotten minimally invasive operation. Br J Surg 1995;82:435–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Buess G, Mentges B, Manncke K, Starlinger M, Becker HD. Minimal invasive surgery in the local treatment of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;163:63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sorensen M, Rasmussen O, Tetzschner T, Christiansen J. Physiological variation in rectal compliance. Br J Surg 1992;79:1106–8.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jehle EC, Haehnel T, Starlinger J, Becker HD. Level of the anastomosis does not influence functional outcome after anterior rectal resection for rectal cancer. Am J Surg 1995;169:147–53.

    Google Scholar 

  19. MacDonald A, Smith A, McNeill AD, Finlay IG. Manual dilatation of the anus. Br J Surg 1992;79:1381–2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Horgan PG, O'Connell PR, Shinkwin CA, Kirwan WO. Effect of anterior resection on anal sphincter function. Br J Surg 1989;76:783–6.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Duthie HL. Dynamics of the rectum and anus. Clin Gastroenterol 1975;4:467–77.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Suzuki H, Matsumoto K, Amano S, Fujioka M, Honzumi M. Anorectal pressure and rectal compliance after low anterior resection. Br J Surg 1980;67:655–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Denny-Brown D, Robertson EG. An investigation of the nervous control of defecation. Brain 1935;58:256–310.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pedersen IK, Hint K, Olsen J, Christiansen J, Jensen P, Mortensen PE. Anorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Ann Surg 1986;204:133–5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. O'Riordain MG, Molloy RG, Gillen P, Horgan A, Kirwan WO. Rectoanal inhibitory reflex following low stapled anterior resection of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:874–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Williamson ME, Lewis WG, Finan PJ, Miller AS, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D. Recovery of physiologic and clinical function after low anterior resection of the rectum for carcinoma: myth or reality? Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:411–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read in part at the meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association, San Francisco, California, May 9 to 15, 1992.

Published in abstract form in Gastroenterology 1992;102:365.

No reprints are available.

About this article

Cite this article

Kreis, M.E., Jehle, E.C., Haug, V. et al. Functional results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Dis Colon Rectum 39, 1116–1121 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02081411

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02081411

Key words

Navigation