Abstract
Chromium contamination in soil, primarily originating from anthropogenic activities has always been a significant threat to plant and ecosystem health. Key factors influencing Cr-induced stress responses including oxidative stress, altered nutrient uptake and disruption of cellular processes are elucidated. The alterations in the signalling pathways & molecular reactions due to Chromium stress, leads to an abnormal production of certain harmful compounds like ROS and other secondary metabolites in the plant cells. These compounds must either be removed or detoxified for the plant to function normally and survive. This review provides an overview of the different signalling pathways, role of genes and proteins, hormesis effect of Cr, alterations in enzymatic activities and the physiological response of the plants. The role of biochar & microbes in bioremediation, hyper-accumulator plants in phytoremediation emerges as a natural yet effective solution in detoxifying the pollutants. The impacts and potential mitigation strategies to minimize and restore the contamination caused in the ecosystem is emphasized. This review provides valuable insights into the multifaceted interactions between plants and Cr stress. It also focuses on mitigating it by bioremediation mechanisms for sustainable environmental management.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Chromium being the 24th element of the periodic table is having an atomic mass of 51.9961u. The density of Chromium metal is 7.20 g/cm3. As the atomic number is more than 20 and atomic density is more than 5 g cm−3 it is considered to be a heavy metal. Heavy metals are known to be potential pollutants and exhibits certain toxic effects on the ecosystem. They tend to accumulate in the food chain and their concentration might increase accordingly in different trophic levels due to the process of bio-magnification. Chromium being the 7th most rich metal on our planet is rated as the 2nd most plentiful metal responsible for environmental pollution. The sources can be natural as well as anthropogenic like volcanic dust, gases, rain & surface water, fertilisers, pesticides, leather tanning to name a few. Chromium is known to exist in two different valence states Cr [III] & C [VI] i.e., trivalent and hexavalent form. By comparing the toxicological profile it was found that Cr [VI] is 100 fold more harmful than Cr [III] due to its high mobility and easily soluble & reduction capability [1]. Several modifications were observed in the plants. Molecular changes like increase in ROS levels, Ca2+ accumulation, activation of NADPH oxidase & Ca2+ dependent protein kinase is observed. The signaling pathways also showed some modifications like ethylene, JA & AA mediated signaling pathway is activated whereas Gibberellic acid pathway is deactivated [2]. Brassinosteroid, a plant steroid hormone undergoes some alterations to act as a ROS scavenger [3]. Genetic modifications like post transcriptional gene silencing mediated by miRNA is done to reduce stress reaction in plants [4]. MicroRNAs also play a significant role in plants for its adaptation to stressed conditions. Expression analysis concluded up-regulation and down-regulation of certain miRNAs [5]. In plants, two types of miRNAs are found namely, conserved & non-conserved miRNAs. Nearly 45 miRNAs having 833 target genes and 13 miRNAs having 280 target genes are found in roots and leaves respectively. [6]. Chelation, transportation, metabolism and detoxification mechanism are performed by miRNAs to deal with heavy metal stress. miR167a, novel_miR15 and novel_miR22 functions in chelation and transportation of Cr whereas miR165a, miR164, miR396d, novel_miR155 are involved in detoxification and metabolism of Cr [7]. Regulatory proteins like SOLITARY ROOT & MEDIATOR 18, plant hormones like auxin, JA, ethylene, amino acids like cysteine, proline and glutamate provides protection from effects of stress [8]. In between 2000 and 2020 the levels of heavy metals increased from 0.074 to 0.163% in the world. Plants also secretes organic acids that form chelating compounds with the heavy metals and reduces its mobility and activity [9]. Lysine is an essential amino acid which acts as a precursor for glutamate. Glutamate is a signalling amino acid which helps to regulate plant growth & responses to the environment. Zinc is essential for the synthesis of plant growth hormone auxin. So the combination of Zn & Lysine proves to be beneficial for the plant body as it upregulates the growth and maturation of plant by reducing ROS production & oxidative stress [10]. When the micronutrient Zn is chelated with lysine, elevated growth and yield of oil rape crops is recorded. The supplementation of Zn-Lys improved the morphological, physiological and nutrient uptake capability of the crop. By this supplementation, Cr uptake is observed to decrease in wheat plants [11]. Silicon is known to have beneficial impact on the development and maturation of plants. It alters the physiological mechanism and genetic expression of the plant system. It plays a major role in germination of seed and protecting from oxidative stress by improving the anti-oxidant defence system. SiO2 (phytoliths) deposition hardens the cell wall and other tissues and protect the plant against pathogens. Due to this deposition, the translocation of heavy metals is also reduced as it acts as barrier. In turn, the heavy metal ions either form a complex or precipitate along with Silicon. SAR (Systemic Acquire Resistance) is also induced in plants due to the activity of Silicon. Cr stress caused membrane damage and protein breakdown which is compensated by the supplementation of Si [12]. This exposure also damaged the chloroplast of the plants resulting in reduction of growth & yield, intercellular space, stomatal conductance and uptake of micronutrients. The extent of photosynthesis is highly affected by the subjection of plants to Cr6+ [13]. While working upon the rice plants, it was observed that either the Cr ions were immobilised or the activity of antioxidants were enhanced. Some particular antioxidant enzymes like NADP-isocitrate dehydrogenase, ferredoxin-NADP reductase, glutamine synthetase 1 (GS1) & glyoxalase I (Gly I) were found to be activated which helped the plant to fight the stress and eventually made it Cr tolerant [14]. Maximum deposition was seen in root parts and minimum in the shoot areas and least in case of seeds. It was found that deposition of Cr in roots is proportionately 10 times more than leaves [15].The phytotoxic effects of Cr can be depicted from it’s morphological, cellular and physiological response. It causes plasmolysis & wilting in root cells, degradation of 5ALA dehydratase (helps in chlorophyll synthesis), degradation of carotenoids, disintegration of the thylakoids and destruction of the chloroplast membrane as well as uneven swelling of chloroplast was observed. The amount of plastoglobuli and starch granules was increased. In roots, the vacuole size increased and simultaneously the nucleus disrupted and disappeared [16]. A recent technology of using nanoparticles to alter the molecular activity and regulate the genetic expression is beneficial in boosting the suppressed activity of the enzymes and detoxifying the effect of heavy metal stress. Nanoparticles reduce stress impact by interfering with the signalling and transduction pathways. They upregulate the anti-oxidant enzymes that counteracts the oxidative stress. This positive impact of Si nanoparticles has already been recorded in Cucumis sativus and Hordeum vulgare. Morphological, physiological and metabolic attributes of the plants showed an improvement after foliar administration of Si nanoparticles. Roots and shoots of wheat plants under Cr stress showed a significant increase in biomass when treated with Si NPs [17]. The combined effect of two plant growth promoting hormones auxin and cytokinin reduces the production of ROS produced due to stress conditions. When a combination of Si, cytokinin and auxin is used it resulted in increase of the antioxidant activity and photosynthetic efficiency. MDHAR, DHAR, APX and GR genes maintained the balance of Ascorbate–glutathione cycle. Proline metabolism is regulated which results in the maintenance of nutrient homeostasis. Genes like ZIP1, MHX, SULT1, Lsi1, etc. are involved in the improvement of plant growth process [18]. Addressing heavy metal pollution requires comprehensive management strategies to mitigate the release, remediate the contaminated sites and minimize exposure risks.
1.1 Chromium uptake and accumulation in plants
Cr comes 17th in the list of the most toxic substances by the ATSDR. By the IARC, it is classified as the topmost carcinogenic substance. When Cr [VI] enters the cells of the plants it gets converted into Cr [V], then gradually into Cr [IV], R-S & O–H radicals and finally into Cr [III]. These different states of Cr is harmful for plant system as it alters the constitution of cell by interfering with the membrane lipids, protein and DNA [19]. Chlorosis and necrosis are the most common symptoms that are observed in plants exposed to stress. Other anatomical and physiological abnormalities are also seen [20]. During seed germination the reduction in seedling growth can be related to defective root development resulting in decreased conduction of H2O and minerals to the shoot. The root exudates bind to the Cr and forms complexes with it and eventually accumulates in the root. This leads to a reduction in the length of roots and overall decrease in its growth. This is probably due to disproportion movement of Ca2+ through the plasma membrane to the cytoplasm which alters the normal activity of calcium modulated binding protein (CAM). Due to the direct impact of Cr on metabolism of shoots, the height of the plant reduced significantly and stunted growth is observed. In leaves, the total dry matter (DM) production is reduced. The photosynthetic pigments were degraded thereby decreasing the photosynthetic activity. Fixation of CO2, electron transport, enzymatic and photophosphorylation reactions were also affected. Due to the presence of metal blockages, uneven transport of water resulted in dehydration of shoots causing wilting, decline in water potential of leaf and diameter of the tracheary vessel. Under Cr stress, Mg uptake is inhibited and Mg2+ transport is increased to the leaves from roots for the proper functioning of leaves. Three metabolic modifications are observed i.e., a significant change in the production of pigments, metabolites and some modification in the metabolic pool leads to the release of certain biochemicals that helps in conferring resistance to Cr stress [21]. Plants vary in their ability to accumulate and tolerate chromium. This accumulation of chromium in edible parts of plants raises concerns about food safety and human health.
1.2 Hormesis effect
It is a biphasic or triphasic dose–response phenomenon which is enhanced at low doses and retarded at higher doses. It serves as a mode of adaptation of biological systems with the changing environmental conditions. So, the heavy metals that the plants are getting exposed to might be fatal at high concentrations whereas beneficial and a growth promoter at lower concentrations. In some plant species, beneficial effects of Cr was observed in terms of increase in biomass and photosynthetic efficiency [22]. Kinases, deacetylases, Nrf-2 and NF-Κb (transcription factors) are found in cells that are involved in hormesis effect. Antioxidant enzymes, protein chaperones, cryoprotective and restorative proteins and growth factor production is increased [23]. Hormetic effect is due to certain factor called hormetins. It strengthens the homeodynamic space by altering the stress response pathway in the cells [24]. The homeodynamic response to stressed conditions occurs in some steps. First, the homeodynamic equilibrium is disturbed due to induction of stressed conditions. Then, signalling pathways are activated respectively in response to it. Effectors are produced as a result of the responses. Homeodynamics is restored with better and enhanced adaptability conditions. The changing impact of stress on homeodynamics is as follows. It first increases and then decreases. And, the plant attains better adaptability features to sustain or adjust to stressed conditions [24]. Exposure of low levels of toxin might improve the stress resistance and improve the repair system for better adaptation of the plant in the environment.
1.3 Hormesis effect of Cr at varied concentrations
An experiment on alfalfa plants showed that lower levels of K2Cr2O7 (0.5 mgL−1) promoted growth by increasing biomass and area of leaf. But increasing K2Cr2O7 concentration up to 1 mgL−1 reversed the impact by decreasing the biomass, leaf area and photosynthetic yield. Further increase in concentration up to 5 and 10 mgL−1 caused NO stress [25]. At low concentration the net rate of photosynthesis is increased. Electron transport activity of PS-II is enhanced. An increase in the medulla & outer skin tissue of the root is seen. It also promotes root & root hair growth. But in the elongation region of the roots, a reduction in the cell division & cell size is observed. Growth of lateral roots is also reduced. The root tips turn yellow & necrotic. A reduction in the number of root cells, length & volume of roots is observed. [9]. In the shoot region, a reduction in the biomass & dry matter is observed. Photosynthesis is negatively affected. Several enzymatic reactions & transport of water is disrupted. Dwarfing of the plants & yellowing of leaves is marked. A reduction in growth & yield is observed [9]. Under Cr stress internal damage to the cell is also observed. Plastoglobuli, starch and chloroplast basal granules increased in number ultimately it ruptured. The number of thylakoids are decreased and their membrane is also damaged [9]. A decline in the number of leaves, size of the leaves and reduction of biomass is observed. Leaves were affected by chlorosis and necrosis. As a result, photosynthesis is highly affected [26]. Anatomical change in epidermis, cortex & stele is observed. Stomatal pore became wider and wax deposition is reduced. Palisade and spongy parenchyma cells also showed a decline in its number. Pith & cortical tissue increased in roots. In some, the root cap, root hairs & lateral roots are found to be damaged [26].
1.4 Physiological and biochemical responses of plants to chromium stress
Higher content of ROS promotes degradation of nutrients in the seed. Cr also triggers protease activity, resulting in the suppression of hypocotyl transport. Hence, it inhibits seed germination activity [9]. The heavy metals can damage the cell membrane and alters their selective permeability. The abnormal increase in permeability causes lipid peroxidation. To measure the extent of damage two commonly used indicators are Relative Conductivity & Malondialdehyde [9]. Grain weight and production was reduced. No or less harvestable yield was reported causing an overall loss in productivity and yield [26]. The seedlings that we treated with 1 mM Cr showed an elevated nitrate reductase activity and in higher concentrations it was found to be toxic and reduced enzymatic activity. In dicot plants its effect is observed in terms of Fe uptake by preventing reduction of Fe [III] into Fe [II] or by racing with Fe [II] at the site of intake. At high concentrations of Cr, ATPase activity was increased. The retardation in functioning of ATPase caused a decline in proton expulsion. As a result, the uptake of most of the nutrients were reduced due to reduction in the transportation activities of the plasma membrane of the roots. Plants needed to remove the harmful ROS which are produced due to the stress. The antioxidant system functions here in scavenging the ROS and H2O2 [21]. The catalytic function of anti-oxidant enzymes decreased. Deteriorating function of the following enzymes SOD, CAT, POX & GR is observed. It results in oxidative stress in the plants. Several organic acids & metallothionein are known to nullify the effect and help in detoxification of the heavy metals [27]. It is observed that various number of enzymes, organic acids and metallothionein to perform in scavenging the ROS efficiently and act as a first line of defence in plant systems (Table 1). These catalytic activities exhibit that, the toxic species are ultimately converted into a harmless product i.e., water. Some phenolic compounds, carotenoids, flavonoids, alkaloids, free amino acids & tocopherols also aids in the catalysing activity in removing the ROS. ROS exists in two forms i.e., radical and non-radical forms. The radical form comprises of the following O2−, OH & HO2−. Whereas, the non-radical form includes H2O2 & 1O2. The radical and non-radical form of particle comprises the composition of ROS. In plants, mitochondria have a carbohydrate-rich environment and act as vital site for production of ROS. Chlorophyll, endoplasmic reticulum, cell wall, apoplast & cell membrane also contributes in the production of ROS [28]. In response to the stress imposed by heavy metal, plant species exhibit different physiological responses to mitigate the harmful effect of these stressors (Table 2).
1.5 Genetic and molecular approaches to enhance Cr tolerance in plants
Heavy metals cause DNA damage, arrest the cell cycle, changes the transcripts, proteins & metabolites or eventually cause cell death. Approximately around 3000 genes were found to be affected by Cr stress, of which 1138 were up-regulated and 1610 were down-regulated. Different anti-oxidant enzymes like APX, SOD, POD & GPX coding genes were also found to be activated [29]. It is reported from the study that various genes & proteins plays the role to neutralize the stress (Table 3). Proteomic analysis of the rice roots revealed 20 proteins (R6, R9, R11, R12, R14, R20, R23, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, R35, R39, R41, R42, R44, R45, R46, R47) and their physiological roles in cell wall synthesis, detoxification, primary metabolic reactions, signalling molecules and molecular chaperones and some other proteins with unknown functions are found [14].
1.6 Remediation approaches to remove pollutants from environment
The process of detoxifying and removing the pollutants from our environment by the help of plants is known as phytoremediation. The heavy metal contamination of soil can be mitigated by use of certain plants which is achieved by increased antioxidant activity, hyperaccumulation, phytoextraction or precipitation. BCF & TF values are calculated values that act as parameters to determine the detoxification ability of the plants. Depending upon the BCF value a plant can be categorised as a hyperaccumulator or an excluder. BCF > 1 indicates that it is an hyperaccumulator and the plant can serve as a potential phytoremediation agent. Different plant species like Convolvulus arvensis L. [67], Leersia hexandra Swartz (Gramineae) [68], Helianthus annuus [69], Salix matsudana [70], Prosopis laevigata [71], Spartina argentinensis [72] Nopalea cochenillifera [73], Pennisetum sinese [74], Pteridium aquilinum (Dennstaedtiaceae) [75], Allium griffithianum, Colocasia esculenta, Pistia stratiotes, Spirodela polyrrhiza, Hydrocotyle umbellate, Rumex dentatus, Parthenium hysterophorus, Cannabis sativa, Canna indica, Euphorbia helioscopia, Arachis hypogea, Vigna unguiculata, Origanum vulgare, Callitriche cophocarpa, Arundo donax, Chrysopogon zizanioides, Leersia hexandra, Miscanthus sinensis, Oryza sativa, Spartina argentinensis, Vetiveria zizanoides, Eichhornia crassipes, Pteris vittate, Genipa americana, Solanum viarum [26] function as hyperaccumulator plants and aid in phytoremediation activity. These plants can be cultivated on contaminated soils for the neutralisation or reduction of the toxicity of heavy metals. Biochar is a nutrient enriched organic substance obtained by the pyrolysis of biomass residues. When biochar was applied to stressed plants an improvement in their overall growth and development was observed. A significant decrease in the levels of abscisic acid is also recorded. Biochar also improved the soil texture and increased its water holding capability [76]. Biochar can be produced by two processes namely, torrefaction & pyrolysis [77]. Torrefaction is done in an oxygen-deficit environment, where a thermo-chemical process is conducted causing loss of moisture content, resulting in the formation of a brittle end product which is the char. The most commonly known biochar available is charcoal. The production quantity can be estimated from criteria such as temperature & residence time. Here residence time indicates the lifetime of the substance i.e., the total amount of time spent by a substance in the reactor. Chars are considered toxic when they contain harmful substances like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Several physical and chemical properties are taken into consideration which confers mechanical stability to the char. It’s fibrous structure, elemental constituents, energy value, pH, reactivity and degradation is recorded for further analysis [78]. The soil horizon has a crucial role in water absorption by roots. The physical properties of biochar determine the soil texture and quality. For the optimum growth of plant, it’s roots must be healthy with a high penetrating power for better availability of water and minerals. The pore & particle size, density, depth, texture and structure plays an important role in determining soil quality. Due to its porous nature, it aids the growth and survival of certain beneficial microorganisms which in turn provides ecosystem services. The soil ecology can be maintained and balanced by the use of biochar. It also helps in carbon sequestration & improving soil fertility. The natural carbon reservoirs might get converted into biochar within an estimated span of some 100,000 years. Upon comparison between normal soil and biochar it was observed that the pH and cation exchange capacity were increased. It resulted in the formation of hydrophobic sites that act as adsorber of microorganisms, minerals and even chemical fertilisers [79]. Rice Husk Biochar (RHB) an agricultural waste rich in K and Si reduced chlorosis and stunting growth in the stress affected plants and increased their biomass and grain yield. In wheat plants, when the subcellular fractions of shoots were compared before and after application of RHB, the extent of accumulation of heavy metals varied in different compartments. In stressed plants heavy metal content is highest in soluble fraction followed by cell wall and organelles. After application of RHB, the accumulation is highest in cell wall and minimal in soluble fraction and organelles [80]. The heavy metals interact with the functional groups present on the surface of biochar and forms a complex ultimately immobilizing the heavy metals which reduces its availability for uptake by plants [81]. Bioremediation measures can prevent leaching of heavy metals deeper into the soil and convert it into less toxic complexes. It is an effective natural solution with least side effects.
1.7 A case study in Odisha
The Sukinda chromite mines located in the Jajpur district of Odisha, India, represents one of the largest chromite ore reserves globally. Extensive open-cast mining and inefficient waste management practices led to a hazardous condition. In the year 2007, the Blacksmith Institute reported it as the world’s 4th most polluted place. Approximately 70% of the surface water and 60% of the drinking water contains Cr [VI]. While the standard for Cr [VI] is 0.005 ppm for India, at several water sources of Sukinda it was up to 2.5 ppm which is around 50 times the standard value. While the tribal people residing there still rely upon agriculture and forests for a living, the contaminated soil and water is directly and indirectly affecting their health and livelihood. Bacterial species like Micrococcus luteus, Serratia marcescens & Acinetobacter caloaceticus have been introduced to the contaminated soils for its detoxification. Out of them, Acinetobacter caloaceticus showed a reduction of 70.53% Cr (VI) at pH 8.0 & temperature 30 °C/24 h [82]. Bioleaching, biosorption and bioreduction processes are performed by microbes. Some microbes are capable of secreting the enzyme chromate reductase which converts hexavalent chromium into less toxic trivalent chromium [83]. Some, also act as an adsorbing surface by adsorbing the heavy metals on their cell walls [84]. Sukinda is one of the most polluted places in Odisha and its impact reflects in the deteriorating health conditions of the ecosystem and the people residing there.
2 Discussion
The physiological responses of plants to heavy metal stress are intricate and multifaceted involving complex signalling pathways. It has both positive and negative impact on the growth and development of plants. This phenomenon is discussed under the hormesis effect i.e., biphasic or triphasic dose–response phenomenon. The impact varies with the varied concentrations of Chromium. At low concentrations, it proves to be beneficial whereas at high concentrations the effects are detrimental. Due to Cr stress, an overall physical, biochemical, anatomical, molecular and physiological alteration is seen in different species of plants. miRNA sequencing and their expression were analysed in different plants of the plant. A declined photosynthetic rate, yield, symptoms of chlorosis & necrosis are some of the impacts. And different plant species responded differently to the same stress conditions. As a response to the stress, some biochemical activities were upregulated while some were downregulated. The activity and response of different genes and proteins are listed above. The toxic substances that were produced by the plants as a result of the defence mechanism were either detoxified or removed from the plant body. This mechanism infers that some plants can act as a phytoremediation agent for the heavy metals. In mining areas, where the soil is highly contaminated, the plantation of suitable plants can prove to be beneficial for our environment. Another organic substance namely biochar, possessing the property of bioremediation can also be used. Biochar is obtained from Biomass energy crops. So, the plantation of such crops in the contaminated areas can help to restore and enhance the overall quality of soil and the ecosystem. And silicon is also known to mitigate the harmful effects of chromium. So, addition of Si-supplements to soil can also neutralise the harmful effect up to an extent.
3 Conclusion
This review highlights the physiological, molecular and biochemical alterations that occurs in a plant in response to heavy metal stress. Through an extensive analysis of the recent literature, we conclude that bioremediation can be a sustainable solution for reducing the levels of heavy metals from our environment. Despite treating chemicals with chemicals and worsening the environmental conditions, the use of plants, organic substances and environmental-friendly processes should always be encouraged. This is a theoretical review of the work done till time. The future depends upon its practical implementations and necessary awareness. Morphological, physiological, biochemical and ecological studies can be done upon this to find out what actually happens when the individual components that had positive impacts individually, act altogether. By utilising the collective knowledge from this review, we can pave a way towards a cleaner and greener environment.
Data availability
None.
References
Ao M, et al. Chromium biogeochemical behaviour in soil-plant systems and remediation strategies: a critical review. J Hazard Mater. 2022;424:127233.
Trinh N-N, et al. Chromium stress response effect on signal transduction and expression of signaling genes in rice: chromium stress response effect on signal transduction. Physiol Plant. 2014;150:205–24.
Basit F, et al. Seed priming with brassinosteroids alleviates chromium stress in rice cultivars via improving ROS metabolism and antioxidant defense response at biochemical and molecular levels. Antioxidants. 2021;10:1089.
Pandita D, Wani SH. MicroRNA as a tool for mitigating abiotic stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). In: Wani SH, editor. Recent approaches in omics for plant resilience to climate change. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 109–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21687-0_6.
Dubey S, et al. Identification and expression analysis of conserved microRNAs during short and prolonged chromium stress in rice (Oryza sativa). Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27:380–90.
Tang M, et al. Integrated analysis of miRNA and mRNA expression profiles in response to Cd exposure in rice seedlings. BMC Genom. 2014;15:835.
Nie G, et al. MicroRNA-mediated responses to chromium stress provide insight into tolerance characteristics of Miscanthus sinensis. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:666117.
López-Bucio JS, Ravelo-Ortega G, López-Bucio J. Chromium in plant growth and development: toxicity, tolerance and hormesis. Environ Pollut. 2022;312:120084.
Saud S, et al. The impact of chromium ion stress on plant growth, developmental physiology, and molecular regulation. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:994785.
Hussain A, et al. Role of zinc-lysine on growth and chromium uptake in rice plants under Cr stress. J Plant Growth Regul. 2018;37:1413–22.
Zaheer IE, et al. Zinc-lysine supplementation mitigates oxidative stress in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) by preventing phytotoxicity of chromium, when irrigated with tannery wastewater. Plants. 2020;9:1145.
Zeng F, et al. Alleviation of chromium toxicity by silicon addition in rice plants. Agric Sci China. 2011;10:1188–96.
Ma J, et al. Photosynthesis performance, antioxidant enzymes, and ultrastructural analyses of rice seedlings under chromium stress. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23:1768–78.
Zeng F, et al. Physiological and proteomic alterations in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings under hexavalent chromium stress. Planta. 2014;240:291–308.
Oliveira H. Chromium as an environmental pollutant: insights on induced plant toxicity. J Bot. 2012;2012:1–8.
Ali S, et al. The influence of silicon on barley growth, photosynthesis and ultra-structure under chromium stress. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013;89:66–72.
Huang Q, et al. Silicon dioxide nanoparticles enhance plant growth, photosynthetic performance, and antioxidants defence machinery through suppressing chromium uptake in Brassica napus L. Environ Pollut. 2024;342:123013.
Kandhol N, et al. Cytokinin and indole-3-acetic acid crosstalk is indispensable for silicon mediated chromium stress tolerance in roots of wheat seedlings. J Hazard Mater. 2024;468:133134.
Sharma A, et al. Chromium bioaccumulation and its impacts on plants: an overview. Plants. 2020;9:100.
Samantaray S, Rout GR, Das P. Role of chromium on plant growth and metabolism. Acta Physiol Plant. 1998;20:201–12.
Hayat S, et al. Physiological changes induced by chromium stress in plants: an overview. Protoplasma. 2012;249:599–611.
Muszyńska E, Labudda M. Dual role of metallic trace elements in stress biology—from negative to beneficial impact on plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3117.
Mattson MP. Hormesis defined. Ageing Res Rev. 2008;7:1–7.
Rattan SIS. Hormesis in aging. Ageing Res Rev. 2008;7:63–78.
Christou A, et al. Hexavalent chromium leads to differential hormetic or damaging effects in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) plants in a concentration-dependent manner by regulating nitro-oxidative and proline metabolism. Environ Pollut. 2020;267:115379.
Srivastava D, et al. Chromium stress in plants: toxicity, tolerance and phytoremediation. Sustainability. 2021;13:4629.
Panda SK, Choudhury S. Chromium stress in plants. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2005;17:95–102.
Bilska K, Wojciechowska N, Alipour S, Kalemba EM. Ascorbic acid—the little-known antioxidant in woody plants. Antioxidants. 2019;8:645.
Wang J, et al. Overexpression of CaAPX induces orchestrated reactive oxygen scavenging and enhances cold and heat tolerances in tobacco. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017:1–15.
Rahantaniaina M-S, et al. Cytosolic and chloroplastic DHARs cooperate in oxidative stress-driven activation of the salicylic acid pathway. Plant Physiol. 2017;174:956–71.
Rajput VD, et al. Recent developments in enzymatic antioxidant defence mechanism in plants with special reference to abiotic stress. Biology. 2021;10:267.
Waśkiewicz A, Gładysz O, Szentner K, Goliński P. Role of glutathione in abiotic stress tolerance. In: Ahmad P, editor. Oxidative damage to plants. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014. p. 149–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799963-0.00005-8.
Gullner G, Komives T, Király L, Schröder P. Glutathione S-transferase enzymes in plant-pathogen interactions. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1836.
Li J, et al. Overexpression of a monodehydroascorbate reductase gene from sugar beet M14 increased salt stress tolerance. Sugar Tech. 2021;23:45–56.
Tauqeer HM, et al. Phytoremediation of heavy metals by Alternanthera bettzickiana: growth and physiological response. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016;126:138–46.
Bashri G, et al. Physiological and biochemical characterization of two Amaranthus species under Cr(VI) stress differing in Cr(VI) tolerance. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;108:12–23.
Zaheer IE, et al. Role of iron–lysine on morpho-physiological traits and combating chromium toxicity in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) plants irrigated with different levels of tannery wastewater. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;155:70–84.
Kováčik J, Babula P, Klejdus B, Hedbavny J. Chromium uptake and consequences for metabolism and oxidative stress in chamomile plants. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61:7864–73.
Singh D, et al. Glycine betaine modulates chromium (VI)-induced morpho-physiological and biochemical responses to mitigate chromium toxicity in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. Sci Rep. 2022;12:8005.
Vernay P, et al. Effect of chromium species on phytochemical and physiological parameters in Datura innoxia. Chemosphere. 2008;72:763–71.
Samantaray S, Rout GR, Das P. Induction, selection and characterization of Cr and Ni-tolerant cell lines of Echinochloa colona (L.) Link in vitro. J Plant Physiol. 2001;158:1281–90.
Ding H, Wang G, Lou L, Lv J. Physiological responses and tolerance of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) exposed to chromium. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016;133:509–18.
Kumar S, et al. Chromium induces toxicity at different phenotypic, physiological, biochemical, and ultrastructural levels in sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) Plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:13496.
Rahman M, Rahman M, Islam K, Chongling Y. Effect of Chromium Stress on Antioxidative Enzymes and Malondialdehyde Content Activities in Leaves and Roots of Mangrove Seedlings Kandelia Candel (L.) Druce. J For Sci. 2010;26.
Reale L, et al. Cyto-histological and morpho-physiological responses of common duckweed (Lemna minor L.) to chromium. Chemosphere. 2016;145:98–105.
Rai V, Vajpayee P, Singh SN, Mehrotra S. Effect of chromium accumulation on photosynthetic pigments, oxidative stress defense system, nitrate reduction, proline level and eugenol content of Ocimum tenuiflorum L. Plant Sci. 2004;167:1159–69.
Zhang M, Wang X, Yang L, Chu Y. Research on progress in combined remediation technologies of heavy metal polluted sediment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:5098.
Anjing G, Xu W, Lishu W, Fuhua W, Zhichao W, Hui Y, Yan C, Dian W, Xiangxiang L. Silicon improves growth and alleviates oxidative stress in rice seedlings (Oryza sativa L.) by strengthening antioxidant defense and enhancing protein metabolism under arsanilic acid exposure. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;158:266–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.050.
UdDin I, Bano A, Masood S. Chromium toxicity tolerance of Solanum nigrum L. and Parthenium hysterophorus L. plants with reference to ion pattern, antioxidation activity and root exudation. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015;113:271–8.
Aldoobie NF, Beltagi MS. Physiological, biochemical and molecular responses of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants to heavy metals stress. Afr J Biotechnol. 2013;12:4614–22.
Surekha S. Chromium stress on peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidase and acid invertase in pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedling. Int J Biotechnol Mol Biol Res. 2012;3:15–21.
Paiva LB, et al. Ecophysiological and biochemical parameters for assessing Cr+6 stress conditions in Pterogyne nitens tul.: new and usual methods for the management and restoration of degraded areas. Environ Eng Manag J. 2014;13:3073–81.
Choudhary SP, Kanwar M, Bhardwaj R, Yu J-Q, Tran L-SP. Chromium stress mitigation by polyamine-brassinosteroid application involves phytohormonal and physiological strategies in Raphanus sativus L. PLoS ONE. 2012;7: e33210.
Zaheer IE, et al. Iron-lysine mediated alleviation of chromium toxicity in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) plants in relation to morpho-physiological traits and iron uptake when irrigated with tannery wastewater. Sustainability. 2020;12:6690.
Do Nascimento JL, et al. Physiological, ultrastructural, biochemical and molecular responses of young cocoa plants to the toxicity of Cr (III) in soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;159:272–83.
Ali S, et al. Fulvic acid mediates chromium (Cr) tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through lowering of Cr uptake and improved antioxidant defense system. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:10601–9.
Zhang X, et al. Tolerance and accumulation characteristics of cadmium in Amaranthus hybridus L. J Hazard Mater. 2010;180:303–8.
Shanker A, Djanaguiraman M, Sudhagar R, Chandrashekar C, Pathmanabhan G. Differential antioxidative response of ascorbate glutathione pathway enzymes and metabolites to chromium speciation stress in green gram ((L.) R. wilczek cv. CO 4) roots. Plant Sci. 2004;166:1035–43.
Maiti S, et al. Responses of the maize plant to chromium stress with reference to antioxidation activity. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2012;24:203–12.
Wakeel A, Xu M, Gan Y. Chromium-induced reactive oxygen species accumulation by altering the enzymatic antioxidant system and associated cytotoxic, genotoxic, ultrastructural, and photosynthetic changes in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:728.
Sallah-Ud-Din R, et al. Citric acid enhanced the antioxidant defense system and chromium uptake by Lemna minor L. grown in hydroponics under Cr stress. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24:17669–78.
Kaszycki P, Dubicka-Lisowska A, Augustynowicz J, Piwowarczyk B, Wesołowski W. Callitriche cophocarpa (water starwort) proteome under chromate stress: evidence for induction of a quinone reductase. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25:8928–42.
Jacobsen S, Hauschild MZ, Rasmussen U. Induction by chromium ions of chitinases and polyamines in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and rape (Brassica napus L. ssp oleifera). Plant Sci. 1992;84:119–28.
Sharmin SA, et al. Chromium-induced physiological and proteomic alterations in roots of Miscanthus sinensis. Plant Sci. 2012;187:113–26.
Bukhari SAH, et al. Genome-wide identification of chromium stress-responsive micro RNAs and their target genes in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum ) roots: Cr responsive microRNAs and target genes in tobacco. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2015;34:2573–82.
Jain R, Singh A, Singh S, Chandra A, Solomon S. Study on Physio-Biochemical attributes and Metallothionein (MT) gene expression affected by chromium (VI) in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid). J Environ Biol. 2016;37.
Gardea-Torresdey JL, Peralta-Videa JR, Montes M, De La Rosa G, Corral-Diaz B. Bioaccumulation of cadmium, chromium and copper by Convolvulus arvensis L.: impact on plant growth and uptake of nutritional elements. Bioresour Technol. 2004;92:229–35.
Zhang X-H, et al. Chromium accumulation by the hyperaccumulator plant Leersia hexandra Swartz. Chemosphere. 2007;67:1138–43.
January MC, Cutright TJ, Keulen HV, Wei R. Hydroponic phytoremediation of Cd, Cr, Ni, As, and Fe: can Helianthus annuus hyperaccumulate multiple heavy metals? Chemosphere. 2008;70:531–7.
Yu X-Z, Gu J-D. Effect of available nitrogen on phytoavailability and bioaccumulation of hexavalent and trivalent chromium in hankow willows (Salix matsudana Koidz). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2008;70:216–22.
Buendía-González L, Orozco-Villafuerte J, Cruz-Sosa F, Barrera-Díaz CE, Vernon-Carter EJ. Prosopis laevigata a potential chromium (VI) and cadmium (II) hyperaccumulator desert plant. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:5862–7.
Redondo-Gómez S, Mateos-Naranjo E, Vecino-Bueno I, Feldman SR. Accumulation and tolerance characteristics of chromium in a cordgrass Cr-hyperaccumulator, Spartina argentinensis. J Hazard Mater. 2011;185:862–9.
Adki VS, Jadhav JP, Bapat VA. Nopalea cochenillifera, a potential chromium (VI) hyperaccumulator plant. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2013;20:1173–80.
Chen X, Tong J, Su Y, Xiao L. Pennisetum sinese: a potential phytoremediation plant for chromium deletion from soil. Sustainability. 2020;12:3651.
Eslava-Silva FJ, de Muñíz-Díaz León ME, Jiménez-Estrada M. Pteridium aquilinum (Dennstaedtiaceae), a novel hyperaccumulator species of hexavalent chromium. Appl Sci. 2023;13:5621.
Zhang W, et al. Effects of two biochar types on mitigating drought and salt stress in tomato seedlings. Agronomy. 2023;13:1039.
Sohi SP, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R. A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Adv Agron. 2010;105:47–82.
Weber K, Quicker P. Properties of biochar. Fuel. 2018;217:240–61.
Lehmann J, Joseph S. Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. London: Taylor and Francis; 2012.
Li Z, et al. Silicon-rich biochar detoxify multiple heavy metals in wheat by regulating oxidative stress and subcellular distribution of heavy metal. Sustainability. 2022;14:16417.
Naveed M, et al. Co-composted biochar enhances growth, physiological, and phytostabilization efficiency of Brassica napus and reduces associated health risks under chromium stress. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:775785.
Dubey CS, Sahoo BK, Nayak NR. Chromium (VI) in waters in parts of Sukinda chromite valley and health hazards, Orissa, India. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2001;67:541–8.
Nayak S, Rangabhashiyam S, Balasubramania P, Kale P. A review of chromite mining in Sukinda Valley of India: impact and potential remediation measures. Int J Phytoremed. 2020;22:804–18.
Guo S, Xiao C, Zhou N, Chi R. Speciation, toxicity, microbial remediation and phytoremediation of soil chromium contamination. Environ Chem Lett. 2021;19:1413–31.
Acknowledgements
The author gratefully acknowledges the P.G Department of Botany, Berhampur University, for providing excellent facilities during the writing of review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both the authors conceptualize the article, did proof reading, editing and correspondence. Author proofread and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
None.
Consent for publication
Yes.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jena, P., Hembram, P. Navigating the chromium conundrum: a review of heavy metal stress and bioremediation strategies. Discov Environ 2, 66 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-024-00085-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-024-00085-7