Abstract
Introduction
The efficacy of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) management with blood delivery via femoral artery cannulation for paediatric aortic arch repair has yet to be reported. This study aimed to verify the hypothesis that this CPB method would reduce lactate elevation compared to CPB management using circulatory arrest of the lower body under deep hypothermia.
Methods
This study included patients who underwent paediatric aortic arch repairs between March 2012 and March 2018 at the German Paediatric Heart Centre, Sankt Augustin. Patients who were repumped intraoperatively were excluded. Group A (lower body circulatory arrest), Group F (retrograde aortic perfusion via femoral artery cannulation), and Group D (antegrade descending aortic perfusion) included 41, 18, and 15 patients, respectively. The CPB records were retrospectively reviewed for the minimum body temperature during CPB (℃), lactate levels before CPB (mmol/L), CPB duration (min), aortic clamp time duration (min), total urine output (mL) and changes in lactate levels during CPB (mmol/L).
Results
The minimum body temperatures during CPB were 16.79 ± 1.48℃, 23.73 ± 4.67℃, and 30.59 ± 2.35 ℃ in Groups A, F, and D, respectively. The increases in lactate levels during CPB in Group F (1.06 ± 0.94) were significantly lower than in Group A (1.66 ± 0.90, p = 0.033); however, no different from Group D (0.92 ± 1.13, p = 0.807).
Conclusion
This CPB method is a promising alternative to the CPB method using antegrade descending aortic perfusion for paediatric aortic arch repair.
Trial registration
UMIN000052933.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Paediatric aortic arch repairs, such as the Norwood procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome, interrupted aortic arch repair, or coarctation of the aorta, require intraoperative aortic arch clamping. Aortic arch clamping requires careful management to maintain blood flow and organ function in the lower body as well as in brain. Various strategies have been proposed for intraoperative cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) management, such as circulatory arrest of the lower body under deep hypothermia, or using antegrade descending aortic perfusion via a cannula inserted into the descending aorta to ensure the perfusion of lower body organs including the spinal cord [1].
However, CPB management with hypothermia can lead to platelet and coagulation system dysfunction, resulting in increased intraoperative blood loss and greater blood product requirements [2, 3]. Alternatively, CPB management, combined with antegrade descending aortic perfusion via an additional cannula inserted into the descending aorta, aims to avoid circulatory arrest of the lower body under deep hypothermia. However, this method has limitations. Patients may experience stress when the cannula is removed from the descending aorta, because the heart will be compressed immediately after CPB withdrawal, potentially causing further haemodynamic instability. In addition, ensuring haemostatic control of the cannula insertion site in the descending aorta within the restricted surgical field of small paediatric patients presents challenges.
To address these issues, we proposed a CPB management method involving cannulation into the femoral artery to provide retrograde perfusion to the descending aorta to maintain blood supply to the lower body organs [4]. This method allows for removing the femoral artery cannula postoperatively once blood coagulation stabilises, simplifying the procedure and minimising the risk of haemodynamic instability. Furthermore, the absence of a descending aortic cannula in the small surgical field of paediatric patients enhances visibility, a feature appreciated by cardiovascular surgeons [4]. Subsequently, we explored methods to optimize blood flow volume using smaller cannulas without increasing the CPB circuit pressure by selecting the cannula and extension tube for this method [5].
Although we have reported on innovations and critical aspects to ensure the success of cannulation into the femoral artery as a method of CPB management for paediatric aortic arch repairs [6], the efficacy of this method has yet to be objectively assessed despite more than a decade of successful implementation. Therefore, in this study, we hypothesised that CPB management with blood delivery via femoral artery cannulation reduces lactate elevation compared to CPB management with circulatory arrest of the lower body under deep hypothermia. This study aimed to test the validity of this hypothesis by comparing the degree of lactate elevation during CPB management as the primary outcome. This study also examined the efficacy of this method compared to that of CPB management with antegrade descending aortic perfusion via an additional cannula inserted into the descending aorta.
Methods
Ethics approval and registration
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Niigata University, Niigata, Japan (chairperson: Prof. Hirohito Sone), on November 14, 2022 (registration number: 2021 − 0208) and was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: UMIN000052933, registered 28 November 2023, https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/s/detail/um?trial_id=UMIN000052933). Written informed consent for general anaesthesia and surgery and publication was obtained from the parents or persons with parental authority for all paediatric patients undergoing surgery.
Study protocol and patients
This study included patients who underwent paediatric aortic arch repairs between March 2012 and March 2018 at the German Paediatric Heart Centre, Sankt Augustin. Patients who were repumped intraoperatively were excluded. This study retrospectively reviewed the CPB records by investigating the minimum body temperature during CPB (℃), which was measured rectally, the lactate levels in the blood gas analysis at the start of CPB (mmol/L), CPB duration (min), aortic clamp duration (min), total urine output during CPB (mL), and changes in the lactate levels during CPB (mmol/L).
Lower body circulatory arrest (Group A) vs. femoral artery perfusion (Group F)
We first compared a group that underwent lower body circulatory arrest (Group A, circulatory arrest) with a group that received additional retrograde aortic perfusion via femoral artery cannulation (Group F, femoral artery perfusion). Group A included 41 (male/female = 27/14) paediatric patients. Group F included 18 (male/female = 8/10) paediatric patients. Both groups were operated on by the same surgeon. Table 1 shows the daily age (days), height (cm), and weight (kg) of the patients in each group.
Descending aortic perfusion (Group D) vs. femoral artery perfusion (Group F)
We compared a group that received additional antegrade descending aortic perfusion (Group D, descending aortic perfusion) and Group F (n = 18). Fifteen (male/female = 12/3) patients were enrolled in Group D. Groups D and F were operated on by different surgeons. Table 1 shows the daily age (days), height (cm), and weight (kg) of the patients in each group.
Statistical analyses
Numerical data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The Welch t test was used to compare two groups, and p < 0.05 was considered to indicate significance.
Results
Lower body circulatory arrest (Group A) vs. femoral artery perfusion (Group F)
During CPB, patients in Group A had a minimum body temperature of 16.79 ± 1.48 °C (95% CI 16.34 to 17.24), which was significantly different (p < 0.05) from that in Group F (23.73 ± 4.67 °C, 95% CI 21.57 to 25.89).
The lactate levels at the start of CPB were 2.32 ± 0.70 mmol/L (95% CI 2.10 to 2.53) in Group A and 2.30 ± 1.46 mmol/L (95% CI 1.62 to 2.98) in Group F. The CPB durations were 148.98 ± 22.45 min (95% CI 142.10 to 155.85) in Group A and 158.67 ± 41.64 min (95% CI 139.43 to 177.90) in Group F. The aortic clamp time durations were 75.49 ± 21.97 min (95% CI 68.76 to 82.21) in Group A and 78.11 ± 17.67 min (95% CI 69.95 to 86.27) in Group F. The total urine outputs during CPB were 7.03 ± 5.54 mL (95% CI 5.24 to 8.11) in Group A and 8.94 ± 9.62 mL (95% CI 4.22 to 13.62) in Group F. These parameters did not significantly differ (lactate levels, p = 0.964; CPB duration, p = 0.375; aortic clamp time, p = 0.637; total urine output, p = 0.480).
The mean increase in lactate levels during CPB was 1.66 ± 0.90 mmol/L (95% CI 1.39 to 1.94) in Group A and 1.06 ± 0.94 mmol/L (95% CI 0.62 to 1.50) in Group F; the mean increase in lactate levels was significantly lower in Group F (p = 0.033) (Table 2).
Descending aortic perfusion (Group D) vs. femoral artery perfusion (Group F)
Patients in Group D had minimum body temperatures during CPB of 30.59 ± 2.35 °C (95% CI 29.40 to 31.78), which were significantly different (p < 0.05) from those in Group F (23.73 ± 4.67 °C, 95% CI 21.57 to 25.89) (Table 3). The lactate levels at the start of CPB in Group D did not differ significantly from those in Group F (Group D: 2.35 ± 0.68 mmol/L, 95% CI 2.00 to 2.69 vs. Group F: 2.30 ± 1.46 mmol/L, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.98; p = 0.908).
Group D differed significantly from Group F in terms of CPB duration (Group D: 90.53 ± 8.84 min, 95% CI 86.06 to 95.01 vs. Group F: 158.67 ± 41.64 min, 95% CI 139.43 to 177.90; p < 0.05), aortic clamp time duration (Group D: 39.93 ± 6.09 min, 95% CI 36.85 to 43.02 vs. Group F: 78.11 ± 17.67 min, 95% CI 69.95 to 86.27; p < 0.05), and total urine output (Group D: 2.67 ± 3.09 mL, 95% CI 1.10 to 4.23 vs. Group F: 8.94 ± 9.62 mL, 95% CI 4.22 to 13.62; p = 0.028).
The mean increase in lactate level during CPB did not differ significantly between Group D and Group F (Group D: 0.92 ± 1.13 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.49 vs. Group F: 1.06 ± 0.94 mmol/L, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.50, p = 0.807) (Table 3).
Discussion
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the CPB method using blood delivery via femoral artery cannulation for paediatric aortic arch repair. We compared the degree of lactate elevation during CPB managed via circulatory arrest of the lower body under deep hypothermia, management via antegrade descending aortic perfusion via an additional cannula inserted into the descending aorta, and management via femoral artery cannulation.
In the CPB method with blood delivery via femoral artery cannulation, blood from the CPB blood reservoir is oxygenated and temperature controlled in an oxygenator and heat exchanger, respectively, before being directed to the systemic flow line. The blood pump maintains a total blood flow of 2.2–2.4 L/min/m2, equivalent to approximately 450–500 ml/min based on a body surface area of approximately 0.2 m2 for a newborn or infant requiring aortic arch repair (approximately 50 cm and 3 kg) in the DuBois formula [7]. The systemic flow line is then split into blood delivery lines to the upper and lower bodies via a Y-connector. Blood flow to the lower body was controlled at approximately 300 mL/min, with the remainder delivered to the upper body [4]. In this study, the minimum body temperature during CPB was 23.73 ± 4.67 °C (95% CI 21.57 to 25.89) in Group F, which was typical of procedures when we started using the CPB method. However, subsequent refinements in technique have enabled the maintenance of body temperature during CPB at approximately 28 °C in all patients with this CPB management. During CPB, blood pressure is monitored via an arterial pressure line inserted into the right radial artery, reflecting cerebral circulation pressure via the right common carotid artery during aortic arch repair, and is maintained at approximately 35 mmHg [4].
Our study involved two cardiac surgeons performing complex surgeries requiring aortic arch repair, such as the Norwood procedure, interrupted aortic arch repair, or repair of coarctation of the aorta. One surgeon performed paediatric aortic arch repair by circulatory arrest of the lower body, and the other used antegrade descending aortic perfusion via a cannula additionally inserted into the descending aorta to provide perfusion to the lower body organs. In approximately 2012, both surgeons transitioned to using femoral artery cannulation. Therefore, patients in Groups A and F were operated on by the same surgeon, while patients in Groups D and F were operated on by two different surgeons. Although the daily ages of patients in Groups D and F, who were operated on by different surgeons, were significantly different, there was no significant difference in the height and weight among the patients in the three groups.
Comparisons between patients in Groups A and F, who underwent identical surgeries, revealed no significant differences in CPB duration or aortic clamp time duration, suggesting that femoral artery cannulation did not impose additional surgical challenges, because the femoral artery is cannulated while anaesthesia induction.
Blood temperature during CPB is surgically controlled because it is correlated with organ metabolism and the impact of reperfusion [8, 9]. In our study, the minimum body temperature during CPB was significantly greater in Group F than in Group A, while the increase in lactate levels was significantly lower in Group F. In contrast, lactate levels at the start of CPB, aortic clamp time duration, and total urine output did not differ significantly between Group F and Group A. Lactate levels in patients in Group F could thus be managed without lowering body temperature as much as those in Group A. This suggests that CPB management using femoral artery perfusion in paediatric aortic arch repair can be performed under moderate hypothermia [10], thus preventing unnecessary deep hypothermia associated with lower body circulatory arrest.
In comparisons between Groups D and F, lactate levels at the start of CPB did not differ significantly, but patients in Group D had significantly greater minimum body temperatures during CPB than patients in Group F. Patients in Group D had larger cannulas (8 Fr in all 15 patients) inserted into the descending aorta than patients in Group F (3 Fr in nine patients < 3 kg; 4 Fr in nine patients > 3 kg into the femoral artery), allowing more flow to the lower body. The CPB and aortic clamp time durations were significantly longer in Group D, which might be due to different surgeons performing the procedures. Despite these differences, Groups D and F did not differ in terms of the degree of increase in lactate levels during CPB. Urine output during CPB was significantly greater in Group F, possibly due to the prolonged duration of CPB. Our results suggest that the use of the CPB method with femoral artery perfusion was comparable to the CPB method with antegrade descending aortic perfusion, given similar lactate elevation levels even with longer CPB durations.
Hypothermia is a risk factor for various adverse events, such as haemoconcentration, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia [11], impaired blood coagulation system [12] related to dysfunction of the coagulation cascade [13], disordered fibrinolysis, disruption of platelet function [14, 15], and acute kidney injury [16]. Hypothermia is also implicated in the development of arrhythmias [17, 18]. In addition, paediatric patients who develop arrhythmias after open-heart surgery require longer ventilatory support and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, as well as longer catecholamine support [19]. Therefore, unnecessary deep hypothermia should be avoided whenever possible. Although the minimum body temperatures during CPB reported here were significantly different between Groups D and F, our subsequent modifications have allowed CPB management at 28 °C with blood delivery via femoral artery cannulation. This method allows CPB to be conducted at temperatures similar to those achieved with antegrade descending aortic perfusion via additional cannulation without complications such as spinal cord ischaemia.
Limitation of this study was that it was a retrospective observational study reviewing the CPB records in a single centre. Therefore, the trend of lactate levels after surgery, the postoperative mechanical ventilation duration, or the length of ICU stay were not investigated. Further investigations into changes in lactate levels during CPB with blood delivery via femoral artery cannulation at our current temperature setting of 28 °C and the questions about the impact on the postoperative courses are needed.
Conclusion
CPB management with blood delivery via femoral artery cannulation offers enhanced visibility and maneuverability in the restricted surgical field of small paediatric patients and neonates undergoing aortic arch repair, even without a descending aorta cannula. Notably, this method alleviates the need for immediate post-CPB removal of the descending aorta cannula under stressful conditions when the patient’s haemodynamic status is unstable, and coagulation status is not yet normal. The femoral artery cannula can be removed once haemodynamic and blood coagulation stability is achieved in the ICU [4]. This study was the first to examine the efficacy of the CPB method with blood delivery via femoral artery cannulation for paediatric aortic arch repairs, showing superiority to CPB management with circulatory arrest of the lower body under deep hypothermia, positioning it as a promising alternative to antegrade descending aorta perfusion for paediatric aortic arch repair.
Data availability
The data of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Lodge AJ, Andersen ND, Turek JW (2019) Recent advances in congenital heart surgery: alternative perfusion strategies for Infant Aortic Arch Repair. Curr Cardiol Rep 21:13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-019-1098-8
Koster A, Sanger S, Knorig FJ, Kuppe H, Hetzer R, Loebe M (2002) Autologous plasma and platelet sequestration at the beginning of cardiopulmonary bypass: a pilot investigation in five patients undergoing extended vascular surgery in deep hypothermia. ASAIO J 48:106–109. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002480-200201000-00021
Van Poucke S, Stevens K, Kicken C, Simons A, Marcus A, Lance M (2016) Platelet function during hypothermia in experimental mock circulation. Artif Organs 40:288–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.12555
Yamamoto T, Schindler E, Asfour B, Hraska V (2019) Cardiopulmonary bypass method with blood delivery via femoral artery cannulation for pediatric aortic arch repair. Paediatr Anaesth 29:885–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.13681
Yamamoto T, Saito T, Shiraishi S, Asfour B, Hraska V, Schindler E (2022) Novel choices of Cannula for blood delivery via femoral artery in Pediatric patients. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 70:45–49. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715604
Yamamoto T, Schindler E (2022) Femoral artery cannulation timing for a Pediatric Aortic Arch Repair. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1755206
Wang Y, Moss J, Thisted R (1992) Predictors of body surface area. J Clin Anesth 4:4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0952-8180(92)90111-d
Westenskow DR, Wong KC, Johnson CC, Wilde CS (1979) Physiologic effects of deep hypothermia and microwave rewarming: possible application for neonatal cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 58:297–301. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-197907000-00007
Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study G (2002) Mild therapeutic hypothermia to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 346:549–556. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa012689
Gocol R, Hudziak D, Bis J, Mendrala K, Morkisz L, Podsiadlo P, Kosinski S, Piatek J, Darocha T (2021) The role of deep hypothermia in cardiac surgery. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137061
Van Poucke S, Stevens K, Marcus AE, Lance M (2014) Hypothermia: effects on platelet function and hemostasis. Thromb J 12:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-014-0031-z
Dennhardt N, Sumpelmann R, Horke A, Keil O, Nickel K, Heiderich S, Boethig D, Beck CE (2020) Prevention of postoperative bleeding after complex pediatric cardiac surgery by early administration of fibrinogen, prothrombin complex and platelets: a prospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 20:302. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01217-1
Rohrer MJ, Natale AM (1992) Effect of hypothermia on the coagulation cascade. Crit Care Med 20:1402–1405. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199210000-00007
Valeri CR, Khabbaz K, Khuri SF, Marquardt C, Ragno G, Feingold H, Gray AD, Axford T (1992) Effect of skin temperature on platelet function in patients undergoing extracorporeal bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 104:108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5223(19)34842-1
Ortmann E, Klein AA, Sharples LD, Walsh R, Jenkins DP, Luddington RJ, Besser MW (2013) Point-of-care assessment of hypothermia and protamine-induced platelet dysfunction with multiple electrode aggregometry (multiplate(R)) in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesth Analg 116:533–540. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31827cee88
Cheruku SR, Raphael J, Neyra JA, Fox AA (2023) Acute kidney Injury after Cardiac surgery: prediction, Prevention, and management. Anesthesiology 139:880–898. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004734
Gurabi Z, Koncz I, Patocskai B, Nesterenko VV, Antzelevitch C (2014) Cellular mechanism underlying hypothermia-induced ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in the setting of early repolarization and the protective effect of quinidine, cilostazol, and milrinone. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 7:134–142. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000919
Yuxiang L, Fujiu K (2019) Frozen Heart and Arrhythmia. Int Heart J 60:1019–1021. https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.19-407
Mildh L, Hiippala A, Rautiainen P, Pettila V, Sairanen H, Happonen JM (2011) Junctional ectopic tachycardia after surgery for congenital heart disease: incidence, risk factors and outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 39:75–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.04.002
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This study did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TY, HGW and ES conceptualised the study. TY and HGW carried out data extraction and data analyses. BA and ES contributed to the interpretation of the findings. TY wrote the initial version of the paper. All authors contributed to subsequent drafts and agreed for the final version to be submitted.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval consent to participate and consent for publication
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Niigata University, Niigata, Japan (chairperson: Prof. Hirohito Sone), on November 14, 2022 (registration number: 2021 − 0208) and was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: UMIN000052933, registered 28 November 2023, https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/s/detail/um?trial_id=UMIN000052933). Written informed consent for general anaesthesia and surgery and publication was obtained from the parents or persons with parental authority for all paediatric patients undergoing surgery.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Presentation
This study was presented at Euroanaesthesia 2024 in Munich, Germany, on 25 May 2024.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yamamoto, T., Wolf, H.G., Asfour, B. et al. Efficacy of cardiopulmonary bypass method with blood delivery via femoral artery cannulation for paediatric aortic arch repair. Intensive Care Med. Paediatr. Neonatal 2, 25 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44253-024-00049-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44253-024-00049-y