Skip to main content
Log in

Defecography

Results of investigations in 2,816 patients

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to analyze the frequency of different findings at defecography in patients with defecation disorders and see in what way the evaluation could be improved. METHODS: The reports of investigations in 2,816 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of the investigations were considered normal. Thirty-one percent of the patients had rectal intussusception, 13 percent had rectal prolapse, 27 percent had rectocele, and 19 percent had enterocele. Twenty-one percent of the patients had a combination of two or three of these diagnoses. The combination of rectocele and enterocele was rare. The majority of patients with enterocele had other concomitant findings. Patients with or without abnormal perineal descent had similar frequencies of rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, and enterocele. Rectocele was more common in patients with abnormal perineal descent. CONCLUSIONS: Defecography is valuable when investigating patients with defecation disorders. Pathologic findings were found in 77 percent of the patients. A standardized protocol should ensure a complete evaluation of defecography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walldén L. Defecation block in cases of deep rectogenital pouch. Acta Chir Scand 1952;165:1–121.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ekengren K, Snellman B. Roentgen appearances in mechanical rectal constipation. Acta Radiol 1953;40:447–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burhenne HJ. Intestinal evacuation study: a new roentgenologic technique. Radiol Clin North Am 1964;33:79–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kerremans R. Radio-cinematographic examination of the rectum and the anal canal in cases of rectal constipation. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 1968;31:561–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brodén B, Snellman B. Procidentia of the rectum studied with cineradiography: a contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism. Dis Colon Rectum 1968;11:330–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahlbäck S-O, Brodén B. Defecography in invagination and prolapse of the rectum. Lakartidningen 1978;75:668–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P. Defecography: I. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol 1984;9:247–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P. Defecography: II. Contribution to the diagnosis of defecation disorders. Gastrointest Radiol 1984;9:253–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ekberg O, Nylander G, Fork FT. Defecography. Radiology 1985;155:45–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Karulf RE, Coller JA, Bartolo DC,et al. Anorectal physiology testing: a survey of availability and use. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:464–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Johansson C, Ihre T, Ahlbäck SO. Disturbances in the defecation mechanism with special reference to intussusception of the rectum (internal procidentia). Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:920–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Roe AM, Bartolo DC, Mortensen NJ. Techniques in evacuation proctography in the diagnosis of intractable constipation and related disorders. J R Soc Med 1986;79:331–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Roe AM, Bartolo DC, Mortensen NJ. Diagnosis and surgical management of intractable constipation. Br J Surg 1986;73:854–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Skomorowska E, Hegedüs V. Sex differences in anorectal angle and perineal descent. Gastrointest Radiol 1987;12:353–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bartolo DC, Roe AM, Virjee J, Mortensen NJ, Locke-Edmunds JC. An analysis of rectal morphology in obstructed defaecation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:17–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Skomorowska E, Hegedüs V, Christiansen J. Evaluation of perineal descent by defaecography. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:191–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Turnbull GK, Bartram CI, Lennard-Jones JE. Radiologic studies of rectal evacuation in adults with idiopathic constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:190–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 1989;30:1737–49.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Goei R, van Engelshoven J, Schouten H, Baeten C, Stassen C. Anorectal function: defecographic measurement in asymptomatic subjects. Radiology 1989;173:137–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Felt-Bersma RJ, Luth WJ, Janssen JJ, Meuwissen SG. Defecography in patients with anorectal disorders: which findings are clinically relevant? Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:277–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Goei R. Anorectal function in patients with defecation disorders and asymptomatic subjects: evaluation with defecography. Radiology 1990;174:121–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Infantino A, Masin A, Pianon P,et al. Role of proctography in severe constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:707–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuijpers HC. Application of the colorectal laboratory in diagnosis and treatment of functional constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:35–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferrante SL, Perry RE, Schreiman JS, Cheng SC, Frick MP. The reproducibility of measuring the anorectal angle in defecography. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:51–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Freimanis MG, Wald A, Caruana B, Bauman DH. Evacuation proctography in normal volunteers. Invest Radiol 1991;26:581–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Penninckx F, Debruyne C, Lestar B, Kerremans R. Intraobserver variation in the radiological measurement of the anorectal angle. Gastrointest Radiol 1991;16:73–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Poon FW, Lauder JC, Finlay IG. Technical report: evacuating proctography-a simplified technique. Clin Radiol 1991;44:113–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Salanga VD, Corredor C, Jagelman DG. Neurophysiologic assessment of the anal sphincters. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:606–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoshioka K, Pinho M, Ortiz J, Oya M, Hyland G, Keighley MR. How reliable is measurement of the anorectal angle by videoproctography? Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:1010–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoshioka K, Matsui Y, Yamada O,et al. Physiologic and anatomic assessment of patients with rectocele. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:704–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jorge JM, Wexner SD, Marchetti F, Rosato GO, Sullivan ML, Jagelman DG. How reliable are currently available methods of measuring the anorectal angle? Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:332–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD, Homback JA, Benson JT. Pelvic prolapse: assessment with evacuation proctography (defecography). Radiology 1992;184:547–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Siproudhis L, Ropert A, Lucas J,et al. Defecatory disorders, anorectal and pelvic floor dysfunction: a polygamy? Radiologic and manometric studies in 41 patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 1992;7:102–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sunderland GT, Poon FW, Lauder J, Finlay IG. Videoproctography in selecting patients with constipation for colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:235–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ting KH, Mangel E, Eibl-Eibesfeldt B, Müller-Lissner SA. Is the volume retained after defecation a valuable parameter at defecography? Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:762–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bartolo DC, Bartram CI, Ekberg O,et al. Proctography. Symposium. Int J Colorectal Dis 1988;3:67–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ihre T, Seligson U. Intussusception of the rectum-internal procidentia: treatment and results in 90 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1975;18:391–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Christiansen J, Zhu B-W, Rasmussen OøO, Søorensen M. Internal rectal intussusception: results of surgical repair. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:1026–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparision of techniques. Br J Surg 1992;79:107–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Holmström B, Brodén G, Dolk A. Results of the Ripstein operation in the treatment of rectal prolapse and internal rectal procidentia. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:845–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Madoff RD, Williams JG, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Long-term functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapse. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:101–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Bartram CI, Turnbull GK, Lennard-Jones JE. Evacuation proctography: an investigation of rectal expulsion in 20 subjects without defecatory disturbance. Gastrointest Radiol 1988;13:72–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Nichols DH. Types of enterocele and principles underlying choice of operation for repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972;40:257–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Nichols DH, Randall CL. Vaginal Surgery. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mellgren A, Dolk A, Johansson C, Bremmer S, Anzén B, Holmström B. Enterocele is corrected by rectopexy according to Ripstein. Dis Colon Rectum (in press).

  46. Parks AG, Porter NH, Hardcastle J. The syndrome of the descending perineum. J R Soc Med 1966;59:477–82.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Bartolo DC, Roe AM, Mortensen NJ. The relationship between perineal descent and denervation of the puborectalis in continent patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986;1:91–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Johansson C, Ihre T, Holmström B, Nordström E, Dolk A, Brodén G. A combined electromyographic and cineradiologic investigation in patients with defecation disorders. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:1009–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Rutter KR, Riddell RH. The solitary ulcer syndrome of the rectum. Clin Gastroenterol 1975;4:505–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Johansson C, Nilsson BY, Holmström B, Dolk A, Mellgren A. Association between rectocele and paradoxical sphincter response. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:503–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Kuijpers HC, Bleijenberg G. Assessment and treatment of obstructed defecation. Ann Med 1990;22:405–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Dahl J, Lindquist BL, Tysk C, Leissner P, Philipson L, Järnerot G. Behavioral medicine treatment in chronic constipation with paradoxical anal sphincter contraction. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:769–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Christiansen J, Søorensen M, Rasmussen OøO, Emblem R, Sjödahl R. Ano-rectal physiology measurements. Eur J Surg Suppl 1991;564:73–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read in part at the 14th Biennial Congress of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Crete, Greece, October 25 to 29, 1992.

About this article

Cite this article

Mellgren, A., Bremmer, S., Johansson, C. et al. Defecography. Dis Colon Rectum 37, 1133–1141 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049817

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049817

Key words

Navigation