Abstract
This paper presents a new algorithm for resolving linear and non-linear second-order Robin boundary value problems (BVPS) and the Bratu-type equations in one and two dimensions using spectral approaches. Basis functions according to second-kind shifted and modified shifted Chebyshev polynomials that comply with the Robin conditions are created. It has produced operational matrices for its derivatives. The provided solutions are the result of applying the collocation and tau approaches. These methods convert the problem dictated by its boundary conditions into a system of linear or non-linear algebraic equations that may be solved using any suitable numerical solver. Convergence analysis has been provided and it accords with the numerical results. Six numerical problems are provided to investigate and demonstrate the practical utility of the suggested method. The current results show that our method outperforms the previous methods in terms of accuracy which are presented in tables and figures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The study of numerical solutions is important, which is an approximation to the solution of a mathematical equation, often used where analytical solutions are hard or impossible to find. Numerical solutions to linear and non-linear Robin BVPs and Bratu-type equations play a significant role in contemporary mathematics research. Computer systems are constructed by analyzing BVPs and Bratu-type equations, calculating numerical solutions, and identifying convergent alternatives. Recently, many methods have been submitted to find numerical solutions, you can read these papers [1,2,3,4,5].
Lately, Chebyshev polynomials have emerged as an extremely powerful approximation for numerical analysis under orthogonality constraints. Chebyshev polynomials play an important role in approximation theory due to their minimality properties and direct linkages to the Laurent and Fourier series with continuous and discrete orthogonality in function spaces [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. This research proposes the numerical solution to linear and non-linear for Bratu-type equations and Robin BVPs applying shifted Chebyshev tau and collocation methods. The tau and collocation methods are easily applicable to solve any Differential equations with their types. You can see that in [13,14,15].
Spectral methods become one of the greatest popular numerical algorithms employed to solve many forms of differential equations. These methods have certain advantages over other ways. The spectral approach has a pair of basis functions: test and trial functions. These two types of functions are frequently described in terms of appropriate orthogonal polynomials or a combination of them. The test and trial functions are selected based on the method used. Finite-difference approaches involve approximating the function and its derivatives with a local polynomials interpolant, whereas spectral methods are global. Spectral approaches can yield exponential convergence with solutions, making them useful in chemical and physical applications that demand solutions that have several decimal places of accuracy. These papers [16,17,18] describe some of the major applications of spectral techniques. The spectral Galerkin methodology selects two coincident pairs of polynomials that fulfill the problem’s fundamental conditions. The Galerkin approach is based on establishing certain combinations of orthogonal polynomials that accomplish the differential equation’s initial or boundary conditions, and then forcing the residual to be orthogonal with the chosen basis functions. This method is particularly good at dealing with linear boundary value problems, and systems that result from its use can be easily and efficiently inverted. In this paper, we apply shifted and modified shifted Chebyshev polynomials as bases to get an approximate solution of Bratu-type equations and Robin boundary value problems, respectively.
The Robin problem, sometimes known as the third boundary value problem, is a combination of the Neumann and Dirichlet conditions, which are fundamental BVPs that exists in complex analysis. There are many authors solving BVPs with Robin conditions, such as in [19] which used the Adomian decomposition method, and others in [20,21,22,23]. Robin boundary conditions occur in a variety of applications, including heat transport and electromagnetic problems, these Robin conditions are known as impedance and convective boundary conditions, respectively, as discussed within [24]. The Galerkin approximation and Bernoulli polynomial for resolving Robin boundary condition (BC) problems with linear and non-linear were investigated in [25]. The diagonal block approach for solving differential equations has been extensively investigated in prior publications. These involve discussions on how to resolve first-order differential equations within [26]. In [27], also the authors used the diagonal block approach to solve ordinary differential equations of second order.
Bratu-type equations often serve to compare and evaluate numerical solutions like polynomial pseudospectral algorithms [28], the homotopy analysis method [29], Laplace transform decomposition algorithms [30, 31], Derivative Legendre spectral method [32], and an Adomian decomposition technique [33,34,35] can be efficiently used on non-linear equations of this kind.
The Bratu’s BVP with one-dimensional planar coordinates is represented as
based on BCs:
analytical solution:
where \(\nu\) is distributed as
This equation was applied for modeling the fuel explosion in the thermal combustion theory, a combustion problem in a numerical slab, and Chandrasekhar model of the universe’s expansion. It promotes a thermal reaction operating in a hard material, which is dependent on an equilibrium of chemically produced heat and heat transport via conduction [35,36,37,38].
A problem of two-dimensional Bratu represents an elliptic partial differential equation, applicable to homogeneous Dirichlet BCs. This problem forms as
where the boundary conditions:
where \(\zeta\) is a restricted domain about a boundary \(\partial \zeta\).
Several numerical and analytical methods were used to tackle problems (1) and (5). For problem (1), the authors in [39] turn this problem into the non-linear starting value problem, which they then solve using the Lie-group shooting approach. In [40], the authors give a numerical method that uses the decomposition technique to deal with a type of non-linear BVPs encompassing Bratu one-dimensional and Troesch problems. The analytical solution to problem (5) is unknown. Thus, a numerical method for a solution is required.
This paper has been organized as follows: Sect. 2 provides an overview of Chebyshev polynomials about the second-kind and their fundamental features. In Sect. 3, the linear and non-linear Robin BVPs are solved numerically using the spectral tau method. Also, elliptic partial differential equations are solved in Sect. 4. Section 5 analyses the convergence and error of the suggested approach. Section 6 proposes numerical results and comparisons to validate our proposed method. Section 7 includes a small outline paper.
2 Overview of the Chebyshev polynomials about the second-kind
This section provides an overview of the shifted and modified shifted Chebyshev polynomials about the second-kind, as well as several helpful relations and power forms.
The Polynomials of Chebyshev of the second-kind \(\vartheta _{\iota }(\chi )\) are famous polynomials given in the interval \([-1,1]\) with the relation [41]:
The polynomials \(\vartheta _{\iota }(\chi )\) are created via the basic recurrence relations
when the initial polynomials are provided as
The weight function about the second-kind Chebyshev \(\varphi (\chi )\) presented by
then the orthogonality of \(\vartheta _{\iota }(\chi )\) is
The power form of \(\vartheta _{\iota }(\chi )\) is
such that \(\lceil \frac{\iota }{2}\rceil\) is the lowest integer larger than or equal to the specified value of \((\frac{\iota }{2})\).
Theorem 1
[42] For Chebyshev polynomials about the second-kind, the first derivative yields by
In our work, we use the polynomials about the second-kind Chebyshev on the interval [0, 1] where we transform \(\chi\) into \(2\,\chi -1\), so the polynomial becomes \(\vartheta ^{*}_{\iota }(\chi )\)
or for the polynomials of the second-kind Chebyshev on the interval [a, b], we have
Shifted Chebyshev polynomials are polynomials that are orthogonal for a weight function \(\varphi ^{*}(\chi )\)
where
The recurrence relation of shifted Chebyshev polynomials for the second-kind is defined as
in addition to the initial conditions
The second-kind for shifted Chebyshev polynomials’ power form is denoted by
and its explicit inversion formula is as follows
Theorem 2
[42] For shifted Chebyshev polynomials about the second-kind, the first derivative yields by
3 Linear and non-linear Robin BVPs
In this section, we introduce an overview of the Robin linear and non-linear BVPs and how to use the modified shifted Chebyshev about the second-kind polynomials to solve them.
3.1 Second-order linear BVPs involving robin conditions
We consider the following form of the second-order linear differential equation [43]
managed by non-homogeneous Robin BCs:
or
where \(\alpha _{0}\), \(\alpha _{1}\), \(\beta _{0}\), and \(\beta _{1}\) are non-negative constants, \(\alpha _{0}+\beta _{0} > 0\), \(\alpha _{1}+\beta _{1} > 0\), \(\alpha _{0}+\alpha _{1} > 0\), and \(\gamma _{0}\), \(\gamma _{1}\) are both finite constants.
In this article, we apply modified shifted Chebyshev polynomials \(\aleph _{p}(\chi )\) to the Robin BVP, where
such that \(\varphi _{p}(\chi )\) establishes the form
where \(A_{p}\) and \(B_{p}\) constitute distinct constants that make \(\aleph _{p}(\chi )\) satisfies the Conditions (24) or (25). Substituting \(\aleph _{p}(\chi )\) through (24) or (25) yields two separate linear equations with two unknowns \(A_{p}\) and \(B_{p}\)
or
which ((28) and (29)) or ((30) and (31)) immediately yields
and
where \(\eta =\beta _{0}\,(-3\,L\,(3+2\,p\,S)\, \alpha _{1}-4\,p\,S\,(3+p\,S)\,\beta _{1})-3\,L\, \alpha _{0}\,(-3\,L\,\alpha _{1}-(3+2\,p\,S)\,\beta _{1})\ne 0\), \(S=2+p\), \(L=b-a\), \(Y=3+p\,S\), \(C=1+p\), and \(T=b+a\). In a particular case of (24) or (25), homogeneous Dirichlet conditions are established by setting \(\alpha _{0}\) = \(\alpha _{1}\) = 1, \(\beta _{0}\) = \(\beta _{1}\) = 0, and \(\gamma _{0}\) = \(\gamma _{1}\) = 0. We can define \(\aleph _{p}(\chi )\) as
In case of (24), so that \(\alpha _{0}\) = \(\alpha _{1}\) = 0, \(\beta _{0}\) = 1, and \(\beta _{1}\) = -1 or in case of (25), where \(\alpha _{0}\) = \(\alpha _{1}\) = 0, \(\beta _{0}\) = -1, and \(\beta _{1}\) = 1 there are both defined as homogeneous Neumann conditions with \(\gamma _{0}\) = \(\gamma _{1}\)= 0 and that can be considered a specific case of the Robin conditions, which yields
Now, we shall create an operational matrix for derivatives of modified shifted Chebyshev polynomials about the second-kind \(\aleph _{p}(\chi )\) with the Robin BCs
These allow us to declare and establish the main theorems, which introduce derivatives of the modified shifted Chebyshev about the second-kind polynomials.
Theorem 3
For all \(p\ge 0\), the first and second derivatives of a modified shifted Chebyshev for the second-kind polynomials are denoted as
Proof
Using the relation (34), the first derivative for \(\aleph _{p}(\chi )\) is represented by
The second derivative can be obtained from the last relation of the first derivative for \(\aleph _{p}(\chi )\), which is provided by
□
Theorem 4
In the special situations of (35), the first and second derivatives of the modified shifted Chebyshev for the second-kind polynomials are designated as
\(\forall \, p\ge 0\),
Proof
That’s simple to demonstrate. The procedures are the same as in the earlier proof.□
The numerical formula to (23) is
such that
The residual of the given problem (23) is obtained as
then employ the spectral methods, Specifically tau method
with the numerical Robin conditions ((28) and (29)) or ((30) and (31)).□
3.2 Second-order of non-linear BVPs with robin Conditions
The next non-linear BVPs of second-order form
adapted to the Robin non-homogeneous boundary conditions (24) or (25).
The residual of Eq. (46) is provided by
We now apply the collocation method to the residual, and the next relation yields (M+1) equations
with the numerical Robin conditions ((28) and (29)) or ((30) and (31)). Then we solve these equations by any suitable method to get the unknowns K.
4 Elliptic partial differential equation
This section discusses two dimensions of linear elliptic equation (5), as well as how to solve them using our method.
An approximate solution is provided by
where \(\Upsilon _\iota (\chi )\) shifted Chebyshev for the second-kind polynomials is supplied as
and
Theorem 5
The orthogonality of \(\Upsilon _\iota (\chi )\) w.r.t \(\varphi ^{*}(\chi )\) could be obtained as
Proof
Substituting \(\Upsilon _\iota (\chi )\) in the left side of relation (52). So, we acquire the next
from the orthogonality form in (16), we obtain
□
Equation (5) has the residual form supplied by
using the Galerkin technique, we generate a system of equations from the residual as
The relation (56) constructs (M + 1) equations as a linear system with unknowns \({\textbf {Z}}\). Finally, we employ any algebraic method to solve this system.
5 Convergence analysis for the suggested polynomials
This section contains an error estimate and convergence analysis for the method employed to solve the Robin BVPs and Bratu-type equations. To apply the theory on orthogonal polynomials (shifted and modified shifted Chebyshev polynomials about the second-kind).
Theorem 6
Let \(\mathcal {L}_M(\chi ),\,\mathcal {L}_M(\chi ,\tau )\le \xi\), \(\xi \ge 1\), The coefficients \(k_j\) and \(z_{ij}\) can be computed as follows:
and
Proof
Multiplying each side of the relation (42) with \(\aleph _j(\chi )\) and \(\varphi ^{*}(\chi )\) yields
Then the constant \(k_\iota\) will be supplied by
Now, we evaluate the integration and then estimate the result to get the next value
Now, we will prove the second relation as follows:
multiplying each side of the last relation by \(\Upsilon _\iota (\chi )\), \(\Upsilon _j(\tau )\), \(\varphi ^{*}(\chi )\), and \(\varphi ^{*}(\tau )\), then integrating with respect to \(\chi\) and \(\tau\) from 0 to 1. As well as applying the relation (50) in the integration with the orthogonality (52), we have
□
Theorem 7
For \(\iota \ge 0\), the modified shifted and shifted of Chebyshev polynomials satisfy the estimates below, respectively
Proof
Equation (26) provides
where \(\vartheta ^{*}_{\iota }(\chi )\) can be estimated as follows:
Then we’re given the next estimate
For shifted to second-kind Chebyshev polynomials is provided by
□
Theorem 8
The absolute error \(|e_M(\chi )|\) and \(|e_M(\chi ,\tau )|\) are estimated employing these relations:
Proof
The definition of absolute error can be stated as
Implementing relations in (57) and (64), we generate
We will now prove the second relation of the absolute error in (69)
with hypotheses (58) and (64), we find
where \(\Gamma (\eth ,\jmath )\) indicates an upper incomplete gamma function.□
6 Discussion of numerical results
This section explores the second-kind of shifted Chebyshev polynomials on the Bratu-type equation and Robin BVPs. All the next examples were solved to evaluate the maximum absolute error, where
or with two variables are given as
All results were obtained by using the Mathematica program of version 11 by a PC with those specifications: Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790 CPU @ 3.60GHz; installed memory: 16.0 GB.
Example 1
[44, 45] Consider the following is a second-order non-linear BVP:
applied in the non-homogeneous Robin BCs:
Analytical solution:
In Table 1, by using our method, we compare both exact and approximate solutions at \(M=2\) and \(M=4\). As we increase the value of M, we observe how the numerical solution approaches the exact solution. The maximum absolute error for our method, the compact finite difference method (CFDM), and the Direct two-point diagonal block method of order four (2PDD4) is compared with \(M=8\) and \(M=16\) in Table 2. Figure 1 presents the absolute error with \(M=18\). As well as to Fig. 2, we explain the absolute error for various values of M.
Absolute error with \(M=18\) of Example 1
Absolute error for \(M=2:2:12\) of Example 1
Example 2
[44,45,46] Assume the non-linear Bratu-type BVP shown below:
through the Robin BCs:
Analytical solution:
We estimate in Table 3 the maximum absolute error with across various h and then compare our results to those of other methods (CFDM, 2PDD4, and QBSCM), where QBSCM is the Quintic B-spline collocation method. Figure 3 illustrates the absolute error to our method in \(M=50\). Finally, we compare the exact solution with approximate solutions about (\(M=10\), 15, 20, and 40) as shown in Fig. 4.
Absolute error with \(M=50\) of Example 2
Comparison of exact and approximate answers with distinct values of M in Example 2
Example 3
[44] Consider the next is the non-linear Robin BVP:
based on the Robin BCs:
Analytical solution:
We use the provided method in 3 with different values of h and M, the maximum absolute error to our method is better than CFDM in [44] as shown in Table 4. Figure 5 shows the behavior of absolute error in shifted Chebyshev polynomials to solve the non-linear Robin BVP with \(M=24\). For a variety of M, we present Fig. 6 to illustrate the difference between approximate and exact solutions. From this figure, we note that the exact solution is very close to the approximate solution at small values of M.
Absolute error at \(M=24\) for Example 3
Comparison between the exact and approximate solutions involving various values at M of Example 3
Example 4
[25, 47,48,49] Considering a non-linear BVP about Robin’s conditions:
according to the Robin BCs:
Analytical solution:
In the beginning, we provide a comparison with both exact and approximate solutions at M =5, 10, and 15 as shown in Table 5. In which there isn’t a difference between them. With different values of h in Table 6, we make a comparison in the maximum absolute error by our method with the following methods:
-
2PDD5: The [47] paper proposes a direct two-point diagonal block approach of order five.
-
2PDAM5: The direct two-step Adams Moulton block approach of order five, as described in [48].
-
DAM5: The direct Adams Moulton technique of order five, as described in [49].
For \(M=8\) and \(M=10\), we compare the maximum absolute error between our technique and Bernoulli polynomials (BPs) [25] in Table 7. Figure 7 shows the behavior of the absolute error with \(M=6\) by our method. Finally, Fig. 8 illustrates the plot of absolute error for various M values.
Absolute error with M = 25 of Example 4
Absolute error with \(M=5:5:25\) of Example 4
Example 5
[47,48,49] Considering a linear Robin BVP:
through the Robin BCs:
Analytical solution:
With \(h=0.1,\, 0.05, \, and \, \, 0.01\) at different M, we compared the maximum absolute error between our technique and some authors [47,48,49] in Table 8. In Table 9, we describe the results of the approximate solution \((M=15)\) obtained by our method and compare these with the exact solution, then there isn’t a difference between them. Figure 9 describes the log(maximum absolute error) of our method with \(M=3,\, 5,\, 7,\, 9,\, and\, 11\).
For \(M=3,\, 5,\, 7,\, 9,\, and\, 11\), this figure refers to Example 5’s log (maximum error)
Example 6
[50] Evaluate a subsequent linear elliptic equation:
ruled with the homogeneous BCs:
Analytical solution:
In Tab. 10, we compare maximum absolute error between of our technique with others when \(M=3,\,6,\, and \, 9\). Used methods in [50] are shifted third-kind about Chebyshev Petrov-Galerkin method (S3CPGM) and the shifted fourth-kind about Chebyshev Petrov-Galerkin method (S4CPGM). When \(M=9\), we compare exact and approximate solutions. In that case, the approximate solution equals the exact solution stated in Tab. 11. Figure 10 demonstrates the absolute error when \(M=9\).
When \(M=9\), this figure refers to Example 6’s absolute error
7 Conclusions
In this study, numerical solutions of two-dimensional Bratu-type equations and Robin BVPs were obtained by applying suitable spectral methods in conjunction with shifted and modified shifted Chebyshev polynomials about the second-kind, and then we converted the residual of those two problems to equations. These equations are solved numerically using two algorithms. We demonstrated the superiority of the suggested method over a few other methods. If the remainder of the modes of the approximation expansions are modest, we have acquired more accurate errors. The proposed approximate expansion’s convergence analysis was examined by proving certain estimations related to the second-kind shifted and modified shifted Chebyshev polynomials.
Data Availability
No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study, as our work is purely theoretical and mathematical.
Abbreviations
- BVPs:
-
Boundary value problems
- BCs:
-
Boundary conditions
- CFDM:
-
Compact finite difference method
- 2PDD4:
-
Two-point direct diagonal block method of order four
- QBSCM:
-
Quintic B-spline collocation method
- 2PDD5:
-
Two-point direct diagonal block method of order five
- 2PDAM5:
-
Two-point direct Adams Moulton block approach of order five
- DAM5:
-
Direct Adams Moulton technique of order five
- BPs:
-
Bernoulli Polynomials
- S3CPGM:
-
Shifted third-kind about Chebyshev Petrov–Galerkin method
- S4CPGM:
-
Shifted fourth-kind about Chebyshev Petrov–Galerkin method
References
Bakodah HO, Alzahrani KA, Alzaid NA, Almazmumy MH (2024) Efficient decomposition shooting method for tackling two-point boundary value models. J Umm Al-Qura Univ Appll Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-024-00162-w
Arqub OA, Rashaideh H (2018) The rkhs method for numerical treatment for integrodifferential algebraic systems of temporal two-point bvps. Neural Comput Appl 30:2595–2606
Arqub OA (2019) Computational algorithm for solving singular Fredholm time-fractional partial integrodifferential equations with error estimates. J Appl Math Comput 59(1):227–243
Arqub OA, Shawagfeh N (2021) Solving optimal control problems of Fredholm constraint optimality via the reproducing kernel Hilbert space method with error estimates and convergence analysis. Math Methods Appl Sci 44(10):7915–7932
Arqub OA (2016) The reproducing kernel algorithm for handling differential algebraic systems of ordinary differential equations. Math Methods Appl Sci 39(15):4549–4562
Boyd JP (2001) Chebyshev and Fourier spectral methods. Courier Corporation
Abd-Elhameed WM, Youssri YH (2019) Sixth-Kind Chebyshev spectral approach for solving fractional differential equations. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 20(2):191–203
Abd-Elhameed WM, Doha EH, Youssri YH (2013) New spectral second kind Chebyshev wavelets algorithm for solving linear and nonlinear second-order differential equations involving singular and Bratu type equations. Abstr Appl Anal. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/715756
Youssri YH, Abd-Elhameed WM, Abdelhakem M (2021) A robust spectral treatment of a class of initial value problems using modified Chebyshev polynomials. Math Methods Appl Sci 44(11):9224–9236
Abd-Elhameed WM, Tenreiro Machado JA, Youssri YH (2022) Hypergeometric fractional derivatives formula of shifted Chebyshev polynomials: Tau algorithm for a type of fractional delay differential equations. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 23(7–8):1253–1268
Abd-Elhameed WM, Ahmed HM (2022) Tau and Galerkin operational matrices of derivatives for treating singular and Emden-Fowler third-order-type equations. Int J Mod Phys C 33(05):2250061
Youssri YH, Ismail MI, Atta AG (2023) Chebyshev Petrov-Galerkin procedure for the time-fractional heat equation with nonlocal conditions. Phys Scr 99(1):015251
Abd-Elhameed WM, Youssri YH (2019) Spectral Tau algorithm for certain coupled system of fractional differential equations via generalized Fibonacci polynomial sequence. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Sci 43:543–554
Sayed SM, Mohamed AS, El-Dahab EMA, Youssri YH (2024) Alleviated shifted Gegenbauer spectral method for ordinary and fractional differential equations. Contemp Math 5(2):4123–4149
Manohara G, Kumbinarasaiah S (2024) Numerical approximation of the typhoid disease model via Genocchi wavelet collocation method. J Umm Al-Qura Univ Appl Sci 11:1–16
Sayed SM, Mohamed AS, Abo-Eldahab EM, Youssri YH (2024) Legendre-Galerkin spectral algorithm for fractional-order bvps: application to the Bagley-Torvik equation. Math Syst Sci 2(1):27–33
Abd-Elhameed WM, Youssri YH (2018) Fifth-kind orthonormal Chebyshev polynomial solutions for fractional differential equations. Comput Appl Math 37:2897–2921
Doha EH, Youssri YH, Zaky MA (2019) Spectral solutions for differential and integral equations with varying coefficients using classical orthogonal polynomials. Bull Iran Math Soc 45:527–555
Duan J-S, Rach R (2011) A new modification of the Adomian decomposition method for solving boundary value problems for higher order nonlinear differential equations. Appl Math Comput 218(8):4090–4118
Adomian G, Rach R (1983) Inversion of nonlinear stochastic operators. J Math Anal Appl 91(1):39–46
Adomian G (2014) Nonlinear stochastic operator equations. Academic Press
Wazwaz A-M (2002) Partial differential equations. CRC Press
Arqub OA (2018) Numerical solutions for the robin time-fractional partial differential equations of heat and fluid flows based on the reproducing kernel algorithm. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow 28(4):828–856
Akano TT, Fakinlede OA (2015) Numerical computation of Sturm-Liouville problem with robin boundary condition. Int J Math Comput Phys Electr Comput Eng 9(11):39–643
Islam MS, Shirin A (2013) Numerical solutions of a class of second order boundary value problems on using bernoulli polynomials. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.6064
Zawawi ISM, Ibrahim ZB, Ismail F, Majid ZA (2012) Diagonally implicit block backward differentiation formulas for solving ordinary differential equations. Int J Math Math Sci. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/767328
Zainuddin N, Ibrahim ZB, Othman KI (2014) Diagonally implicit block backward differentiation formula for solving linear second order ordinary differential equations. AIP Conf Proc 1621:69–75
Boyd JP (1986) An analytical and numerical study of the two-dimensional Bratu equation. J Sci Comput 1:183–206
Li S, Liao S-J (2005) An analytic approach to solve multiple solutions of a strongly nonlinear problem. Appl Math Comput 169(2):854–865
Khuri SA (2004) A new approach to Bratu’s problem. Appl Math Comput 147(1):131–136
Syam MI, Hamdan A (2006) An efficient method for solving Bratu equations. Appl Math Comput 176(2):704–713
Abdelhakem M, Youssri YH (2021) Two spectral Legendre’s derivative algorithms for Lane-Emden, Bratu equations, and singular perturbed problems. Appl Numer Math 169:243–255
Deeba E, Khuri SA, Xie S (2001) An algorithm for solving boundary value problems. J Comput Phys 1(170):448
Öziş T, Yıldırım A (2008) Comparison between Adomian’s method and He’s homotopy perturbation method. Comput Math Appl 56(5):1216–1224
Wazwaz A-M (2005) Adomian decomposition method for a reliable treatment of the Bratu-type equations. Appl Math Comput 166(3):652–663
Boyce WE, DiPrima RC, Meade DB (2017) Elementary differential equations. Wiley
Wazwaz A-M (1999) A reliable modification of Adomian decomposition method. Appl Math Comput 102(1):77–86
He J-H (2007) Variational iteration method-some recent results and new interpretations. J Comput Appl Math 207(1):3–17
Abbasbandy S, Hashemi MS, Liu C-S (2011) The Lie-group shooting method for solving the Bratu equation. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 16(11):4238–4249
Deeba E, Khuri SA, Xie S (2000) An algorithm for solving boundary value problems. J Comput Phys 159(2):125–138
Mason JC, Handscomb DC (2002) Chebyshev polynomials. Chapman and Hall/CRC
Padma S, Hariharan G (2019) An efficient operational matrix method for a few nonlinear differential equations using wavelets. Int J Appl Comput Math 5:1–20
Egidi N, Maponi P (2021) A spectral method for the solution of boundary value problems. Appl Math Comput 409:125812
Malele J, Dlamini P, Simelane S (2022) Highly accurate compact finite difference schemes for two-point boundary value problems with robin boundary conditions. Symmetry 14(8):1720
Nasir NM, Majid ZA, Ismail F, Bachok N (2018) Diagonal block method for solving two-point boundary value problems with robin boundary conditions. Math Probl Eng 15:10
Lang F-G, Xu X-P (2012) Quintic B-spline collocation method for second order mixed boundary value problem. Comput Phys Commun 183(4):913–921
Majid ZA, Nasir NM, Ismail F, Bachok N (2019) Two point diagonally block method for solving boundary value problems with robin boundary conditions. Malays J Math Sci 13:1–14
Phang PS, Majid ZA, Suleiman M (2011) Solving nonlinear two point boundary value problem using two step direct method (Menyelesaikan Masalah Nilai Sempadan Dua Titik Tak Linear Menggunakan Kaedah Langsung Dua Langkah). J Qual Meas Anal 7(1):129–140
Majid ZA, Phang PS, Suleiman M (2011) Solving directly two point non linear boundary value problems using direct Adams Moulton method. J Math Stat 7(2):124–128
Ashry H, Abd-Elhameed WM, Moatimid GM, Youssri YH (2021) Spectral treatment of one and two dimensional second-order BVPs via certain modified shifted Chebyshev polynomials. Int J Appl Comput Math 7:1–21
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study’s procedures. Shahenda Mohamed Sayed and Youssri Hassan Youssri derived the algorithm, wrote the original draft, and implemented the codes. Amany Mohamed Saad and Emad Mohamed Abo-Eldahab revised the final draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sayed, S.M., Mohamed, A.S., Abo-Eldahab, E.M. et al. A compact combination of second-kind Chebyshev polynomials for Robin boundary value problems and Bratu-type equations. J.Umm Al-Qura Univ. Appll. Sci. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-024-00184-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-024-00184-4
Keywords
- Bratu-type equations
- Robin boundary conditions
- Modified shifted Chebyshev polynomials
- Convergence analysis
- Elliptic partial differential equations
- Spectral methods